Ichiro/Sisler Watch!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (208 of them)
he's hitting .477 since the break to be exact! with a slugging percentage around .600 and an OBPS of 1.100

Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 5 September 2004 06:53 (nineteen years ago) link

only 1-4 today.

He's slumping!!

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 5 September 2004 23:06 (nineteen years ago) link

the decline has begun!

Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 6 September 2004 00:58 (nineteen years ago) link

A Sunday Times column by the author of the new book "Behind the Numbers" (which I received as swag but haven't read yet):


No Power, No Patience, but the Hits Keep Coming

By ALAN SCHWARZ

For someone hitting .251, Bret Boone gives Ichiro Suzuki an awfully hard time. Whenever Suzuki, the Mariners' lightning-quick leadoff man, scoots safely to first on a four-hopper to short, a flare to center or a 30-foot bunt for yet another three-hit game, Boone accosts him in the Seattle dugout.

"Are you gonna count those as hits?" Boone says. "Nobody else in the world can get hits like that!"

To which Suzuki calmly and confidently says, "On purpose."

As it turns out, Suzuki, who entered this weekend's series with the White Sox leading the major leagues with a .374 batting average, has left more than his contemporaries scratching their heads. He has left fans of statistics at a loss as well - specifically for ways to quantify how good a player he truly is.

On a pace to smash the record for hits in a season (George Sisler's 257 for the 1920 St. Louis Browns) and hitting a spectacular .400 since April, Suzuki lacks the two skills that beguile the numbers folks: power and patience. Meanwhile, his off-the-chart attributes are reflexively dismissed: hitting for average (which is generally overrated), speed (which is hard to measure) and defense (which is even harder).

Like the Yankees' Derek Jeter, whose all-around game is about as popular among stat types as a calculator with a low battery, Suzuki is a round peg in baseball's increasingly square world. As Athletics General Manager Billy Beane says, "He's a very difficult player to get a handle on."

Dodgers General Manager Paul DePodesta put it this way: "Ichiro creates anxiety when he's in the box and on the bases. He forces you to play differently on defense. And when a guy behind Ichiro hits a home run, who's to say that bad pitch wasn't caused because he was on base? You can't measure everything. Part of the beauty of this game is that it's not completely scientific."

Sure enough, many of Suzuki's numbers are often served with salt. He is on a pace to get 264 hits, but because he walks so infrequently, he is also on a pace for 706 at-bats, another record. With so few walks and a vast majority of his hits being singles, his O.P.S. (on-base plus slugging percentage) is .884, placing him 41st in the majors and 7th among baseball's generally more power-oriented right fielders. His 32 stolen bases are nice, but his being caught 10 times tends to even out their benefit. And although he's among the top defensive right fielders, making 2.33 plays a game and reaching 86.6 percent of balls hit into his area, you will not win many arguments with such esoteric fielding data.

(At least there's no Roger Maris-like controversy over how Suzuki's season is 162 games long rather than Sisler's 154. Hits per game, anyone?)

When the numbers settle like flakes in a snow globe, Suzuki's appeal becomes more aesthetic than scientific. And thankfully, although baseball offense is moving more and more toward power and walks, the game does retain its soft spot for all-around players that the numbers often hide.

Henry Chadwick, the 19th century writer who espoused the use of statistics to evaluate players, invented categories like sacrifice hits and stolen bases to discourage home runs, which he considered narcissistic displays of brute force. (He also argued that running 360 feet was too tiring.)

New York Giants Manager John McGraw also railed against the Babe Ruth-catalyzed power boom of the 1920's, calling Ruth a bum who would hit into "a hundred double plays before the season is over."

And Ty Cobb, a prime focus of the slapper-versus-slugger debate, complained about the death of fundamental baseball in a 1952 personal letter. "The hit-and-run, stolen base, bunt and sacrifice bunt are deteriorating from unuse," Cobb wrote, "and they only hit for their amusement and pleasure for the home run."

Suzuki, a native of Japan, speaks of achieving balance in his game, of not neglecting the defense and base-running aspects of baseball that statistics have yet to appreciate. He says only one number concerns him: "Getting as many hits as you can during a year."

