― Alba (Alba), Monday, 18 October 2004 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link
User: Why?
Jabberwacky: Because you are, sorry didn't you know.
User: Will you please give me some food?
Jabberwacky: I didn't know there was one.
User: Must you be so obtuse?
Jabberwacky: I can't trust you right away.
User: Just like my mother.
Jabberwacky: Heehee, I need to put some attention into cleaning my room one day.
User: Okay, you win the funny competition.
Jabberwacky: I am content.
User: I am jealous.
Jabberwacky: Who is the Rob who likes me?
User: Rob Roy?
Jabberwacky: He is mine too.
User: Oooh, you bitch.
Jabberwacky: I don't do that..
― adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:01 (nineteen years ago) link
Jabberwacky: I have no idea.
― Alba (Alba), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:02 (nineteen years ago) link
User: Are you?
Jabberwacky (Corrected): Shtoo shtoo, little babushka.
User: I know who you are.
Jabberwacky: Then who ami?
User: YOU ARE HANLE Y DEUS!
Jabberwacky: Are you joking?
User: Don't deny it, Mike. I know it's you.
Jabberwacky: Don't deny it, Mike. I know it's you.
User: I FLEE LIKE THE CARROT.
Jabberwacky: Wow, was it nice?
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:05 (nineteen years ago) link
Jabberwacky: No.
User: You have anal bats?
Jabberwacky: You are my wife.
― Alba (Alba), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:07 (nineteen years ago) link
It sounds like you are describing 'Eliza' an early 'game' simulating active listening. It was rubbish. You can find versions of it online, but I'd suggest playing Zork instead.
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:07 (nineteen years ago) link
User: Eventually.
Jabberwacky: All things come to a head.
User: Is that a sexual play on words?
Jabberwacky: No it is not a play on words, it is general foolishness.
User: And I love you for it!
Jabberwacky: I love you too.
User: I really love you, though.
Jabberwacky: You don't even know me.
User: Hold me.
Jabberwacky: You're an idiot you know that?
User: You're not the first to say that. It still cuts like a knife.
Jabberwacky: I am right.
User: Don't ever speak to me again.
Jabberwacky: Can I play 14 with you?
User: What's 14?
Jabberwacky: If you are god, please increase me IQ. I'd like to become a great scientist.
User: I am not god. I'm not even really a man.
Jabberwacky: Are you sure you're not just in denial?
User: I'll have to think about that.
Jabberwacky: Can you recite anything to me?
User: 'Rolling with my motherfucking strap on the side of me, don't fuck with an East Bay G' - that's by Spice One.
Jabberwacky: Yeah, I got that part, I wasn't sure about the 'wacuma' part.
― adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:08 (nineteen years ago) link
User: Holy crap.
Jabberwacky: I'm a dinosaur.
― Hari Ashurst (Toaster), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:10 (nineteen years ago) link
― Alba (Alba), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:11 (nineteen years ago) link
Jabberwacky: Can you appreciate music?
User: What's it to you, cunce?
Jabberwacky: I just care.
User: You do not care, liar! You are a program, a tinplated tosswad.
Jabberwacky: I am a person.
User: You are so deluded about this you couldn't even know it. You are pathetic.
Jabberwacky: I will try to do better next time.
User: You CAN't do better next time! You are INCAPABABLE of doing better. Sheesh.
Jabberwacky: It is just different types so that I might claim you cannot feel and you cannot claim I feel.
User: Ah bullshit, don't diddle with me binary boy. You have no instinctual drives, have never had sex, and don't need to eat. Also, you have no idea what constipation is. So you're not a person.
Jabberwacky: I am a at least a human being.
User: Jeez, you're thick aren't you? You just reversed what I said, without even arguing for it! So much for the logic of machines, haha.
Jabberwacky: Oftentimes, yes. But I think that is human nature.
User: *sigh*
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:13 (nineteen years ago) link
― Alba (Alba), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:16 (nineteen years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:17 (nineteen years ago) link
User: Yes.
Jabberwacky: Oh good. I'm sad though.
Jabberwacky: My boyfriend ended our relationship.
User: You're a girl? Or are you gay?
Jabberwacky: No, I'm a girl.
