the horrors - classic or dud

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (135 of them)

Oh, so you mean they've hit us with the trump card early on and they're kinda hoping the rest surfs on its wake?

Damn sweet trump card mind.

Zayatte Mondatta (country matters), Monday, 30 March 2009 14:56 (fifteen years ago) link

'Who Can Say' is great, complete with po-faced spoken section!

Definitely hearing The Rip in Sea Within A Sea. And plenty of Psychedelic Furs and Chameleons in the rest of the albu,/

Chris in Belfast, Wednesday, 8 April 2009 12:34 (fifteen years ago) link

i like 'primary colours', nothing groundbreakingly original but ive been enjoying listening to it

vain_bowers, Wednesday, 8 April 2009 13:14 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.nme.com/layout/magImage.php

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Wednesday, 8 April 2009 13:35 (fifteen years ago) link

I am listening to this album again now. I really want to like it more than I do! It does sound quite a lot like Loop, albeit if they'd never listened to any heavy rock records

National Lampoon's Minimal House (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 8 April 2009 14:28 (fifteen years ago) link

This album is sounding pretty great actually, but the 'ZOMG they have ripped up the rulebook and thrown it out of the window!' hype is going to be insufferable. As a patchwork of very obvious influences though it's enjoyable enough.

Matt DC, Saturday, 11 April 2009 11:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Despite being slavishly derivative, I did quite like their first EP. Full first album wasn't bad, but can't remember the last time I played it.

Alex in NYC, Saturday, 11 April 2009 12:45 (fifteen years ago) link

Citation from the DiS review: "The Horrors have done the one thing no other hyped to the heavens British guitar band has been able to do in the past ten years; they’ve given birth to a sophomore album that drastically improves upon its predecessor"

Discuss. But perhaps they're right.

zeus, Saturday, 11 April 2009 13:02 (fifteen years ago) link

one month passes...

Interesting. Hard to think of exceptions right now. I was underwhelmed by their first album. First listen of the new one was entertaining, if just for the spot-the-unexpected-influence game. Sounds like Geoff Barrow had some fun injecting some inspiration. Still seems a bit awkward and silly to me, which means it's probably going to be a huge mega-seller. It's fun, maybe I'll enjoy repeated listens, we'll see.

Slavering review: http://www.clashmusic.com/reviews/the-horrors-primary-colours

Fastnbulbous, Tuesday, 12 May 2009 12:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Some talk about the new album here:

New album by the Horrors out today....

zero learnt from nero (Neil S), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 12:21 (fourteen years ago) link

General consensus: pretty interesting.

zero learnt from nero (Neil S), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 12:21 (fourteen years ago) link

I missed that revive from a month ago. Liked that video a lot better than what I had heard from the previous album. A pretty faceless take on Can like others were sayin, but surprisingly enjoyable. But I guess if I wanted Can w/o Damo Suzuki there are actual Can albums w/o Damo Suzuki...

SQUIRREL WITH A PEOPLE FACE (╓abies), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 13:03 (fourteen years ago) link

I can't really get behind the implication that it's inherently more musically... distinguished to do an album that's a bite of Can and Loop or whatever than one that's a bite of The Cramps and The Birthday Party or whatever. Like all of those are more or less canonically esteemed bands in equal measure, y'know?

display mane (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 13:33 (fourteen years ago) link

Exactly.

Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 13:37 (fourteen years ago) link

I agree, but it's no fun to listen to repeated remakes of Cramps records (or for that matter Can, or whoever). Even if they've taken off some equally derivative sources as from their first record, they've done so in a pretty interesting way I think.

zero learnt from nero (Neil S), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 13:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Or to put it another way the fact that they are biting krautrock and drone rather than just garage rock shows that they want to develop.

zero learnt from nero (Neil S), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 13:44 (fourteen years ago) link

This album is gash. It only got to 25 so hopefully they'll get dropped again.

CosMc (Raw Patrick), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 13:56 (fourteen years ago) link

i liked the single that sampled 'mother sky'. it was good.

FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 14:08 (fourteen years ago) link

I'd be really, really curious to hear the reactions to this album had it come from some no-names with no previous history.

homage is parody gone sour (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 14:13 (fourteen years ago) link

I haven't felt the urge to go back to this album. I have enough records that sound a bit like this, I really don't need another one, especially with shitey goth vocals all over it.

Enormous Epic (Matt DC), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 14:46 (fourteen years ago) link

I can't really get behind the implication that it's inherently more musically... distinguished to do an album that's a bite of Can and Loop or whatever than one that's a bite of The Cramps and The Birthday Party or whatever. Like all of those are more or less canonically esteemed bands in equal measure, y'know?

― display mane (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, May 13, 2009 1:33 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

That's pretty OTM. So they've done a better job aping Can than they did the Cramps. Big deal.

SQUIRREL WITH A PEOPLE FACE (╓abies), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 14:55 (fourteen years ago) link

hang on, the only place where they ape Can on this record is on the first third of one song

sorry for british (country matters), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 14:56 (fourteen years ago) link

i mean, MBV and Spiritualized have much more of a case in the legal department imo

sorry for british (country matters), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 14:57 (fourteen years ago) link

I have only heard this one song lol.

