John Coltrane vs. Eddie Van Halen

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (115 of them)
I don't see people simply giving Coltrane a free pass here. In addition to the more sweeping generalizations, people are mentioning specific works and in some cases the qualities they like about them.

DeRayMi, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

And dave q's "quiet storm" comment makes me wonder if he has heard any of Coltrane's late Impulse recordings, which don't meet that description at all, as Geoffrey Balasoglou pointed out.

DeRayMi, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Van Halen allowed himself to be relegated to the role of mere accompanist to a) a funny frontman and b) a walking turd. Coltrane wins for realizing that solos are better than songs.

sundar subramanian, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I find a lot of Coltrane's '50s and '60s work both beautiful and thrilling. I find a couple of Van Halen tunes quite fun. I don't understand why these two are put together here at all. I'm not the world's biggest jazz fan by any means, but EVH seems particularly feeble opposition. JC is my second favourite saxophonist, by the way: he produced nothing I love as much as King Curtis on Yakety Yak.

Martin Skidmore, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Jimi's solos were neither fast nor really complicated. Hell, even Stevie Ray Vaughn could do that part better!

Tracer Hand, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

i'm gunna try and give a non-trollish non-jerkish explanation of what i'm on abt in the next coupla days, deraymi: i am really in the end puzzled more by his sanctified ultra-jazz apexhood than the fact that ppl like him (which is fine)... i agree that free pass is a poor description for how ppl have gradually started to respond HERE (but then i hold evil sway in these regions heh)

mark s, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

QUOTE: "John Coltrane quit drugs, in his later years, he had a spiritual enlightening in 1957, and he was drug free from than on" this is debatable.

http://www.everythingblows.com/rant.cfm?ID=191&startrow=1

-- neil (neilemmerson33@yahoo.co.uk), May 31, 2002.

Thank you for sharing that website, I was unaware of the possible connection between John Coltrane and LSD. However most of what I've read doesn't support this, he even said himself in the liner notes to A Love Supreme, however this might not be true, he might have been taking it.

Geoffrey Balasoglou, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

i look to my records to tell me which i like better: 30 odd coltrane albums, and i think i have a used cassette of 5150. coltrane it is!!!

ron, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Coltrane and EVH both suck and here's why. Take these two poles and find the equator: And it's JOHN FRIGGIN' MCLAUGHLIN.

Jody Beth Rosen, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

For mark s...I think there are a lot of reasons why Coltrane gets the jazz sainthood position but I really don't think you can overestimate how influential the 'classic' quartet was. Not that it was totally unprecedented of course, but it started a whole style of playing in jazz. I think every jazz musician goes through a point where they want to be *insert Coltrane quartet member here* on their instrument. It's just an amazing mix of power and technique and emotion that does the trick of balancing being fascinating to musicians and very accessible to even non-jazz listeners.

Jordan, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Shakti rule!

'Free Jazz Free Pass' - I wonder if, in the UK at least, this has anything to do w/ Phillip Larkin's fear and loathing of mid-late JC - by default JC came to stand for non-trad 'progress'?

Andrew L, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Bit exasperating to still see 300 variations of the old "fast gtr playing = wank". WHAT is it about EVH's playing that automatically equals "flash for its own sake"? Barney Kessel and Tal Farlow played RILLY fast too, but they had a 'clean' tone so it was more 'spiritual'/'tasteful'/whatevah? EVH just seems like a simple guy who loves his instrument, I don't know why this 'Star Wars' thing seems to come up reflex-like

dave q, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Also, I bet none of the EVH-bashers can tell me the subtle differences between the solos in "Romeo Delight" (mind-destroying) and "DOA" (bonkers), or have even heard these songs. Come on, if you're going to bring up technical matters to explain JC's greatness then let's be fair!

dave q, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Also, I am reliably informed that Farlow was the first to use the two- handed thing on a regular basis. Which means it's a 'jazz' technique so it's OK. Or at least as OK as any other technique, although for some reason some get more opprobrium than others. I never see punkoid Smiths reviews saying "Strum strum strum. Johny 'Chordmeister' Marr delights in showing us 10,000 chords, which will thrill 'jangle' enthusiasts but bore everybody else silly. Smiths = for guitar-chord geeks only"!

dave q, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Tal Farlow and Barney Kessel are great.

