mine says christmas, even though i have no mention of religion in my profile. they're chubby beardo dudes so far, i wonder if they'll get progressively more santa-looking until dec. 25th?
or the guy i've been talking to on there is a beard guy so i guess they think that must be my type.
― JuliaA, Thursday, December 17, 2015 12:58 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
http://hellogiggles.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/22/tim-allen-the-santa-clause.jpg
― goole, Thursday, 17 December 2015 19:11 (eight years ago) link
tbh I think 90% of men on okcupid are beard guys now
― μpright mammal (mh), Thursday, 17 December 2015 18:59 (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
figures they'd be still looking
― MONKEY had been BUMMED by the GHOST of the late prancing paedophile (darraghmac), Thursday, 17 December 2015 19:13 (eight years ago) link
I've been back on OKC since I changed cities. I've had time off from my new job and little else to do. Two dates down, two to go. Doubt I can stomach more than that in one short period of time. 1st date was really really good (best I've been on) but then she told me she'd be busy for weeks thanks to the holidays, so I'm left to hope she'll reach out in the new year. Which seems far-fetched, given my dismal track record.
2nd date was with possibly the most boring human I've ever met in my life - she actually stated as a point of pride that she has no strong opinions about anything. OKC thinks we're a great match though so it's possible i'm also vv boring
3rd is tonight, with a probably-too-attractive filmmaker
4th and likely final is this weekend, with a girl (my age, 29) who's in an open marriage - her and her husband only date solo, blessedly. I'd normally steer very clear of this but she seems really cool and if nothing else I'm curious about her story.
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Thursday, 17 December 2015 19:40 (eight years ago) link
this site adding auto-playing video ads might be getting us close to the final nail. i mean my whole way of browsing matches involves opening up multiple tabs, y'know, so it's just a cacophony plus "guhhh which tab is it coming from" syndrome
― the thirteenth floorior (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 31 January 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link
why don't you use adblock tho
― glandular lansbury (sic), Sunday, 31 January 2016 03:34 (eight years ago) link
a great feature added to recent versions of Firefox is a speaker icon that shows up on the tab of any session that plays unsolicited audio
― Lee626, Sunday, 31 January 2016 06:55 (eight years ago) link
been using an add-on to do that - didn't know FF had it natively now. nice!
― Nhex, Sunday, 31 January 2016 07:45 (eight years ago) link
chrome has it if you turn on developer mode too iirc? really useful
― Worth Taking from Little Kid (Will M.), Sunday, 31 January 2016 08:31 (eight years ago) link
Chrome and FireFox both do it by default now actually
― all official correspondence concerning "chili cook-off" (El Tomboto), Sunday, 31 January 2016 15:36 (eight years ago) link
and one of them, i forget which, will let you mute the tab without opening it.
― koogs, Sunday, 31 January 2016 15:40 (eight years ago) link
i'm a pretty primitive web-user, i admit. i think a while back ad-block was causing some malfunctions with Flickr, which I use all the time - i should try it again.
― the thirteenth floorior (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 31 January 2016 17:26 (eight years ago) link
use ghostery imo, it has good controls to whitelist sites
― μpright mammal (mh), Sunday, 31 January 2016 17:32 (eight years ago) link
in Firefox or Safari, clicking on the speaker icon mutes the tab without opening it. Click on slashed-out speaker to restore sound
in Chrome, right-click on the speaker icon and scroll down to 'mute tab'
― Lee626, Sunday, 31 January 2016 17:35 (eight years ago) link
the inevitable
http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/okcomrade-facebook-dating/
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 1 February 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link
was this started by a HOOS affiliate
― μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 1 February 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link
i have friends on it lol
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 4 February 2016 00:50 (eight years ago) link
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ce42OQjVAAEYBkt.jpg
― mookieproof, Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:02 (eight years ago) link
That kind of reminds me of the (rightly monumentally stupid) idea I once had that every single person should have some kind of icon on their person that lights up when they pass another single person and like them.
― Interesting. No, wait, the other thing: tedious. (Trayce), Friday, 1 April 2016 03:02 (eight years ago) link
is this for people who can't tell when they have a crush
― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 1 April 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link
the lovebit i mean; at least trayce's breaks the ice
― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 1 April 2016 03:08 (eight years ago) link
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfY2FMCUAAAh9LJ.jpg
― j., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 21:35 (eight years ago) link
Namaste ;)
― sheesh, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 22:47 (eight years ago) link
anyone want to write me a profile for this site
― μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 17 May 2016 00:24 (seven years ago) link
profiles are on their way out afaict. mine looks like moby dick compared to most of the ones i'm seeing these days. i mean it was always a bit long-winded but i feel like at least a slim majority of the new profiles i see are derived from thinking about a dating profile kinda like a tinder profile. very short and mysterious. god knows what you're supposed to write people about. i wasn't made for these times.
― sisterhood of the baggering vance (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 17 May 2016 01:01 (seven years ago) link
I'm glad we're finally winnowing it down to only the boldest, most attractive people being allowed to date.
