basement jaxx now is about 100x better than DNCEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPLE2Bo3T6M
― ulysses, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link
maybe i'll write something about the hot 100. i've been looking for something to do.
would read
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Monday, March 14, 2016 11:31 AM (22 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Second
― thom yorke state of mind (voodoo chili), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link
xp Q doesn't sneer at pop fwiw. A lot of the key writers were and are ex-Smash Hits so the vibe has always been pro-pop as well as pro-old-man-bands. The current issue has The 1975 on the cover.
― impossible raver (Re-Make/Re-Model), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link
I'm well aware of how old the dnce song is and that it's a joe Jonas vehicle and that it's naff and shameless/tasteless and yet....it is great
― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 14 March 2016 19:01 (eight years ago) link
I'd feel really sad if I thought you two were right—but that's mostly because I don't think of myself as "established." I think of myself as "old." Which actually puts me at a disadvantage in the market. There are writers I think of as established—Chuck Eddy, Rob Harvilla, Maura, Weingarten, Julianne Escobedo Shepherd, Jessica Hopper, plenty of others—but I definitely don't count myself among them.
on the emo tip, I actually, authentically, non-sarcastically appreciated seeing my name in this list considering not all that long a Ph1l didn't consider me established or w/e enough to be a part of the Marooned book
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 14 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link
awww, emo puppy! let's all hug. you and phil are both nuts but you are OUR nuts.
― scott seward, Monday, 14 March 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link
define...."thrilling"...
"For decades, indie rock bands like Built to Spill, Pavement, and Sonic Youth won critical and fan praise with their clever lyrics and distorted guitars. Those bands and their peers moved into thrilling new styles throughout the 1990s;"
http://www.mtv.com/news/2793656/rip-indie-rock/
― scott seward, Monday, 14 March 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link
also, r.i.p. indie rock.
― scott seward, Monday, 14 March 2016 21:24 (eight years ago) link
also that quote makes it sound like those bands were around for decades and then got thrilling in the 90's. but maybe i can't read right.
"throughout" kind of fixes that misread, but yeah.
― Evan, Monday, 14 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link
that thing also doesn't have anything to do with being white until the last paragraph. which makes the title weird. i read the whole thing! i really gotta go home...
― scott seward, Monday, 14 March 2016 21:31 (eight years ago) link
Title is just clickbait I suspect.
― Evan, Monday, 14 March 2016 21:35 (eight years ago) link
pop music is tackling sexism and racism in profound ways? cool i guess i'll have to take your word on that, since you've provided literally no examples!
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 21:47 (eight years ago) link
also kind of funny how an article on male supremacy in indie rock only offers one lyric from a female musician and it is “You’re less than me / I am nothing”
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 21:48 (eight years ago) link
define..."new styles"...
― fact checking cuz, Monday, 14 March 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link
Damn we had so much riding on the new Diiv and Porches albums
― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 14 March 2016 22:21 (eight years ago) link
is there really a band called porches?
― tylerw, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:37 (eight years ago) link
that band floundered for months
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, March 14, 2016 9:27 AM (6 hours ago)
this is how long it takes for unestablished acts to climb pop radio playlists in today's age of ridiculously tight playlists. before long it'll be like country radio where it routinely takes over 6 months for a newer artist's single to rise to the level of exposure where ppl who only listen to radio on the drive home will hear it. w/ a song like "cake by the ocean" i wouldn't be surprised if they were expecting it to take until summer to break.
― dyl, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:43 (eight years ago) link
the torches of porches
― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 22:46 (eight years ago) link
The porches of the mystics
― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 14 March 2016 22:53 (eight years ago) link
now that's a good band name
― tylerw, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:55 (eight years ago) link
Chill, Jack Johnson style Sun City Girls cover band
― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 14 March 2016 23:14 (eight years ago) link
mtv finally takes a real stand on the music they only played at midnight on sundays because there was too many swv and brandy videos to play during the day
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 01:49 (eight years ago) link
But the key factor driving this concern isn’t, say, Spoon or Vampire Weekend crossing over to cultural ubiquity a few years ago
Most people in America have zero idea who these bands are
― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 03:51 (eight years ago) link
i wish swv and brandy were here
― ulysses, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 04:10 (eight years ago) link
Didn't Brandi have an album a couple years ago?
― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 12:04 (eight years ago) link
"It may be hard to remember now, but MTV started a national conversation on indie rock."
― Chris L, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:13 (eight years ago) link
I think there's a lot to like in that piece, actually, but that the headline (and the author's cosigning of same on Twitter) is pretty sad. like, you can't get anybody to read your piece unless you present it as DID HE REALLY SAY THAT? HE WENT THERE! etc
also, is there any safer piece to write than "the mainstream indie that you hear on NPR? I'm here to tell you it's not actually paradigm-shifting innovative music!"
― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:31 (eight years ago) link
^^ this was my reaction. we're hanging the death of indie rock on a DIIV album and a Porches album?
― alpine static, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:51 (eight years ago) link
though I disagree that there's a lot to like in that piece. i don't think there's a lot of anything in that piece. it feels very thin. which ... whatever. get paid, sir.
― alpine static, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:52 (eight years ago) link
yeah i don't think the piece is bad, but i do feel like it could've been written in 2004, 1994 ... maybe even 1984. whenever i start bemoaning the "death of a genre" i just try to remember that there are probably kids who feel the same way about Diiv that i felt about, say, pavement. And back then, there were probably older dudes who thought pavement was super lame / unoriginal / uninspired compared to dino jr and the replacements. and so on...
