― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 14:33 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 14:34 (nineteen years ago) link
On the interweb, during CG's heyday, whenever a CG news item was posted (to either Newsarama or The Pulse), a contingent of fans would always post, praising CG for their diversity and (most importantly) their timely shipping, & offering paradigm-shifting rhetoric not dissimilar from the line Alessi spun. The first chink in the armor came, actually, when it was reported that some CG books would be late. It turned out that these books were being held up by the printer becasue CG was delinquent in paying their printing bills. And then news bubbled up that various freelance creators were getting the shaft pay-wise (w/ CG just transferring the work to other creators on CG's payroll w/out settling debts first). And then word leaked about the SALARIED creators getting the shaft. And then various re-orgs (personnel-wise, and line-wise) took place. They went from approximately 15 books to 4 in the span of 6 months (if that), and things were so dire that some of the solicited books (that were scheduled to be cancelled after issue #XX) were axed ahead of schedule - the script of one title's final issue (Siege?) was actually posted online (for the fans) (yay) in lieu of actually putting the book out or even paying for an artist to draw the pages.
If you snoop around the web, you can probably find a bunch of CG TPBs on sale for cheap, if you want to give various titles a shot.
― David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 14:57 (nineteen years ago) link
Also key in all of this - Alessi's goal (and he wasn't shy about announcing it, in so many words) was to leapfrog at least one of the Big Two, which is probably where all of this really went wrong .
― David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:03 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.captaincomics.us/readingroom/cganalysis/index.htm
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:17 (nineteen years ago) link
― David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:21 (nineteen years ago) link
you lost me.
― Huk-L, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:33 (nineteen years ago) link
That's what I was getting @ with CG's supposed claim (& I don't know if it's a claim their press materials actually made, or what pro-CG folks said when praising CG) - superhero books already use a lot of the supposedly neglected fiction dramas within their framework (cf. Batman & Daredevil as crime fiction, cosmic DC stories as sci-fi, time travel adventures into the Wild West, jungle adventures w/ Ka-Zar and the X-Savages w/ DINO-RACHEL). And, of course, these genres were usually blended together in one story, like almost any Savage Land or Wakanda story in the Marvelverse, where JUNGLE ADVENTURE meets SCIENCE FICTION.
To sell fans already kneedeep in X-books and Crises on a group of books that tells similar types of pulpy stories in a similar pulpy publishing format in a similar type of creative framework (the shared universe, w/ continuity & all of that) but excluding the sugared pill (the superhero!) that made such stories easy to swallow for folks not looking for just straight up sci-fi / westerns / fantasy in their graphically sequential narratives is a hard sell, unless the creators are top-notch and the hook is irresistable. Probably the most damning praise that can be offered re: CG's output is that it was consistently solid, and the majority of folks CG hired to write their books (vets like Barbara Kesel, Ron Marz, Chuck Dixon) are those types of "consistently solid" writers - not spectacular, not godawful, just servicable & (again) consistent. They punch the clock, they meet their deadlines, they know their stuff, and that's that. Not a bad thing, but not an awe-inspiring thing, either.
― David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:40 (nineteen years ago) link
― Huk-L, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― Huk-L, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:45 (nineteen years ago) link
A lot of CrossGen's launch stuff was much closer to that -- power as something granted/inherited, with responsibilities attached, not as a product of accident or personal design, with the conflicts closer to the GL scale than matters of vigilantism (some of this is because -- or why -- Ron Marz wrote at least one of the launch books).
― Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:56 (nineteen years ago) link