The Great ILX Gun Control Debate

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3246 of them)

also "epidemic" 1= "endemic"

"Go pet your dog" is the name of my dog (DJP), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:01 (nine years ago) link

aimless, that's correct. to claim an epidemic we'd have to see either (or both) a marked increase in the incidence of campus rape over previous eras, or a rate of campus rape significantly greater than the incidence of rape off campus. there's not good evidence for either of these things, despite the frequent citing of some very flawed surveys done a number of years ago. there have been a ton of good articles on this in e.g. the chronicle of higher education.

"endemic" is something i'd agree with (the bar is certainly lower), but again, there's not convincing evidence that rape is any /more/ endemic on campus than off, at least among the 18-25 age group.

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:04 (nine years ago) link

I don't think we need to argue about how much rape is going on to agree that it happens and that putting guns in the hands of college students is dumb.

I guess if you think all rapes and murders are of the "criminal jumps out of the bushes, assaults person who happens to be walking by" variety, then in that situation having a gun might have a small bit of utility. But even then, probably not.

mh, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:06 (nine years ago) link

.. I don't think introducing terms into a discussion so that you can dismiss them as overreach is a sign of someone entering a conversation in good faith

"Go pet your dog" is the name of my dog (DJP), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:06 (nine years ago) link

btw here's a survey of some of the issues around data about rapes on campus:

http://chronicle.com/article/Behind-the-Statistics-on/151089/

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:06 (nine years ago) link

so basically it's an argument that relies on people who think there's "real rape" out there and it's of the stranger assault variety

mh, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:07 (nine years ago) link

.. I don't think introducing terms into a discussion so that you can dismiss them as overreach is a sign of someone entering a conversation in good faith

― "Go pet your dog" is the name of my dog (DJP), Wednesday, February 18, 2015 2:06 PM (12 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

to whom is this addressed?

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:07 (nine years ago) link

To you.

"Go pet your dog" is the name of my dog (DJP), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:07 (nine years ago) link

"the best rape prevention program is armed women" has been a gun-nut jpg slogan for my whole adult life; i'm surprised it took this long for something quasi-real to come out of it

goole, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:08 (nine years ago) link

i do think it matters whether we define it as an "epidemic" because that inevitably colors how we handle the problem through policy and otherwise. for example the dep't of education's "dear colleague" letter, which has caused many colleges to start adjudicating rapes in a way that many people (victims and those accused) have taken issue with, was in large part motivated by the perception of an "epidemic" or surge in campus rapes.

but in any case yeah guns won't help alleviate campus rape. that's why i referred to those advocating for guns on campus as essentially 'trolling' in their newfound concern for campus rape.

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:09 (nine years ago) link

No one in this conversation called it an epidemic so I don't see why you need to make an argument against a position no one here has taken.

"Go pet your dog" is the name of my dog (DJP), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:10 (nine years ago) link

context for dep't of education thing: http://chronicle.com/article/Campus-Is-a-Poor-Court-for/134770/

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:10 (nine years ago) link

No one in this conversation called it an epidemic so I don't see why you need to make an argument against a position no one here has taken.

― "Go pet your dog" is the name of my dog (DJP), Wednesday, February 18, 2015 2:10 PM (11 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

you're right, sorry

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:11 (nine years ago) link

i guess i was doing some trolling of my own. this is a conversation i've been having with folks not-on-ILX for a while, so i guess i kind of imported that context here in my mind.

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:12 (nine years ago) link

"women must be armed to prevent rapes" is once again putting the onus on women to fight off rapes rather than, ya know, punishing and preventing rapists from committing rape

Nhex, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:16 (nine years ago) link

Yeah, I would like to drop that conversational byway. It's mostly an artifact of people coming around to acknowledging non-stranger rape is real, and rather than admitting it's been happening all along, they have to make some amazing claim that it suddenly came into existence in order to invalidate their past inaction.

On the other hand, most people who shoot others do shoot people they know.

mh, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:17 (nine years ago) link

xpost

true, but i guess the advocates would argue that it's on a continuum with the sort of women's self-defense training that's pretty common on campus and doesn't obviate the need to reduce rapes through prevention/prosecution.

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:18 (nine years ago) link

multi-xps

I see that "epidemic" does not occur anywhere in the NYT article.

I will admit I have no especially well-developed ideas about rape on campus, but it doesn't take much thought to observe that campuses have high concentrations of 18-25 year old women, which is a fairly vulnerable cohort for rape, including both assault rape and acquaintance rape.

I expect that dealing with those two different categories would require two different strategies, but greatly multiplying the number of guns on campus seems like a policy that is particularly ill-suited to addressing acquaintance rapes, and a pretty damn poor way to reduce assault rapes, too.

Aimless, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:31 (nine years ago) link

nb: not having any grip on the preferred jargon for what I am calling acquaintance and assault rape, I simply used the terms that fell to hand. feel free to flay me for this indiscretion.

Aimless, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:37 (nine years ago) link

there's not a lot of agreement about what the "typical" campus rape looks like. there are some high-profile folks who advance the theory that most campus rapes come from serial offenders who are effectively sociopaths or worse, but many others have strongly challenged this idea. i think the alternative idea--that "good" men commit rape, because of their (likely alcohol-aided) disregard for boundaries--is particularly unsettling.

and yeah like you i really have no idea what the reality is. i think there's a big move afoot for better-funded and more carefully-designed research on this very subject, so maybe in a few years we'll have a better sense of what goes on and thus how it might best be prevented and dealt with.