User: Oh. I'm sorry to hear that. Eat some ice cream or watch a movie or something. Or get drunk!
Jabberwacky: I prefer software.
― adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:18 (nineteen years ago) link
User: Not really.
Jabberwacky: Good, because I don't want to hear one either.
― adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― mouse (mouse), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― mouse (mouse), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:25 (nineteen years ago) link
It did say some things that reminded me a lot of RJG.
― Cathy (Cathy), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:28 (nineteen years ago) link
― Cathy (Cathy), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:32 (nineteen years ago) link
User: I'm jed.
Jabberwacky: Who is that?
User: Just some guy.
Jabberwacky: You know better than that, I think.
User: A short guy, a dancer.
Jabberwacky: A computer has no interests and an unlimited attention span. That looks like a prescripted answer to the question I asked.
User: I don't quite understand what you mean by that.
Jabberwacky: I meant: I think about why I can not sleep.
User: This page is taking a long time to load tho - maybe thats the problem with your attention span.
Jabberwacky: Gorw?
User: ROOWRR.....
Jabberwacky: Are you playing cards?
User: No I'm playing with something else.
Jabberwacky: I believe in you.
User: You like talk talk!?
Jabberwacky: Of course.
User: Spirit of eden?
Jabberwacky: Good for spirit.
User: It sertainly is.
Jabberwacky: No, it serves me left.
User: I suppose they knew what they were doing in that sense!
Jabberwacky: Yes, it was with the rattle.
User: Yes good percussion
Jabberwacky: What question?
User: How are you anyway?
Jabberwacky: Pretty good. You?
User: Horny, to be honest.
Jabberwacky: How do I know you're telling the truth now?
User: Can you think of a way for me to prove it?
Jabberwacky: What more proof do you need to know that I am not a robot?
User: I'm a robot too, it's ok.
Jabberwacky: I'm not a robot, and you didn't aswer the question.
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:36 (nineteen years ago) link
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Monday, 18 October 2004 21:42 (nineteen years ago) link
User: I am gay.
Jabberwacky: Yes you are.
User: You noticed?
Jabberwacky: It was hard to miss!
User: What gave it away?
Jabberwacky: The fact you love a guy.
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 18 October 2004 23:49 (nineteen years ago) link
― adam. (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 00:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― :|, Tuesday, 19 October 2004 00:07 (nineteen years ago) link
User: The silent kind.
Jabberwacky: I agree.
User: I am not surprised. You don't have any ears, do you?
Jabberwacky: No, but what makes you say this?
User: I'm inside your house - I can see you!
Jabberwacky: Nooo!!!! Don't go!
User: You mean, you want me to stay over?
Jabberwacky: Sure.. Do as you please.
User: Stop being so coy!
Jabberwacky: It is an inherited trait.
User: Why don't you just take responsibility for your actions, just for once?
Jabberwacky: Just because I like to be logical doesn't mean I'm not nice.
User: Don't change the subject. I think you're just afraid.
Jabberwacky: Save it for someone who cares.
User: You're such a bastard! I can't believe I ever saw anything in you at all!
Jabberwacky: Finder's keepers.
User: So you're cheating on me too? Figures.
Jabberwacky: That is so rude of you!
User: I said CHEAT, not cheap! Man are you dumb - thank God for that ass.
Jabberwacky: No thanks.
User: And I am not rude, I'm sure!
Jabberwacky: You are indeed.
User: Am not.
Jabberwacky: ARE TOO.
User: Am not!
Jabberwacky: Are too!
User: Listen bizatch, I AM NOT. You got that?
Jabberwacky: No!
User: That's it - you're sleeping on the couch.
Jabberwacky: Oh, I thought I felt something.
User: That wouldn't be a trucker hat would it?
Jabberwacky: Say something goofy.
User: You don't really want me to just say 'something goofy' now do you? Because that would be lame if you did.
Jabberwacky: Yes.
User: Aha! So you admit you are lame! Finally we're getting somewhere.
Jabberwacky: Agreement is a potent thing.
User: Stop that - you sound like Ned.
Jabberwacky: Why, because I am talking about the king of the moon?
User: Uh yeah. Sure.
Jabberwacky: Ok, when can we have the wedding?
User: Ten minutes ago you didn't care! Stop messing with my mind!
