grime and the hardcore continuum

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (136 of them)
I think theres truth in that yea, i wouldnt disagree

Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Sunday, 25 January 2004 10:23 (twenty years ago) link

But was there an economic downturn in the UK big enough to account for grime? I'm not sure cos we're still in the middle of seven years of fat cows down here in Oz.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 25 January 2004 11:16 (twenty years ago) link

I dont know if you would say theres a downturn which could account for grime, but theres not a lot of jobs out there right now

Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Sunday, 25 January 2004 11:35 (twenty years ago) link

am I mistaken in thinking the economy was booming in England during the late '90s, too, the way they were in the U.S.? because sociohistorically I've always sort of figured that to be one reason 2step emerged the way it did.

2-Step did break around the time that Britpop was also at its apex, and that genre and attendant excesses are always contributed to "the Blair effect", so why not indeed?

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Sunday, 25 January 2004 16:56 (twenty years ago) link

Haha "the Blair effect" meant something very different then.

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Sunday, 25 January 2004 16:57 (twenty years ago) link

peoples lives aren't determined solely by the state of the economy. it's far too simplistic to say
dark music=downturn in the economy
happy music=upturn

i don't want to overstate the amount of people involved in crime but,it is a big thing. and if you or even some of your friends are involved in that, whether its nicking cars and selling them on to car yards or individuals, going on shopping sprees with stolen credit cards, jacking, selling drugs whatever, that means pretty much that you'll have friends go to jail, get grassed up, have the police fabricate evidence, get stabbed, or shot if you're unlucky. it means constant paranoia, police and rivals, if you're weak youll get robbed, you might see people you know get addicted to things, you'll find tht with a criminal record you can't get a job no matter the state of the economy, it's a trap in other words, a trap that even if you escape will defintely claim some of your mates if you move in those circles.
'it's just one big cycle here'
everybody involved in making grime has involvement in that world, everybody, even if just by association.

'''''', Monday, 26 January 2004 10:02 (twenty years ago) link

one, nobody's saying the economy is the sole reason for anything, and two, citing crime right after dismissing economic conditions as a contributing factor seems mighty short-sighted if not completely disingenuous

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 26 January 2004 10:07 (twenty years ago) link

I mean, the crime rate traditionally goes up during a bad economy, no?

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 26 January 2004 10:08 (twenty years ago) link

yea, but whether its simplistic to say it or not, darker music made when economic downturn, i mean, you only have to look when music got darker, it corrolates, simplistic or not.

crime doesnt go away anyway, when theres more money sloshing around, theres more to rip. look at hardcore, happy music right, but how much crime was there involved at that time? loads

i think the difference is, when theres a downturn, perhaps it strikes a wider chord, and when music succeeds, it does so by breaking out of its immediate demographic

Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Monday, 26 January 2004 10:53 (twenty years ago) link

look at hardcore, happy music right, but how much crime was there involved at that time? loads

perhaps but the difference was that the vast majority of the music's creators themselves were NOT involved in serious crime.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 January 2004 11:23 (twenty years ago) link

but it was around the scene, from promoters down

Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Monday, 26 January 2004 11:27 (twenty years ago) link

wasn't disco popular during times of economic troubles?

searchanddelete, Monday, 26 January 2004 13:28 (twenty years ago) link

is the economy particularly bad at the moment? i don't know much about those kind of things but i hadn't noticed a recession in progress. and if there's not (and i may be wrong, i don't read the finance pages) then it seems you have to, not reject the theory, cos i agree it certainly has an impact, but at least modify it, as i say, it's too simplisitc, it's a factor but not the sole determing factor. i think the major determing factor is crime, violence and imprisonment making a major impact on a large number of peoples lives, more so than ever before coupled with the fact, and i can't stress this enough, that grime gave a voice to a section of society which has never been heard before in this country. i really do beleive that. british reggae, jungle etc all that came from the estates but it was older, wiser people for the most part and the criminal elements of the audience were condemmed, never celebrated. that was why it was such a shock hearing riko and wiley on rinse fm for the first time. they were talking from the perspecitve of the criminal, unapologetically. talking about armed robberies and that. that was the big shift. thats my argument. i'm not saying economy doesn't matter, i just think my reason is more important.
all anecdotal evidence says its worse on the streets than it was when i was growing up. some obvious reasons for this
-larger profits to be had, crack, coke and brown in other words
-new immigrant groups meaning more people fighting over a smaller piece of pie, which raises the stakes and encourrages serious violence
-increased availiability of guns on the streets and more willingness to use them
-it's fashionable to be a criminal and the girls like it and it means you can buy xbox and wide screen tv and that.

