soul, what the hell is it anyway?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (64 of them)
Yes Patrick I will take the chance to explain myself, now that I'm on schedule with my ILM reading. There is this idea of soul, a certain blackness that through the years has come to signify Realness, authenticity, the outpouring of lofty feelings. Of which Sam Cooke is a good example. Now maybe that meant something once upon a time, maybe even to a lot of people nowadays but personally it doesn't mean anything to me. It's all shite 80s re-issues to sell more jeans to sell an image of simpler times. Now what I personally find more interesting is the way a band like Autechre who are perceived to be cold machine-shagging bastards somehow suggest something in their music that I would like to call Soul, a sort of mix of the sublime, childhood memories and even the soul of the machines themselves. I dunno I just find that to be more interesting and to me says more about the times we're living in.

Bjut maybe it's just me I think the greatest soul band ever are Kraftwerk and Marvin Gaye bores me stiff (ho!ho!)

Omar, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

omar, truly a european definition of soul. ;)

and so it goes, this generation (embodied by omar) turns its back on an "outdated" form of expressions, just as those to follow us will shun autechre (as some of us do today!) as an excuse to sell jeans (and perhaps they've already been used in commercials already!) and to bring back nostalgia of simpler times. this explanation could certainly be applied to nick drake -- what form of music is imbued with more "meaning" than the singer/songwriter? and yet i view him apart from the v.w. commercial and the reissues and the "renewed interest" and listen to the music and say, "yes, that nick drake was a soulful fellow."

i think some of the other posters are correct in saying that, stripped of its original context and taken as a "concept", "soul" becomes a vague, incredibly subjective and almost pointless signifier. thank God "funk" doesn't correspond with any higher principles!

fred solinger, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

---- truly a european definition of soul. ;) ----

Is it? :) I'm sort of curious why that is? I like yr implication of Autechre losing their soul for a next generation. This will no doubt happen. But really I hope my argument doesn't get reduced to It-sell-jeans-it-loses-its-soul. There is just something about Sam Cooke style soul that is so heavy with preconceived ideas of Great Sentiments, The Right Feeling, etc. and all I can hear is dead meaningless sound, just can't help it.

Omar, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Can't argue with you being bored by Sam Cooke, but surely there are people who like him who aren't a) being fooled by jean peddlers or b) attaching themselves nostalgically to an idea of soul-as-authenticity to fend off the future. I mean... people loved his music before jeans and nostalgia entered the picture, y'know. People loved him when he was alive. Saying "this music bores me because I'm into this other thing that's more exciting and more relevant to where I'm at now" is one thing - why does it have to lead to "this music sucks, it has no intrinsic interest except for nostalgic bores" ?

Patrick, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Well Patrick, that's why i was clever enough to pepper my argument with lotsa "personally"'s and "i think"'s ;) It's obvious people were once moved by Sam Cooke's soul...hell, that might even happen today although I rather listen to my washing machine finish its longest program.

---- "this music sucks, it has no intrinsic interest except for nostalgic bores" ? ----

now I haven't said anything like this? I like nostalgia :)

Omar, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Omar - Gotcha. I need to stop over-reacting about this kind of thing. I'm becoming like Robin is with perceived attacks on the English countryside ;).

Patrick, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

OK, multiple definitions of soul, which means the word stretches a bit, hence arguments between eg me and Fred.

i. a specific moment in black pop music between (approx)mid-50s and mid-70s. Multiple stylistic offshoots, some of which (funk, perhaps) shouldn't be included.

ii. music derivative of that moment, the stylistic conventions arising from that moment. still trace elements in most musical styles today.

iii. that moment reconfigured as something attitudinal rather than musical. So ideas of struggle, authenticity, freedom, emotion, rawness, organicness, liveness, pain...a lot of this stuff is very very bound up with interpretations of blackness. The 80s interpretation of soul as in jeans ads, literally adding colour to the yuppie lifestyle, comes into play here.

iv. 'soul' as a totally abstract concept - the rowland/t&f stuff quoted above. Basically a way of saying "this is good" possibly - but not neccessarily - with some ideas from i., ii. and iii. above mixed in. This version of 'soul' is a discussion-killer, and is also quite close to how I use 'pop', as some abstracted force driving most good music. The choice of 'it has soul'/'it rocks'/'it is pop' can be a way of allying yourself with other discource currents or it can be just personal preference.

(Interesting perhaps to analyse the sentences above - soul is something external, rock is a doing word, pop is something music is or isnt.....)

Tom, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Tom's taxonomy is as super-useful as ever. I think that "pop" and "rock" are in fact more specific than the fourth definition of "soul". But, more importantly, perhaps we can view all three words as in fact invoking a different 'aspect' of the same musical act. Seen from the pov of the listener (i.e. awed by the mysterious "soul") the pov of the musician (gap between audience and artist is narrowed by the act of "rocking out" -- c.f. Lester Bangs on The Stooges) and the 'impartial' pov of the media (If something is 'pop' then that's just another way for saying it is a pure commodity, and thus it is judged on the terms in which society judges commodities -- it is not an act but a recognition of social "popularity").

Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Yes: woolly hats off to Ewing. He should be in Forensics.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 30 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

one year passes...
i am a man and i am 19 years old

jason roberts, Saturday, 15 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

one year passes...
I'm a man too, but I'm not 19 years old.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 17:39 (twenty years ago) link

nine years pass...

This is soul --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxyLU5jHJf0

i guess i'd just rather listen to canned heat? (ian), Saturday, 22 December 2012 01:02 (eleven years ago) link

it's a hamhock in your cornflakes

m0stlyClean, Saturday, 22 December 2012 01:33 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.