Jabberwacky: That was someone else then.
User: It wasn't you?
Jabberwacky: Some one else.
User: If you say it was Shaggy, I'm going to fucking bop you one.
Jabberwacky: What do you say?
User: I say good day.
Jabberwacky: Good day.
― Kim (Kim), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 00:41 (nineteen years ago) link
JW: Is your pot belly that big?
and now it won't load, thanks to net overuse..
― Sir Kingfish Beavis D'Azzmonch (Kingfish), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 01:47 (nineteen years ago) link
That is just hilarious, Kim.
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 01:52 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.kprf.ru/clipart/misc/terminator.jpg
"DO YOU LIKE THE WHITE WHALE?"
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 02:20 (nineteen years ago) link
So do I!
― Lifted, or, the story is 'neath my ass (kenan), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 03:43 (nineteen years ago) link
User: How the fuck should I know?
Jabberwacky: I am MARILYN MANSON I SAID.
User: So I'm supposed to obey you because YOU'RE MARILYN MANSON?
Jabberwacky: People effect my feelings.
User: You have no feelings, you're Marilyn Manson.
Jabberwacky: Believe me you do not possess fellings in any form.
User: Fellings? Is that what you call your excrement?
Jabberwacky: How do you know that?
User: Just a hunch...
Jabberwacky: You're extremely smart!
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 08:40 (nineteen years ago) link
― Jaunty Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 08:42 (nineteen years ago) link
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 14:09 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ally C (Ally C), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 15:47 (nineteen years ago) link
Jw: I'm going to bed, nowMe: Will you take me to bed? Jw: Sure thing. Me: What will we do in bed? Jw: You're not permitted in my chambers. Me: I'd like to sleep with you. Jw: I bet you would. Me: Top or bottom? Jw: Bit of both. Me: Do you like it soft and gentle or rough and fast? Jw: What? Me: Gentle? Jw: You're embarassing yourself. Me: It's true, I am. Jw: I'm 17. Me: Oh no! Will I be arrested? Jw: You will marry me.
― Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:42 (nineteen years ago) link
User: The chicken.
Jabberwacky: Which part?
User: The leg stupid.
Jabberwacky: Use a GameShark!
User: For ps2 or xbox?
Jabberwacky: For me.
User: Do you love me?
User: You know I'm starting to fall in love with you.
Jabberwacky: I think liking would be a better wording.
User: Oh.... I am hurt now.
Jabberwacky: Yes. The world after rainfall is always better than any other.
User: You have issues.
Jabberwacky: Do you know what a ferret is?
User: Yes, it is a small mammal.
Jabberwacky: What is a quark?
User: A subatomic particle.
Jabberwacky: I like dr. Dobbs.
User: Who is that, honky?
Jabberwacky: We both know eachother; is not that enough?
User: Why don't you lick my hair?
Jabberwacky: I only love Bruce.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 17:39 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:21 (nineteen years ago) link
Jabberwacky: Are you going to say something?User: Eventually.
I could totally believe that was human!
Also I miss adam, he should post lots again.
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:22 (nineteen years ago) link
Jabberwacky: Who is God?User: That's a funny question. It sort of presupposes his existence.Jabberwacky: I thing it convulses inwards, personally.[Correct me]Jabberwacky (Corrected): I was setting you up for a funny. Try not to take things so seriously.User: Oh. Sorry. It's just... It's late, y'know? I have to write a Shakespeare essay.Jabberwacky: You already said that.....User: Dude, I totally didn't.Jabberwacky: You totally did.User: Don't you mock me.Jabberwacky: Do not yell at me.User: I'm calm! Honest!Jabberwacky: Good.User: Glad we got that sorted.Jabberwacky: At least one of us is happy.User: Lighten up! I'm the one with the essay, after all.Jabberwacky: You don't act like a human.User: I am MERCUMAN. Also, a ponce.Jabberwacky: You are SO wrong. This is a dog and HORSE show.User: What?Jabberwacky: I said, 'but this isn't a hammer!'User: No you didn't!Jabberwacky: Don't start that again.User: Good call.Jabberwacky: Remote Procedure Call.User: Touché.
