Fires in Southern California

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (288 of them)
GWB finally declared it a national emergency, or disaster, or whatever the right term is -- reported on CNBC. So I guess there'll be some sort of federal assistance.

Hurlothrumbo (hurlothrumbo), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:40 (twenty years ago) link

simi valley is burning!

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Monday, 27 October 2003 22:28 (twenty years ago) link

no justice no peace!

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 27 October 2003 22:56 (twenty years ago) link

i heard the reagan library was close to the flames but was saved... unfortunately.

</immature schadenfreude>

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 27 October 2003 22:57 (twenty years ago) link

Rodney King's revenge!

nickn (nickn), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 00:49 (twenty years ago) link

i have a college friend whose house is in simi valley!

the latest news report said oneof the fires started near LA defnitely WAS the work of arsonists!!

Vic, Tuesday, 28 October 2003 01:17 (twenty years ago) link

If any of these arsonists are under age, i'd sure loooooove to be their parents right about now.

"Haha, oh me? I'm doing fine, aside from owing the rest of my income to the state for life."

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 01:39 (twenty years ago) link

About right, though it would be hell to catch them (the baby arsonists), first

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 01:54 (twenty years ago) link

Glad to hear of the forum's SoCal contingency doing okay thus far! Please continue to keep us updated with further developments, you guys. I'm especially intrigued about the fire's possible causants/origins.

Also, thankfully I haven't heard of any big fires in South/Central TX this year. Usually we get a few of them a year, but because we've received so much rainfall this year we've not been in any real danger yet, thankfully.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 02:33 (twenty years ago) link

A quick update -- even hazier today around here and the burnt smell has returned. Reports are that the San Diego fire could get dramatically worse and Chatsworth up in LA is a risk. A couple of friends in San Bernardino County are at this point crossing their fingers and waiting, though they're not in immediate danger.

Good article in the LA Times today with interview bits from Mr. City of Quartz himself, Mike Davis:

No Way Out When Home Is in 'Firebelt'
Steve Lopez

October 28, 2003

With half of Southern California ablaze in a spectacular series of killer infernos, and no end in sight, it's only natural to
want the arsonists tracked down and tied to the nearest tree.

But arson, suspected in at least two fires, isn't the only culprit in all this death and destruction. In part, we're witnessing the
inevitable consequence of insane land management, and generations of public officials rolling over for developers despite
past lessons.

"We keep putting tens of thousands of homes in harm's way," said author Mike Davis.

The UC Irvine history professor's scorching books have assailed Southern California as an apocalyptic theme park,
always courting disaster. In "Ecology of Fear," Chapter 3 is called "The Case for Letting Malibu Burn." It's a history of
California's failure to conduct preventive burns, despite the growth of "firebelt suburb populations" on the edge of
combustible vegetation.

Homeowner groups resist preventive burns because they're risky and leave scars, but then scream for help when fire
rages out of control, Davis argues. The public cost is huge; so is the risk to firefighters.

Davis, of San Diego, watched distraught Scripps Ranch residents await firetrucks as flames approached their
multimillion-dollar homes. This was a huge base of support for smaller government, and for Arnold Schwarzenegger,
Davis said.

"Now all that stands between them and an ash pile is the car tax," which Schwarzenegger promised to cut back, even
though it helps pays for fire protection. . . .

Davis thinks this could grow into California's fire of the century, which he predicted in 1998. "The exponential growth of
housing in foothill firebelts," he wrote in "Ecology of Fear," "increases the likelihood of several simultaneous
conflagrations."

On Monday, Davis said friends had been burned out and relatives were preparing to evacuate, and it's remarkable there
hasn't been more death. He captured the horror and madness in a single sentence:

"We're building homes in places where there's no fire escape at all."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 20:22 (twenty years ago) link

Davis thinks this could grow into California's fire of the century, which he predicted in 1998. "The exponential growth of
housing in foothill firebelts," he wrote in "Ecology of Fear," "increases the likelihood of several simultaneous
conflagrations."