― You say tomato, Isao Tomita (RIP) (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 17 May 2016 01:25 (seven years ago) link
(immediately physically attractive obv)
suggest lj
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 May 2016 01:46 (seven years ago) link
I've been getting more action thru OKC of late, but I suspect it has to do with the world realizing my looks and the depth of my charm.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 17 May 2016 01:52 (seven years ago) link
fair point
along similar lines, i turned mine off
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 May 2016 02:03 (seven years ago) link
Did I ever mention that I got tired of trying and changed all my dating profiles to just read "I love avocados" about a year ago and haven't reopened them since
― μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 17 May 2016 04:30 (seven years ago) link
I quit in Jan, though I did write someone else's profile a month or two ago
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 17 May 2016 04:40 (seven years ago) link
How does that work? I mean, do you write it as if you're reviewing the person or are you Cyranoing that shit?
― You say tomato, Isao Tomita (RIP) (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 17 May 2016 06:39 (seven years ago) link
The former option. It hasn't had much effect on her dating life one way or another, AFAICT.
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 17 May 2016 10:37 (seven years ago) link
surprised this didn't get brought up:
https://www.wired.com/2016/05/okcupid-study-reveals-perils-big-data-science/
a danish "researcher" scraped the site and put up a dataset of the results of all q's w/o consent of the users
― goole, Friday, 27 May 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link
quick perusal of the guy's social media showed strong hints of being an obtuse asshole, fyi
When contacted by Motherboard for comment, Kirkegaard was dismissive, stating he “would like to wait until the heat has declined a bit before doing any interviews. Not to fan the flames on the social justice warriors.”
― goole, Friday, 27 May 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link
"unscientific discussion" seems to follow the "I believe in science, not morality" stance a bunch of jerks have been taking lately
― μpright mammal (mh), Friday, 27 May 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link
wired says he took the set down; when i saw this blowing up a couple weeks ago he hadn't yet. which i guess means there's no way to know if your shit's out there.
here's his twitter
https://twitter.com/KirkegaardEmil
― goole, Friday, 27 May 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link
don't have a link rn but there is a way to check; someone put up something iirc on github to allow you to srch the dataset by username just to check. guy is obviously a p.o.s. & the ramifications of this/seeming lack of oversight by his academy are rly horrifying i think.
― schlump, Friday, 27 May 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link
i think he was doing the "research" on his own as an amateur; his degree program is in an unrelated field. or something.
― goole, Friday, 27 May 2016 18:13 (seven years ago) link
back on here, seems like there are way more spam bots now eh
― global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 1 June 2016 03:06 (seven years ago) link
q:
did 'kiddo'/'kiddos' start being used in possessives / as a direct object ('my kiddos' / 'i have a kiddo'), rather than being used as a term of address to one's kids, as a form of dating profile evasive maneuver? i don't see it so much elsewhere but it seems like the norm on this kind of site now.
― j., Wednesday, 1 June 2016 03:25 (seven years ago) link
Waitamo, that data scraper dude's excuse was 'tough tits, data is already public", but it isnt, unless things have changed. Most people have their profile set to only be visible to others with OKC logins. Not to the ehole world.
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Wednesday, 1 June 2016 03:34 (seven years ago) link
I think kiddo is more of a general (American) English usage these days. My co-worker refers to her daughter as "the kiddo" like, daily. She's not on OKC, either.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 1 June 2016 04:24 (seven years ago) link
So...when you get friendly, polite messages from people you're just not interested in based on their profile, the preferred response is:
a) Ignore the messages.b) Engage with what was said, but add that you're not interested.c) Just say you're not interested.d) Other.
I've gotten a few of these and don't want to be mean, but I also don't want to spend a bunch of emotional energy on people I don't at least find kind of cute to begin with :/
― circles, Monday, 11 July 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link
imho nobody is ever even slightly obligated to respond to messages on dating sites. i get the impulse sometimes, and every so often i do send what i hope is a polite no-thank-you, but basically if you were obligated, the obligation would be endless. you don't know them and you don't owe them anything, and i feel most of them would understand the same etiquette if the positions were reversed.
― 'they pelted us with rocks and garbage' (Doctor Casino), Monday, 11 July 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link
that's probably reasonable. lol, honestly this kind of thing can be more anxiety-producing for me than actual dates.
― circles, Monday, 11 July 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link
http://nymag.com/thecut/2017/02/hater-dating-app-will-match-you-based-on-mutual-dislikes.html
perhaps the partner of my dreams also hates being awake, being sober, and leaving the house
― mookieproof, Friday, 3 February 2017 00:46 (seven years ago) link
Hater should have its own thread imho
― El Tomboto, Friday, 3 February 2017 00:50 (seven years ago) link
I posted that link a minute before you on another thread.
― sarahell, Friday, 3 February 2017 01:04 (seven years ago) link
oh wait, mine was to a vice article about the same thing n/m