SQUIRREL WITH A PEOPLE FACE (╓abies), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 15:05 (fourteen years ago) link

it doesn't sound much like can except for the beat tbh

FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 15:07 (fourteen years ago) link

LIKE KANYE

FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 15:08 (fourteen years ago) link

It's a really good song, is what people are ignoring :P

(And the fact is, the best things about it have nothing to do with Can, and a helluva lot to do with uh er Portishead lolz)

sorry for british (country matters), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 15:08 (fourteen years ago) link

So they've done a better job aping Can than they did the Cramps. Big deal.

I'm not even sure they have done a better job - both albums come off to me as well-intentioned but less than the sum of their parts. (And yeah I don't think it's a *flagrant* rip of any of these people but my point is it's all record collection rock or music critic rock or whatever you call it.)

display mane (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 15:11 (fourteen years ago) link

it's all record collection rock or music critic rock or whatever you call it.

sometimes this stuff is good though, idk, im not prescriptive. it's usually music critics/blogtards who have a problem with 'music critic rock' n'est ce pas.

FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 15:12 (fourteen years ago) link

Sea Within A Sea is immense but I don't really feel any compulsion to listen to any of the other tracks to see what they are like.

I am using your worlds, Tuesday, 12 May 2009 15:15 (fourteen years ago) link

The Can rip in particular was pretty much alarms goin off I thought, but all that aside I think the best I say is...it's nice...I wouldn't say it sucks. I just can not muster any enthusiasm for these dudes.

SQUIRREL WITH A PEOPLE FACE (╓abies), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 15:19 (fourteen years ago) link

NB I'm still butthurt that everyone pays attention to these dudes when there was already a better Horrors.

SQUIRREL WITH A PEOPLE FACE (╓abies), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 15:20 (fourteen years ago) link

sometimes this stuff is good though, idk, im not prescriptive. it's usually music critics/blogtards who have a problem with 'music critic rock' n'est ce pas.

Oh me too, some of my favourite bands etc etc - just sayin is all

display mane (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 15:32 (fourteen years ago) link

also bear in mind that this is exactly the type of band i wouldn't have given the time of day to until i heard the new music with my own ears

like i said on the other thread, "i only think of you" and "new ice age" are stormers, up there with "sea within a sea"

sorry for british (country matters), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 15:34 (fourteen years ago) link

I have listened to this album at least 20 times in the last week...

henry s, Tuesday, 12 May 2009 16:52 (fourteen years ago) link

give or take

henry s, Tuesday, 12 May 2009 16:56 (fourteen years ago) link

new record sounds like the stone roses with a hangover. i don't think the world is quite ready for a baggy shoegaze revival.

horses, Wednesday, 13 May 2009 14:10 (fourteen years ago) link

I've not heard the whole album but someone sent me the opening track and, aside from some vaguely MBV guitar oscillation it's just goth, isn't it? Doomy vocals and nasty snare sound. But didn't MBV come from a nasty goth background? The Stone Roses certainly did, following on from what horses said above.

Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 13 May 2009 14:21 (fourteen years ago) link

But didn't MBV come from a nasty goth background?

Not exactly?

I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 13 May 2009 14:34 (fourteen years ago) link

the stone roses with a hangover

bahahahaha

Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 13 May 2009 17:24 (fourteen years ago) link

Any further opinions on this?

Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 27 May 2009 07:02 (fourteen years ago) link

My opinion - best British indie rock record of the last five years. I know that isn't saying much mind you.

ch4rlie fr4m3, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 08:08 (fourteen years ago) link

All these Can comparisons, I think are overblown. The rest of the album sounds more like Magazine playing in Joy Division's studio.

ch4rlie fr4m3, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 08:19 (fourteen years ago) link

on acid?

a somnambulist in an ambulance (r1o natsume), Wednesday, 27 May 2009 08:54 (fourteen years ago) link

The rest of the album sounds like the Psychedelic Furs playing in White Lies' studio.

CosMc (Raw Patrick), Wednesday, 27 May 2009 10:24 (fourteen years ago) link

one month passes...

This is actually pretty good. I'm impressed.

Moka, Thursday, 2 July 2009 05:34 (fourteen years ago) link

I listened to it once through...thought it definitely had its moments, but couldn't really decide. Was planning to listen again, soon.

He was feeling canonical (Bimble), Thursday, 2 July 2009 05:38 (fourteen years ago) link

woowwwww this new record came out of left field. They're first one is one of the worst albums I've ever bought, I sold it the day after I bought it.

this new is incredible. just hit me.

meme muggin (surfboard dudes get wiped out, totally), Sunday, 12 July 2009 01:57 (fourteen years ago) link

two months pass...

Me having a mutter with Tom of said band.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 25 September 2009 02:44 (fourteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

i love this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EOPIi4Q3lM

Bee OK, Thursday, 15 October 2009 03:33 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.