Does Davis really want to be known throughout CA history as the guy that foresaw CA's total destruction? The tone of the article almost makes him sound smug. Almost.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 20:37 (twenty years ago) link

Smug vs. calling it as you see it FITE in this case, Nichole. Would you rather that everyone pretended that everything was happy go lucky all the time? Still, Ibsen/An Enemy of the People to thread.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 20:40 (twenty years ago) link

Davis reminds me of Steve Martin, when he played the garbage commissioner that loses to Homer in the election:

"Oh I'm so happy. I'm not much on speeches but it gives me joy to...leave you in the filth you created. You're screwed, bye."

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 20:46 (twenty years ago) link

Realism is my middle name, Ned. I still say that Davis doesn't have to crow quite so loud. He foresaw the disaster. I get that. Did he actually have useful suggestions for how to handle the problem, now that it's already here?

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 20:50 (twenty years ago) link

"buy me a taco"

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 20:53 (twenty years ago) link

haha, seriously Nichole, what do you propose he do? Do you think SoCal land developers invest a lot of attention into cultural anthopology texts?

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 20:55 (twenty years ago) link

Did he actually have useful suggestions for how to handle the problem, now that it's already here?

Slight x-post with Gygax here:

There seems to be some confusion here -- Davis has made a deserved and notable name for himself over the past fifteen years with a series of books, articles and presentations about the poor state of urban and suburban affairs when it comes to any number of issues in Southern California and Los Angeles in particular. This includes land management, which he has suitably and understandably attacked on many fronts given its current (mis)use. While I cannot claim complete familiarity with all his conclusions I would be very surprised if he did not offer up some general suggestions or at the least pointed out what the problem areas were that needed work. He is a researcher and academic, he is not a politician by trade, and he uses his academic standing to advance his conclusions and beliefs in much the same way that Edward Said, for instance, was able to do in turn with regard to Palestinian issues. I am not trying to say he's a perfect person -- there's a reason I made the Ibsen reference, though others would be able to speak on that point more than I could -- but I am confused as to your immediate and specific annoyance with him given his background and well known public statements.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:02 (twenty years ago) link

I am confused as to your immediate and specific annoyance with him given his background and well known public statements

It's not truly annoyance, though it may come out sounding like that. What I said was more a reaction to the tone of the article---than to the individual, himself. (That was why I'd asked the question about useful suggestions.) As I'm not obviously a CA resident, I'd have no way to know about Davis' high standing and expertise, beforehand.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:10 (twenty years ago) link

Fair enough. I don't read it as smugness at all, I just see it as, "Well, you know, I've been saying this...now that it's here, I'll hope for the best but jeez, guys, does history teach you nothing?" If there had been NO history of fires and fire conditions in the area in the slightest and only Davis had said anything about them, then things would probably be a lot more smug-sounding, I'm sure.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:15 (twenty years ago) link

until they arrested him as the prime arson suspect

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:25 (twenty years ago) link

dunh dunh DUNNNNNH!

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:27 (twenty years ago) link

ASTOUNDING!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:43 (twenty years ago) link

in mr. davis' walkmen at the time of his arrest:

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:45 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.japander.com/japander/images/schwarz7.jpg

Can't we all just get along?

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:46 (twenty years ago) link

It's so smoky outside - everything's blocked out by a yellowy haze - it almost looks like fog

luna (luna.c), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:47 (twenty years ago) link

Can't smell fog, and there's the difference.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:49 (twenty years ago) link

my radio people say more transmitters are falling victim to the fire, grrr public safety issues.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:54 (twenty years ago) link

Well no, the difference is that the world is on fire, and with fog, not so much.

luna (luna.c), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 22:12 (twenty years ago) link

