34. At all times referred to herein, Defendants, individually or in concert with others, acted maliciously, and/or intentionally, and/or with deliberate indifference to Plaintiffs’ federal constitutional and statutory rights described herein and rights under Utah State Law.
35. Furthermore, Defendants have acted self righteously, with much crying and penis rubbing, in order to put down anything that a reasonable person would like, if it happens to be female-identified.
― 86 HAVE YOU EVER NEEDED SOMEONE SO BAD DEF LEPPARD (deangulberry), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 22:23 (eighteen years ago) link
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 22:27 (eighteen years ago) link
― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 22:39 (eighteen years ago) link
― 86 HAVE YOU EVER NEEDED SOMEONE SO BAD DEF LEPPARD (deangulberry), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 22:43 (eighteen years ago) link
some pretty intense drama went down today on the Wisconsin Hispanic Lawyers Association mailing list~
From: AlanTo: Wisconsin Hispanic Lawyers AssociationSent: Thu Jan 21 08:54:09 2010Subject: WHLA event
Comment from a member of the public can't believe this...Not only are they holding the event at a “Mexican” Restaurant that is not owned by Mexicans,They are having this party outside of the Latino community vicinity. Viva La Raza!
From: EnriqueTo: Wisconsin Hispanic Lawyers AssociationSent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 10:00 AMSubject: Re: WHLA event
What's your deal, Alan? You seem intent on fomenting controversy/conspiracy where there is none. Please save your adversarial comments for your practice.-Enrique
From: PeterSent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:53 PMTo: Wisconsin Hispanic Lawyers AssociationSubject: RE: WHLA event
Alan,Why do you continue to make absurd statements? Enrique’s comment was not a personal attack.If you do not like where the party is being held do not attend. If you have a problem with the ethnic makeup of the owners of El Fuego, I suggest you take your issues up with them personally.Let us see how long they tolerate your nonsense.Peter
From: AlanSent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 10:09 PMTo: Wisconsin Hispanic Lawyers AssociationSubject: RE: WHLA event
Enrique’s comment was not just a personal attack, it was ANOTHER ONE. You accusing me of making a nonsensical statement because of a tame criticism by me, is also a personal attack, typical of your attitude towards me. The family that owns El Fuego are friends of mine. I have no criticism of them. You don’t get it. This group is having the event outside the Hispanic community at a place not owned by Latinos is very consistent with this group’s elitist attitudes, a comment made by another, and I will not name him, but he is correct. As a member, I and anyone else can criticize. It’s a little concept called the first amendment, which some lawyers are not familiar with or have no respect for it. You, Peter, think you are above criticism. There are a hundred Latino businesses that could use the business in these difficult times.
From: PeterDate: Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:44 PMSubject: RE: WHLA eventTo: Wisconsin Hispanic Lawyers Association
Alan,Let us set matters straight. Your “tame criticism” like your response to my comment speaks volumes about you as a person and a lawyer.First, it is unnecessary and foolish on your part to talk down to me or any member of this organization. Perhaps you should take your business elsewhere. I feel safe saying- although I am not speaking on behalf of- most of the membership would be better served if you did.Second, there are members of this organization that are committed and dedicated to maintaining and keeping it viable and well respected. I am referring to the officers and countless others who give a large amount of their time.Third, I am still convinced after all these years that you have an injudicious understanding of the First Amendment.Finally, I do not want to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man, but you cannot be serious about your last statement. What next, the Asian bar should have their party at an Asian owned business, the Jewish Bar should have their party at the JCC, the African American Bar should have their party at an African American owned business, the Justinian Society should have their party at the ICC… shall I keep going?This group is the furthest from “Elitist”. I am just sorry you do not get it.
― iiiijjjj, Friday, 22 January 2010 05:26 (fourteen years ago) link
I do not want to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man,
― Joint Custody (ian), Friday, 22 January 2010 05:30 (fourteen years ago) link
i'm 100% with alan on this one btw. el fuego is some straight B.S. (bull shit), as evidenced by this JPEG image depicting its colonial spanish hacienda interior
http://i49.tinypic.com/sd0nyu.jpg
― iiiijjjj, Friday, 22 January 2010 05:45 (fourteen years ago) link
i know we're not really supposed to "do meta" or whatever, but is it okay to say that i imagine these guys are the gabbnebs of their particular lawyering assosciating?
― Joint Custody (ian), Friday, 22 January 2010 06:06 (fourteen years ago) link
i'm mostly annoyed that a guy who can't put a coherent sentence together is employed while i am not.
