Peanuts: Search and Destroy

Search: all the strips between 1955 to 1970. Some of the most melancholy and downright bleak 'funnies' ever produced; childhood as a time of pain, confusion and rejection.

Destroy: The Red Baron, Woodstock, all of the sports gags, the diminishing of Charlie Brown's existential angst, and the gradual decline of Schulz's wonderful linework and lettering. But almost to the end, Schulz could still produce a poignant picture, a funny gag.

Well that's my search - the annual CB vs. Lucy trust betrayal that goes beyond the running gag into the realms of true tragedy.
Destroy: Most of Snoopy's fantasy sequences, esp. involving the Red Baron.

Also, I love the mwah-mwah-mwah of the out of view adults in the TV shows. When I was a sullen teen, the absolute best way to wind up my mother (besides doing baby-voiced 'I love you, Mommie Dearest' while brandishing a wire hanger) was to block out irritating chore requests/ other nagging with Uberparent noises.

I will put up that article again though Ned, thanks for reminding!

My first evah mail-order purchase (w.money I won on premium bonds, aged 10 or 11) = 40 Peanuts booXoR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So I guess at one time I luvd em. Mum was upset when he died, I think becoz she was excited with and for me when Big Box o'Peanutz arrived all those years ago.

Eek.

I suspect neither are as bad as The Tao of Pooh and The Te of Piglet

Peanuts is a classic, I even like the past 5 years' worth.

Search: The seam of tragedy which runs through Charlie Brown's entire existence.

Destroy: Repitition of gags (although kind of unavoidable in a 50 year run).

Peanuts = def. CLASSIC. Surprised no-one mentioned the "Snoopy Come Home" movie, where Snoopy leaves Charlie Brown for his original owner (Leila, was it?) only to come back. Even after all these years and having grown up, it still touches a nerve.

Schulz is also notable as one of very few daily cartoonists who gets much funnier in large doses.

DESTROY DESTROY DESTROY

As far as "Peanuts" is concerned, I wouldn't have learned to read so quickly had it not been for Charles M. Schultz, so CLASSIC. Search: Linus, Peppermint Patty, Franklin (WOEFULLY UNDERUSED BROTHER), Marcie, Sally. Destroy: Snoopy's ugly-ass brother, Spike. And Violet, because she was the poor man's Lucy.

Josh, alas, is confused, poor man. ;-)

Lately I've noticed that a lot of the Peanuts anthology books have slowly become completely unavailable, perhaps even out of print. Hopefully this and the Chip Kidd book are the prelude to the release of a Compleat Peanuts collection of books where every strip Sparky ever did is reprinted, in chronological order and in color (where applicable).

The 70's, 80's and 90's Peanuts strips are nowhere near as bad as anybody says they are. The humor is awfully dry, I admit, but it's there.

I'll have to stick up for the Red Baron sequences, at least the original ones in the '60s. Yes the emphasis on Snoopy and Woodstock in later years and downplaying of Charlie Brown (and Lucy, who pretty much became a nonentity except for the football episodes) was depressing. But, I still think the idea of a dog pretending to be a World War I Flying Ace (flying a SOPWITH CAMEL, yet, and somehow knowing the names of all the French towns he's flying over) is the most bizarre idea ever to hit the comics. It makes Calvin and his pseudo-Buck Rogers fantasies look positively normal.

Wasn't the message of the show A Charlie Brown Christmas about "the true meaning of Christmas" as opposed to commercialism--that is, shopping, for example? Of course, with all the Snoopy dolls, and comic strip collections and games and greeting cards and everything else, we must realize that the "true meaning" is to go out and buy!

I think the strip also began to quit emphasizing the holiday at that time as well.

But the writer (or writers) went through the same plots of Lucy yanking the football from Charlie Brown, of Charlie Brown losing ballgames, etc. even as Snoopy got lost in the desert with his brothers. The new stories didn't make sense and the old ones were worn out. Worse, one wonders if any of the newspapers actually had the guts to drop the strip in favor of newer strips.

The strip had become a narcotic. Had it not been there, perhaps more newspaper editors and readers would have demanded change. But they remained set in their ways--and too many still do. We should be thankful that a few papers have dropped the Peanuts comic strip, but that number is too few.

They are great because they are lame! They make the other ones seem funny.

Am I missing something?

Jan 2000 strip has officially ended me

depression team

good game, good game!

ended

Funky Winkerbean

Moby-Dick

August 16, 1972 pic.twitter.com/mLFQGFY3pD

— Peanuts On This Day (@Peanuts50YrsAgo) August 17, 2022

that's a great one

50 years today since Rerun's first appearance!

Today in Comics History: The Little Red-Haired Girl, the unseen and unrequited secret crush of Charlie Brown, was first mentioned in "Peanuts" on November 19, 1961. (It’s also among the most brutally poignant strips Charles Schulz produced.) pic.twitter.com/urL84d0V9L

— Tom Heintjes (@Hoganmag) November 19, 2023

Chat gpt insists that charlie brown had hoes

Any idea what collection that strip above appears in?

You could get it in this collection:

https://www.fantagraphics.com/products/peanuts-every-sunday-1961-1965

Or this one:

https://www.fantagraphics.com/products/the-complete-peanuts-1961-1962-hardback

Thanks - appreciated.

There’s also a paperback for the 1961-62 collection.