um, i don't want to accuse the artists of being involved in serious crime, if they were they wouldn't be wasting their time making music, they'd be making serious money. (and a lot of them cease their illegal activites once the legal money starts coming in.) it;s small scale, but it still ruins lives.

luke'', Monday, 26 January 2004 13:35 (twenty years ago) link

totally agree with luke on that one. at the foundation of grime is a tight and isolated section of London society who have less and are more angry, armed and ignored than ever before. for them, the happyness of 2step just doesnt reflect their world...

martin (martin), Monday, 26 January 2004 15:19 (twenty years ago) link

oh and also re Simon's suggestion that there will be a 2step revival, my London intuition suggests there wont be. purist garage heads have headed off to the energy and warmth of 4/4 todd-aping urban house, while the music of choice for the majority of "urban" girls is overwhelmingly r&b/jiggy US hip hop...

martin (martin), Monday, 26 January 2004 15:23 (twenty years ago) link

well, there's also the "bad economy = upsurge of creativity" idea, too. but my question was a question more than anything.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 26 January 2004 21:34 (twenty years ago) link

who have less and are more angry, armed and ignored than ever before

is this really the case? i mean, they have mobiles, the internet, technology is generally cheaper or somehow more ascertainable - i'm alluding that generally people are better off, it seems so but of course there is still poverty and people live in it and it's quite likely that there will be SOME in that scene who fit that description but the generalisation seems too stong - it doesn't seem any more 'hard-up' or desperate than hip hop or jungle did here when they were young underground movements.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 January 2004 22:02 (twenty years ago) link

it's easier for younger people to cultivate their own scenes now BECAUSE of technology is what i'm saying and i think this counters luka's well made points to some effect giving some balance. he's right about things like tension and increased competition between immigrants and different ethnic groups who fall into crime (who tend to operate in areas not already covered by more established groups no?) - it does seem that guns are more accessible too - i can see that urban youths may feel less safe now than they did ten or 20 years ago which in turn could make a scene like grime stronger in a way, with technology being it's only real aid in helping to establish social and media recognition more easily than before.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 January 2004 22:08 (twenty years ago) link

it was surely always fashionable to be a crim tho (foundation of hip-hop really but goes way beyond that too)

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 January 2004 22:12 (twenty years ago) link

please please please, if anyone, toby, lee, martin, ambrose, anyone taped todays nasty set, i NEED a copy of that. seriously, i need that. it was the best thing ever on deja, the best set i've heard in my life, 4 hours, nasty, NAA, highly flammable, mucky wolfpack, boundary, more fire, east co, meridian, every corner of london represented
all the east lot
nasty jack fever from west
meridian from north
NAA from south (does anyone know if these boys got kicked out the studio? sounds like they might have sparked some beef, but thats just me spreading rumours)
the intensity was ridiculous, i was listening half in rapture half tearing my hair outt cos i was working and coulnt tape it. so anyone who taped please get in touch
blungblung@hotmail.com
i don;t usually ask for favours but this is different, this is special, i'll go mad if i don't own that
i'll give you some tapes in return, i'll pay for p&p whatever i don't care, but i need it. that was crazy. kano tore it down, hyper tore it down, ghetto tore it down, narstie held his own...


yup, always fashionable to be a crim, no argument there. but i promise you, i grew up in stratford and it weren't scary. there wasn't crackheads pestering you for money, there wasn't as many muggings, and there was certainly nowhere near as many arms, and that crew/gang culture wasn't nearly so serious. if you get involved with that (and i'm not obviously) you can get stabbed up for being in the wrong territory. i know some of you will think i'm making it up, but thats what i'm trying to tell you, it's much realer than you think, when we were coming up it wasn't like that. and thats what i'm saying isn't it, i'm not saying people are poorer now, i'm saying they're scareder.