― tehresa, Friday, 22 January 2010 06:14 (fourteen years ago) link
lawyers are so fucking boring
― randy e. bugler (jeff), Friday, 22 January 2010 08:18 (fourteen years ago) link
i am boring yes
― sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Friday, 22 January 2010 12:36 (fourteen years ago) link
http://img.skitch.com/20100122-jkjx1s623bus3xqck6yp26s3x4.jpg
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Friday, 22 January 2010 12:48 (fourteen years ago) link
i will be here tomorrow LOLZ
http://developdontdestroy.org/php/latestnews_ArchiveDate.php
― sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Thursday, 28 January 2010 15:20 (fourteen years ago) link
boondoggle
― ♖♕♖ (am0n), Thursday, 28 January 2010 15:56 (fourteen years ago) link
DDDB
― Joint Custody (ian), Thursday, 28 January 2010 16:18 (fourteen years ago) link
will you be opposing this petition cutty
― harbl, Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link
you got me all wrong!
― sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:44 (fourteen years ago) link
i do eminent domain for NYC. so i certainly would not be opposing this. but this is a state project, so i am not involved. i will be there opposing a motion on my own proceeding.
but i'll get to watch the madness.
― sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:45 (fourteen years ago) link
oh ok, i knew you worked for the city but didn't know if the city didn't want to eminent domain it or how that process works
― harbl, Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:51 (fourteen years ago) link
ah, i see. the city has put in many amicus briefs supporting the atlantic yards project.
― sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:52 (fourteen years ago) link
i will be at the c3ntral b0oking and int4ke facility
― harbl, Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:53 (fourteen years ago) link
unnecessary googleproofing? i dunno
I said it elsewhere but second day at new job today
sexy accused
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:55 (fourteen years ago) link
accuseds have bad breath imo
― harbl, Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:56 (fourteen years ago) link
accused bologna breath
― sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link
dammmmmmn contentious stuff is reaaaaaaaall boring; so tedious and laborious
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Friday, 29 January 2010 21:18 (fourteen years ago) link
"i'm sure superman would have quit ages ago if he didn't get to rescue a grateful kid or a hottie from time to time"makes u think
― forksclovetofu, Friday, 29 January 2010 21:45 (fourteen years ago) link
cutty are u like an actual practicing lawyer
― scent of a wolfman (s1ocki), Friday, 29 January 2010 21:55 (fourteen years ago) link
I'm not (anymore)
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Friday, 29 January 2010 21:56 (fourteen years ago) link
coz u were a lawyer? not just a borad lawyer?
― forksclovetofu, Friday, 29 January 2010 22:00 (fourteen years ago) link
is gabbneb anti-boondoggle
― ♖♕♖ (am0n), Friday, 29 January 2010 22:09 (fourteen years ago) link
boongabble
― forksclovetofu, Friday, 29 January 2010 22:10 (fourteen years ago) link
gabnebble
― iiiijjjj, Friday, 29 January 2010 22:21 (fourteen years ago) link
I am qualified but don't practice, forks
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Friday, 29 January 2010 22:27 (fourteen years ago) link
how did you get near the sexy accused then coz
― harbl, Friday, 29 January 2010 22:28 (fourteen years ago) link
he's the accuser
― ♖♕♖ (am0n), Friday, 29 January 2010 22:36 (fourteen years ago) link
$$$ working freelance $$$
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Friday, 29 January 2010 22:39 (fourteen years ago) link
not as lawyer (I don't do contentious/court work usually) just doing a watching brief for a client
court hours (10-4) and mad skrilla :D
it's true, freelance work is what commands the big $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 29 January 2010 22:41 (fourteen years ago) link
yes
― sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Friday, 29 January 2010 23:35 (fourteen years ago) link
i am a litigator
― sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Friday, 29 January 2010 23:36 (fourteen years ago) link
cutty what is your onbike nutrition for 80 miles in Zone 3 with about 7k feet of gross climbing?
― ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Saturday, 30 January 2010 00:00 (fourteen years ago) link
i dont think you should spend 80 miles in Z3
― sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Saturday, 30 January 2010 00:17 (fourteen years ago) link
what if youre on the program and being paid to drag LA to the bottom la mongie
― u b ilxin' (Hunt3r), Saturday, 30 January 2010 01:46 (fourteen years ago) link
then it's your job!!! 80 miles in Z4
― sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Saturday, 30 January 2010 01:47 (fourteen years ago) link
coz, are you like a bannister? or a railgrip? what the hell do you britishes call it?