But the real innovators were Jazz guitarist, like James Blood Ulmer (with Ornette Coleman), Derek Bailey (solo, man listen to him, he plays the guitar like no-one else), Sonny Sharrock (with Last Exit, the free jazz SUPERGROUP), AND Lenny Breau!!! he could play a bass line while playing a melody, at the same time. If you want Fast guitar playing, and this is 10 times faster than Farlow, listen to Joe Pass, forget about John Mclaughlin, this is the real thing, he played mostly acoustic guitar, proving his power more.

Geoffrey Balasoglou, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Interested in viewpoints re, what's more 'challenging'/'impressive', getting power out of an acoustic instrument or 'reigning in' a spark- spitting electrical machine? It's like watching trained guinea pigs vs. watching F1 racing (metal) or demolition derby (improv) or dirt- bike racing (no-wave etc)

dave q, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sorry, 'guinea pigs' sounds like a putdown - maybe 'trained alligators'? (And now this thread is going to mutate into 1001 stupid one-liners about amphibious combat, consider it dead)

dave q, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

i'd rather listen to some screaming tube-blare guitar feedback thing than brotzmann blow, most days of the week, but oddly enough i'd rather listen to a jazz band playing "hard and fast" (this is not to say skronking free jazz, mind) than most rock acts. i think it might have something to do with rhythm, but it also might have to do with that "cloud waveform" thing we were talking about on the cd thread.

jess, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

meaning, perhaps, there's a clarity of tone (and thereby "focus"?) with an acoustic jazz band which is lost once speaker fuzz/blare is factored in. (when it comes to "freaking out" however, i'd prefer some machine to do all the work and just spazz out all over the shop. maybe it's oddly easier to take "seriously" than someone honking a horn and sounding to everyone but the adepts like your little cousin or lester bangs picking up an sax and going to town.)

jess, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

actually seeing as i haven't made it clear on this thread i ONLY LIKE V.V.LATE COLTRANE: one of the things abt ascension that's GOOD is that they are all blowing the tops of their heads off, yet the music is best considered/listened to as a gentle one-level soothing new age hum (however loud you play it): it attains a level and sticks at it => immense effort to achieve stillness, like alice and the red queen running to stay where they are

mark s, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

this is good becuz it turns some "solo blowhard=gutful&truthful" cliche or othah upside down, not becuz penetration of the veil of maya is attainable by listening to a record a lot

mark s, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

yeah, ascensions good for warming up the house on a cold winters day. it fills the room up, etc. etc.

jess, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

actually seeing as i haven't made it clear on this thread i ONLY LIKE V.V.LATE COLTRANE

That's the stuff you're supposed to be a little skeptical about.

DeRayMi, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

One theory - EVH is so synonymous with 'wankery' simply because he looks like he's really fucking enjoying himself.

static, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

"this is good becuz it turns some "solo blowhard=gutful&truthful" cliche or othah upside down, not becuz penetration of the veil of maya is attainable by listening to a record a lot"

but whatevah yr opinion of col's mysticism surely it is too difficult (impossible?) to demolish solo=soulo impasse without it. mysticism was smokescreen for all-inclusive group play behind John Coltrane TM, allowing likes of drumma Rashied Ali (real genius of later records?) to flourish. do you like those later recs only for coltrane's input? no. regrettable cult of personality for sure but ultimately necessary I think. In any case things get twisted in the hands of the fans rather than on coltrane's part. It's not my bag, but i don't find it intrusive.

bob zemko, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

yeah i don't blame coltrane for it at all

mark s, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Just listened to part of "Coltrane Ole.") I don't really care all that much anyway. I always thought that the more Coltrane I listened to, the more I would like him; but in fact, I have an awful lot by him that I don't especially like. Nor do I find that my appreciation of his works grows deeper over time. (I like "A Love Supreme," but it's hardly as important to me as it is for many listeners.) But as I keep saying, yet seem to forget myself, jazz is not my bag, man. I don't think it's it aura and image that keeps me coming back to it. There are aspects of jazz that I like, but they are almost always mixed in with other elements that turn me off.

DeRayMi, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm actually quite curious what aspects you, as a non-jazz listener, like and don't like of Coltrane's music (or jazz in general)...?