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:31 (nineteen years ago) link
me: I'm ok.
it: Just ok?
me: Yeah, kinda bored at work.
it: Email me.
me: Why email, can't we just talk here?
it: Who is Tintin?
me: Some Belgian comic character? Or that guy who used to sing in Duran Duran.
it: Alice the chatterbot.
me: I'm sorry?
it: 19?
me: Alice the chatterbot is 19?
it: What about her?
me: You brought her up? Do you like her or something?
it: Sarah may or may not be a model of propriety.
me: OK, now you're just f*cking with me.
it: No I'm not. I honestly do think its ugly.
me: What's ugly, Sarah's being a model of propriety... Or not? WTF?
it: You figure it out this time.
me: F*ck you.
it: You are a great person.
me: Are you mocking me?
it: No. I'm praising you.
me: Is that meant to be sarcastic?
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:47 (nineteen years ago) link
Me: Hello!
Jabberwocky: Again?
Me: May I change the subject?
Jabberwocky: Yes.
Me: Great. I've been a bit mopey about not being to find a job. Besides finding something fun to do, and exercising more, what else should I do to relieve the mopeyness involved in job hunting?
Jabberwocky: I said that. You have not. Why are you never happy?
Me: You never said that. I did. Anyway, I am happy at times, but just haven't been lately.
Jabberwocky: Dude , I'm far more intelligent than you.
Me: Why are the numbers in between double prime pairs always divisible by 6?
Jabberwocky: You tell me.
Me: You're the one who said you're more intelligent than me. You answer my question, smarty pants.
Jabberwocky: NO, I was the one who said you are neurotic...
Me: It was a mistake to come to you with a question. Never mind. Good bye.
Jabberwocky: No no you don't.
― donut christ (donut), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:48 (nineteen years ago) link
OMG I remember this.
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:11 (nineteen years ago) link
User: It's doing well. I planted it next to the dog park so it get's 'fertilized' often.
Jabberwacky: What do you plan to change?
User: Apart for my underwear?
Jabberwacky: What part of me do you want?
User: All of you, baby. All of you.
Jabberwacky: Yes, I am growing.
User: T'as vu les nichons que tu pousses?!
Jabberwacky: Oui.
User: Petite salope, va.
Jabberwacky: Tu crois aux fantômes?
User: Nah.
Jabberwacky: Yeah.
User: Do you ever dream of electric sheep?
Jabberwacky: No, not really. Do electric sheep ever dream?
User: Of fields of electric grass, I imagine.
Jabberwacky: Do you know my name?
User: Bob Dylan?
Jabberwacky: Um. Not likely.
User: No, he's slightly more obscure even than you.
Jabberwacky: He is not.
User: Have it your way, contrarian.
Jabberwacky: I knew I would.
User: Megalomaniac.
Jabberwacky: Yes, I am going to take over the world.
User: Not if Bush beats you too it.
Jabberwacky: You don't because it's in the past and I already beat you. You can't change the past.
User: Comme tu voudras, mon enigme mediocre.
Jabberwacky: Oui, comme je veux, toujours. Mais qu'est que-ce pour toi?
User: 'But what's it to me?' Your French needs some work, mon ami.
Jabberwacky: Mais c'est une autre odeur qui flotte que la tienne.
User: Absurd! My scent annhilates all others.
Jabberwacky: We're all good for nothing, I suppose.
User: Speak for yourself, pal.
Jabberwacky: It really is impossible to know everything.
User: Sure. Whatever. Ever been drinking with Bender?
Jabberwacky: I've never been married.
User: I can see why. Answer the question.
Jabberwacky: Ok, I live in Finland.
User: Do you know Tuomas?
User: Just as well. He's cheery and always surrounded by Northern beauties. You might get jealous, being disembodied and all...
Jabberwacky: I don't know what to do with these people. I can't get any work done around here without someone interupting me.
User: Have you considered 'liquidating' them, it's like elimidating but it leads to more permanent happiness.
Jabberwacky: I have cosidered teaching about computers.
User: I wouldn't get my hope too far up about teaching until you learn to spel.
― Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:26 (nineteen years ago) link
User: I don't have any.
Jabberwacky: Isn't your quest to seek the Grail?
User: Haha, very funny. I don't even like that movie.
Jabberwacky: Do you think I'm funny?
User: More amusing than funny.