luke''', Monday, 26 January 2004 23:21 (twenty years ago) link

incidentally, luke, I want to make it clear that I don't think you're making anything up, I understand totally where you're coming from in these threads - I say this mainly because I get the feeling you have me down as part of the "some of you", and I have the greatest desire to understand and relate to all the positions held on ILM, even if I can't fully agree with them.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 01:09 (twenty years ago) link

you don't show up enough on these threads to get included in that i'm afraid robin, although i guess i would loosely think of you as being in a kind of an 'enemy camp' (this doesn't mean i feel hostile towards you, or think you're shit or anyone else i, almost unconsciously, think of in that way). i'd stick nick southall in there too, and you two don't get on. i'd stuff all sorts of personable, sane, intelligent people into that pigeonhole actually, the whole of the freaky trigger axis for example, doesn't mean i don't think its good writing, or sloppy thinking, it's just a paper tiger i can rail against, YOU LOT, THE ENEMY!!
I love dorset though.

does everyone think like that or am i just childish? or am i just the only one stupid enough to admit to something like that?

should put somehting garage related here too now
if ruff sqwads music was a woman, i'd seek her hand in marriage.

'''', Tuesday, 27 January 2004 01:32 (twenty years ago) link

i used to think like that. at any rate, i had mental "enemy camps". it wasn't a sub-class-war thing (which is how your slant seems to me) because it was mainly people of my own background, Kula Shaker excepted, and pre-swastika i hated Oasis more than them. i had a sort of "i have reached higher than you, i've gone further outside the constraints of my background and its tribalism" slant (this was a family thing though, my mum was the only person in the whole family to go to college and probably the only one to listen to Radio 4 for decades). i used to turn up my collar a la Cantona (actually I still do this, though I barely remember the source) and at one point i used to look at my cousins (Oasis fans, lumpen proles) and say i could hardly believe i was so closely related to them (though i never said that to their face). so it was totally different to your slant because it wasn't IN ANY WAY "middle-class college kids, you're good writers and you know what you know but you DON'T GET IT", if anything it was a kind of inverted snobbery against white lumpen-proles because i thought they listened to shit music and that Men Behaving Badly was funny. now i hear cars pumping Ludacris, though, so that's alright.

of course i was 16/17 then, i think most of us are like that at that age, and a good many are like that in a class-war sense, as you are. Nick is like that, and he's from a very similar background to me after all. but - the crucial, total difference between him and me - he liked Oasis in the mid-90s.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 02:26 (twenty years ago) link

incidentally i was born in Lambeth and lived on the Thames estuary from ages 1-14, which makes a difference - i was first into hip-hop when it was all Britpop and then Noelrock so i had an angry feeling that i'd been taken away from my true home, but i lost that years ago; partially the culture changed, partially i changed.

robin carmody (robin carmody), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 02:32 (twenty years ago) link

It wasn't 4hrs, Marcus Nasty played an extremely pleasing and nostalgic old skool UKG set, mixed wonderfully. So it ended up being more like an hour and twenty-five minutes of amassed genius - BIG SET!
Have no fear - I organise my whole Monday evenings around Deja nowadays, not a second was missed.

tinman, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 04:27 (twenty years ago) link

you're a bit patronising robin, you need to watch that, it makes you look bad. you've also misunderstood me fairly spectacularly. send me an email and i'll explain my position (it's nothing to do with class, i don't have prole credentials, oits more to do with, i bet if these people met me they wouldn't like me, they#d lok at me like i was a weirdo), this isn't the place for it.

luke'''', Tuesday, 27 January 2004 10:07 (twenty years ago) link

now, more about the griminess. lord of the decks 2 is out now. i'm getting mine on saturday. it's got a dvd, with it.

more important than crime and low funds is the mC though. this is the real reason why grime can into existence. it was the music the MCs willed into existence. they were sick of being the sideshow. the younger ones were sick of dibby dibby and flava for the raver, they wanted to write they wanted to spit properly and to do that they needed some music to act as a backdrop. thats the real reason grime came into existence. it sounds like it does for a whole host of other resons, but the need to talk was why it exists at all.

i don't hate anybody, not even marcello.

luke'''', Tuesday, 27 January 2004 10:29 (twenty years ago) link

thats why its the speed it is too. that bpm is precisely calculated to accomodate an MC using an english accent.