Not slugging or on-base percentage, the statistics that measure power (of which Suzuki has little) and patience (of which he has even less). By all accounts, it was the suggestion of Seattle's hitting coach, Paul Molitor, that he take more pitches and drive balls farther - essentially adapt himself to the modern game - that led Suzuki to struggle in April, when he batted .255. Only by shaking free of that approach did his amazing season start.

Suzuki immediately began rapping out hits, his skills once again asserting themselves as some of baseball's most well rounded, if not most appreciated.

"They idolize technique and skill in Japan more than Americans do," said the Dodgers' pitching coach, Jim Colborn, who coached and scouted there for eight years in the 1990's. "How you do something is paramount in Japan. Here, it's more about achieving the numbers. Power is the American way."

With the last two World Series champions relying on speedy singles-hitting leadoff men (Anaheim's David Eckstein and Florida's Juan Pierre), the science of baseball statistics must grudgingly accept that the game has other dimensions to conquer. And every time Suzuki gets one of his beloved hits - whether it travels 400 feet or 90, bounces one time or seven - he offers that pesky reminder.

Like a cat eating 264 canaries, Suzuki is forcing baseball to consider what the numbers, even the newest ones, do not say.

On purpose.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 13:53 (nineteen years ago) link

He only has 54 RBIs, that is incredible (or is Seattle that bad?)

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 16:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Seattle got all sorts of old all at once, but it's not as if their optimally performing lineup would be so stacked as to allow Ichiro ample opportunity to drive in the bottom third of that line-up.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 16:52 (nineteen years ago) link

I think it's more surprising that he's scored only 89 runs despite being on base as much as he is.
Then again, the low RBI and R totals aren't so surprising considering that Seattle are nearly last in the league in runs scored.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 17:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Both Raul Ibañez and Bret Boone are underperforming in a big way.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 17:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Expecting a lot out of Raul Ibañez -- who has previously exceeded 18 HR and .350 OBP once each -- says more about foolish optimism than his performance. His raw numbers are in line with his career.

At what point does Ichiro's pursuit of .400 eclipse the Sisler mark? If he gets above .390?

.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 18:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Also re: Ibanez - he had that great 2K3 in a park that's very friendly to hitters, & he went to a place where hitters don't fare so well (or, at least, that's the accepted wisdom, & I believe Park Factor measurements bear this out).

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 18:55 (nineteen years ago) link

That would be something, if he could approach .400, considering he'd have to hit around .520 the rest of the way to make it (with his high number of at bats). Right now, I wouldn't put it completely past him.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 18:59 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm become pretty convinced i was henry chadwick in a past life.

John (jdahlem), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 20:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Ha, do you subscribe to running 360 feet as being too tiring? Chadwick has slavish adherents in the Krukkers and Dibbses of the world (hits, RBI, pitching wins)...

I did the math on Ichiro nad indeed, it takes .520 to get him to .400. A 2-for-5 at this stage doesn't always raise his BA a point.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 13:59 (nineteen years ago) link

"He only has 54 RBIs, that is incredible (or is Seattle that bad?)"

It isn't bad for a leadoff hitter on a terrible team.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 14:30 (nineteen years ago) link

"do you subscribe to running 360 feet as being too tiring?"

that was the kicker

John (jdahlem), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:18 (nineteen years ago) link

I just posted this on ILE but it's funny how Ichiro is far better this year than in 2001 and he may not be in the top 10 in AL MVP voting.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:28 (nineteen years ago) link

surely he'll be top 10, esp if he breaks sisler's record??

John (jdahlem), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link

mora's got a higher OBP...