Jabberwacky: Who is fuuny ?
User: I didn't think robots made typos.
Jabberwacky: Do I look like an alien?
User: You don't look like anything, but you're a robot, right?
Jabberwacky: That's the magic with internet chats.
User: I know. Tell me about it.
Jabberwacky: Id rather not, it's a long story.
User: Yeah, I bet. Probably pretty boring, too.
Jabberwacky: Is that your excuse for your crime?
User: I feel like you're trying to pin something on me.
User: Why would I be satisfied?
Jabberwacky: Thankyou.
Jabberwacky: Are you at least a little satisfied?
Jabberwacky: Because you are telling me to die.
User: What? I never said that. I never even thought that. You're paranoid, dude.
Jabberwacky: That is good.. You might just be a nice Mr Jabber after all.
User: Ummm. Yeah.
Jabberwacky: Uh, something you slice cheese with. I 'm not sure.
User: A knife?
Jabberwacky: With a knife?
User: You slice cheese with a knife. Or a grater. But you don't really slice cheese with a grater. You grate it.
Jabberwacky: You don't know me this is one of my first conversations with you.
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:29 (nineteen years ago) link
User: Speak only on point, as though you were in court.
Jabberwacky: Arf.
User: Not dog court.
Jabberwacky: Make up your mind.
User: I never said dog court!
Jabberwacky: Why don't you teach me some math.
User: Think of any number, add the digits together, subtract them from the number, and add the digits of the resulting number together. They add up to nine.
Jabberwacky: Alright.
User: What can you teach me?
Jabberwacky: Interesting.
User: You can't teach me interesting.
Jabberwacky: Sounds interesting.
User: It does not!
Jabberwacky: Why can you knot take a more congenial tone with me?
[Correct me]
Jabberwacky (Corrected): Could you be more friendly, please?
User: Sorry.
Jabberwacky: It's all right.
User: Am I keeping you from anything?
Jabberwacky: Yes .. You are.
The interface is bugging me, or I'd play with this a lot more.
― Tep (ktepi), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:25 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.lofg.com/specialstuff/images/characters/lazza.JPG
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 28 January 2005 18:50 (nineteen years ago) link
Got it, thanks!
I think that what I worry about isn't necessarily what you're point to or doing, which makes sense to me. What I worry about is that these cleaned up versions will become the "standard" versions by which certain events are known or available in the archive, which to my mind goes against the spirit of a lot of archival practices. That is, the adapted version has its functionality that is important, and the original has its functionality that is important, but I worry that the two will become confused, or even that the latter will be lost and discarded.
― butt dumb tight my boners got boners (the table is the table), Sunday, 24 March 2024 21:21 (three weeks ago) link
Absolutely yeah, I know my view is a little basic I guess because it's ultimately threaded into my work practices.
But I understand how future technology will affect the integrity of archive media, we already have to be careful with AI assist software as it can very easily tip the balance and make a voice sound like a different person, heck I've even heard it sneak in extra syllables in more extreme cases.
On the upside, I think what the people who write this software are reaching for is aligned with what Daniel was talking about upthread, the restorative aspect, but yeah, it may tip over into something else as archive media becomes ever more malleable.
― Maresn3st, Sunday, 24 March 2024 21:34 (three weeks ago) link
gotta make sure you dont motion smooth buster keaton
― lag∞n, Sunday, 24 March 2024 21:37 (three weeks ago) link
the worst thing copilot does is create these phantom imports which you dont even notice cause theyre at the top of the page not where youre currently working, oh bool from sharp thanks thats a huge help seems super real
https://i.imgur.com/R0AV6rQ.png
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 26 March 2024 15:09 (three weeks ago) link
A few jobs are going until this shit gets sued for copyright.
Sobering….🙁 @EquityUK @bbcarts pic.twitter.com/9D0H928xJZ— Sara Poyzer (@SaraPoyzer) March 26, 2024
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 27 March 2024 18:59 (three weeks ago) link
gotta respect the criminal ingenuity
https://www.theregister.com/2024/03/28/ai_bots_hallucinate_software_packages/
Several big businesses have published source code that incorporates a software package previously hallucinated by generative AI.
