most of it started probably with the chandler trade. phil at that point genuinely believed the knicks had a playoff roster; if he had simply been trying to tank like he is now, he might have pushed for a real asset like a good pick or like, brandan wright. not shane larkin
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:56 (nine years ago) link
Chandler trade really his only mistake so far but it's a big one
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:19 (nine years ago) link
he can spin calderon off but it prob won't be for that much at this point
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:20 (nine years ago) link
and the melo contract, tho his hands were kind of tied there
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:20 (nine years ago) link
calderon has been soo bad and on the downslide
― Spottie, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:20 (nine years ago) link
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:20 PM (5 seconds ago)
another second round pick perhaps!
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:21 (nine years ago) link
― k3vin k., Tuesday, January 13, 2015 9:20 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I think it was still the right move, Melo's taking a season off and all but who cares
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:24 (nine years ago) link
i don't fault phil for thinking they had a playoff roster and if you believe the rumors that chandler and melo essentially couldn't play together anymore then the decision to trade chandler wasn't horrible
the actual trade he made was poor but it won't hamstring them that much
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:24 (nine years ago) link
i doubt phil had anything to do w/ melo
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:25 (nine years ago) link
he should have tanked from the beginning tho, this is the year for them to do it
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:28 (nine years ago) link
a ton of cap room+ a stacked top 5 + no pick in 2016
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:29 (nine years ago) link
well, Denver's pick I guess but
oh the raptors have that too
from the fucking bargnani trade lol
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:30 (nine years ago) link
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:24 PM (6 minutes ago)
well it's clearly a disastrous deal in hindsight, whether one thinks it was a good deal at the time or not. it's a 5 year near-max for a player who in all likelihood won't be worth that much in a few years, which since they're rebuilding is when they will supposedly start to contend
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:33 (nine years ago) link
i guess with the cap going up it might not be THAT bad but it still isn't great. tho again the options were melo or nothing i guess
still think they could have at least gotten SOMETHING for shumpert. it's not like he's gonna command a huge paycheck after this season, is he?
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:36 (nine years ago) link
shumpert and melo are sins of the previous regime
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:43 (nine years ago) link
they should've had a first for shumpert last year but the previous front office turned it down
the knicks were never not offering melo a contract, that's out of phil's hands
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:44 (nine years ago) link
right i agree about melo
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:46 (nine years ago) link
i guess phil felt that neither JR nor melo would ever be useful players. otherwise if the best you can get for the two of them is a second round pick, why not just roll the dice and hope they re-sign at a reasonable rate?
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:49 (nine years ago) link
I think considering they don't have a 2016 pick keeping melo makes sense. Unless they could have swung a sign and trade or something.
What they do in free agency is really interesting, it's a great class.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:53 (nine years ago) link
it will be interesting if phil picks his spots instead of finding the free agent who is good enough to command max money but bad enough to only command max money from the knicks
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:11 (nine years ago) link
trade melo
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:37 (nine years ago) link
and while we're at it, ban wade
― Aimless, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:39 (nine years ago) link
Brian Robb @CelticsHub 1m1 minute agoCeltics are still trying to deal Austin Rivers, so the guess here is Nate Robinson and a draft pick are coming back in 3-team deal.
B-)
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:43 (nine years ago) link
wonder if phil and jeannie compare stories about how much they hate kobe/melo
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:48 (nine years ago) link
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, January 13, 2015 5:11 PM (35 minutes ago)
(greg monroe)
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:48 (nine years ago) link
:-/
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:53 (nine years ago) link
Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA 26s27 seconds agoBoston is sending Jameer Nelson to Denver for Nate Robinson, source tells Yahoo.
im unclear what the point of this is but
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:55 (nine years ago) link
danny ainge is a goddamn dark mage if he can turn austin rivers into a draft pick
― Clay, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:58 (nine years ago) link
Nelson has an option and Robinson doesn't
― polyphonic, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:58 (nine years ago) link
jameer nelson isn't that good and nate rob is awesome, albeit not necessarily for objective basketball reasons
― i'm tellin you it was kenard (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:59 (nine years ago) link
guess nates gonna get bought out
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:02 (nine years ago) link
denver must be getting a pick or something or else there's no reason to do this
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:03 (nine years ago) link
aw man
― i'm tellin you it was kenard (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:09 (nine years ago) link
Woj sez maybe if Nate gets bought out clips will take him?
― i'm tellin you it was kenard (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:10 (nine years ago) link
― k3vin k., Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:48 PM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:53 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
why don't you believe in greg
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:22 (nine years ago) link
it's a perfect fit
only real issue I can see with it is that this is a bigman heavy draft but mudiay isn't chopped liver
at what point do the knicks start playing defense tho
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:34 (nine years ago) link
okafor or mudiay should help the defense a lot right?
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:35 (nine years ago) link
obviously they'll have all the rookie defense issues
i mean monroe is fine. maybe they will get him at a reasonable price! if i were a knicks fan would i want them to pay greg monroe $60 million for 4 years. i'm not sure.
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:49 (nine years ago) link
I think you were right about a melo-monroe-okafor frontcourt probably being a mess defensively tho
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:52 (nine years ago) link
let's not dismiss the importance of being competent in one area of the game first tho!
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:53 (nine years ago) link
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:52 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
any defense with okafor at center will probably be bad for the first year or two and then great after that regardless of who is around him
maybe this doesn't work for the knicks because of the triangle but if asik goes for half the price of monroe i think i'd rather sign up for that
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:58 (nine years ago) link
oh my assumption was that melo would be the 4 and monroe the 5, so they wouldn't go for okarfor. a melo-monroe-okafor front court would be pretty crowded
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:59 (nine years ago) link
monroe is a weird player since he's a near-7 footer who can neither shoot nor defend the rim. not sure it's wise to be spending much on those kinds of guys. plus going with that frontcourt forces melo, their best and highest-paid player, to play the 3 again where he's less effective
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 January 2015 00:01 (nine years ago) link
their future is weird because they want to win but also they're gonna be drafting a top 3 pick. it's hard to reconcile those two timelines.
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 14 January 2015 00:03 (nine years ago) link