"we had to clean up after the Oregon militia and there were dildos and lube *everywhere*!"
― Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 14 January 2016 21:45 (eight years ago) link
one should empathize with the mail(wo)men who have to interact with these lunatics.
― Sharkie, Thursday, 14 January 2016 21:45 (eight years ago) link
lol did anybody actually go to the actual website where Doucette was "sworn in" as a "Superior Court judge": http://scannedretina.com/2015/05/25/public-announcement-new-superior-court-judges-steven-dean-byfield-and-bruce-doucette/
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Thursday, 14 January 2016 22:44 (eight years ago) link
so that means these guys are essentially:
http://www.doblu.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/darkknightrises20248.jpg
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Thursday, 14 January 2016 22:46 (eight years ago) link
Protester arrested in Burns, accused of driving stolen refuge vehicle
― the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Saturday, 16 January 2016 00:57 (eight years ago) link
Guy claims he is not a US citizen, tries to enter a courtroom with a camera, with predictable results.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMUdxNXo7QY
― schlep and back trio (anagram), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 14:37 (eight years ago) link
lol that was quick
― badg, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 16:16 (eight years ago) link
what an asshole
― carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 17:13 (eight years ago) link
a little knowledge...will get you zapped!
― scott seward, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link
you know what my motto is? stay away from fucking courthouses!
Mikey Blah Blah 1 month ago Let the record show I watched this over a dozen times.
― nomar, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link
http://gawker.com/oregon-militia-idiots-promise-to-leave-if-chris-christi-1755160817
― nomar, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 17:24 (eight years ago) link
Cheesy intro going INSTA - JUSTICE! had me a little worried that I had stumbled upon my cousin's facebook feed.
But you know what? It was entirely appropriate, I enjoyed the federal government's heavy hand of law in that one.
― pplains, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link
he sounded like a total neckbeard MRA kinda guy, too, not just an infowars stan. i was hoping to see a fedora tumble off his head and down the hallway, like that hat from miller's crossing.
― nomar, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 17:38 (eight years ago) link
'the several states'
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 17:53 (eight years ago) link
gotta say i would feel better about that vid if the guy blocking him gave, like, a clear verbal warning before using the taser.
― the thirteenth floorior (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 17:56 (eight years ago) link
no way, that guy is an American hero
― Chikan wa akan de. Zettai akan de. (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link
the guy did try to force his way into a courtroom...
― nomar, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 18:18 (eight years ago) link
At the point when a cop or enforcement officer raises his taser and takes aim at you – and you don't have a taser of your own – that's when you need to beat a hasty retreat.
― pplains, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 18:21 (eight years ago) link
maybe he got confused for a sec and thought he was a timecop?
― nomar, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMnPnNIyPHA
― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link
"Not-for-hire" on the door, around, unh, pretty car, got the green mask on front...
― how's life, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 19:02 (eight years ago) link
these guys with their belief that they can hack the entire american justice system with some carefully placed loopholesi blame Law and Order
― ulysses, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 19:08 (eight years ago) link
I blame Nightmare on Elm Street.
― how's life, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 19:13 (eight years ago) link
loved the "gotcha" moment the dude had when he read the bailiff dude's nametag, total pwnage
― nomar, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 19:13 (eight years ago) link
whenever i'm in a position of privilege at a venue (working ticket lists and such), this is always the tipoff that i am dealing with a king asshole
"Check again, under my first name" "Yeah, I'm sorry; I'm not seeing it there either. Do you know who put you on the list?""How am I supposed to know? Just check it again.""Well, it's not there; is there anyone you can call?""Who's your manager?""Um, I'm my own manager.""oh yeah... WHAT'S YOUR NAME" * pulls out iPhone and points it at me as if waiting for me to start breakdancing*
― ulysses, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link
That was perfect ty
― broderik f (darraghmac), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 19:51 (eight years ago) link
― pplains, Tuesday, January 26, 2016 1:21 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
ehhhh i dunnnnnno. i mean obviously this is a really different context but maybe i am really sensitive to this on account of the last year and a half's public conversation about law enforcement and the use of force and so on. i mean right up until then i was really feeling the guy blocking the door, and his cool-as-fuck answers to this loon's dumbass lines. just would have really liked a "sir, i am giving you fair warning that if you make another attempt to enter this courtroom i will use this taser." it sorta looked as if only a couple seconds passed between him taking out the taser and using it, like it's totally possible someone (especially an amped-up loon clearly spieling out some scenario in his head and maybe not that plugged into reality around him) would not recognize what it was or realize it was RIGHT about to be used.
