V for Vendetta -- C/D?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (68 of them)

View Previous Page...

There is zero chance it will be a good movie.

― Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 06:00 (eighteen years ago) link

That is perhaps the most exceptionally awful dialog I have ever heard or read.

Vapid, vile and very vaguely vomitous.

― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 13:20 (eighteen years ago) link

Haha, that has to be a joke, come on now.

― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 13:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Didn't you see any of the Matrix films then?

― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 13:47 (eighteen years ago) link

Ah.

― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 14:05 (eighteen years ago) link

For vintage and voluminous examples of the Matrixers valiant yet vain attempts to proffer vivacious dialogue, please view any or all of their very pricey Burlyman books. For vuck's sake.

― David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 15:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose vis-à-vis an introduction

(Stan) Lee for Vendetta!

― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 15:36 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, they got the mask right, at least.

http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=20377

― Huk-L, Monday, 6 June 2005 15:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Vexcellent.

― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 6 June 2005 15:30 (eighteen years ago) link

I feel that people should stop reading about the film. It is nigh inevitable that we will go and see it, and it would be nice to form an impression from the film itself rather than a million pieces of pre-publicity about it.

― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 6 June 2005 18:11 (eighteen years ago) link

Ha ha, good one, DV.

― Huk-L, Monday, 6 June 2005 18:12 (eighteen years ago) link

Round these parts, we call it "doing a Scoffer".

― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 6 June 2005 18:50 (eighteen years ago) link

It is nigh inevitable that we will go and see it,

I've not seen any Alan Moore adaptation and I'm not about to start now!

― kit brash (kit brash), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:49 (eighteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...

Okay, finally read the series. ANybody know where i can find an annotated version of it? Not being British, i figure i'm only getting about 1/2 the refs...

― kingfish (Kingfish), Sunday, 3 July 2005 17:42 (eighteen years ago) link

This blog post (not written by me) has a lot of links http://www.livejournal.com/users/rfmcdpei/784578.html
that I'm too lazy to copy over

― Ray (Ray), Sunday, 3 July 2005 20:14 (eighteen years ago) link

So, uh, do today's events spell bad news for the future of this movie?

― Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 7 July 2005 18:19 (eighteen years ago) link

maybe it'll be delayed 6 months at the most, but if Collateral Damage came out, this one will too.

― kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 8 July 2005 05:21 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't know how similar the script is to the book, but there are events near the end of the book - the Viking funeral - that people might be wary of. In the same way that there's unlikely to be a remake of The Running Man that sticks more closely to the book's plot, because of that big ending.

― Ray (Ray), Friday, 8 July 2005 07:22 (eighteen years ago) link

seven months pass...

If I'm to make but one post today,
it shall be to say
that Natalie Portman with short hair
is beyond exceedingly fair.

― c(''c) (Leee), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 21:44 (eighteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...

BEST MOVIE OF 2006 SO FAR! IT'S INSANELY GOOD!

― meatloaf, Tuesday, 21 March 2006 04:46 (eighteen years ago) link

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.