Radiohead - In Rainbows

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1649 of them)

Yeah, I think you're right ciderpress.

three handclaps, Monday, 1 October 2007 00:42 (sixteen years ago) link

ok

W4LTER, Monday, 1 October 2007 00:43 (sixteen years ago) link

So, will the vinyl be just the first group of songs, the songs on CD1? Or will the vinyl have all the songs from CD1 and 2? On the website the photo of the vinyl looks like it's just the first group of songs.

Z S, Monday, 1 October 2007 00:47 (sixteen years ago) link

umm, I'd say record no.1 = cd1 record no.2 = cd2

W4LTER, Monday, 1 October 2007 00:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, with only 10 songs on the actual album I find it hard to believe they'd need two slabs of vinyl. Unless they're going really prog this time.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Monday, 1 October 2007 00:51 (sixteen years ago) link

"Faust Arp" and "Jigsaw..." better not be wussy little segues...

Simon H., Monday, 1 October 2007 00:53 (sixteen years ago) link

So, I guess they're releasing this themselves. This is really, really cool, and has made my night.

Z S, Monday, 1 October 2007 00:54 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.vvvu.ca/dryheeves/images/Prog.jpg
xxpost

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 1 October 2007 00:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Is it worth 80? Everything's too fucking cryptic....

Stevie D, Monday, 1 October 2007 01:00 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.inrainbows.com/Content/12.jpg

Z S, Monday, 1 October 2007 01:05 (sixteen years ago) link

"We've installed Sitemeter on our sleeves."

Andy K, Monday, 1 October 2007 01:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Hahahaha someone reads one too many blogs. :)

three handclaps, Monday, 1 October 2007 01:08 (sixteen years ago) link

In 2001, maybe.

Andy K, Monday, 1 October 2007 01:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Fair enough.

three handclaps, Monday, 1 October 2007 01:11 (sixteen years ago) link

this is pretty awesome. they sure did take their damn time, though. can't decide whether to take the $80 plunge - someone upthread said it - may as well take it so i'm not kicking myself later. i'd be bummmed though if it's not a great collection of songs.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 1 October 2007 01:39 (sixteen years ago) link

wow. wow. wow.

i like the whole notion of a 10-day window. it's like the polar opposite of kanye/50, let alone detox/cuban link II...10 days is enough to get the word out to virtually everyone who cares, but not enough time to build up unrealistic expectations. and no leaks? radiohead are geniuses.

i admit i'm choosing the, uh, least expensive option. as i can't afford $81, i'll buy the proper lp or cd version once it's out.

mike a, Monday, 1 October 2007 02:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Ouch - expensive - Good for them for working outside the established industry - geez I hope they worked hard and it ends up being a great listen - the concert boots with new songs sound great - so I'm all for it ...

BlackIronPrison, Monday, 1 October 2007 03:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I will now make a prediction:

After a flurry of observations regarding new elements never before heard, this will sound like a Radiohead record.

Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 1 October 2007 03:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Genius idea.

Tape Store, Monday, 1 October 2007 04:06 (sixteen years ago) link

so i can download this for a cent if i want?

latebloomer, Monday, 1 October 2007 04:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Yep.

Melissa W, Monday, 1 October 2007 04:11 (sixteen years ago) link

OMG this is so awesome I don't know what to say.

Roz, Monday, 1 October 2007 04:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Also while forty pounds is way out of my budget, I now have something to say when someone asks what I want for my birthday. WOOT.

Roz, Monday, 1 October 2007 04:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I almost wonder if the whole idea of the set is pre-Xmas gift.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 1 October 2007 04:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i am a radiohead fan, & have visited the site, & i am looking forward to this album, but i do not understand what any of you are saying. can any of you explain what is going on to me as you might to a 12 year old brother in law (ie a 12 year old but one whom you had respect for or at least feared the potential consequences of upsetting or misleading).

deeznuts, Monday, 1 October 2007 05:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyone posting anything serious on this thread is on the verge of being banned from the noise board, fyi.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 1 October 2007 05:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Hey there sport! That stupid weird band I seem to like so much? They're releasing some new media files (that we used to call "albums" back in the day) in 10 days! And they didn't start hyping it 8 months ago, which is typically the case, in order for rockstars to swim in their pools made of gold. And We The Fans can decide how much we want to pay for those files, because it's the 21st century and Anarchy's en vogue. So I opted not to pay, because I know I'll be a sucker for the eventual release of said files pressed to disc and smothered in artwork. Now lets forget about this nonsense and get back to Brett Favre.
xpost

Cosmo Vitelli, Monday, 1 October 2007 05:37 (sixteen years ago) link

jaw drops and we only have to wait ten days.

brilliant!