― the thirteenth floorior (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 19:57 (eight years ago) link
That's all fair, seriously, but he will def recognise the next one so yknow growth through experience
― broderik f (darraghmac), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link
i think that, given the fact that it's a court setting where it's not unlikely that someone could come in looking for revenge against a lawyer / judge / plaintiff, those guys take more or less zero shit and that's honestly one of the few settings where is seems appropriate.
― ulysses, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link
it prob was not the first time they had encountered that loon tho
― a (waterface), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 20:06 (eight years ago) link
I don't completely disagree with you DC, but take my post from the POV of just plain common sense - based upon anyone aiming a taser at you.
But that said, I do not feel in the slightest that the bailiff needed to announce some sort of Robocop warning to the man trying to forcibly gain access into a federal courtroom.
― pplains, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 20:07 (eight years ago) link
Doc Casino is otm obviously but it's important to remember that to yr Freeman the Tasing is like a kiss, it's his consummation, his raison d'etre
― Chikan wa akan de. Zettai akan de. (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link
he also says to the guard that your laws don't apply to me
― a (waterface), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 20:11 (eight years ago) link
the taser applies to him
― μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 20:12 (eight years ago) link
The laws of physics, though...
(xp)
― the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 20:13 (eight years ago) link
the whole sub-genre of *watch me make a fool of/school this cop* youtube videos is going to have some heeeeelarious results at times. i'm not a big cop fan but i did LOL at this video in the same way i would LOL at *little kid gets knocked over by cat* on youtube.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 20:58 (eight years ago) link
Dunno how he squares "I am an unperson and your country's laws don't apply to me" with his rights to freedom of speech and movement.
― ilxors ananimus (onimo), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:05 (eight years ago) link
iirc he would regard those as being natural rights of some kind as opposed to the made up maritime dc conspiracy
― Chikan wa akan de. Zettai akan de. (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link
sooooo, he can walk anywhere does that mean i can walk into his house?
― scott seward, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link
and then tase him in his house?
― scott seward, Tuesday, January 26, 2016 9:15 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
a fucking men
― lute bro (brimstead), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link
(that was meant to be read as AMEN with the word "fucking" in between A and Men)
good work everybody itt
― lute bro (brimstead), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:11 (eight years ago) link
i DO get a kick out of the whole *I can do whatever I want I'm not a citizen!* thing. i gotta try that.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link
I think it's some narrow, psycho reading of the Constitution and how it treats the several states, (i.e. believing we're in some kind of Articles of Confederation deal where states are forming a union, not a single country with administrative subdivisions) crossed with some paranoid-critical interpretation of the admittedly vague provisos about citizenship. So he believes in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but insists that you can't be a citizen of the United States, unless born in federal territory.
As for the taser and the warning... I hear what y'all are all saying. Just seems like so many of the same justifications rhyme with ones we might hear in a different setting. Like, idk, if some over-enthusiastic college kid at a protest got up in some cop's face ranting their own equally confused and cobbled-together understanding of the law and their rights, and the cop just shot or tased them without warning, would we be cool with that? Or is it specifically that this specific guy is one who all of us here would find completely insufferable? Not sure I totally agree that trying to enter a courtroom by force is different enough to require a different standard, especially since he was being barred from entry because of the camera, not because of any suspicion that he'd engage in violence once inside or something.
― the thirteenth floorior (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link
i'd argue that he was being barred following an attempt to forcibly enter a court.it's certainly no explicit guarantee of safety if you DON'T do it but the fastest way to get in a terrible position is to lay hands on anybody working in a federal building that is open to the public. those guys are under high stress with long periods of boredom, wearing uncomfortable clothes and they're armed.
― ulysses, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link
but yeah i hear you
"Or is it specifically that this specific guy is one who all of us here would find completely insufferable?"
this is kinda it for me...
― scott seward, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link
I'm totally with you on this, Dr Casino. Much as I felt schadenfreude w/ a guilty lol, I'm kind of disturbed by how easily everyone finds justifying this.
― emil.y, Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link