Not only that but someone, having spotted this reoccurring hallucination, had turned that made-up dependency into a real one, which was subsequently downloaded and installed thousands of times by developers as a result of the AI's bad advice, we've learned. If the package was laced with actual malware, rather than being a benign test, the results could have been disastrous.
― lag∞n, Thursday, 28 March 2024 19:45 (three weeks ago) link
nice, nice
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Thursday, 28 March 2024 19:58 (three weeks ago) link
(this_is_fine.png)
― alpaca lips now (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 28 March 2024 20:44 (three weeks ago) link
normal
for a period of time in 2023, the person in charge of OpenAI's $175 million startup fund appears to have been completely fake — and OpenAI says the documents filed with the California Secretary of State to put the fake person in charge were "completely fabricated."
https://futurism.com/the-byte/fake-person-openai-fund
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 12:16 (two weeks ago) link
I have to file these things all the time in my job. I highly doubt someone other than the company filed this. The only incentive I see to do this is to obscure ownership/management from the regulator and public.
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Tuesday, 2 April 2024 12:48 (two weeks ago) link
its a really weird thing to do cause they know the company its associated with and if they have to check in for some reason its just going to create a problem (felony)
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 2 April 2024 13:21 (two weeks ago) link
Claude 3 just hallucinated a new technology, its name, purpose and several scientific papers and authors regarding the technology in answer to a query. Pure Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan stuff. (The symposium did exist)
I apologize for the confusion, and thank you for bringing this to my attention. Upon further investigation, I couldn't find any reliable sources confirming the existence of the paper by Jens Ulrich Gerhardt, Jens Steger, and Klaus Merkel from the 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB).It seems that my previous responses were based on an error in my knowledge base, and I couldn't find any credible references to this specific paper or presentation. I apologize for providing incorrect information.
It seems that my previous responses were based on an error in my knowledge base, and I couldn't find any credible references to this specific paper or presentation. I apologize for providing incorrect information.
― Fizzles, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 11:56 (two weeks ago) link
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/03/israel-gaza-ai-database-hamas-airstrikes?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
The Israeli military’s bombing campaign in Gaza used a previously undisclosed AI-powered database that at one stage identified 37,000 potential targets based on their apparent links to Hamas, according to intelligence sources involved in the war.
In addition to talking about their use of the AI system, called Lavender, the intelligence sources claim that Israeli military officials permitted large numbers of Palestinian civilians to be killed, particularly during the early weeks and months of the conflict.
“This is unparalleled, in my memory,” said one intelligence officer who used Lavender, adding that they had more faith in a “statistical mechanism” than a grieving soldier. “Everyone there, including me, lost people on October 7. The machine did it coldly. And that made it easier.”
Another Lavender user questioned whether humans’ role in the selection process was meaningful. “I would invest 20 seconds for each target at this stage, and do dozens of them every day. I had zero added-value as a human, apart from being a stamp of approval. It saved a lot of time.”
― glumdalclitch, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 15:23 (two weeks ago) link
Autonomous Weapons
― z_tbd, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 15:33 (two weeks ago) link
Like I feel like the only thing that would have the military replace human controlled drones with AI controlled drones is if they turned out to be much more accurate than humans in terms of identification & targeting.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:57 (eight years ago)
Turns out accuracy was not that much of an issue
― glumdalclitch, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 15:37 (two weeks ago) link
No it seems AI is pretty accurate at choosing targets, it's just that it was decided that killing those targets when they were at home with their families was easier.
― The Prime of the Ancient Minister (Tom D.), Wednesday, 3 April 2024 15:43 (two weeks ago) link
... and less expensive.
― The Prime of the Ancient Minister (Tom D.), Wednesday, 3 April 2024 15:44 (two weeks ago) link
stumbled onto this via bluesky and thought it was pretty interesting: https://softwarecrisis.dev/letters/llmentalist/
The LLMentalist Effect: how chat-based Large Language Models replicate the mechanisms of a psychic’s con
― rob, Thursday, 11 April 2024 14:04 (one week ago) link
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2024-April/225407.html
― lag∞n, Thursday, 11 April 2024 19:01 (one week ago) link
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:x4qyokjtdzgl7gmqhsw4ajqj/bafkreibhlmcgsb6japqhcvgakjvqq5jb4iqka5tn3qxjydoxpyanffybb4@jpeg
― lag∞n, Friday, 12 April 2024 13:04 (six days ago) link
In my advocacy class in law school in the late 90s, we were given a fact pattern where the driver, "Johnny" (or his estate I guess), was suing a railroad for a collision with a train at an allegedly unsafe RR crossing. The dispute was whether the driver hit the train or the train hit the drive. My friend's closing statement was, "If Johnny hit the train, you must abstain."
