Rahm Emanuel: C/D? (probably going to be a Chicago politics complaint thread too)

Perhaps. Do you know any I can contact?

I know several! Just one Rahm though.

I only know one:
http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/darth/images/3/3c/CHEWIE.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width/391?cb=20080623000509

A couple coworkers used to call me Chuy so you kind of already know a Chuy.

I would not vote for you. Well maybe if you brought back the true Lincoln bus.

Oh I would, believe that.

^ Guy named Chuy, only knows how to say "Raaaahhhhhmn."

xp

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-td-ceXIAU6Hee.png

way to go Chi, now get the ratbastard out

popcorn.gif

It's time for aldermaniacs
They're crooked to the max
So just sit back and relax
Increment financing comma tax
We're aldermaniacs!

― from batman to balloon dog (carl agatha), Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:58 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

somehow missed this before, lolling @ "Increment financing comma tax"

Thank you. That was my favorite part.

Interesting off the record stuff from aldertrack yesterday:

The one thing we know for sure is that the Chicago City Council will never be the same. Nineteen runoffs, seven that came very close to a runoff and one incumbent knocked off outright means a lot of potential seat changes. A tightly contested mayoral race also means those 19 remaining contested ward races will get a whole new level of attention from voters and donors.

Today, the Aldertrack team spoke to dozens of consultants, alderman, candidates and activists in an effort to understand the new playing field. Almost all of those conversations were off the record because all of these people still have something at stake for the April 7 runoff. This report is a digest of what we learned today.

Mayoral
Almost uniformly, our sources say Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s path to a runoff victory is still unclear, but he has an apparatus that can execute well and ready access to plenty of money to keep the gears turning. Jesus “Chuy” Garcia has a path to victory, our sources say, but he lacks enough talented staff to execute a strategy and raise (and find) the money needed to win. There will be lots of national interest from union and progressive groups that will want to assist Garcia’s campaign, but whether or not they will be able to mesh with his existing team has to be resolved.

The most important endorsements to secure will be Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, Willie Wilson and Bob Fioretti, in that order. Preckwinkle will either endorse Garcia or do nothing for either candidate. Wilson and Fioretti both told Fran Spielman last night that they would support Garcia, but Wilson’s campaign told us this morning they are still working on details on exactly what sort of work for Garcia an endorsement would mean. The devil will be in the details.

Not lost on anyone is that the runoff election is two days after Easter, when plenty of African American voters will listen to a sermon at church. Willie Wilson is better poised than anyone to ensure the “right” message is delivered.

We’re told the two mayoral campaigns started working on rounding up aldermanic candidate support late last night; calls started up again well before breakfast to winning alderman and runoff candidates across the city. Not surprisingly, Emanuel and Garcia are doing everything they can to set their teams in the wards.

The Council
The biggest change, however, is that the mayor runoff, and the sheer volume of aldermanic runoffs puts everything in flux. Since Richard M. Daley’s election in 1989, Chicago government has thrived on stability. That stability is is threatened now, as nobody is quite sure who will be the man at the top. Committee chairmanships, major city projects and sacred cows are all up for grabs as horse trading is just beginning and is likely to continue until the bitter end.

Our sources tell us that while big corporate CEOs have strongly backed Rahm in the past, medium-sized and smaller business leaders–the majority of the business taxpayers in Chicago–see no benefit to sticking their neck out for either mayoral candidate. A better investment, they believe, is to play in the 19 Council runoffs to find leaders who will protect their interests in what is sure to be a chaotic next four years in Chicago government.

Incumbents heading into a runoff will be pressed hard to align with Emanuel, we’re told, but there’s little incentive to do so, since yesterday’s results show little connection between supporting a mayor candidate and an aldermanic candidate. Endorsements, whether they come from aldermen, congressmen or presidents, have much less impact than they did in the past, it seems. So aligning ward organizations with one mayoral campaign or another will have less to do with getting votes than ensuring a place at the table after the election.

