semi surreal casual racism - dud, or dud and it does yer fukcing head in a bit as well?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (159 of them)
*starts impenetrable argt abt how the ambiguity of the term 'petit bourgeouis' in classical marxism is necessary, as the crux point of hegelian motion*

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:16 (twenty years ago) link

suzy, i´m not having a dig at you per se, but you do say this sort of thing quite a bit. looking down on people from a slighty higher social vantage point is a dangerous thing to do. my family (not my old man or my mum, i hasten to add) regularly come out with all manner or shite like norman´s describing, but it´s not because they´re "proles". it´s because they´ve not had the same opportunities to open their eyes as me. they´re in that position where people like richard littlejohn actually MAKE SENSE and reactionary, racist opinions breed fastest. Using words like "prole" in this context (pushing working-class people further into the dirt) make wankers like him (with all his points about "bleeding heart liberals" and "the metropolitan elite") appear all the more valid and pertinent and the kind of attitudes toward the mass of the british population displayed by the liberal media actively help these ideologies to grow.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:18 (twenty years ago) link

"The English have, in addition to their bourgeoisie, a bourgeois aristocracy and a bourgeois working class" — Confused of Manchester

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:23 (twenty years ago) link

"bourgeois working class"

i guess that´s what i am!

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:24 (twenty years ago) link

Mark: Nail: Head

Class:Cultural:Economic

Bourgeois != 'Middle Class'

But - hey, perhaps things have changed a leetle since 1844?

Friedrich E (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:25 (twenty years ago) link

I am lumpen prole aristocracy! Woo!

kate (kate), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

i used to think i knew what "middle-class" meant. then i moved to London!!

Norman's post is a great one. it reminds me VERY much of elevator convos among almost universally "older" men about wanting to bend the secretary over the back of a chair, etc and feeling expected to grin and join in. ladies you would not BELIEVE what guys will say to each other about you. but if you ever actually get down with one of them and their mate's like "so how was it??" you'd be amazed at how quickly they change the subject!!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

God, bourgeoise working class! Unvarnished truth stares you in the face sometimes! I am going to refer to myself thusly in future. if the cap fits blah blah blah.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

anyway i´m going to have to catch my bus now to go sightseeing - was just killing time. am going to write article on iceland called "day in the life of a geyser"!

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

Declasse = k-classic

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:30 (twenty years ago) link

I'm still trying to figure out in what way this conversation was surreal because this is what I assume 75% of conversations amongst "homogenous" groups of people about people outside of their group to be like. ("Homogenous" is not restricted to race, of course; I have recently been examining things that I regularly say about people whom I have decided are "not smart" to associates whom I consider "smart" and have ended up horrifying myself.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:38 (twenty years ago) link

(IOW human being denigrating the "other" to the "similar" SHOCKAH)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:39 (twenty years ago) link

one thing that's changed since 1844 (in the UK) = mass literacy

(he said, casually chucking the elephant in the room into the stagnant pol-economy millpond)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:40 (twenty years ago) link

Also to suzy's post that touched off the class debate, growing up I noticed a very strong tendency amongst upper-Midwest "alternakid" culture to be very nice and accepting of someone until that person commits some cardinal sin, at which point EVERY ASPECT of that person's life is open for ridicule and denigration with extreme prejudice with the implicit undertanding that the ire is individualized to the recipient, not generalized.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:43 (twenty years ago) link

what seemed "surreal" to me wasn't the iow human being denigrating the "other" thing, it was the fact that somebody beeping their car horn b/c they wanted another driver to move out of the way was taken as some kind of obvious racial quirk!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:45 (twenty years ago) link

Mark - For serious. Not doubting ya. And democracy. And organized labour. The car. The telephone. The bicycle even. Pop music. World war. Chilled beer. Association football. The interweb. The Pill. Great days!

Dan - It's the language, but also the assumption a) about race and b) that other whites will appreciate a). It's surreal because it's relatively unusual behaviour (among ILX0rs) and because, I dunno, it seems so... odd. An odd thing to say, since as a racial assumption it's a bit receherche. It's not one I've heard.