Bee OK, Monday, 1 October 2007 06:00 (sixteen years ago) link

the real question is how will Trent Reznor respond

http://sun3.lib.uci.edu/jariel/atomicblast.jpeg

The Macallan 18 Year, Monday, 1 October 2007 06:41 (sixteen years ago) link

a new chapter in his year zero game surely

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 1 October 2007 06:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyone posting anything serious on this thread is on the verge of being banned from the noise board, fyi.

-- Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, October 1, 2007 5:28 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

uh oh lol

latebloomer, Monday, 1 October 2007 06:58 (sixteen years ago) link

OMG this is so awesome I don't know what to say.

OTM.

Bimble, Monday, 1 October 2007 07:02 (sixteen years ago) link

this is great.
they came up with the best way i've seen to date for beating the leaks and avoiding fans from just downloading the album. this way its pretty much a donation type deal.
they certainly know their audience. i would have supported them and bought a new album but i feel like the majority wouldnt.

wish the free one was 18 tracks though.

gman, Monday, 1 October 2007 07:05 (sixteen years ago) link

wish the free one was 18 tracks though.

they need some incentive to sell the 'discbox' besides vinyl and digital photos that'll be on the internet the day the thing is sent out anyway.

Jordan Sargent, Monday, 1 October 2007 07:07 (sixteen years ago) link

so awesome

Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 1 October 2007 10:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Speak of keeping a secret.

Always interesting even though they haven't been close to their artistic potential since "OK Computer".

Geir Hongro, Monday, 1 October 2007 11:17 (sixteen years ago) link

t/s paying a cent for a new radiohead album because it's not worth any more

vs

just not bothering, and that being my comment.

darraghmac, Monday, 1 October 2007 11:55 (sixteen years ago) link

October 10 prediction:

Skipping 2148 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

Billy Pilgrim, Monday, 1 October 2007 12:11 (sixteen years ago) link

free one?

jed_, Monday, 1 October 2007 12:16 (sixteen years ago) link

October 10 prediction:

The earth opens up and swallows everyone who opted not to pay for their download. "It's up to you" ..!? Radiohead are obviously testing our moral character here.

adamj, Monday, 1 October 2007 12:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I say that a Radiohead album is worth $0.00!!!!

Also, you people who like Radiohead are retards.

King Boy Pato, Monday, 1 October 2007 12:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Billy Pilgrim OTM.

three handclaps, Monday, 1 October 2007 12:38 (sixteen years ago) link

As someone mentioned on another board, I could totally see Radiohead sending out tickets for some special tour to those that bought the discbox while giving two fingers to the $0.00 downloaders.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Monday, 1 October 2007 12:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Or: the more you pay, the longer before the tracks fade out :-)

StanM, Monday, 1 October 2007 12:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Industry types resond:

Adam Benzine of music industry bible 'Music Week' said it will really shake things up in terms of album pricing.

"Radiohead have really put the cat amongst the pigeons with this one," he told NME.COM. "The album will revolutionise the way people think about music. It had already forced people to question how much music is actually worth.

http://www.nme.com/news/radiohead/31470

Cheers industry types!

pisces, Monday, 1 October 2007 12:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Or: the more you pay, the longer before the tracks fade out :-)

This is an incentive!?

Trayce, Monday, 1 October 2007 12:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Coolfer generally OTM, except I think this will shake things up more than he seems to suggest in his post.

http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2007/09/radiohead_album.php

three handclaps, Monday, 1 October 2007 12:53 (sixteen years ago) link

i wonder how much money Waste Products Ltd took last night?

jed_, Monday, 1 October 2007 13:02 (sixteen years ago) link

They are regarded by some music critics as the world's best rock band.


Just so you know...

Mark G, Monday, 1 October 2007 13:04 (sixteen years ago) link

wish the free one was 18 tracks though.

they need some incentive to sell the 'discbox' besides vinyl and digital photos that'll be on the internet the day the thing is sent out anyway.

No, I would guess they need some incentive to charge £40 for the deluxe version rather than the regular version. It says "So Far, it is only available from this website"-- so the idea is that eventually they will ship regular CDs, eh? I would guess this will happen on 12/3, same as when those who ordered the huge package get their shit. That is the release date.

Oct. 10, however, is the leak date: What Radiohead have done is leaked their own album, two months before its physical release -- same as everything else -- but they turned it into an event and a moral decision about whether you should pay for that leak or you should just steal/take it/sample it and maybe buy it later, whatever you want to call it. And they've enticed people to actually give them money for a leak in part by, at this moment, setting up this deluxe product as your only other choice to pay for their music.

scottpl, Monday, 1 October 2007 13:10 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.