ATTN: Copyeditors and Grammar Fiends

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5060 of them)

It's The King James Bible. It doesn't belong to him, it's named after him.

― CharlieNo4, Thursday, 5 April 2007 10:14 (seventeen years ago) link

and my context:

"There's plenty to see this Easter weekend"

"There are plenty of films to see this Easter weekend"

A writer submitted "There's plenty of films to see..." and it wrong-footed me!

― CharlieNo4, Thursday, 5 April 2007 10:15 (seventeen years ago) link

"there's all kinds of things i'd like to talk about" - this sounds fine to me although i know it's wrong; i could make the argument that "all kinds of things i'd like to talk about" (or "plenty of films to see") constitute(s?) One Big Thing - a mushed-together agglomeration that is conceptually singular - "plenty of films to see" is something that's happening this easter weekend - the films themselves are something to know about, but the fact that there are so many films to see is also something to know about, and in fact that is the main point of the sentence

i COULD make that argument but i mean, that would faintly ridiculous?

― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 5 April 2007 10:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Pretend that (for this example) the King James Bible belongs to King James. Like Prince Charles(')(s) ears. What is correct?

― the next grozart, Friday, 6 April 2007 02:51 (seventeen years ago) link

There's a long history of debate on this point. I'd go for Prince Charles's ears, following the simple rule that singular words ending in s take an apostrophe s, and plurals just take an apostrophe. I think that's the Chicago Manual style, as well as that of the publication I work for.

Some people say it depends on how you pronounce it. Some have other, complex rules.

― Alba, Friday, 6 April 2007 07:46 (seventeen years ago) link

is king james a plural?

no.

there's your answer.

simple, efficient and correct. next!

― grimly fiendish, Friday, 6 April 2007 09:09 (seventeen years ago) link

"The 14 animals will have two months to decide if any of the salt varieties are suitable for road use."

are suitable? is suitable? isn't "any" technically singular, being shorthand for "any one"? argh.

― CharlieNo4, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:26 (seventeen years ago) link

"varieties" makes it "are", I'd say

― RJG, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:30 (seventeen years ago) link

if any of the salt is suitable

if any of the salts are suitable

― RJG, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:33 (seventeen years ago) link

b-b-but "none of us is insured for this car" is correct isn't it? so that makes no sense...

― CharlieNo4, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:35 (seventeen years ago) link

I thought it was "is" but I might be wrong.

― Alba, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:36 (seventeen years ago) link

none of us are insured

what an oversight

― RJG, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:37 (seventeen years ago) link

but "none" is a contraction of "not one", therefore "is" is correct!

No? Why not? *shoots self*

― CharlieNo4, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:39 (seventeen years ago) link

except none is singular

crosspost

― RJG, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:39 (seventeen years ago) link

guess it depends whether you predict only one or more than one of your salt varieties may be suitable!

― RJG, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:42 (seventeen years ago) link

i guess they could all be ok...oh bollocks.

― CharlieNo4, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:44 (seventeen years ago) link

'none of us is' is correct

― braveclub, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Cuz "none" is "not one," right?
I don't know about the road salt thing. It would seem that the "is" or "are" would be referring to (modifying?) the "any" and not the "varieties," thus making "is" correct, but it sticks in my craw. Perhaps moving away from this hyper-correctness in conjugating the "to be" verb is an area where the language is evolving.
Also fading into extinction, most probably, is the word "whom," use of which I can never figure out on the fly, that is, when speaking.

― Beth Parker, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 12:21 (seventeen years ago) link

I saw Amazing Grace last night and Wilberforce saying "to who" about three times in the space of a minute really grated! Also, he kept saying "bored of" instead of "bored with". Slack git.

― Alba, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 12:39 (seventeen years ago) link

AP style says that proper names ending in "s" just get an apostrophe to show possession, and that's it - I like it cause it's more efficient innit

― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 14:02 (seventeen years ago) link

I'd have gone with Prince Charles' ears on instinct.

― Madchen, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 18:10 (seventeen years ago) link

"All," "any," "most," "none," and "some" can be either singular or plural, depending on what they're referring to.

"All of the milk is gone" vs. "All of the candy bars are gone."

"None of the crowd was left" vs. "None of the fans were left."

― jaymc, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 18:14 (seventeen years ago) link

not one of the fans was left

vs

none of the fans were left

― CharlieNo4, Thursday, 12 April 2007 09:18 (seventeen years ago) link

Madchen you tart!

― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 12 April 2007 10:15 (seventeen years ago) link

i wish 'imaginary' could mean 'pertaining to imagery'.