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:42 (nine years ago) link

but yeah i doubt the answer will be "guns"

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:43 (nine years ago) link

I find that the questions best answered by "guns" are along the lines of "what do I need if I want to shoot somebody"

"Go pet your dog" is the name of my dog (DJP), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:46 (nine years ago) link

"What is the most fun way of making a hole in something from 20 feet away"

mh, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:47 (nine years ago) link

you guys should write a jeopardy category

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 20:49 (nine years ago) link

but it doesn't take much thought to observe that campuses have high concentrations of 18-25 year old women, which is a fairly vulnerable cohort for rape, including both assault rape and acquaintance rape white men in an environment where they can feel reasonable certainty that their actions will go unpunished, which are all indicators for a high occurrence of sexual assault.

Also having said that iirc the incidence of rape is actually higher among women who don't go to college though, so....

Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 21:06 (nine years ago) link

I like to keep my personal career talk to 77, but you are very near the mark xp

mh, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 21:06 (nine years ago) link

orbit I'm curious if there's some statistical reason you call out white men specifically there

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 21:15 (nine years ago) link

or is that just a "white = more likely to get away with it" type of thing

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 21:16 (nine years ago) link

Specifically because it was the very first point at my source: "Sex offenders are overwhelmingly white males. Nearly 99% of sex offenders in single-victim incidents were male and 6 in 10 were white (Greenfeld, 1997)."

http://sapac.umich.edu/article/196

Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 21:18 (nine years ago) link

huh. weird.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 21:20 (nine years ago) link

"Sex offenders are overwhelmingly white males. Nearly 99% of sex offenders in single-victim incidents were male and 6 in 10 were white (Greenfeld, 1997)."

http://sapac.umich.edu/article/196

― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 21:18 (10 minutes ago)

this statistic would suggest a large cohort of white american men would contain fewer sex offenders than cohorts american men other races?

no love deb weep (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 21:36 (nine years ago) link

7 in 10 men are white, I believe, so... inconclusive

mh, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 22:22 (nine years ago) link

also, at least 9 in 10 white men are men.

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 22:22 (nine years ago) link

eh shove off, I actually looked that up for north america

mh, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 22:23 (nine years ago) link

i wasn't making fun of you, just of statistics

I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 22:38 (nine years ago) link

:)

mh, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 22:45 (nine years ago) link

Specifically because it was the very first point at my source: "Sex offenders are overwhelmingly white males. Nearly 99% of sex offenders in single-victim incidents were male and 6 in 10 were white (Greenfeld, 1997)."

http://sapac.umich.edu/article/196

― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, February

considering 77% of americans are white, 60% is pretty good. tho as shakey points out part of that could be due to who actually gets charged for sexual assault

k3vin k., Thursday, 19 February 2015 00:15 (nine years ago) link

actually check that 62.6% of americans are non-hispanic white

k3vin k., Thursday, 19 February 2015 00:16 (nine years ago) link

"the best rape prevention program is armed women" has been a gun-nut jpg slogan for my whole adult life; i'm surprised it took this long for something quasi-real to come out of it

― goole, Wednesday, February 18, 2015 2:08 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

man the town listserv was all about this a few days ago re: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2015/SB0116.html

gbx, Thursday, 19 February 2015 00:18 (nine years ago) link

nh loves their guns man

k3vin k., Thursday, 19 February 2015 00:20 (nine years ago) link

People in the Midwest don't understand the redneckery of rural northeast, generally. My recent coworker acquaintance is from rural Maine and I have a knowing eyebrow-raise in our interactions.

mh, Thursday, 19 February 2015 03:59 (nine years ago) link

one month passes...

Wow---Currington comes off like a wuss, but he's not nearly as successful as McGraw (who might still get Dixie Chicked, to some extent)(we'll see what the fading Duck Dynasty Daddy has to say; ditto Kid Rock, Hank Jr., Ted Nugent)
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/tim-mcgraws-sandy-hook-show-sparks-controversy-billy-currington-bails-20150417

dow, Friday, 17 April 2015 19:43 (nine years ago) link

I have to think at some point that shouting about your right to automatic rifles at the expense of a pile of dead children would create an image problem for you.

DJP, Friday, 17 April 2015 19:51 (nine years ago) link

you would think so, and yet...

casual male (will), Friday, 17 April 2015 20:42 (nine years ago) link

(we just enjoyed a 78,000+ strong NRA convention here last weekend)

casual male (will), Friday, 17 April 2015 20:45 (nine years ago) link

"enjoyed"

casual male (will), Friday, 17 April 2015 20:45 (nine years ago) link

two months pass...

A generally forgotten '90s episode recalled at the end of this piece by ILE fave Dennis Perrin:

Nothing proved this awesome power of gun cult batshittery more than the controversy in the mid-90s, when ex-President George H. W. Bush resigned from the NRA and published a letter attacking the NRA. The language in Bush Sr.’s letter may seem mild to us today, but back then, this is about as close to raw outrage as a blue-blooded elder statesman gets:... (text follows)

https://pando.com/2015/06/26/brief-history-american-gun-nuts/5b63d36f4248427552398e4d08fe314a0851f942/

skateboards are the new combover (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 July 2015 19:05 (eight years ago) link

http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/S-F-killing-sparks-national-outrage-likely-6366684.php

# of times the word 'immigration' appears: 10
# of times the word 'gun' appears: 0

a silly gif of awkward larping (Sparkle Motion), Sunday, 5 July 2015 03:52 (eight years ago) link

one month passes...

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.