By the way, my mom owns two original strips in frames. Her boyfriend in high school in the 50's wrote Schultz and said his girlfriend loved Peanuts, did he have anything he could give her? He sent two originals. She's thinking about donating them to the archives, since she is an archivist herself.

― sleeve, Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:22 PM (sixteen years ago)

so

she gave them to me

https://i.imgur.com/uSEJtcR.jpeg

(sharpie for scale)

Whoa very very cool!!

Wow. I would seriously consider getting them framed asap and making sure they are never exposed to direct sunlight. Avoid any other forms of restoration or retouching.

Looking again, maybe they’re under glass already? Would still think about getting them reframed.

Really cool - I mean, there are thousands out there, but they're still one of a kinds

Very! And I say this having a hand-drawn Snoopy from him with a 'for Ned' intro!

The second strip is very hilarious in a 'oh Calvin and Hobbes summarized in a one strip existential crisis' way.

xps yes they were framed back in the day, fortunately. noted on the direct sunlight!

and yeah they could use a reframing, the cardboard backing is old and flaking

Beautiful! I have a signed Charlie Brown "print" (just a photocopy his office sent out) from when I wrote to him in 2nd grade that my mom kept with my old report cards and pulled out for me one day in my 30s after I'd completely forgotten about it. It's framed on my wall now.

You probably know this already but I'd also look into getting these insured. He may have drawn thousands of strips but each one is highly sought after by collectors.

And yes, I'd have them professionally reframed with UV protective glass, acid-free backing, etc.

Ward or dinnerboat or others, how would I get an appraisal on these for insurance, are there specialists? I do have regular homeowners insurance fwiw.

You might try Heritage Auctions. They're one of the big comics art auction houses in the U.S.

ty!

If you have a local art museum, you could reach out to them to see who they use for appraisals for works on paper. They have to get works appraised for insurance as well, and they are not allowed to do it themselves.

Heritage Auctions might be able to recommend someone, but auction houses have an interest in how much something is worth. Meaning, I don't know how legit their appraisals will be, if that makes sense.

Get it professionally framed, with archival materials and spacers that keep the paper off the glass. If for any reason moisture got into the frame and the paper is against the glass, it's probably trash. You can also get special plex that reduces UV impact, but if you want them on view keep them away from any areas that get sunlight. Even indirect sunlight is bad if it's on view for a long time.

That last strip is solid gold. Sometimes I forget how good Peanuts could be.

I do have a local museum, also I know local librarians, thanks all!

Agreeing with dinnerboat abt Heritage Auctions. They are the biggest players in the sale of original comics art and often get eye-watering prices for pieces. So while their valuation would not be disinterested - they would want to sell them and make a profit obv - their high-end estimate would be good for insurance purposes alone. These look to be relatively early strips - what's the copyright date on them? - so would be at the top end of the market, especially as they both have Charlie Brown and Lucy on them. In the last ten years or so, fine art and institutional collectors have bought into the comics art market and overinflated prices, but even if there's a bubble burst I don't think it would particularly affect Peanuts originals, which have always been highly prized and valued.

Schulz never needed to sell his originals, although he did give them away to fans (as with your mum), or in trade for other original comic art (especially Krazy Kat originals). So while, yes, he did draw thousands of strips, there aren't that many in private hands - I think most are still held by the Schulz Museum, who might also be worth contacting for advice.

the Museum was my first thought actually, thanks again - I did just submit a Heritage request for reference.

also just left a message at the local museum, reframing seems like the first step here

more complete notes from my mom if this helps, maybe these are not originals? they sure look like it, you can see the brush strokes

"A high school classmate whom I dated briefly wrote to Charles Schultz in probably 1957 and asked him for something to give a girlfriend for her birthday, and got the two strips, unframed at the time. I'm 99.999% certain Les didn't pay anything for them - just asked. I think it would have been my 17th birthday, the summer before my senior year in high school. My father got them framed. (The brown paper backing on them is getting a bit crumbly after 60-some years.) I think you should have them as companions to your complete Peanuts collection. Whether they actually got published or not you'll have to check in your volumes. One of them is particularly interesting because it has a correction, a piece of paper with the correct wording pasted over the original (which left out the apostrophe in one word). That one is signed, "Kindest regards, Charles Schultz." Although I'm not sure they are actually the original drawings, maybe mockups of some sort? They both have dates on them, one says "9-22" in ink on the strip and "9/22/56" in pencil below the frame of that strip, and the other is just "3-21" (no year, but likely 1956). Framed they are each 8"x30"."

posting closeups here as well

https://i.imgur.com/UGPTUuc.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/WS8DBtI.jpg

they look legit - pasting on the header and copyright is totally standard practice, and the only other Peanuts original I've seen was also startlingly large.

Also, of those I've seen, when gifting strips it was standard for Schulz to sign them like that.

so my sister and I have decided to sell these, they are prob gonna go for like $30K each. wild. my mom is in shock lol. we are using Heritage, thanks dinnerboat for that tip!

my mom with the winning quote: "do you even want something that valuable in your house?"

Ha! Mommest thing I've heard in a while....

wow those are amazing!!

That’s amazing

All for selling the expensives btw, let upkeep be somebody else’s problem

Awesome stuff, hope the fetch you that pretty penny!

yer ma has a point! hope you guys make $$$$s

Good luck! And thanks for sharing — your story’s like a prime Antiques Roadshow episode.