why do writers like Matthew Murphy at Pitchfork always review my favorite records and never rate them outside of the 7-7.9 realm?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (62 of them)
you can always work on the assumption that I've spent roughly three minutes (and three units of caring) on the number rating, and roughly 230 minutes (and 230 units of caring) on the text below it.

Same here. I have never agonized over a rating and don't take the decimals seriously at all (they're useful only when you use "X.9" as a way of saying "almost X+1").

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 28 September 2005 21:00 (eighteen years ago) link

dunno scott. just seems like the same old bands get BNM over and over. I agree this conversation is kinda dumb though. i don't know murphys reviews- but why do some writers always get the bnm bands

pure luck?

dunno, Thursday, 29 September 2005 02:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh snap! Hope mrgoodman isn't a Blackalicious fan.

Mr. Murphy done done it again!

Zimmer026 (Zimmer026), Friday, 30 September 2005 12:25 (eighteen years ago) link

I reject Spencer's "suggestion" that we focus more on the rating, purely on the basis that I spend as much time thinking about the rating as I do about what I write. A number is not worth a thousand words, sir. Nor are a thousand words worth a number. Nor am I making a damn bit of sense, so I'm shutting up.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 30 September 2005 12:50 (eighteen years ago) link

"just seems like the same old bands get BNM over and over."

i see a lot of variety on the bnm page. could it be that once a band gets BNM it gets the perception of being "the same old band," even if that's unwarranted? for example, sfa had actually never been BNM until this album. kinda don't see how the game fits into your theory, either. and i'm sure everyone was REALLY tired of cyhsy before that pitchfork review...

marc h. (marc h.), Friday, 30 September 2005 17:03 (eighteen years ago) link

I feel sorry for that Adam Moerder guy who writes for the site. It seems like he always gets stuck with all the crappy mediocre albums that nobody else wanted to bother listening to.

Ross Godfrey (scatter), Saturday, 1 October 2005 01:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Radiohead's Thom Yorke Considering Meeting With Tony Blair

Kati Llewellyn reports:
From Pitchfork's "We Keep Track of Every Move Radiohead Makes" Department:

This morning, you probably went through the "All-Stars or Pumas?" routine, moved on to a 10-minute debate over whether or not shaggy hair really does look best, and finally, sealed the deal with the choice to wear that hideous SpongeBob SquarePants watch. Celebrities, however, have real decisions to make, decisions that can impact everything from Ben Affleck's likeliness of winning another Academy Award (zilch) to the fate of planet Earth. Fortunately for all of us, Thom Yorke holds his stakes in the latter. Or sort of, anyway.

Last May, Yorke made his way to British Parliament as a representative of the Friends of the Earth campaign, in an attempt to get the government involved with decreasing the UK's impact on global warming. Writing in the the Radiohead blog Dead Air Space on Wednesday, Yorke relayed to fans the charity's latest request for his involvement.

Friends of the Earth asked this Radio head if he would meet with Prime Minister Tony Blair at Downing Street to discuss what the goverment "is not doing about climate change." Karma police, arrest this man! But Yorke hasn't made up his mind on whether or not he wants to go.

In a respectably honest confession, Yorke wrote, "i have no intention of being used by spider spin doctors to make it look like we make progress when it is just words. id love to know what you think but i cant ask. youd say oh ther e he goes again interfering and meddling in politics why doesnt he get on with the music and shut up. perhaps because i feel like a hypocrit if dont do anything, and equally feel like a hypocrit if i try getting involved... id love to forget about it like your average Times reader. wed all like it to go away. turn to to the rising sea and say come back later im busy right now."

He closed the entry with a request for decision-making assistance and a good ol' fashioned "politics is poision." We hope the next set of liner notes have an editor. Damn.

Yorke also gave a li'l update on the progress of Radiohead's upcoming album, announcing the titles of two tracks: "Pay Day" and "Burn the (White?) Witch". Since there are bound to be a few more in the works, we'd like to offer the following song titles as a sign of our deep Radiohead love: "Prime Time: A Day in the Life of Tony Blair" and "Googlefight: Blair VS. Bush". Do with them what you will, Mr. Yorke, do with them what you will.


AND YOU PEOPLE TAKE THIS WEBSITE SERIOUSLY!!!!!!!!!

Ian John50n (orion), Saturday, 1 October 2005 03:01 (eighteen years ago) link

it's not that anyone is saying "what pfork says is truth"

it's the fact they they have so much influence over the market
deny all you want, not everyone is ironic, sassy, reading ILM


the point is right now, in music, esp indie music, they have a HUGE influence

this is the problem, not about if we think what they are saying is bible or not

mrgoodman, Saturday, 1 October 2005 05:52 (eighteen years ago) link

hi coolfer

marc h. (marc h.), Saturday, 1 October 2005 15:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Who would you rather see wielding this kind of influence, Mr. Goodman?

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Saturday, 1 October 2005 15:21 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.