― forksclovetofu, Saturday, 30 January 2010 05:25 (fourteen years ago) link
INCONTROVERTABLE PROOF OF HOW EXCITING LAWYERS ARE
http://www.youtube.com/user/MarriageTrial#p/a/u/1/6zLtYQ6K1rI
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 5 February 2010 03:08 (fourteen years ago) link
Sorry, "incontrovertible."
Actually, it is a very interesting reenactment, but mostly to lawyers (i.e., insider baseball).
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 5 February 2010 03:10 (fourteen years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESJINXeBjhc
― ♖♕♖ (am0n), Friday, 5 February 2010 16:40 (fourteen years ago) link
What is a "document review" and what does it practically entail? I do not understand "contract law" in general I think.
― Let's see how tough Aquaman is once we get him in the water. (Laurel), Friday, 5 February 2010 16:43 (fourteen years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0XWSBAe-1U&feature=youtu.be&t=1m09s
― 龜, Monday, 7 September 2015 22:45 (eight years ago) link
ff to 1m 09 s
that's why they call it jones day night and weekends lololol
― computer champion (harbl), Tuesday, 8 September 2015 13:38 (eight years ago) link
MY BEST MEMORIES, ONCE ALL FIRSTLIFE MEMORIES WERE ERASED FROM MINDDRIVE, ARE THE ALL-NIGHTERS
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 8 September 2015 13:48 (eight years ago) link
clause 9.2, been there man
― Meta Forksclove-Liebeskind (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 8 September 2015 14:04 (eight years ago) link
nothing gets the heart racing quite like memories of billable hours past
― all my friends are vampires (art), Tuesday, 8 September 2015 14:24 (eight years ago) link
The twinkle in his eyes as he drops his guard a bit really pulls it through for me.
― pplains, Tuesday, 8 September 2015 14:44 (eight years ago) link
There's a lot, and nothing at all, going on in those 44 seconds.
― Three Word Username, Tuesday, 8 September 2015 15:23 (eight years ago) link
i watched it again. he has the face of a man who hasn't slept in years. it's all about the written word.
― computer champion (harbl), Tuesday, 8 September 2015 21:35 (eight years ago) link
He has wet eyes
― 龜, Wednesday, 9 September 2015 05:05 (eight years ago) link
...and is unconciously shaking his head "NO NO NO". It's a sad sick world and the good times have been gone for about 20 years or so.
― Three Word Username, Wednesday, 9 September 2015 06:38 (eight years ago) link
relatedly
"One thing ... that's very different from 10 years ago is that associates have a perspective on balance that was never discussed before," Kowalczyk said. "Finding a firm in a regional legal market that allows them to do quality work, get paid well and still go home to their families at 8 p.m. is very attractive."
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 29 October 2015 21:39 (eight years ago) link
was gonna put this on the lindsay lohan hot ready and legal thread but it's a long thread http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2015/11/young-ready-on-body-worn-camera-activation-among-police-officers.html
― #amazing #babies #touching (harbl), Friday, 6 November 2015 01:45 (eight years ago) link
better call barry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb3gPWoKZ84
― am0n, Sunday, 17 April 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/Bq3AlqQ.jpg
― 龜, Wednesday, 27 April 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link
love those forfeiture captions they never get old
― #amazing #babies #touching (harbl), Wednesday, 27 April 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link
They're like little portraits of lives.
― JWoww Gilberto (man alive), Wednesday, 27 April 2016 23:03 (seven years ago) link
DEA case in California from what I can see in pacer. What a pulp character.
― bothan zulu (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 27 April 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link
I made this
https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xal1/v/t1.0-9/13102871_10156766601330304_7771361438783094901_n.jpg?oh=22ccd28f17a64da7d24a991e909e1c62&oe=57B04285
― JWoww Gilberto (man alive), Friday, 29 April 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link
http://www.rossintelligence.com/lawyers/
― am0n, Thursday, 12 May 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link
https://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/appdiv/manualonstyle.pdf
― 龜, Friday, 13 May 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link
hahaha
was really hoping the whole thing would be in comic sans and not just the cover
― JWoww Gilberto (man alive), Friday, 13 May 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link
https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/5415028177800239645
― JWoww Gilberto (man alive), Tuesday, 17 May 2016 16:03 (seven years ago) link
lolz
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 17 May 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/DjtqCaI.png
― 龜, Sunday, 24 July 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link
Wertkin, who worked in Washington for Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, believed he would hand a copy of a complaint to an employee of the company, which was accused in the complaint by a whistle-blower of falsely billing the government. Wertkin, who was wearing a wig and using the name of Dan, was met instead by an FBI agent, according to arrest documents unsealed on Feb. 6.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-08/akin-gump-lawyer-accused-of-trying-to-sell-lawsuit-under-seal
― 龜, Thursday, 9 February 2017 16:39 (seven years ago) link
false dan
― mh 😏, Thursday, 9 February 2017 17:04 (seven years ago) link
wertkin'd
― El Tomboto, Friday, 10 February 2017 01:53 (seven years ago) link
https://i.imgur.com/qjel5f1.jpg
― 龜, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:58 (seven years ago) link
How did those children graduate with her?
