please vote and try to force a runoffplease?― groundless round (La Lechera), Thursday, February 12, 2015 9:30 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― groundless round (La Lechera), Thursday, February 12, 2015 9:30 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
You're right. I'm just intrigued enough with Garcia to want to know more that an additional two months of campaigning would probably bring out. I'm not sure I would vote for him over Rahm in April, but a run off would be better for everyone. Well except for Rahm, but he'll get over it.
― Jeff, Saturday, 14 February 2015 18:13 (nine years ago) link
He'll get over it alright. I heard a story about the Chicago superpac on the radio the other day and they are all about the sleazy mailers -- that's totally a Rahm tactic.
― groundless round (La Lechera), Saturday, 14 February 2015 23:30 (nine years ago) link
Jeff! Chuy is a marathoner! I just learned this and thought you might find that interesting. He has completed ~three~ marathons, apparently.
― groundless round (La Lechera), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 00:07 (nine years ago) link
Yeah, I saw that. Rahm is just a stupid triathlete. Screw triathletes.
― Jeff, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 00:15 (nine years ago) link
Anyway, mailed my ballot today, voting for Garcia. but I will be very surprised if rahm doesn't get 50%.
― Jeff, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 00:16 (nine years ago) link
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20150218/BLOGS02/150219820/city-transit-hospitals-could-be-targeted-in-rauners-first-budget
If this passes, the RTA cut is going to suck.
― Jeff, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 16:50 (nine years ago) link
"For transit, the Regional Transportation Authority would get a roughly $110 million cut, other sources say. Half or a bit more would come from the Chicago Transit Authority, the rest from Metra and Pace. The CTA has an overall operating budget of about $1 billlion, so something is going to pinch."
― Jeff, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 19:28 (nine years ago) link
does the red line still run all night?
― I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 19:32 (nine years ago) link
Yah
― Jeff, Wednesday, 18 February 2015 19:37 (nine years ago) link
i can see that being a victim of the cuts :(
― I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2015 19:46 (nine years ago) link
Moving back in a month, y'all are getting me a little worried.
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Saturday, 21 February 2015 16:55 (nine years ago) link
http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/alderman-race-elections-2015-aldermania-city-council/Content?oid=16577750
The 11th ward favorite, DALEY Thompson, is so smarmy I can't handle it.
― dan m, Saturday, 21 February 2015 18:30 (nine years ago) link
I'd like to run for alderman one day, but I'm sure I have an offensive tweet or ilx post somewhere that would do me in. But my ward would have the best crosswalks in all the land.
― Jeff, Saturday, 21 February 2015 19:51 (nine years ago) link
you could take over for ameya pawar when he becomes mayor, his office is right next to half acre so there's half your demographic right there
― gr8080, Sunday, 22 February 2015 18:55 (nine years ago) link
I would totally vote Pawar for mayor if he's able to bring back the Lincoln bus.
I wonder if Waguespack will ever run. He's be rumored to have interest, seems like he'd be ready to go in 2019. From the progressive Caucasus alderman, seems like he'd be a much stronger candidate than Fioretti is this year.
― Jeff, Sunday, 22 February 2015 19:43 (nine years ago) link
Waguesp@ck is under attack by the Rahm-fueled superpac acc to the radio interview I heard from the guy who followed the campaign $$
― groundless round (La Lechera), Sunday, 22 February 2015 19:50 (nine years ago) link
Yes, including funding his opponent. Which is still find bizarre, because she has absolutely zero chance of winning. Wags is too popular in this ward. I'd be surprised if he got any less than 75% of the vote.
― Jeff, Sunday, 22 February 2015 21:10 (nine years ago) link
http://www.reddit.com/r/chicago/comments/2wr8m8/im_bob_fioretti_candidate_for_mayor_ama_about_my/
Read Bob copy and paste stuff off his website to answer questions.
― Jeff, Sunday, 22 February 2015 21:11 (nine years ago) link
Classic Rahm. So predictable!!
― groundless round (La Lechera), Sunday, 22 February 2015 21:16 (nine years ago) link
Lots of good links in today's aldertrack email: http://eepurl.com/be8r3f
― Jeff, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 16:00 (nine years ago) link
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/24/chicago-police-detain-americans-black-site?CMP=share_btn_tw
― global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 16:26 (nine years ago) link
Whoa.
― from batman to balloon dog (carl agatha), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 16:32 (nine years ago) link
what? how does the guardian get this sort of scoop i wonder
― groundless round (La Lechera), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 16:40 (nine years ago) link
idk, from the article it seems like all this information was already really out there. It's just that the guardian gives enough of a shit to publish it?
