bill simmons IS bill simmons IN the book of BASKETBALL

also have really enjoyed diana moskovitz's articles and that recent oral history of the clippers series

yeah i enjoyed that though i did lol at them even then just openly going 'we should do some grantland shit', clickhole doing an oral history of the flu game like a day later just made it even funnier

lol

those clickhole oral histories obvs better than the grantland and deadspin ones put together

*are obvs

oh would you speak of the devil:

Rembert Browne ‏@rembert 2m2 minutes ago
list of grantland pieces about deadspin, since 2011:

i've made fun of rem before but he has a point

yeah deadspin went hard at grantland from day one, even publishing a list of grammar mistakes in their first few articles which struck me as being really bitchy

I decided to re-read this for some reason.

http://grantland.com/features/welcome-grantland/

Tbf ilh blasted grantland in that shaky early phase because really it boiled down to get one (1) editor, not that hard

let it never be said that denton (and by extension craggs or whoever's in his chair now) ever hesitated for a second before aggressively moving to attack a threat to its pageviews

then as now it was cloaked in this hysterical "we're telling it like it is and taking on big media! IN STRATEGICALLY DEPLOYED ALL CAPS!" tone

gawker does media criticism grantland does not this is not too hard to figure out

how in the blue fuck is it a question of "figuring out," the question is "why bother," and somehow i doubt the answer has to do with having strong ethical media-watchdog feelings and everything to do with "that's what people will click on/read," the obvious cold-blooded pragmatism of which wouldn't even be an issue if they would be halfway honest about it instead of pretending they have standards

like i'm under 30 and i fall for my fair share of clickbait about various topics i just appreciate it being presented honestly

jfc sloth

cant believe u all wont get behind bullying bill simmons smh what has this bord come to

― lag∞n, Tuesday, May 12, 2015 9:32 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

what happened to this thread even

i want to post this about once a week i'm going to take this occasion to actually do it

http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/anchorman-i-dont-know-what.gif

http://www.si.com/more-sports/2015/05/12/espn-upfronts-john-skipper-bill-simmons-grantland-epl?xid=nl_siextra

feeling like mr snrub about that van pelt announcement, svp and russillo is the only sports talk radio show i deliberately listen to and enjoy.

On whether the deal with Simmons broke over money. “It did not come down to money. Look, we're a big company. If it was just dollars and cents, we would have figured something out. "It is about ultimately about what he wants to do, what value that creates, what we want to do together in deciding whether there is going to be a match, and we decided that ultimately there wouldn't be."

On his level of interest for retaining Colin Cowherd and Skip Bayless, whose contracts are coming up: “Very high.”

smdh

I was listening to the Hollywood Prospectus podcast this week, and for the umpteenth time, Ryan and Greenwald were joking about forgetting scenes and characters from the shows they are paid to review. Thought that was particularly tone deaf in light of the questions being asked about Grantland's value in light Simmons' canning.

Not that remembering Walda Frey is a matter of life or death, but jesus, have a little bit of professionalism.

they shd take notes

tbf that's a running joke for a lot of people who watch game of thrones casually and ryan isn't an actual critic, but, yeah.

(he runs the triangle blog and does that pod with greenwald bc the two of them are irl friends iirc)

Ahh that explains some of it. Also explains why Ryan admitted to not having seen any of the oscar movies during one of their year-end podcasts.

from a goodbye e-mail to his staff:

Wanted to tell you that it looks like I am done being involved with Grantland. Can’t say much here for obvious reasons, at least for now—I know you understand. In the short-term—don’t let this bullshit affect you. Just keep doing what you’re doing. It’s a job. We tried to make it feel like it was more than a job these last four years, but right now, it’s still a job and Grantland is still being consumed and judged by the general public (with unusually high standards, too). So keep the quality of your work as high as it’s always been. Work situations are rarely going to be perfect and you can’t allow it to affect what you’re doing. The best way to “respond” right now is to keep putting out a great site. If you didn’t know, April was our best month—we passed 10 million uniques without chasing traffic and without any leading-the-site promotion whatsoever from ESPN.com (just one Mets piece for like 90 minutes, that’s it). We built an audience because of quality and quality only. You guys should feel good about that.

It’s a job. We tried to make it feel like it was more than a job these last four years, but right now, it’s still a job

:(

fuck jobs

it would be sweet if a bunch of the staff left with him but i'm not sure if that'll happen

seems like after putting all the time and effort into building that thing most ppl wldnt want to immediately repeat the process somewhere else but who knows

the ESPN affiliation is a big deal and some of the smaller names i'm not sure can take the risk of leaving that behind

seems like if he tries another grantland, maybe an independent venture, might want to make it more podcast heavy less writing

obv just hiring a million ppl cause u like them is not really the look

i know u (kev) luuuuv him, but why on earth would they? espn has a certain interest in making grantland succeed without him, they are decent writers getting paid to work for the wwl, and i doubt that bs himself is much of an editor. unless espn brings in alec baldwin, they would seem to be in a pretty good spot right now

espn prob dismantles/wildly rethinks grantland pretty fast one wld think, it doesnt seem to have much point other than making simmons happy

without any leading-the-site promotion whatsoever from ESPN.com (just one Mets piece for like 90 minutes, that’s it)

/declines the to say what % of traffic came from other espn properties, just like there was only one piece that was leading the home page/

just about everyone on that site is pretty replaceable except for zach lowe, tho

it's possible they liked simmons as a boss and are not going to like the new direction (probably SEO) the site goes in. i agree that for the majority of the staff the ESPN brand is probably more important to their careers and starting something new with BS is probably a big risk

xxp

we passed 10 million uniques without chasing traffic

/publishes game of thrones precaps and recaps because they are good and the world needs them/

(probably SEO)

― k3vin k., Friday, May 15, 2015 10:33 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

eh hem we are living in the social era

how many mad men pieces are on the grantland front page right now, the friday before the airing of the finale? this is probably a fun guessing game u can play at parties w/ friends this weekend.

w/o checking i would guess 4

p much guaranteed anyone focused on quality, doing great work, etc is on some extremely middlebrow shit

wow the answer is only 1, and that's just as part of some culture podcast thing. but i guess grantland isn't quite vulture or hitfix or whatever.

lol yeah i was just about to post that it isn't the a.v. club

hey its only friday theres still time!

they don't post stuff on the weekend!