Jordan, Sunday, 2 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Coltrane - because John was truly one of a kind and innovative, and EVH was merely (a very competent) member of the scores of 70s/early 80s champions of guitar pyrotechnics (Ritchie Blackmore, Yngwie Malmsteen, everyone on Shrapnel Records, et al). Coltrane created a paradigm, Eddie worked within one. That's why Coltrane is an icon and EVA is an example...

Siegbran Hetteson, Sunday, 2 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm actually quite curious what aspects you, as a non-jazz listener, like and don't like of Coltrane's music (or jazz in general)...?

Jordan, I would like to give this some thought and see if I can answer in more detail what it is that I like about some jazz, despite not really considering myself a jazz fan. (I've listened to a fair amount of it for someone who is not a jazz fan.) In very broad terms, for instance, I like the idea of improvisation. I have listened to a lot of Arabic music and some other middle eastern music which involves a lot of improvisation. With Coltrane, sometimes I just like the tone he gets from his instrument which to me seems to have a very individual stamp on it.

The more I think about it, the more confused I get. I think I'd better answer further some time when I have more energy. I do like quite a bit of Sun Ra's recordings, and find John Gilmore's style extremely appealing much of the time.

DeRayMi, Sunday, 2 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

As part of answer, though this is vague: in every genre of music (I would venture to guess) there are aspects of the music which are particular to the genre, certain conventions and so forth, but there are other things happening at the same time that aren't as narrowly specific to the genre, but are more universally musical. (I realize this is inadequate and am floating it as an attempt at expressing something, more than a real assertion.) In a genre such a jazz where there is so much emphasis on beating against the boundaries of the genre, so much emphasis on innovation, it makes sense that sometiems jazz musicians will make something new which is attractive to people who might not be drawn to many of jazz's conventions.

DeRayMi, Sunday, 2 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I like when Coltrane hits a point in his solo where he plays the same thing repeatedly, or plays little blocks of these repeated melodic framents. I like in "Crescent" the way, at a certain point, he interrupts what he is playing to introduce something else, which, every time I hear it, reminds me of a little kid running around when he's not supposed to.

(I'm still thinking. I have no idea why I have posted so much to this thread.)

DeRayMi, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

(i'm glad you are doing: you may yet turn me round...)

mark s, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'll always remember my metalhead guitar teacher dissing Jimi for playing "sloppy" all the time and bending notes into unresolved territory; "man, if you see a lot of those old films he's just all over the place"; I NEVER ONCE get the feeling that Eddie's about to fall apart which for me would be more interesting than what he does do, which is prove again and again how long he can stay on top of his mechanical bull. I'd much rather see the pile-up than the cleanly- driven race.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Your metalhead teacher reminds me of a guy i once met who ranted on and on about how Jimi "just jammed his hands down on the frets" and got lucky.... I detected definite racist undertones... If Jimi was sloppy, he was controlled sloppy... the guy could "play" feedback, after all.

Ben Williams, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't really like or understand Elvin Jones's playing. I don't understand it either technically or intuitively. Since I don't know music theory, I don't understand almost any music technically speaking, but there is music that I "understand" in a more gut level sort of way. I can relate to it, anyhow. I "get" Afro-Latin percussion, even when it gets pretty involved and crazy. One thing that bugs me about a lot of jazz drumming is the constant use of the cymbals, which just isn't a sound that appeals to me, I think. I don't get the point of Jones's frequent drum rolls. Given the number of his admirers, and the fact that I don't understand what he's doing, I tend to give him the benefit of the doubt. I just don't enjoy listening to him. (I don't particularly like Roy Haynes either.) I used to like McCoy Tyner more than I do now. It's a funny thing where I'm really on the fence: if I just leaned a little more in a certain direction, I think I'd like him, but I can't quite make it to that point. I find him a bit boring at this point.

DeRayMi, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

On second thought, sometimes Elvin Jones isn't really that incomprehensible to me.

Getting back to jazz, more generally. A lot of it simply boils down to: I don't especially like early jazz, or swing (as a genre, though not necessarily in the broader sense); so I don't connect much to the roots of jazz, which would explain why I am more likely to enjoy jazz as it gets further away from those roots. Still, there have been exceptions. I think I am more likely to enjoy these things in a live performance. If nothing else, there is the sense of something unfolding. I'm saying that I don't like swing, and yet I have found myself uncontrollably tapping my foot to the Sun Ra Arkestra within the past year, during fairly straight forward swing numbers. But if I put on most swing recordings, especially older ones, but necessarily, I almost immediately want to turn them off.

