lightroom! Aperture is good, but it's slow and makes the fans on my mac go nuts. The searching on Lightroom is aeons faster as well.
― stet, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link
Lightroom - the controls are more Photoshop-like (thus intuitive) and robust. I found it much easier to sharpen images, use curves, alter colors, etc.. It's basically all of the good photo tools from Camera Raw and Photoshop without all the other stuff that's more useful for graphic artists and designers. I haven't tried to dodge and burn images - that may be the missing feathered selections stet refers to.
Aperture probably still has a superior filing system, but I've not made good use.
― milo z, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:34 (sixteen years ago) link
good use of it*
― milo z, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link
I use Photoshop Elements at home and Paint.net at work.
See? You can make hardcore gangsta watermarks with Paint such as the one I did here.
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/4722/herringnutteditdf0.jpg
Check that opaque shit out! It's crazy!
― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:41 (sixteen years ago) link
nice manboobs
― milo z, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link
paint.net is totally awesome
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:46 (sixteen years ago) link
oh, nice, i'll have to d/l that. i tried GIMP @ home and have yet to do any editing with it that didn't look like garbage. I use photoshop at work..
― daria-g, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:49 (sixteen years ago) link
Jack Del Rio and Jim Tressel are on to something.
― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link