― That one guy that quit, Friday, 13 April 2007 12:36 (seventeen years ago) link

make it so!

― CharlieNo4, Friday, 13 April 2007 12:36 (seventeen years ago) link

I suspect there's nothing wrong with "This information is believed accurate," but why does it bother me without "to be"?

― Dr Morbius, Friday, 13 April 2007 13:58 (seventeen years ago) link

I think dropping the "to be" is a Scottishism. They're fond of saying things like "These shirts need washed" instead of "...to be washed" or "...washing".

― ledge, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:04 (seventeen years ago) link

well, some MD from Wilkes-Barre likes to do it too.

― Dr Morbius, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I think the original phrase is "all information believed accurate at time of printing", ie, headline style abbreviation with articles and auxiliary verbs removed. I'm not sure "believed accurate" really is grammatical outside that convention.

― underpants of the gods, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:12 (seventeen years ago) link

I mean, I can't think offhand think of any other instance where you can have believed + adjective. "The woman is believed to be blonde" - you couldn't say "The woman is believed blonde".

― underpants of the gods, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:15 (seventeen years ago) link

thanks, that's what I was feeling.

― Dr Morbius, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:18 (seventeen years ago) link

You hear "believed missing" or "presumed dead" a lot too.

― NickB, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Hmmm, that's true...

― underpants of the gods, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Both most common at police press conferences though, so I blame the goddamn fuzz.

― NickB, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:26 (seventeen years ago) link

"shitties are presumed whipped"

― Tracer Hand, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:31 (seventeen years ago) link

"Found guilty" or "found dead" are also the same thing aren't they?

― NickB, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:33 (seventeen years ago) link

meh, I'll query it at most. Fortunately it's in a loose line that can use extra words.

― Dr Morbius, Friday, 13 April 2007 14:38 (seventeen years ago) link

"illnesses for which more than one treatment method exist"

I understand the conecpt of "two or more," but still ugly.

― Dr Morbius, Monday, 16 April 2007 17:19 (seventeen years ago) link

It looks ugly because of the numerical weirdness, surely -- plural illnesses usually have more than one treatment, because there are more than one of them. Technically that clause could be referring to two medicines that both treat a whole group of related illnesses, rather than various illnesses each with multiple treatments.

Also, "exists."

― nabisco, Monday, 16 April 2007 17:23 (seventeen years ago) link

'Found dead' is an interesting one - it implies the person was dead when you found them. 'Found to be dead' implies you weren't sure and had to investigate before coming to your conclusion.

― Madchen, Monday, 16 April 2007 18:51 (seventeen years ago) link

I am so sick of seeing and hearing the words 'select FROM ONE of the following'. Wrong wrong wrong.

― braveclub, Thursday, 19 April 2007 11:16 (seventeen years ago) link

anyone have a concise explanation of when to use "poor," and when to use "bad"?

― 69, Friday, 20 April 2007 15:40 (seventeen years ago) link

NABISCO

― 69, Friday, 20 April 2007 16:44 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm not sure I understand the issue -- could you give an example of where you can't decide which is right? I don't know of any grand grammatical distinction between "poor" and "bad": they're adjectives with similar connotations, but mostly you just use poor when you mean poor (suggesting a lack, deficiency, poverty, or inadequacy) and bad when you mean bad (suggesting something just flat-out negative).

― nabisco, Friday, 20 April 2007 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link

it sounds clunkier to say (about a baseball player, for instance) "he played badly" than "he played poorly."

like OH why does it seem to me to be IMPORTANT that the dude in last crusade say "he choose... poorly," instead of "...badly"?

― 69, Friday, 20 April 2007 18:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Some of the books I'm reading for this hellish essay I'm doing cap up the words Dada and Futurism but then don't cap up the word Modernism. Should I cap up modernism? I checked over my lecturers emails to see what she did. She did both Modernism and modernism. Maybe she was typing quickly or something.

― Zoe Espera, Monday, 23 April 2007 11:15 (seventeen years ago) link

i don't think you should.

others would disagree, and have good cause to do so.

you should check with yr tutors as to what they expect.

― grimly fiendish, Monday, 23 April 2007 11:27 (seventeen years ago) link

ie this is style, not grammar. next!

― grimly fiendish, Monday, 23 April 2007 11:29 (seventeen years ago) link

I think that deliberating over modernism vs Modernism is a way of delaying writing your hellish essay. I suggest you at least pick a more productive avoidance tactic, like doing the washing up.

― Alba, Monday, 23 April 2007 11:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Skipping 4960 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.