xp
― gbx, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:05 (nine years ago) link
When does fifa 2015 come out?
― ^ 諷刺 (ken c), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:06 (nine years ago) link
NickB, that's indeed what was mentioned, that it was his third time already.
― In the airplane over the .CSS (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:06 (nine years ago) link
Oh fuck right off, that's an outrage
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:06 (nine years ago) link
Also banned from signing new contracts til October?
― Blandford Forum, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:07 (nine years ago) link
I know id go fucking insane if fifa comes out and i am banned from it
― ^ 諷刺 (ken c), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:07 (nine years ago) link
Xp
― ^ 諷刺 (ken c), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:08 (nine years ago) link
There's only one person to blame, and that's the mentalist himself. Nobody makes him keep biting people.
― Turtleneck Work Solutions (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:08 (nine years ago) link
ah well same as last season really.
Have FIFA announced if they're doing retrospective punishments for Sakho and Giroud?
― pandemic, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:09 (nine years ago) link
Or does video evidence only apply to Suarez?
dunno how many people did they bite?
― not lazy but clowning (Suedey 2), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:10 (nine years ago) link
> Have FIFA announced if they're doing retrospective punishments for Sakho and Giroud?
and shearer?
― koogs, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:11 (nine years ago) link
There's whoever handed down this absurd punishment to blame too
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:12 (nine years ago) link
As long as we're clear on what will and won't be subject to video review fair enough. Seems a strange criteria that elbowing an opponent if not spotted by the ref means no further sanction, but as long as they stick with that okay.
― pandemic, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:14 (nine years ago) link
Or it's Suarez's fault for, y'know, biting someone. Again. You'd think he might have noticed it's frowned upon the last two times he did it and got banned, it's not exactly surprising
― not lazy but clowning (Suedey 2), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:17 (nine years ago) link
cmon you can't lay the blame on suarez. he's being singled out! other people did things. three bites is hardly any over a period of several years
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:19 (nine years ago) link
lolz
― leave the web boys alone (darraghmac), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:20 (nine years ago) link
for this re:teeth much thanks
not surprisingly lenient, but still lenient imo
― caek, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:21 (nine years ago) link
It's Suarez's fault for biting, someone else's for overpunishing.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:21 (nine years ago) link
great value though, total legend #footballlad
i don't have an issue with him getting banned for a bit (ha ha), but, eg, if this had happened in august that would net out to a half-season absence from league play
― gbx, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:21 (nine years ago) link
xp's Isn't it 3 bites in four years now? he's stepping it up! Sakho should get a ban for sure mind you, Liverpool lucky England are out of the cup so they've got some players left for next season
― not lazy but clowning (Suedey 2), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:22 (nine years ago) link
FIFA cannot ban for a specific number of domestic games afaik xp
― caek, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:22 (nine years ago) link
i don't think the FA will add to this, but i think they could if they wanted to (e.g. if FIFA had just sent him home from the world cup i'm sure they would have done)
― caek, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:23 (nine years ago) link
great stuff at https://twitter.com/RAWK_Meltdown as per
It means he will miss the first nine games of the Premier League season.
v presumptuous
― clockpuncher (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:25 (nine years ago) link
like
if LFC haven't written a "we don't pay you for suspension" into his contract by now, that's on them
but it is shitty that they bear the brunt of this
but then eh bytimes their defence of this guy has been shitty in itself.
not being able to sell the clown is harsh, but otherwise the risks of owning a liability are risky film (doctored) at 11
Uruguayan fa would be lucky to escape censure beyond this for their behaviour since imo
― leave the web boys alone (darraghmac), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:25 (nine years ago) link
IK - you could get some T-shirts printed up?
― Turtleneck Work Solutions (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:25 (nine years ago) link
is 'not being able to sell' confirmed?
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:26 (nine years ago) link
http://i.guim.co.uk/w-620/h--/q-95/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/6/26/1403778244264/Luis-Su-rez-011.jpg
― caek, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:27 (nine years ago) link
Can you all shut the fuck up with the whole there's no difference between elbowing and biting? Though it's not desired, you do expect a certain rough and tumble around the ball. This rough and tumble is expected to come in certain forms, like shoves and elbows. Biting is outside this expectation. It also, unlike an elbow, but like the spitting someone mentioned before, is able to transfer communicable disease. It is both worse as a risk and worse for being further outside expected behaviour. It is qualitatively different. Idk, it's like if a boxer punched someone in the balls, you'd all be arguing, 'but it's only a punch, why isn't every punch treated this way?'. Because good reasons. Now shhh.
― Popture, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:27 (nine years ago) link
FIFA in not getting a thing right non-shockah.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:28 (nine years ago) link
Eh I've hardly been one-eyed when it comes to his past offences, but this is stupidly harsh
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:28 (nine years ago) link
idk, the only people I've seen saying he's being overpunished are liverpool fans so
― not lazy but clowning (Suedey 2), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:28 (nine years ago) link
Because good reasons
Get to fuck with that
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:29 (nine years ago) link
is de facto identical to his previous bans for the same offence IK. do you think those were harsh?
― caek, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:29 (nine years ago) link
IK i frankly can't believe you are arguing that with a straight face. caek otm this is just on the lenient side of the line.
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:30 (nine years ago) link
i expected 6 months tbh, it clearly isn't harsh given his recidivism
nobody shd shut up about the tolerance extended to other forms of assault in the game, as long as we accept this is a separate and justified case
there is something iffy in an arbitrary application of post-game evidence - so codify it
― clockpuncher (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:30 (nine years ago) link
de facto how? It's four months from all football.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:30 (nine years ago) link
I don't think it's harsh. It's the *third* time he committed the same offence he's been punished for before. What it is, is extremely stupid and mental. He needs professional help or he'll just do it again next year. (please bite Gerrard next time)
― In the airplane over the .CSS (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:31 (nine years ago) link
it's summer. he's going to miss the same number of club games as the last time he did this.
do you seriously think he shouldn't also miss the rest of the world cup?
― caek, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:31 (nine years ago) link
I mean J.Terry
― In the airplane over the .CSS (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:32 (nine years ago) link
he should stop biting people
― caek, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:32 (nine years ago) link
That was on club duty though, this isn't.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:32 (nine years ago) link
What it is, is extremely stupid and mental^this is key
― Turtleneck Work Solutions (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:33 (nine years ago) link
baffling xp
― caek, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:33 (nine years ago) link
Obviously he should miss the next round, assuming it was a bite.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:33 (nine years ago) link
Does it matter? It's football. He's a football player. He committed the crime while playing football. Why does it matter if it wasn't in the domestic league?
xxxp
― In the airplane over the .CSS (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:33 (nine years ago) link
assuming it was a bite.― Ismael Klata, donderdag 26 juni 2014 16:33 (17 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Ismael Klata, donderdag 26 juni 2014 16:33 (17 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Ok, you're just trolling now.
― In the airplane over the .CSS (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:34 (nine years ago) link