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:45 (twenty years ago) link

Haha note to London ILXors: If you don't want to hear all sorts of illogical, nonsensical behaviors attributed to ethnic groups seemingly at random, DO NOT MOVE TO BOSTON.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:47 (twenty years ago) link

(Um where I said "London" plz substitute "UK" thx)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:47 (twenty years ago) link

that substitution is totally unacceptable and offensive dan

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:50 (twenty years ago) link

Dan, I really hope you don't mean that the alternakids called you something nasty the first time you didn't fall in line with them, that's gross. My friends would probably call someone an asshole if they broke a 'rule' and the 'distancing' you speak of rubbished a person's aesthetic choices or dumber ideas in most cases, so we were a little more astute than that (see really great Pete Scholtes spoken-word history of First Avenue on City Pages site w/Matos contributions).

Mark: perhaps, but my mum is a shopkeeper with an additional staff of one, who she is related to, so roughly the same as Norman's racists, who if they rent the shop are prob C2 (my mum ownz, but she has the same attitudes from her renting days, meaning she does tend to think all nonwhites come with a How's My Driving? sticker). The only thing owning tells people like this is that they are now 'rich' enough to have all their money taken by the government to feed the Other's crack babies. Working class bourgeoisie: on a wage, not a salary.

I am entitled to harsh on people who share my background but haven't got a clue about race relations; again, they are stupid tools. My anger at these people for knowing no better is bound up in tons of frustration (and having to pick around some pretty entrenched racisms at home where yeah, you do have to tell my mom that classy people don't use the N word but only when all else fails). I'm not likely to go, poor diddums, he didn't have the education or eye-opening moment or enough motivation to change because this is a very simple right/wrong issue.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:54 (twenty years ago) link

Dan, I really hope you don't mean that the alternakids called you something nasty the first time you didn't fall in line with them, that's gross.

No, not what I meant at all. There were still some things that were taboo (ie no race-baiting unless you were a scummy gutterpunk whom no one liked anyway), but in general once someone proved to be an asshole it was pretty much open season on them. (This may have been more prevalent in Hastings than in other areas where a social shunning really hurt because no one socialized with people who lived outside of School District #200.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:58 (twenty years ago) link

Enrique, but Norman's racist wasn't actually making any sort of serious statement about Asian people being impatient drivers, but articulating her resentment by pinning the nearest available negative association onto the object of racial hatred. Whether or not Asian men *are* more impatient is beside the point, she would have said exactly the same thing had the person in question been spitting on the pavement/refusing to work on Holy Days/killing the Queens swans/knowingly giving HIV to women. It's a classic Sun/Mail trick, obviously.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 17 October 2003 13:00 (twenty years ago) link

It occurs to me in retrospect that another surreal thing (for me) is that I have never heard these people use such talk before. That is part of what weirded me out about it, it was kind of out of the blue.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 17 October 2003 13:05 (twenty years ago) link

Matt - that's what I mean, that's part of how's it's 'surreal'; there are more standard racist tropes that wd be just plain offensive. This combines being offensive with being -- odd.

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 13:09 (twenty years ago) link

I'm shocked that someone made it to nearly age 40 with this being the worst example of racism they've ever encountered.

bnw (bnw), Friday, 17 October 2003 13:32 (twenty years ago) link

False assumption, bnw.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 13:46 (twenty years ago) link

It's not about it being the 'worst' - it's partly that the UK has moved on a lot in, well, roughly the last decade I guess.

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 13:51 (twenty years ago) link

yes i took pashmina's quandary to be as follows: "ok there is toxic racism (to be reacted against in clear manner as all agree) and merely silly racism (pashmina's example), or is it in fact a mistake to make such a distinction?"

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:07 (twenty years ago) link

Sorry if I assumed incorrectly. I guess I was gauging it on the level of outrage which seems a little disproportionate to what I'd expect.

I think there is a distinction. The more 'toxic' tends to have more immediate and violent consequences. But the subtle kind is possibly more dangerous because it is more liekly to be overlooked and more difficult to stamp out.

bnw (bnw), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:14 (twenty years ago) link

To be honest I was less shocked by the initial post than by the crazed response:

Of course your waitress was ignorant, but do you really think your self righteous expression of white guilt is going to have the slightest effect on her?

Like, wtf? 'White guilt'? Not being racist as 'self-righteousness'? Say what?