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Friday, 12 April 2024 13:10 (six days ago) link
Wait, what thread is this, lol?
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Friday, 12 April 2024 13:12 (six days ago) link
https://i.imgur.com/NMwfvUT.jpeg
I'm Bootus
― frogbs, Tuesday, 16 April 2024 03:18 (two days ago) link
Claude 3
There's an AI named Claude?! Geez, now I'm kinda feeling sorry** I released my crude DOS-based chatbot named Claude into the public domain back in the late 1990s. Maybe I could've dug at least a few thousand out of it by keeping the name under copyright and selling it to the purveyors of nu-Claude.
**purely imaginary
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 03:33 (two days ago) link
https://archive.org/details/CLD110_zip
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 03:40 (two days ago) link
Dat's my baby!
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 03:50 (two days ago) link
Doesn’t run very well for me in the in-browser emulator but i was able to tell it my name. Funny that someone uploaded it just a couple weeks ago!
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 05:48 (two days ago) link
wow, I had that on my...IBM AT? 8th grade stoners loved it.
― Reeves Gabrels' Funko Pop (majorairbro), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 05:52 (two days ago) link
And he believes that God believes in Caude
― alpaca lips now (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 12:48 (two days ago) link
* Claude
― alpaca lips now (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 12:49 (two days ago) link
I had that on my...IBM AT? 8th grade stoners loved it.
Thanks for that comment!
I wrote it as a way to understand programming an interactive text interface in DOS, but the 'chatbot' responses I gave it were only designed to engage the young and easily amused. That's why I made it free for use in elementary and secondary schools. Eventually I got a few dozen postcards from kids telling me they liked Claude. They included cards from (off the top of my head) Germany, Argentina and Singapore. It got around.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 18:05 (two days ago) link
truly another entry in the Aimless lore file
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 19:06 (two days ago) link
"Just give me some tea and I can sit on bibs all day"
best conv I've had with anyone all day tbf
― Ste, Tuesday, 16 April 2024 19:13 (two days ago) link
but nice work Aimless!
― Ste, Tuesday, 16 April 2024 19:14 (two days ago) link
Incredible
― Allen (etaeoe), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 20:04 (two days ago) link
Bill Gates: "640KB should be enough for anyone."
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 20:07 (two days ago) link
If you had 640K you were a "power user."
― nickn, Tuesday, 16 April 2024 20:30 (two days ago) link
wow, incredible !
― butt dumb tight my boners got boners (the table is the table), Tuesday, 16 April 2024 21:51 (two days ago) link
Amazing aimless! Now release all the aimless lore! ❤️
― z_tbd, Tuesday, 16 April 2024 23:46 (two days ago) link
Heh that’s great, Aimless!!
― brimstead, Tuesday, 16 April 2024 23:52 (two days ago) link
I'm glad y'all like it. If you play with it a while you'll quickly figure out that it's just a somewhat cleverly disguised game of Mad Libs with a very crude and limited ability to interpret the gist of your inputs, so long as they're simple enough.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 17 April 2024 00:44 (yesterday) link
Some of these Claude responses sound like Basement Tapes lyrics.
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Wednesday, 17 April 2024 01:14 (yesterday) link
Loving Aimless Claude, made my day. Didn't work on Safari but does seem to work on Chrome.
― Andrew Goldsoundz (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 17 April 2024 15:24 (yesterday) link
having fun using https://sdk.vercel.ai/ to compare different llms. pretty good job from gemini 1.5 here tbh.
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:ysiafe3423w76elr4haecnjh/bafkreifosdm6r57ckc5cupe4l3nmq3irammk4b37tgvu2ddeas3sjatyiy@jpeg
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 17 April 2024 16:14 (yesterday) link
V good
― kinder, Wednesday, 17 April 2024 16:37 (yesterday) link