― pplains, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 17:15 (seven years ago) link
do you ever start to read a transcript of yourself feeling dread you will look like an idiot, keep reading, then say damn this is some good lawyering who is this
― assawoman bay (harbl), Wednesday, 12 April 2017 01:13 (seven years ago) link
he he
― niels, Wednesday, 12 April 2017 07:53 (seven years ago) link
https://i.imgur.com/CGcHRsk.jpg
― 龜, Thursday, 24 August 2017 13:09 (six years ago) link
CLE is such a fucking scam. I'm trying to get 24 credits done in a week (oops). I bought one of those online packages -- all you have to do is leave it running very quietly in the background, because the videos pause when the code you need to demonstrate participation is given out. The one I'm watching now is about wellness for lawyers and literally included a guided meditation.
― Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Monday, 26 November 2018 23:13 (five years ago) link
loool I'm in the same position as my last revive two years ago. Today's BS CLE was on how not to be stressed or some bullshit.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Wednesday, 18 November 2020 04:20 (three years ago) link
But the reason I actually revived was that I spent the last several days in brutal deposition preparations with a very meticulous partner who wanted his 90-page outline perfect. Anyone who knows me knows I (1) hate working in this way and (2) am terrified of making mistakes at work. In the middle of reviewing the outline I noted to the partner that there was a typo in the document number. He then said "We need to sit down and talk about this." My heart sank for about a full 30 seconds before I realized he was just reading the first line of the document we had come to in the outline.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Wednesday, 18 November 2020 04:22 (three years ago) link
No, I'm sorry. "We need to sit down and talk about this" is the name of my dog.
― pplains, Wednesday, 18 November 2020 11:47 (three years ago) link
The guy defending the deposition I'm watching right now is the biggest schmuck.
He has repeatedly objected to "reading a document not admitted into evidence." Nothing is admitted into evidence, this is a deposition. He also keeps objecting to "hearsay" the second a document is introduced and before any statement from it has actually be referred to.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 19 November 2020 21:34 (three years ago) link
There’s definitely a feeling of “how long can I keep up this charade” to litigating from home in sweatpants.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 13 May 2021 03:34 (two years ago) link
Loving this Boston defense attorney’s content pic.twitter.com/AVXWkfi6at— 𝔅𝔞𝔟𝔶 𝔤𝔲𝔯𝔩 𝔡𝔞 𝔭𝔯𝔦𝔫𝔠𝔢𝔰𝔰 (@sug_knight) July 29, 2021
― think “Gypsy-Pixie” and misspelled. (We are a white family.) (forksclovetofu), Friday, 30 July 2021 21:09 (two years ago) link
have literally argued this defense irl
― criminally negligible (harbl), Friday, 30 July 2021 22:05 (two years ago) link
The “LawTube” trend is excruciating but I’m fascinated by the people, mostly women in their 40s and 50s, that donate to these creeps. They are usually male personal injury lawyers in their 30s or 40s. It’s barely “true crime” and mostly consists of moaning about millennials, expungement, and bail reform.
― Allen (etaeoe), Tuesday, 18 October 2022 16:52 (one year ago) link
“Thanks for the donation “PotteryMom,” “#JusticeForSally!”
― Allen (etaeoe), Tuesday, 18 October 2022 16:53 (one year ago) link
I also don’t want people to confuse this with courts streaming their proceedings. I think that’s (conceptually) good and sometimes enjoy watching them. It’s just the “reaction” culture that I find really gross.
― Allen (etaeoe), Tuesday, 18 October 2022 16:55 (one year ago) link
Verdict Unsealing videos
― stank viola (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 18 October 2022 16:57 (one year ago) link