― Modern French Music from Failure to Boulez (askance johnson), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 16:57 (nine years ago) link
like i genuinely wonder -- not being flippantand this is published on mayoral election day?!
― groundless round (La Lechera), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 17:25 (nine years ago) link
Looks like the author has published several stories on police abuse in the city and even connections to Gitmo.
― dan m, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 17:40 (nine years ago) link
wow, I'm pretty speechless.
― ƋППṍӮɨ∏ğڵșěᶉᶇдM℮ (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 17:58 (nine years ago) link
Or they are far enough removed from any political consequences.
― from batman to balloon dog (carl agatha), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 18:31 (nine years ago) link
http://baytechlabel.com/photos/7148_small.jpg
― from batman to balloon dog (carl agatha), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 18:32 (nine years ago) link
Our polling place is on our block! That's never happened before. Also, I was the only voter there.
― dan m, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 18:47 (nine years ago) link
So, my ward was apparently not voting on the elected schoolboard question, but most other wards seem to be doing so. Anyone know why that is?
― dan m, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 18:58 (nine years ago) link
Also related to the CPD article, a connection between the CPD and Guantanamo:
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/18/american-police-brutality-chicago-guantanamo
― bit of a singles monster (Eazy), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 19:12 (nine years ago) link
The elected school board question was only on the ballot in 37 wards. It's only a referendum though, so basically meaningless.
― Jeff, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 19:25 (nine years ago) link
gets ppl out
― groundless round (La Lechera), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 19:30 (nine years ago) link
Sends a message, too.
― from batman to balloon dog (carl agatha), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 20:11 (nine years ago) link
So I'm guessing the 11th ward machine kept that one off our ballots?
― dan m, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 20:35 (nine years ago) link
xpost
Eh, I'm not convinced that if a percentage of the 30% of people that actually vote from the 37 wards is much of a message.
Even though I voted yes, I'm not sure it's the best idea. Or at least it wouldn't be any better or worse than an appointed board. I think it's a good idea in theory, but the reality is that certain people and groups will be able to maintain control over who runs and most likely who wins. Perhaps I'm just being too cynical.
― Jeff, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 20:42 (nine years ago) link
Actually 30% turnout is optimistic. Reading some reports from the polling places, some wards are on track for a 20% turnout.
― Jeff, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 20:44 (nine years ago) link
I'm going to run for school board.
― from batman to balloon dog (carl agatha), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 20:44 (nine years ago) link
I'll make sure you get elected. I have the power.
― Jeff, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 20:45 (nine years ago) link
"aldermanic" is such a fun adjective
― touch of a love-starved cobra (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 20:47 (nine years ago) link
during my lolcollege punk phase I used to dye my hair regularly with aldermanic panic.
― ƋППṍӮɨ∏ğڵșěᶉᶇдM℮ (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 21:44 (nine years ago) link
It's time for aldermaniacsThey're crooked to the maxSo just sit back and relaxIncrement financing comma taxWe're aldermaniacs!
― from batman to balloon dog (carl agatha), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 21:58 (nine years ago) link
About half of precincts reported and rahm at only 45.3%. Go team!
― Modern French Music from Failure to Boulez (askance johnson), Wednesday, 25 February 2015 01:51 (nine years ago) link
[With 68 percent of precincts reporting, Emanuel had 45.5 percent to 34.1 percent for challenger Jesus "Chuy" Garcia. Willie Wilson was running third at 10.3 percent, Robert Fioretti had 7.3 percent and William "Dock" Walls had 2.7 percent, according to unofficial early returns.
to be honest, chuy's doing better than i had feared. but i wonder where those remaining 32% of precincts are.
― I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 February 2015 02:12 (nine years ago) link
it's a good thing wilson didn't fool too many people
― I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 February 2015 02:13 (nine years ago) link
i mean, if 75% of the votes for fioretti/wilson/walls go for garcia—and, crucially, those folks are motivated to turn out for a runoff—rahm might be beatable. at the very least he'd be embarrassed.
I don't think he's beatable. The only thing a run off will cost him is more money.
― Jeff, Wednesday, 25 February 2015 02:26 (nine years ago) link
Idk, if chuy can get 34% now, maybe he can get 50% in april? Also, I think a runoff will force the media to pay a lot of attention, which could increase turnout.
― Modern French Music from Failure to Boulez (askance johnson), Wednesday, 25 February 2015 02:31 (nine years ago) link
Chuy will get more money in a runoff.
― dan m, Wednesday, 25 February 2015 02:41 (nine years ago) link