Like about jazz? I don't think it's just the image. I am attracted in some ways to the seriousness of it, the fact that there seems to be a lot going on, but that's not enough to get me to enjoy what's going on.

As with other music, often I get turned off right away because I don't like the feelings it evokes in me. Too often it reminds me of a vague afternoon headache.

I don't think I can answer Jordan's question in a meaningful way. It is too difficult to say just why I like something or don't like something. Why does Sun Ra's quite traditional "Dark Clouds with Silver Linings" resonate with me in a way that, say, Coltrane's "Soul Eyes" (now playing) does not? I like music in which the musicians seem to be listening to what they are playing and responding to their own playing. Is that a clue? But that presumably goes on in good jazz most of the time.

Sometimes it seems happy in a way I can't believe, but that's how I used to feel about salsa before I started dancing to it. But I took some swing classes and that didn't radically change how I responded to swing. Sometimes it is melancholy in a way that feels oppressive to me.

I find that most predictions of the "you like x music, you might like y jazz player" are not true for me. I like (modal) Arabic music: I might find "Coltrane Ole" a good entry point. But I don't, really. Or someone else has suggested Ayler on that basis. Well, one or two tracks that I like when I'm in the right mood. And, no I don't like most Latin jazz that I have heard, despite liking salsa and some other Latin music. (If anything, I think Latin jazz is too busy being jazz in a straightforward way, because it already is something besides jazz, so if it's going to be jazz at all it can't be jazz on the frontier of jazz. This is just an impression/guess and I know that mnay people think that Latin jazz is in fact one of the most vibrant areas of jazz where interesting things are being done.) I like electric guitar, but I don't generally like the way it's used in jazz. I like some work by Fred Frith and Henry Kaiser and Hans Reichel, all of whom have some degree of connection to jazz, but I wouldn't consider any of them to be jazz. If you look at the elements in their music that are shared with jazz, maybe that's a clue as to what I like in jazz.

The "musical elements" that exist no matter what the genre is: if you somehow capture them without any genre coloring I don't think you'd be left with any music, but you might have a nice Platonic ideal.

DeRayMi, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

three years pass...
Holy shit, guys. Wow. Like, wow.

Ok, anytime anyone evr says that ILX used to be so much better than it is now, plz point them to this astounding, breathtaking thread. This whole thread is so ignorant about about jazz it's... well...

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Saturday, 7 January 2006 09:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Jordan being the exception.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Saturday, 7 January 2006 09:29 (eighteen years ago) link

mark's OTM about coltrane getting a "free pass" but lots of other artists get that too.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 7 January 2006 10:02 (eighteen years ago) link


Ornette Coleman vs. Trey Azagthoth

Ian Christe (Ian Christe), Saturday, 7 January 2006 23:48 (eighteen years ago) link

Trey!

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 7 January 2006 23:59 (eighteen years ago) link

"actually seeing as i haven't made it clear on this thread i ONLY LIKE V.V.LATE COLTRANE:"

So Sad.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 00:02 (eighteen years ago) link

Tracer Hand, this thread is your finest hour, possibly excepting the joke you made about locking George Thorogood in a cellar with a mandolin and a lump of coal on the gone-missing Folk vs. Country thread.

Redd Harvest (Ken L), Sunday, 8 January 2006 00:09 (eighteen years ago) link

I think the most interesting about EVH actually was the timbres/textures he got from both guitars and synths.

Sundar (sundar), Sunday, 8 January 2006 00:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Wow, this thread is old.

Jordan (Jordan), Sunday, 8 January 2006 01:21 (eighteen years ago) link

You were right on the money in your first post. Have you changed your mind since then?

Redd Harvest (Ken L), Sunday, 8 January 2006 01:29 (eighteen years ago) link

Nope.

Jordan (Jordan), Sunday, 8 January 2006 01:44 (eighteen years ago) link

mark s. is so gleefully wrong on this thread. but so are a lot of others.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 01:55 (eighteen years ago) link

Good.

Redd Harvest (Ken L), Sunday, 8 January 2006 02:04 (eighteen years ago) link

forget his exact words but my memory seems convinced that he meant manual squeezing shd be involved, i think he did a gesture

mark s, Saturday, 26 August 2017 17:46 (six years ago) link

Def gonna call my jazz fusion collabo with Carlos "Nether Regions"


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.