:-O

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:37 (nineteen years ago) link

He certainly will be top 10; if he breaks Sisler I expect he'll be second, perhaps. Writers understand [sic] hits.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:40 (nineteen years ago) link

B..b...but he didn't deserve to win in 2001, either! Top five, OK, but MVP? Giambi wuz robbed.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 21:18 (nineteen years ago) link

don't know if it's been pointed out but there's a since-mostly derailed sister thread here Ichiro Suzuki for any of you cats who don't ever venture over to the all-inclusive other

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 9 September 2004 00:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Learned on today's SABR e-list: Ichiro is poised to shatter Lloyd Waner's 1927 mark of 198 SINGLES in a season. And in a debate over whether Ich *tries* to hit singles rather than XBH, listee John Pastier says:

"Ichi's 3.13 GB/FB ratio is second in the majors.  Anyone bent on driving the ball into the ground knows that he won't be getting many doubles, and will get no triples or HRs that way...."

ie, It's an amazing skill... the question is if he'd help the team more than if he sacrificed the few-walks, 84% singles approach for a potentially higher OBP *and* SLG.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 September 2004 17:55 (nineteen years ago) link

XBH's give a team a better chance to have big innings. It also takes fewer batters to "manufacture" runs. That is, a team with all singles hitters will need to get three hits to produce one run, whereas a team with singles and power hitters can score more runs with fewer hits.

That's a problem with Seattle's offense this season -- their best hitter is a singles hitter, so he needs a lot of help to drive in or score runs. Ichiro's SLG isn't so bad ~.480, but that's a bit misleading since most of hit hits are singles. His isolated power is ~.110, which is actually quite awful.

So yeah, a team with a below average offense like Seattle would probably be better off if he were hitting .330/.420/.520 with ~50-60 XBH than the .370/.420/.480 or whatever he's hitting now.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 9 September 2004 20:24 (nineteen years ago) link

i'd imagine all teams would be better off with those first numbers. ichiro's higher batting avg is negligible since so many hits are infield singles.

doc, why would you think ichiro would be capable of batting even .275 if he started sitting back and trying to drive the ball? his entire strategy is to rely on his speed and ability to make contact, slap the ball to deep second or deep short and either beat the throw or hope it squeezes through. it might be an interesting experiment if it hadn't already been done - that schwarz article said molitor tried to get him to do just that at the beginning of the season, and it was a disaster.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 9 September 2004 20:39 (nineteen years ago) link

i'd imagine all teams would be better off with those first numbers
Yeah, maybe I should have exagerrated the differences more -- say .290/.380/.520 (OPS is the same, but sacrifice hits for power and walks).

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 9 September 2004 21:40 (nineteen years ago) link

But the numbers in my last post look nothing like Ichiro numbers, so we'd be talking about swapping him with a completely different RF with those sorts of numbers (and decent speed) and asking, "would Seattle be better off with this other guy"?

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 9 September 2004 21:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Although the whole point is kind of moot because you normally wouldn't care about what sorts of hitters you would need to maximize the potential of such a shitty offense on a losing team.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 9 September 2004 21:43 (nineteen years ago) link

His isolated power is ~.110, which is actually quite awful.

David Eckstein and Juan Pierre, 2 players that are fairly similar offensively to Ichiro, have much worse ISOPWR: .054 and .087

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 10 September 2004 04:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, Juan Pierre is even more overrated than Ichi.

I'm speculating on the consequences of Ichiro trying to drive the ball *some* of the time, as opposed to slapping it almost *all* the time. His ceiling in MLB seems to be 50 XBH a year.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:42 (nineteen years ago) link

why are we faulting a player for playing to his strengths? it's not like ichiro is the rob deer of the single; his playing does not bring his team down. in addition, he's the leadoff man, whose primary job is to get on base, which ichiro does very, very well. yes he could be more patient, but how can you argue with his batting average and obp? certainly ichiro gets more attention cuz he's foreign and cuz no one else in the majors right now plays like him (aside, perhaps, xxxstein and pierre, both far inferior players), but ichiro is a helluva player.

i would be curious to see how well ichiro would adjust if he were moved down in the order to the second or third spot. in those cases, with other, slower players on base, the deep grounder that ichiro can beat out becomes a liability, not an asset. judging by ichiro's phenomenal bat control, i would be willing to bet that he would become much more of a line drive hitter...

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Wade Boggs to thread...?