― tylerw, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:46 (eight years ago) link
pavement was always super lame
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:51 (eight years ago) link
thanks, older dude
― tylerw, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:53 (eight years ago) link
some older dude
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:08 (eight years ago) link
all the older dudescome with the 'tudes...
― ulysses, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:13 (eight years ago) link
i love pavement and i hate the 90's! though i was actually kinda happy to see the retro-90's/matador sound make a comeback in the last few years just cuz i like guitars and all the lame young people who were doing really bad DIY synth/electronic/faux horrormovie/goth/chillwave stuff were terrible at it and even terrible guitar playing can sound cool if you are loud enough. built to spill on the other hand were mega-lame. and i can't listen to 90's sonic youth.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:23 (eight years ago) link
I saw some buzz about that MTV indie piece but there's nothing there really. He finds a couple of indie records boring. He likes some other ones. He makes a vague call for more political engagement in the final paragraph. I don't know why people are getting excited about such a safe, bland piece nine years after SFJ's A Paler Shade of White. There's nothing less controversial than saying that indie-rock is too homogenous and cosy in 2016.
― impossible raver (Re-Make/Re-Model), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:32 (eight years ago) link
i mean.. the complaint that bands (as a whole? i guess?) are making music that you don't find exciting because the like "corporations" want them to or something is...?
(well is played, for one)
― ive seen enough Good Wife episodes (s.clover), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link
― scott seward, Monday, March 14, 2016 4:23 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
This quote is a good reminder of the reducing and flattening power of time. It's like how in 500 years, most people will just picture the faces on Mt. Rushmore as a summary of American history.
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link
you've also apparently just described the concept of Chuck Klosterman's new book (just saw the synopsis on Amazon).
― evol j, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link
something is bothering me about this whole pile-on by fellow music writers and I think it's this: when I was 23 almost everything "longform" I wrote was garbage or approaching thus. (I've already corrected for the fact that I dislike all my own work; it just genuinely was not good.) Yet my work somehow never became the target of such a mass pile-on, and I don't think it had anything to do with the quality of my work nor much to do with its platform. I suspect it's more because people praise or criticize a piece based on media politics and increasingly politics-politics, which grants certain writers immunity and makes certain writers targets before they ever put a word into a CMS. It was ever thus, but I suspect in whatever "golden age of literary feuds" people might cite to make that point the journalism climate was healthy enough to be less circumspect.
And, like, sure, I understand that people in the field might not want to put themselves in the position of criticizing the broader editorial strategy of a publication that just went on a huge hiring spree, but surely there are better ways to sublimate that urge than to two minutes' subtweet someone far younger than you?
― a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 21:22 (eight years ago) link
nobody ever criticizes the people they hope to get hired by
― james brooks, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 23:40 (eight years ago) link
Won't somebody think of the children?
― the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 23:58 (eight years ago) link
when i was 23 i didn't give a shit what cranky old burnouts thought of my writing.
― diana krallice (rushomancy), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:04 (eight years ago) link
it is very peculiar to me in the first place that MTV.com chose to become grantland redux. My understanding is that some Grantland bigwig is there now and brought along Molly L., pappademus and maybe others whose names I don't know alongside J. Hopper etc, but… longform thumbsuckers from MTV? Yet I don't know what more suitable role for MTV's innuhnet strategy might currently be.
I also have no awareness of their TV programming presently. I worked for MTV.com/ MTV news in 2000/2001, when it still had stranglehold on the youngs TV-wise and were positioning their sites as such, as well as MTV.com, VH1.com being positioned the music sites of record. by that time, Viacom had counted on inexpensive or free labor w/r/t to working at MTV being so desirable for about 15 years. While I do not remember an MTV show making a stir past Jersey Shore —I guess they have Teen mom marathons a lot, and VH1 has the Real Wives shit— the "oh working at MTV is so great that mom and dad can help me with $$$" thing has been over a long time ago. Vice has had that shit for a while.
― veronica moser, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:07 (eight years ago) link
youth is not a magic shield. you write for the general public, you get a response regardless of your age, people don't avert their eyes and go "well, if they keep writing things i don't like when they're 28, then i'll say something."
― ODD FUTURE WOLFGANG VAN HALEN ON BASS (some dude), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:25 (eight years ago) link
katherine has a good point, but it's probably more a problem of the increasing profile and platform and Y A S S S K W E E N importance that major publications are giving young people than sharky, doughy near-40 ilx nerds approaching ready to dive on all young blood
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:34 (eight years ago) link
hopper even said to the Huffington Post
MTV has a unique opportunity to build a diverse staff that includes up-and-coming writers, veteran critics and journalists from outside the music space, she said, and bringing in young voices like 20-year-old Hazel Cills challenges "very fixed historic ideas of music criticism."
Well, it's either A) Old fart ILX dingleberry-picking Single Jukebox dads need to fix their historic ideas of music criticism and mow their lawns instead flapping their snackholes on the internet
or B) Maybe twentysomethings actually need editors
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:38 (eight years ago) link
And, just because i said that snarkily, doesn't mean that that answer isn't A
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:39 (eight years ago) link
B) Maybe twentysomethings actually need editors
Good thing Hopper did such a bang-up fuckin' job of editing these kids' crap at The Pitch. Bodes real, real well for MTV.
― the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:43 (eight years ago) link