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:17 (twenty years ago) link

Well, it does sound like an example of liberal white man getting a chance to don his righteous cape.

bnw (bnw), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:22 (twenty years ago) link

bnw, it's just something that happened to me this morning that annoyed me a bit. I am not a "liberal", and i am not interested in "righteousness", so stop barking up the wrong tree, at least as far as what i feel is concerned.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:25 (twenty years ago) link

Maybe this is an across-the-ocean thing but I can't see any hint of self-righteousness in Norman's post.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:33 (twenty years ago) link

What I really want to know is did she actually say "pak!s" with a clicking consonant?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:47 (twenty years ago) link

I think what bugs me about the example is that for subtle racism, its pretty obvious. I think that with discussions like these everyone rushes to identifiy them in the right and seems so eager to demonstrate how offended they would be at such a comment. Yet I think subtle racism is more intertwined in our politcal beliefs then we'd care to admit. I guess Norman's example was a step away from the typical racist strawman, but not far enough where it would challenge any typical ILXor. (Which wasn't his point, and is mainly a huge extrapolation on my part, but thats where I was coming from.)

bnw (bnw), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:47 (twenty years ago) link

I'd always say something to a person who made a racist comment, because to let it pass would a) make me very uncomfortable and angry and b) complicit. I'm reliving too much of my recent US trip here, where I had to shoot this sort of talk down every day because members of my family were engaging in it, and the same person brought me up 'everyone's equal' *not* racist. At least it wasn't passed on to me.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 October 2003 14:53 (twenty years ago) link

I'd always say something to a person who made a racist comment, because to let it pass would a) make me very uncomfortable and angry and b) complicit

Eggs-ackley. Suzy -- didn't you mention the Isle of Man? That's even worse there. The reason the ferry is so slow is because you are travelling back in time to the pre-Windrush era. God. Never again.

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 15:00 (twenty years ago) link

Meanwhile, I've by-and-large stopped saying stuff to people who make racist comments because I feel like I've been Black Ambassador To White People for pretty much my entire life and I'm really fucking tired of it.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 15:03 (twenty years ago) link

(I just reread the previous and realized that that is a complete lie; I'm just nice about my correction rather than nasty. Also, if the racism is due to ignorance and not malice, does shunning the person who displays it teach them that what they're saying is wrong more effectively than disproving their words with your presence?)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 15:04 (twenty years ago) link

Much like I've felt like Sane Ambassador to the Insane?

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 October 2003 15:09 (twenty years ago) link

Dan, the serious answer to the ignorance/malice thing is, at least for me, to ask the person what they meant by what they said.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 October 2003 15:10 (twenty years ago) link

Suzy, Dan´s making sense here. But I´ve got to say something now. Having read similar posts from you on other threads (from restaurants to music to God knows what else), the "prole" comment was absolutely typical and I´m sorry to say it – as much as I agree with you on many things (even this issue at base level) – you´re one hell of a snob.
Re. "I'm not likely to go, poor diddums, he didn't have the education or eye-opening moment or enough motivation to change because this is a very simple right/wrong issue."
You know bloody well that wasn´t what I was saying at all.
Call people on racism/bigotry of any kind – it needs doing and I´ll stand right by you, provided you´re not using that person´s screwed up logic as little more than a convenient peg to hang your perceived personal social/intellectual superiority upon.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 16:09 (twenty years ago) link

Since I don't actually consider myself better than anyone, that's a bit silly.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 October 2003 18:01 (twenty years ago) link

mark -- richard wright makes the same arg. about mass literacy in American Hunger. any relation in ideas?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 18 October 2003 04:54 (twenty years ago) link

sterling no, i didn't know that

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 October 2003 05:52 (twenty years ago) link

its a real compelling section of the book, which is fantastic mainly. (he does come off a bit self-righteous, more and less justifiably at difft. times) abt. the difference between russia and america and methods partially being that ppl. from poverty and etc. can learn to read in america.

relates to some of gramsci's arguments in "americanism and fordism". also (obv) perry anderson's Imagined Communities.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 18 October 2003 06:03 (twenty years ago) link

three years pass...
1) black staff member says she imagines recently broken-up white staff member with "a big black man"
2) this exchange is recounted in wider group
3) white temp says maybe male black temp has some friends who could hook white staff member up (ie with a big black man)
4) deathly silence

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 26 January 2007 16:15 (seventeen years ago) link

one year passes...

5) profit

blueski, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 14:52 (fifteen years ago) link

Can someone remind me what Roger's real name was? I have this fear that I might one day wind up writing/talking about his music without remembering which one is him.

nabisco, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 16:36 (fifteen years ago) link

DAD: There we go. The beginning of the end... points to menu items spelled out in Spanish
ME: What, you can't put second languages on an IHOP menu? Guess we had better print the whole thing in Cherokee.
DAD: What's going to have then? A picture of an omlette with UGH underneath it?

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 16:41 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.