Progressive groups are also salivating at the chance to create an actual, effective Progressive Caucus in the Council. Between the wins progressives expect in the runoffs, sitting Progressive Caucus members and aldermen they would hope to peel off from the sort-of-progressive Paul Douglas Caucus, as many as 19 members of the Council could become Progressive Caucus members. A group that sizable would force any mayor–or Ald. Ed Burke–to negotiate with them on every major issue. All of a sudden, the Chicago City Council might actually behave like a typical legislative body.

Very interesting. Thank you!

rahm should try to give himself emergency powers during the run off like he tried to do a couple years ago when the g8 came to town

exciting times! maybe i should come down and help campaign for chuy, but i worry that even though i'm from chicago i'll feel like an interloper.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/02/27/us/27chicago-callout.html?_r=1

New York Times reporters covering the Chicago mayoral race would like to hear from Chicago residents about their experiences living in the city during Mr. Emanuel’s tenure. Your comments may be published, but your contact information will not. A reporter or editor may follow up with you to learn more about your story.

Uh no. Go away nytimes, we'll handle this.

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2015/03/01/wilson-ill-vote-for-garcia-but-may-endorse-emanuel/

What a strange dude. Kind of wish I had voted for him.

hahahaha what a joke

http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150302/rogers-park/rahm-overtakes-chuy-49th-ward-after-mail-in-ballots-counted

Interesting that it was so close up there. A bellwether ward?

http://www.trbimg.com/img-54ee9151/turbine/chi-elect25rahmworker-ct0027229128-20150225/750/750x422

http://www.trbimg.com/img-54ee666b/turbine/chi-rahm-today-ct0027228971-20150225/750/750x422

Okay those are making me LOL.

Candidates on transpo issues. http://www.redeyechicago.com/news/redeye-chicago-mayoral-candidates-on-transit-20150302-story.html

Disappointed in Garcia's comment on the Ashland BRT. Of course it is going to limit the number of car lanes, that's the whole point of having a dedicated bus lane. If you don't have a dedicated lane or have an excessive number of left hand turns, BRT won't work. Also wish he would give more consideration to the Belmont flyover instead of dismissing outright. I don't think it should be a top priority over something like extending the red line or fixing existing slow zones, but don't dismiss it entirely.

I wish either of them would fire Claypool, but Rahm won't, and it doesn't look like Garcia would either.

Rahm's posture in that first photo reminds me of a Bruce Eric Kaplan cartoon.

Like this one:
http://imgc.allpostersimages.com/images/P-473-488-90/66/6609/4Y3E100Z/posters/bruce-eric-kaplan-you-tested-positive-for-being-negative-new-yorker-cartoon.jpg

first photo has got me picturing a looney tunes cartoon where rahm is walking along and falls down a rabbit hole

a man can dream

I was thinking SIX MORE WEEKS OF RUNOFF, AMIRITE?

based on that map it looks like chi won much of albany park, right?

i mean, chuy

I know very little about economics, but from all I've read over the past several days, it all looks very dire. Just look at the numbers:

• $550 million due to police and fire pension, $688 million due to CPS
• $20 billion overall in unfunded pensions (worst of any large city)
• Unless renegotiated, $58 million due to agreements after this latest bond downgrade
• Illinois has the lowest credit rating of all 50 states
• Chicago hast the worst credit rating of any major city outside of Detroit
• $210 million less in state funding coming to Chicago if the Rauner budget is implemented

Not saying that one candidate has better ideas than the other, just that both are doomed to fail. Sadly, a potential measure of success will be who can kick the bucket further down the road to avoid an immediate downfall.

Or who can fail the least!

My pet peeve is that Boeing and other similar-sized companies pay no tax here, that'd be a start.

Hell yeah. Also end tax exemptions for religious organizations. Fuck, the suburban mega churches could probably get Illinois out of the hole on tax revenue alone. Make Joel Osteen pony up.

At the city level, no potential mayor is going to say tax churches if they want to ever get re-elected.

