Why is casual racism/sexism more accepted in video games than other forms of media (these days)?

i get the sense that jocks today are de facto gamers because madden etc... is part of their training protocols now. maybe in england it's different because there are no rowing simulators. fifa though...

these people wd play iss pro

not sure if that's accurate tbf

is there a video on the internet of milhouse shouting 'im not a nerd - nerds are smart!' that i could link here

If the internet has taught us anything it's that nerds are worse than jocks when given the chance

― rap steve (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Saturday, September 6, 2014 12:09 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

never give nerds a chance my motto

Also it should be said that lots of these nerd types really just despise and look down on pretty much everyone, and there's a partic strain of pseudo intellectual bs that differentiates them from actual "smart kids" and continues into adulthood.

― LIKE If you are against racism (omar little), Saturday, September 6, 2014 1:27 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah i feel like this is the defining characteristic of nerd culture thinking youre better than everyone cause youre smart, thinking being smart is the only thing that matters, defining intelligence so narrowly as to be meaningless

irks me how nerds are always portrayed as gentle inquisitive souls when theyre often so completely arrogant, not that gentle inquisitive nerds dont exist

Gentle inquisitive nerds rock, but don't tend to have very popular YouTube channels.

Thought this was good:

http://deathofgamergate.tumblr.com/

That is very good

also lol @ GamerGate, now and forever

i always think of
http://aznbadger.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/shadowgate3.png

The tumblr is very good - one thing that it largely misses though is the collection of bugs under this uncovered rock, people who are convinced that 'SJWs' have been involved in a protracted effort to infiltrate games journalism and now the, er, ivory towers of indie games (?!?) because they hate gamers and they have as their goal the elimination of the gamer identity and the ruining of games by 'forcing' them to change from the good old days (Sarkeesian is far more of a hate-figure for this mob than Quinn).

I'm aware of the very large gulf of analogy, but the tone of the language actually reminds me of 30s German anti-semitism: These people are responsible for the fact that it's not the days of glory any more, these people are invisibly in cliques in positions of influence (and can only be there for subterfuge as they definitionally can't share the same identity as you and I), these people must be fought against at all costs.

http://cdn.broscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/nerd1.jpg

The floor recognises the representative from broscience.org

I sort of understand where Mordy's coming from with the desire to hold onto a flag you find worthwhile even as its been poisoned by others, but having fought that fight myself over a few different flags I'd argue it's almost never worth it--you wind up backing into a corner splitting hairs and spluttering that you're not Like Those People, and no true scotsman would ever be.

http://i.imgur.com/ZWKH45N.png

I'm aware of the very large gulf of analogy, but the tone of the language actually reminds me of 30s German anti-semitism:

this exact thought came to me as well.

also on the level of "we need to keep an eye on these people"

whats it like to fight over a flag

cramped i wd imagine

capture the flag is one of my all time favorite games

http://jeff.rainbow-100.com/other/dosgames/21-1.png

^ more accepted in this form of media

h00s, i was thinking about this a bit over the weekend. it was particularly funny when someone mentioned Zionism as a metaphor for gamers itt bc obv that's a much more complex/controversial flag under which i fight. i just don't think it makes sense to abdicate identity markers instead of reclaim them - both bc ceding the ground leads to unintentional results (like only terrible ppl representing a cause you might otherwise believe in) as well as personal loss. idk.

i can think of like a dozen other examples of this - i'm not about to toss away the NFL bc of concussions and Ray Rice and Incognito etc either

i wanna make a free online game about flag-burning, anyone kno flash

one thing imo strongly identifying as a gamer is kinda frivolous and consumerist, like if thats yr thing in life u might not be doing that good

i don't necessarily think being a 'gamer' (at least how i've understood it) is frivolous and consumerist. yes, it can be, if you organize your identity around your game purchases. but you could be very active in, eg, the IF community, write your own games, play other ppl's games, write reviews + give feedback, and that's a totally different emphasis. or like hardcore board gamers or war gamers, i've never thought of them as particularly consumerist (even tho you do have to buy the games in those cases, but that's not what distinguishes the hobby).

yeah idk theres just something very indicative of contemporary dysfunction in strongly identifying with entertainment imo

more so than identifying w/ cinema, or literature?

pretty similar prob but im sure some differences cld be teased out

if you write your own games i give you a pass but im sure thats less than like .01% of gamers

its consumerist but also involves tech-condescension and virtual competition. its like a perfect storm for the alpha nerd supermen

i'm v. sympathetic to the idea that capitalism has basically totally subsumed/co-opted all these creative endeavors, but i still believe (and continue to identify as a music fan, film fan, lit fan, game fan, etc) and search out in these "entertainments" resistance or at least the opiate-void.

i've written my own games, tho not in many years. generally i believe that creation is the best way to resist the hegemony but also i'm very lazy

feel like the game aspect reduces the ability to convey profundity that movies and books sometimes have but still being a reader or a movie buff who cares

i mean im both of those things and i even love games tho not so much video ones but i dont build my identity around any of that

depends on the game. i've had profound experiences in games that are irreproducible in lit + film (in civ, in dwarf fortress), not to mention the kind of ludic expressivity that other mediums can't capture - the participatory/improv element.

what does a lag00n build his identity around?

*bro-hoof*

free spirit. lucid dreamer. citizen of the world. bacon fanatic. uncle.

video game lifestyle is kinda like the heroin lifestyle only fatter

i should clarify that 'gamer' is not at the top of my list of identifications. my social/relationship and religious affiliations take precedence. but considering how many hours i spend gaming in my life it would be silly i think to say that it had nothing to do w/ how i see myself.

depends on the game. i've had profound experiences in games that are irreproducible in lit + film (in civ, in dwarf fortress), not to mention the kind of ludic expressivity that other mediums can't capture - the participatory/improv element.

― Mordy, Monday, September 8, 2014 1:24 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah im open to the idea that games can convey profundity, its a p interesting question, def a different profundity than books or movies, tho i do think the losing/winning binary game aspect tends to hit a different part of the mind

like chess can be profound, right? i'm not a huge chess guy but i've played games that - if not profound - at least felt deeply immersive + enriching.

it can def be very compelling and satisfying but idk if it reveals deep truths

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnqj31VPNoE

mulling that over i'm not sure we cd agree on a version of deep truth that wd include other art-forms but exclude all games?

maybe the deepest game would be one you lose every time

in the rough mental schemata i've built gaming in general as associated w/ game theory as the kind of deep truth / philosophical deep structure. also there's a lot of writing about how games access 'playing' as like a fundamental, primordial human drive. this is stuff i used to think about a lot in undergrad (and read about a lot - there is some decent academic work in the field lately) but haven't really dealt w/ as of late.

maybe the deepest game would be one you lose every time

oh so Dark Souls or Ninja Gaiden

nethack