'''', Tuesday, 27 January 2004 10:40 (twenty years ago) link

so anyway, what about manchester, nottingham, huddersfield, bradford?

Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 12:01 (twenty years ago) link

anyone heard darkmoormilitary?

29375yghyu, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:03 (twenty years ago) link

sorry luke i didnt tape the deja set. it was pretty intense though. kano stood out as always, though there were too many MCs who thought shouting "i will stab you" 15 times constitutes a good rhymes. the mic was so loud, you couldn't really hear the music... says it all about the priorities of grime really.

martin (martin), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:20 (twenty years ago) link

toby if you somehw digitized this i will spin you straw into gold

rumplo stiltskington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:23 (twenty years ago) link

What are the various Grime dvds like?

What kind of content/ visual quality?

Jedmond, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:58 (twenty years ago) link

the Ends video was wicked. the Sidewinder Bristol/Jon E Cash one was appauling - one single shot of the dj booth.

martin (martin), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 16:20 (twenty years ago) link

Sounds Warholian

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 16:23 (twenty years ago) link

haha jon e cash in static numbness shocker

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 16:26 (twenty years ago) link

>the younger ones were sick of dibby dibby and flava for the raver,

i miss dibby dibby and flava for the raver!

seriously i wish there was a bit more of that old Mc-as-compere, enhancement-to-the-music, foil-to-the-DJ role

it's great they're all into writing out their verses and reciting small books's worth of stuff but i miss all the off the cuff daft stuff

on that old 1999 2step tape i mentioned upstream, it's easter monday and the mc gives out a shout to the Cadbury's Creme Egg massive. that kind of thing doesn't seem to go on so much

sometimes i think the more the uk mcs try to imitate and assimilate to american standards of mcing they'll lose what they had before, the english quirkiness and parochial charm. while not gaining an iota in terms of a chance of breaking into america

(just saw 'fix up look sharp' on MTV 2 the other day and it didn't work at all, he doesn't command the video space like any old US emcee would, the music sounds scrawny, the voice sounded like he's from Mars -- out of context, it doesn't compute)

simonr, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 18:56 (twenty years ago) link

if ruff sqwads music was a woman, i'd seek her hand in marriage.

Haha!

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 19:00 (twenty years ago) link

things are differnt now simon. thats what the romford boys were bemoaing. there was a real sense of betrayal. the rave ethos is stone dead. ecstasy has been wiped from the cultural dna. you still hear that on essex stations but you won't hear it in london unless theres another big drug revolution.
i don't think you can't really expect mcs to resist the flow of time.
dizzee is still distinctly english. althougn i do know where you're coming from. i think the awkwardness of the accent should prevent things ever getting too blanded out/americanised.

'''''', Tuesday, 27 January 2004 19:17 (twenty years ago) link

what about skibadee, people, ha

Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 20:02 (twenty years ago) link

>things are differnt now simon

very. everything's hyper evolving. people talk about producers being old school with in 6 months. kids are in crews acting the badman at 12.

>ecstasy has been wiped from the cultural dna.

yes! this is EXACTLY why i started this thread. surely the lack of e breaks the hardcore continuum?

>i wish there was a bit more of that old Mc-as-compere, enhancement-to-the-music

may i suggest the sublime Crazy D, as foil to the mighty DJ Hatcha, and his amazing abilty to twist and recontextualise odd phrazes from madonna, reggae anthems, adverts etc. he's always shouting to all "first aiders and escapaders."