I know. I'm just dreaming because I have no idea how to fix this shit.

Two words: Trump Casino.

Arguments against a casino are that gambling revenue has been declining for years all across the country. I'm sure a large percentage of your area gamblers would still rather hop on a free/cheap shuttle to Indiana to gamble rather than deal with coming into downtown Chicago.

Hell yeah. Also end tax exemptions for religious organizations. Fuck, the suburban mega churches could probably get Illinois out of the hole on tax revenue alone. Make Joel Osteen pony up.

― from batman to balloon dog (carl agatha), Tuesday, March 3, 2015 10:29 AM (41 minutes ago) Bookmark

hell yeah to both of these ideas
joel osteen is one of the slimiest people i have ever laid eyes on

No we're fucked. The stupid governor built his campaign on the threat of corporations moving elsewhere if Illinois doesn't give them whatever they want. Corporations have no loyalty whatsoever to American heritage or culture, no loyalty to the Midwest. Look what they did to Detroit without remorse.

Then they go and re-locate to some utterly unsustainable place. We need a political culture that is more militant in criticizing corporations and their lack of social responsibility.

http://www.ibtimes.com/rahm-emanuel-runoff-chicago-mayor-tied-lobbyist-citys-red-light-camera-firm-review-1833780

The red light cameras were such dirty business I don't care if they're all removed.

It needs reforming and it certainly deserves to be scrutinized because of all the corruption. But I'm biased and 100% ok with it being purely revenue generating. I'd put one at every stop light in the city if I could.

It irritates me when every article that criticizes the safety claims links to that same flawed tribune investigation that looked at the raw number of crashes rather than the severity of the injuries as the result of t-bone crashes vs rear end collisions.

Having to cross a 6-way intersection every day makes me kind of crabby about the whole thing.

i've seen more people sail through red lights in the last 4 months than i have in my entire memory -- like at least 6 or 7
not like sneak through at the last sec during the yellow (that's normal) -- i mean didn't slow down at all after looking to see if anyone was coming from the other directions sailed right through

sure those people are assholes but it makes me worried about the general breakdown of polite society when people stop obeying traffic signals
it's like just generally a bad sign

Yeah that's my take too -- if someone wantonly flies through, uncaring who they might hurt/kill in the process, you think they give a shit about a $200 fine enough to change their behavior? People drive drunk, without licenses and/or insurance and all the regulation in the world doesn't stop them. That's why I don't like the things: their inception was corrupt to begin with, they ticket innocents, and since they can't motivate better behavior they're just a revenue generator, not a safety enhancement.

I say this as a daily bike commuter (only one day off this winter so far) who consistently sees new and innovative shitty road behavior almost every day. (But I run stop signs and lights too, if no one's coming.)

But as I mentioned, contrary to the Tribune's reporting, they have been shown to reduce the severity of crashes, even if the actual number of rear end collisions increase. FHWA study: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/05049/

I wonder if there's anything to show that the cameras have been placed at intersections with a high likelihood of right angle crashes as well as the other factors recommended in the conclusions.

Related: Garcia updated his transportation platform to actually mention bikes and pedestrians. When he originally released it last Monday, there was no mention at all. Looks like he got some backlash from that and tacked a paragraph onto the end. http://www.chicagoforchuy.com/issues/safe-and-reliable-transportation

xpost. That would be the compromise. I think it would also make sense to increase the yellow light time at intersections that need it too. It's kind of crazy that the same 3 second standard is used regardless of the distance that needs to be covered in the intersection. But I'm not sure that there can be variable yellow light times in the system, it's an all or nothing setting, if I recall correctly reading somewhere.

A camera every red light is just my little retribution dream. Totally unrealistic, but it would make me feel so good when I almost become a hood ornament that the asshole that did it would be $100 poorer.

I voted for Chuy, and I'll do it again, but I can't imagine how a vote for either of them would affect my life in any meaningful way. Thinking about other Chicagoans.

that's what voting is about -- good for everyone, not just you!