bledsoe is fine but just really inconsistent this year. see if he can take the team on his back now w out dragon
― Steph def def (Spottie), Friday, 27 February 2015 05:56 (nine years ago) link
literally where did the idea that waiters is good come from even
― lag∞n, Friday, 27 February 2015 05:57 (nine years ago) link
the knight contract wasn't ideal but he looks like a guy who could really lead a team soon
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 February 2015 05:57 (nine years ago) link
er bledsoe
we'll see the knight contract
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 February 2015 05:58 (nine years ago) link
waiters had some moments in his first few seasons where you could pretty easily see his jamal crawford potential
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 February 2015 06:01 (nine years ago) link
he's basically marcus thornton with a worse attitude
― Steph def def (Spottie), Friday, 27 February 2015 06:03 (nine years ago) link
he has always been bad even in college
― lag∞n, Friday, 27 February 2015 06:04 (nine years ago) link
man do the suns badly need a wing who can hit an open 3
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 February 2015 06:14 (nine years ago) link
they just needed to keep frye
― Steph def def (Spottie), Friday, 27 February 2015 06:16 (nine years ago) link
ya he was croosh
― lag∞n, Friday, 27 February 2015 06:18 (nine years ago) link
pj tucker traditionally hits that corner three tho
― Steph def def (Spottie), Friday, 27 February 2015 06:19 (nine years ago) link
good god tucker has been brutal
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 February 2015 06:19 (nine years ago) link
hes a good backup, shouldn't be starting
the morris twins have mostly fallen into that top of the key spacer role, they need anthony morrow basically
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 February 2015 06:20 (nine years ago) link
lol nice final play bledsoe
― Steph def def (Spottie), Friday, 27 February 2015 06:22 (nine years ago) link
man alive that bledsoe block
― Steph def def (Spottie), Friday, 27 February 2015 06:28 (nine years ago) link
kinda dig these suns grey alt jerseys
― Steph def def (Spottie), Friday, 27 February 2015 06:29 (nine years ago) link
bledsoe playing with 5 fouls too
― micah, Friday, 27 February 2015 06:29 (nine years ago) link
lmao wiaters
― Steph def def (Spottie), Friday, 27 February 2015 06:32 (nine years ago) link
dang he turned his ankle on that final drive
― Steph def def (Spottie), Friday, 27 February 2015 06:37 (nine years ago) link
huge win for the suns
― Steph def def (Spottie), Friday, 27 February 2015 06:42 (nine years ago) link
literally where did the idea that waiters is good come from even --lag∞n
idk where it came from but the idea that he is worth anyone's attention is being maintained by NBA writers who are more into the soap opera aspect of the league than, y'know, the actual games
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 27 February 2015 13:54 (nine years ago) link
he's playing major minutes on one of the most compelling teams in the league
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 February 2015 14:17 (nine years ago) link
right, i guess a better way to put it is, it sorta baffles me (although maybe it shouldn't) that various nba writers spend a lot of time talking about him beyond "he is bad" and try to pitch this "he is bad but also compelling" argument, because all things being equal we should not be interested in a player who exemplifies constant mediocrity and frequent shittiness coupled with a complete and utter denial of said shittiness
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 27 February 2015 15:12 (nine years ago) link
like remember when a not insignificant number of people were saying that JR would prob be more damaging to cleveland than waiters would be to OKC, and that JR was the shit sandwich cleve needed to eat to get iman shumpert? i didn't understand that and it ended up being markedly not true
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 27 February 2015 15:14 (nine years ago) link
it's not that waiters is "bad but compelling" -- he's bad but important. he has been a pivotal role player on two of the most important teams in the nba this season!
think about why no one ever talks about derrick williams
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 February 2015 15:24 (nine years ago) link
i talk abt derrick williams nearly constantly
― lag∞n, Friday, 27 February 2015 15:28 (nine years ago) link
While working out this week, I joined an interesting conversation about analytics with some other applied mathematicians and statisticians. It mostly concerned Kirk Goldsberry’s presentation during the 2014 Joint Statistical Meetings about advances in basketball analytics. Everyone agreed it was embarrassing. He didn’t show recorded observations (“proprietary”) or predictive models (“proprietary”). Moreover, he couldn’t identify one accurate prediction. Why do basketball bloggers give people shit about being skeptical about the recent analytics trend? It’s a completely reasonable view. Ergh.
― Allen (etaeoe), Friday, 27 February 2015 16:15 (nine years ago) link
proprietary work is a problem across sports analytics i think
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 February 2015 16:16 (nine years ago) link
e.g. this tweet doesn’t even make sense:
https://twitter.com/billoram/status/570764951578488832
(However, he does set himself up for a joke about imaginary numbers.)
― Allen (etaeoe), Friday, 27 February 2015 16:17 (nine years ago) link
Fine. But not showing predictions? Finance is secretive too, but it’s easy to know when a model works and when it doesn’t.
― Allen (etaeoe), Friday, 27 February 2015 16:18 (nine years ago) link
Here’s some related trivia that I love that few people know: Donald Knuth started modeling Case Institute of Technology basketball games in the fifties (thirty years before Bill James’ Abstract).