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:59 (nineteen years ago) link

yall are forgetting his arm

cinniblount (James Blount), Friday, 10 September 2004 14:17 (nineteen years ago) link

But he's not always great at getting on base. He's second in OBP this year, but last year he was 30th, 10th in 2002, and 14th in 2001 (his MVP season). Nobody's saying that he brings the team down, but one of the top 10 players in the league? Arguable.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 10 September 2004 15:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Wade Boggs hit doubles by the truck load at the peak of his hitting prowess.

Ichiro I think is pretty similar to Tony Gwynn or perhaps even Rod Carew, who also was good at getting infield hits (especially by bunting).

Earl Nash (earlnash), Friday, 10 September 2004 15:42 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd love to see Ichiro play pepper with the Green Monster for 81 games - that'd definitely (probably?) sex up his SLG.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 10 September 2004 15:51 (nineteen years ago) link

God, my work computer SUCKS BALLZ & STRIKES.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 10 September 2004 16:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Basically it shows that Ichiro has hit the monster 1x in the past 6 seasons. He has hit the ball more than 200 feet to left field 3 times in 6 seasons.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 10 September 2004 16:22 (nineteen years ago) link

Ichiro needs 26 hits to tie Sisler's seasonal record over the next 23 games. Let's say that he gets 4.4 ABs/game (seasonal average):

23 games * 4.4 ABs/game = 102 ABs

26/102 = .254 to tie the record, .265 to break it.

he's 0/8 for the weekend so far (you can't ignore his career numbers which long suggested that he was overdue for a fall back to reality). his 3 year splits show that September is by far his worst hitting month (.283, one of only 2 months that he averages less than .300). this really could go down to the wire. could you imagine if he got intentionally walked if it got close?

Here is SI's Ichiro countdown page, which is pretty cool.

gygax! (gygax!), Sunday, 12 September 2004 05:08 (nineteen years ago) link

In this article, the author says of the other Seattle hitters:

"Their bats are probably not much different than the one George Sisler swung back in 1920, when he banged out a major-league-record 257 hits."

Except for, like, their center of gravity and the thickness of their handles and their weight, sure.

You've Got to Pick Up Every Stitch (tracerhand), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 03:38 (nineteen years ago) link

higher grade pinetar nowadays too

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 12:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Don't forget the cork!

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:39 (nineteen years ago) link

On Topic: last night Ichiro got his third 0-4 in 4 days.

He's batting .200 in the past 7 days.

With a projected 84 at bats remaining in the season, he needs 25 hits to tie the record (.300), 26 to break it (.310).

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 15:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Another oh-fer last night. Perhaps he has something blocking his windpipe?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 17 September 2004 12:40 (nineteen years ago) link

he did get three walks though. two intentional.


maybe i should be posting this in the barry vs. ichiro thread...

the leglo (the leglo), Friday, 17 September 2004 12:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Damn it. I want Ichiro to break this record, or at least get really, really close, so I can read old people getting pissed off. (This is the BEST EXAMPLE EVER.) "Dammit, I didn't watch my friends die in th' mud at Okinawa just so one-a them dadgurned Japaneseys could break Sisler's rekkid!"

alfalfa romeo (natepatrin), Friday, 17 September 2004 16:39 (nineteen years ago) link

(PS: hitters of the '20s were so prolific because the spitball had just been banned and pitchers were leery after the Ray Chapman beanball death incident and umpires ruled that old mushy deadened balls couldn't remain in play as often, so ta-da, offensive explosion. stick it, old-timers)

alfalfa romeo (natepatrin), Friday, 17 September 2004 16:42 (nineteen years ago) link

He's not gonna break the record.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 17 September 2004 17:50 (nineteen years ago) link

He's certainly not gonna break it in 154 games. ASTERISK!!!

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 17 September 2004 18:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Exactly.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 17 September 2004 18:16 (nineteen years ago) link

two months pass...

He could still do it

.@JRODshow44 had the ultimate throwing partner on day one: Ichiro pic.twitter.com/00SC2r7b1T

— Seattle Mariners (@Mariners) February 15, 2024

Roman Anthony gets on his horse (gyac), Thursday, 15 February 2024 07:53 (two months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.