]email me if you want some CDrs Simon. Hatcha & Crazy D are genius...[

martin (martin), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 22:35 (twenty years ago) link

the thing is though martin, how many people did you see e'd up at jungle or 2step raves? that break happened in 94. grime is not responsible for that. 2step was a lot further from the rave ethos than grime is, which at least has kept a kind of inclusiveness, not the beautiful people rhetoric of 2step. maybe if you went up london you might see it, maybe if you went east to essex you might see it, not in stratford though, i didn't see it anyway. sonically theres a thread which is easily traceable, i do think thats right. i'm a believer in the continuum, to me it seems like commonsense.


i got a copy of that nasty set now by the way, no thanks to you lot!

'''''''''', Tuesday, 27 January 2004 23:18 (twenty years ago) link

people did e at jungle nights more than is credited

Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 00:18 (twenty years ago) link

people not only did e's at jungle raves, they STILL do e's at jungle raves. more than ever. hence its now massive popularity up north. hence its now ever-rushing 175bpm tempo.

i agree 2step has never had anything to do with e, but its swing and warmth was still part of the house axis, that warm "up" vibe. (and even jungle and later d&b still had that, before the drop). but now grime is all "down": bassy, controlled, contained, angry...

and also don't get me wrong, i can see the evolutionary thread very clearly sequentially from hardcore to grime. i just think either end of the thread (ie hardcore and grime) share next to none of the same sonic elements.

martin (martin), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 00:47 (twenty years ago) link

oh man, they do e at jungle nights now, of course (and it all hyrbidizes now anyway, pied piper, ray keith, ratpack), but its often assumed, in print, that people didnt take e in 94/5, it isnt true. yes, there was a downturn in e usage, but e was still there!

Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 00:52 (twenty years ago) link

erm i'm not sure how you mean it but d&b 2004 is not hybridized. it's more isolated than ever, on account of its tempo and it's fans' dislike of every other genre except hip hop. pied piper would be lynched...

martin (martin), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 01:07 (twenty years ago) link

the mc as compere to music stuff is already in the best rap i'd say, and also why d-ee is my fave by miles

prima fassy (bob), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 01:20 (twenty years ago) link

that's itneresting that E is still big on drum'n'bass scene, although reading between the lines it sounds like it's used more or less as surrogate amphetamine, to keep up sufficient energy to move to the silly-fast beats -- cos there isn't much that's actually sonixally rushy about d&b now

94 yeah there woz pills around (some of them in my tum) but E had ceased to be the paradigmatic vibe-setter. there weren't any tunes hymning E by 94 but there were lots of tunes about herbalist and ganja lover

i wouldn't actually say a drug element was integral to the Nuum, at least not any specific drug. the only thing maybe that's consistent all the way through every kind of pirate music is weed. but that's not unique to that scene

i think what really defines the h-core Nuum is the transposition of a Jamaican way of doing things onto UK club culture -- the dubplates, the riddims, the bass presha, the MC... pirates i think of as equivalent to the big sounds in JA, instead of a lawn they have a broadcast area. Same cut throat rivalry, same repping their local manor, same ties with shady folk

H-core Continuum = the mishmashed up only-in-Britain/mostly-in-London meeting of house music and Jamaica.

simonr, Wednesday, 28 January 2004 03:05 (twenty years ago) link

i was 14 in 94 and am blagging it slightly here i admit.

''''''', Wednesday, 28 January 2004 09:09 (twenty years ago) link

>H-core Continuum = the mishmashed up only-in-Britain/mostly-in-London meeting of house music and Jamaica.

ok so if you say drugs is not a core element of the "Nuum" then we'll ignore that, but the influence of house music is now almost completely erased from the Nuum's latest thread...

martin (martin), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 09:32 (twenty years ago) link

why is it the hardcore continuum and not the reggae continuum or the disco continuum or something else? what motivates critical attention on this lineage over others? is it something about establishing a narrative throughline for specifically british-based electronic/dance musics? and is it supposed to be prescriptive in some way (which would make sense of bizarre things like jazz influences in jungle being talked about as somehow extraneous or intrusive)?

your original display name is still visible (Left), Saturday, 22 October 2022 13:02 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.