― Allen (etaeoe), Friday, 27 February 2015 16:21 (nine years ago) link
i'm not familiar w/ the presentation you're talking about (the rebounding one?) nor do i know remotely nearly enough about statistics as a practice to argue about it, so i will cede the floor
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 February 2015 16:22 (nine years ago) link
`Eye in the Sky: The Player Tracking Revolution in Sports Analytics`
― Allen (etaeoe), Friday, 27 February 2015 16:28 (nine years ago) link
i'm sure you could reasonably argue that some of the methods being used in NBA statistical analysis are in need of improvement - admittedly idk enough about them to argue on a micro scale about specific concepts - but the macro idea that analytics are bad in the NBA full stop and should be ignored or given minimal credence, which is what someone like byron scott is saying, is problematic imo
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 27 February 2015 16:28 (nine years ago) link
like scott isn't skeptical because he thinks the methods being used don't work and could if improved, he seems to literally not believe that statistical analysis beyond the most basic numbers - PPG, FG percentage, etc. - has any place in the sport whatsoever
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 27 February 2015 16:30 (nine years ago) link
Why is that problematic? A model that’s too faulty or too complicated confuses otherwise reasonable judgement e.g. http://archive.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_quant?currentPage=all.
― Allen (etaeoe), Friday, 27 February 2015 16:31 (nine years ago) link
Yeah. I understand that. But is there any evidence that any non-traditional model has motivated wins (or any measure of success)? Honestly, I don’t know and would like to see some (i.e. I like basketball and statistics).
― Allen (etaeoe), Friday, 27 February 2015 16:33 (nine years ago) link
most of the skepticism analytics does seem to be pretty ignorant and old school, some of that is prob ppl who know a lot about basketball being dismissive rather than bothering to make an actual argument which is fine and understandable, tho i think the argument is basically over at this point in that most teams use fancy analytics to some extent
i do suspect tho that a lot of the new analytics are bad to varying extents for various reasons, one only has to think of sacramentos stats dudes making that presentation in favor of drafting nick stauskas to understand in how many ways this sort of thing can go horribly wrong
the most interesting thing to me is to what extent its very hard to figure out how good an individual player is because he exists within the context of a team which is comprised of not just other players but also a includes a coaching scheme, feel like this is super fundamental and very underrated by numbers ppl who are maybe too influenced by the example of baseball which is essentially a series of one on one matchups, im not sure that analytics will ever fully be able to control for team which is p cool imo
― lag∞n, Friday, 27 February 2015 16:42 (nine years ago) link
lagoon otm, like analytics aren't THE tool, they're A tool, they can be incorrectly deployed (sacramento, potentially philly). the constantly used case study for hoops analytics success is the houston rockets but that model obviously doesn't work without its centerpiece player, harden, and morey has said as much.
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 27 February 2015 16:51 (nine years ago) link
i think it's useful to remind ourselves that "analytics" is not this one monolithic thing and no one to my knowledge is presenting or pursuing a unified theory of ball. it strikes me as very ignorant to deny that analytics has any purpose esp. in the realm of suggesting answers to more focused questions (to take a very simple example "where are the most efficient places to shoot from on the floor?")
― call all destroyer, Friday, 27 February 2015 18:07 (nine years ago) link
I hate this game. /hopsoffbandwagon
― Godsleee You Black Emperor (Leee), Friday, 27 February 2015 18:18 (nine years ago) link
imo, analytics should be used as a corrective to judgment, not as the basis for judgment.
iow, if you think that player X has a certain skill set, then analytics can give you hard numbers to put against that skill set. if the numbers don't agree with your basic impression, you need to go back and rethink your judgment. but if you base your judgment solely on the numbers, then there's nothing you can use to correct whatever the numbers tell you.
― Aimless, Friday, 27 February 2015 18:20 (nine years ago) link
pacers uniform league pass alert
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-4QhUVVIAAyPML.jpg:large
― moullet, Saturday, 28 February 2015 00:26 (nine years ago) link
http://www.nba.com/bulls/90s-night
― Allen (etaeoe), Saturday, 28 February 2015 00:28 (nine years ago) link
James recorded 40 points, five rebounds and five assists in a game for the 41st time in his career, breaking a tie with Elgin Baylor for fourth most such games in NBA history. According to the Elias Sports Bureau, the three players ahead of James are Oscar Robertson (71), Michael Jordan (62) and Wilt Chamberlain (61).
― moullet, Saturday, 28 February 2015 00:53 (nine years ago) link
lol nice xp
― lag∞n, Saturday, 28 February 2015 01:21 (nine years ago) link
keep seeing headlines abt rose on 4-6 week rehab schedule but he's having the mensicus removed so what are the chances that he's going to be able to play productively again? my dad had his meniscus removed in the 80s and if he pivots wrong his knee just kind of pops open, so my only pt of ref is informing a much more difficult road back to balling
― pursuit of happiness (art), Saturday, 28 February 2015 01:30 (nine years ago) link
Depends how bad it is. Fully removed or just the damaged portion removed. I've had damaged meniscus removal and was playing within 6 weeks and have felt nothing since.
― Steph def def (Spottie), Saturday, 28 February 2015 01:32 (nine years ago) link
wade had his meniscus removed when he was like in college and had a hof pro career but says he regrets it now. rose could *theoretically* be better than he's been for awhile w/o it but the drop-off as he ages is steeper
― Clay, Saturday, 28 February 2015 01:34 (nine years ago) link