DEA case in California from what I can see in pacer. What a pulp character.
― bothan zulu (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 27 April 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link
I made this
https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xal1/v/t1.0-9/13102871_10156766601330304_7771361438783094901_n.jpg?oh=22ccd28f17a64da7d24a991e909e1c62&oe=57B04285
― JWoww Gilberto (man alive), Friday, 29 April 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link
http://www.rossintelligence.com/lawyers/
― am0n, Thursday, 12 May 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link
https://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/appdiv/manualonstyle.pdf
― 龜, Friday, 13 May 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link
hahaha
was really hoping the whole thing would be in comic sans and not just the cover
― JWoww Gilberto (man alive), Friday, 13 May 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link
https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/5415028177800239645
― JWoww Gilberto (man alive), Tuesday, 17 May 2016 16:03 (seven years ago) link
lolz
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 17 May 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/DjtqCaI.png
― 龜, Sunday, 24 July 2016 18:52 (seven years ago) link
Wertkin, who worked in Washington for Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, believed he would hand a copy of a complaint to an employee of the company, which was accused in the complaint by a whistle-blower of falsely billing the government. Wertkin, who was wearing a wig and using the name of Dan, was met instead by an FBI agent, according to arrest documents unsealed on Feb. 6.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-08/akin-gump-lawyer-accused-of-trying-to-sell-lawsuit-under-seal
― 龜, Thursday, 9 February 2017 16:39 (seven years ago) link
false dan
― mh 😏, Thursday, 9 February 2017 17:04 (seven years ago) link
wertkin'd
― El Tomboto, Friday, 10 February 2017 01:53 (seven years ago) link
https://i.imgur.com/qjel5f1.jpg
― 龜, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:58 (seven years ago) link
How did those children graduate with her?
― pplains, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 17:15 (seven years ago) link
do you ever start to read a transcript of yourself feeling dread you will look like an idiot, keep reading, then say damn this is some good lawyering who is this
― assawoman bay (harbl), Wednesday, 12 April 2017 01:13 (seven years ago) link
he he
― niels, Wednesday, 12 April 2017 07:53 (seven years ago) link
https://i.imgur.com/CGcHRsk.jpg
― 龜, Thursday, 24 August 2017 13:09 (six years ago) link
CLE is such a fucking scam. I'm trying to get 24 credits done in a week (oops). I bought one of those online packages -- all you have to do is leave it running very quietly in the background, because the videos pause when the code you need to demonstrate participation is given out. The one I'm watching now is about wellness for lawyers and literally included a guided meditation.
― Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Monday, 26 November 2018 23:13 (five years ago) link
loool I'm in the same position as my last revive two years ago. Today's BS CLE was on how not to be stressed or some bullshit.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Wednesday, 18 November 2020 04:20 (three years ago) link
But the reason I actually revived was that I spent the last several days in brutal deposition preparations with a very meticulous partner who wanted his 90-page outline perfect. Anyone who knows me knows I (1) hate working in this way and (2) am terrified of making mistakes at work. In the middle of reviewing the outline I noted to the partner that there was a typo in the document number. He then said "We need to sit down and talk about this." My heart sank for about a full 30 seconds before I realized he was just reading the first line of the document we had come to in the outline.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Wednesday, 18 November 2020 04:22 (three years ago) link
No, I'm sorry. "We need to sit down and talk about this" is the name of my dog.
― pplains, Wednesday, 18 November 2020 11:47 (three years ago) link
The guy defending the deposition I'm watching right now is the biggest schmuck.
He has repeatedly objected to "reading a document not admitted into evidence." Nothing is admitted into evidence, this is a deposition. He also keeps objecting to "hearsay" the second a document is introduced and before any statement from it has actually be referred to.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 19 November 2020 21:34 (three years ago) link
There’s definitely a feeling of “how long can I keep up this charade” to litigating from home in sweatpants.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 13 May 2021 03:34 (two years ago) link
Loving this Boston defense attorney’s content pic.twitter.com/AVXWkfi6at— 𝔅𝔞𝔟𝔶 𝔤𝔲𝔯𝔩 𝔡𝔞 𝔭𝔯𝔦𝔫𝔠𝔢𝔰𝔰 (@sug_knight) July 29, 2021
― think “Gypsy-Pixie” and misspelled. (We are a white family.) (forksclovetofu), Friday, 30 July 2021 21:09 (two years ago) link
have literally argued this defense irl
― criminally negligible (harbl), Friday, 30 July 2021 22:05 (two years ago) link
The “LawTube” trend is excruciating but I’m fascinated by the people, mostly women in their 40s and 50s, that donate to these creeps. They are usually male personal injury lawyers in their 30s or 40s. It’s barely “true crime” and mostly consists of moaning about millennials, expungement, and bail reform.
― Allen (etaeoe), Tuesday, 18 October 2022 16:52 (one year ago) link
“Thanks for the donation “PotteryMom,” “#JusticeForSally!”
― Allen (etaeoe), Tuesday, 18 October 2022 16:53 (one year ago) link
I also don’t want people to confuse this with courts streaming their proceedings. I think that’s (conceptually) good and sometimes enjoy watching them. It’s just the “reaction” culture that I find really gross.
― Allen (etaeoe), Tuesday, 18 October 2022 16:55 (one year ago) link
Verdict Unsealing videos
― stank viola (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 18 October 2022 16:57 (one year ago) link