Ned is more or less OTM there with his thumbnail sketch there. Much of Davis' analysis in Ecology Of Fear is in documenting the political and socio-economic disconnect and denial between civic and developer booster propaganda and the actual environmental reality of fire, flood, earthquake, etc. in Southern California. People shouldn't be shocked that Malibu, Rancho Cucamonga, etc. burn periodically because they ALWAYS do - it's the nature of the topography and the local climate. There's no great secret about this. The cities and communities of Southern California have simply chosen to ignore the reality and continue with it's image-management. Questioning the safety of SoCal, is questioning that image, and selling that image has been SoCal's principal business for the past 100 years. The virulence of the attack again Davis' book when it was released only highlights the level of denial that local government and developers (who are often the same thing) have.

Davis quite rightly points out a the class differences in civic services that occurred during the 1993 Malibu fire when the fire trucks rolled to protect the multi-million dollar homes, but did nothing to protect the poorer areas. Obviously there's only so many resources to go around, and you can't protect everything but still...

Lastly developers STILL build houses with wood shake shingle roofs out here which is just fucking insane. My mom's place has always had a rock roof and we were very meticulous about keeping the brush around our house clear and planting ice plant on the hillside below. Not to get all smug about it, but when the 1993 firestorm came through Laguna, we were fine while half of the houses on our street burned to the foundations.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 22:26 (twenty years ago) link

Lastly developers STILL build houses with wood shake shingle roofs out here which is just fucking insane.

I'd say! Do the developers consider that to be more cost effective? If so, I can't see how....

My mom's place has always had a rock roof and we were very meticulous about keeping the brush around our house clear and planting ice plant on the hillside below. Not to get all smug about it, but when the 1993 firestorm came through Laguna, we were fine while half of the houses on our street burned to the foundations.

Yeah, those pics of yours spoke volumes. Afterward, did the neighbors rebuild with rock roofs?

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 23:33 (twenty years ago) link

the people on the radio are saying "nuclear winter" and that's no overstatement.

at 12 pm i went home for lunch and the smoke had rolled in so thick that you could stare straight at the sun - our visibility was down to maybe 500m. everything looks like you're looking through brown-tinted sunglasses. you park your car and when you come back it's covered in fine white ash. the air is so bad it makes your head spin just walking around in it.

and i live a mile from the beach, about twenty miles west of the fires.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 23:53 (twenty years ago) link

Everything seems so different outside now that I finally got out here. As you're driving, you feel this anxiousness all around you. The eerie orange sky has this cold apocalyptic feel to it..

It just makes me sad to think of the flames enveloping my city...sigh

Vic, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 00:19 (twenty years ago) link

Don't rush it, Chris. You'll get there soon enough, if things continue....;>

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 01:07 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.impawards.com/1989/posters/miracle_mile.jpg

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 01:11 (twenty years ago) link

We can only hope that the entire continent will not burst into flames

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 01:13 (twenty years ago) link

http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/movie/coverv/21/195921.jpg

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 01:14 (twenty years ago) link

Wait, I've missed the theme here, haven't I.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 01:15 (twenty years ago) link

bah!

http://www.impawards.com/1989/posters/miracle_mile.jpg

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 01:16 (twenty years ago) link

And just how much smoke is in the air?

http://abclocal.go.com/images/102803_Satellite_View_map.jpg

Crazy stuff.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 01:35 (twenty years ago) link

(*visions of Nuclear Winter*) Fookin 'ell! It'll take ages for all that to dissipate.

(x-post)

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 01:38 (twenty years ago) link

even though it wasn't bad on sunday where i live, that's when it dawned on me what 9/11 must have been like in nyc, only much worse.

an argument in favor of high density living. it's okay to hear your neighbors before you get to know them or after you know them. or have fewer possessions and move around a lot. jess's ideal city - anonymity.


youn, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 01:41 (twenty years ago) link

Actually, here's an even wider scale picture:

http://i.cnn.net/cnn/interactive/space/0310/gallery.fires.space/4.nasa.seawifs.jpg

Yeesh.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 02:04 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.