"Who' Next" - Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (136 of them)
To me it's just as simple as, the best songs on it have gotten worn to the ground and so when I flip to it in my record box, I at most pause, think it over, and go "Ehhhh." The only thing on it that excites me is of course "Goin' Mobile," which is tremendous fun and untainted by the level of radio saturation-bombing that's been visited on Baba O and even Bargain at this point... I can't really hold any of this against the record but it means I'm not going to put it on. I should give "Sell Out" another try, I've had it for a year and a half and put it on only once. Got distracted by Bridge Over Troubled Water, which I got at the same yard sale...

Doctor Casino (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 06:29 (eighteen years ago) link

How much do ILMers listen to the radio, especially classic rock radio, that they're sick of jams like "Won't Get Fooled Again"? I thought most everyone here iTuned My Bloody Valentine, Annie, Guru Guru, and J Dee.

happy jack, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 06:41 (eighteen years ago) link

How much do ILMers listen to the radio, especially classic rock radio, that they're sick of jams like "Won't Get Fooled Again"?

I listen to the radio when not driving my own car. Mostly oldies radio but classic rock is on the presets usually.

Cunga (Cunga), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 06:48 (eighteen years ago) link

"'"entwistle's best song" is not very high praise!'

"Don't let Colin M see this."

Saw it, wasn't offended, Douglas was absolutely right anyway (Heaven and Hell).

Colin Meeder (Mert), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 08:02 (eighteen years ago) link

Yes, Dr. Casino, you should definitely play Sell Out some more.

Let's get this clear...I am NOT technology (Bimble...), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 08:26 (eighteen years ago) link

It's the first "Who" album as we know them. Juggernaughts, massive rigs, 4 people.

It did indeed 'born' the whole Classic Rock idiom.

That's how good it was.

I missed out on the whole "Who" love at the time, and got the 2CD version in a competition. And it's a big marvellous thing. Sure, I love "Who Sellout" more, but that is only to be expected, it's more human and has fragile moments and out and out comedy.

I admire it without necessarily loving it. (I certainly like it well enough)

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 09:13 (eighteen years ago) link

For an album that kickstarted 70s rock it still sounds surprisingly lean, mean and fresh. Though had Townsend's Lifehouse project survivied intact no doubt we'd have a mostly unlistenable self-indulgent triple album, of which these would be highlights. No point comparing this record unfavourably with the early singles - the who's greatest work. It does lack that comedy. But context is all: there's probably a conscious irony in bellowing out 'Teenage Wasteland' at a field full of stoned rockers.
At the time, no-one in a rock band was sequencing synthesisers like that; what is surprising is that it's done so well.
I love the oo, flawed beast though they were, and this is one of their best.

Craig Kenny (Dr X O'Skeleton), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 10:21 (eighteen years ago) link

It's like a musical version of The Tomorrow People.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 10:24 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't like the who

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 10:29 (eighteen years ago) link

I never need to hear it again.

-- Ned Raggett

but is a classic album just wish they hadn't sold out to everyone possible...

On a side note is Mark, Ryan?

BeeOK (boo radley), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 10:35 (eighteen years ago) link

Saying that Who's Next isn't funny enough (despite "My Wife" and "Goin' Mobile" . . .) implicates all sorts of great albums--Loveless, Tago Mago, Unknown Pleasures, Pink Moon, the list goes on. Are The Who supposed to be like the Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band or something?

happy jack, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 13:53 (eighteen years ago) link

"Tago Mago" is quite funny in places ("Peking O")

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 13:59 (eighteen years ago) link

well, the oo do have that reputation, jack, as your name testifies. I don't see it as a bad thing at all. It sits alongside the serious stuff, so on Who by Numbers you have the 'Carry on' humour of Squeeze Box, followed by townsend crying into the bottom of a glass over the course of several songs.

dr x o'skeleton, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 14:00 (eighteen years ago) link

Humour is a very important part of The Who.

My Wife is funny, but not poignant. Heaven and Hell is funny and poignant. Postcard is funny but not that poignant.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 14:02 (eighteen years ago) link

John Entwistle never wrote a serious song in his life, did he?

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 14:05 (eighteen years ago) link

Classic, and the last Who album I enjoy start to finish, though I like some tracks on the LPs after this one. On the other hand, outside of listening to the LP in one sitting, I'd be happy to never hear "Behind Blue Eyes" again.

I don't consider "Getting In Tune" bad at all, at the least for the part where Roger sings the "right in on you..." part, and Entwhistle and Moon kick things up a few notches, turning what was a ballad into a heavy rocker.

James, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 14:15 (eighteen years ago) link

hey british ILMers…

since classic rock radio has no analogue in the U.K. (or does it? not sure), did '70s-era "rock and roll is IMPORTANT" 'Oo get shoved down yr throats?

i ask cuz i know lots of english ex-pats who never heard LZ—or at least were disinclined to check 'em out— until they moved to the US, since punk and new wave was opposed to dinoaur-ism.

veronica moser (veronica moser), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 14:23 (eighteen years ago) link

hey british ILMers…

since classic rock radio has no analogue in the U.K. (or does it? not sure), did '70s-era "rock and roll is IMPORTANT" 'Oo get shoved down yr throats?

i ask cuz i know lots of english ex-pats who never heard LZ—or at least were disinclined to check 'em out— until they moved to the US, since punk and new wave was opposed to dinoaur-ism.

and Entwistle wrote a song for the 'Oo called "When I was a boy" that was "serious."

veronica moser (veronica moser), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 14:24 (eighteen years ago) link

since classic rock radio has no analogue in the U.K. (or does it? not sure)

It doesn't

did '70s-era "rock and roll is IMPORTANT" 'Oo get shoved down yr throats?

No reason for it, after punk

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 14:28 (eighteen years ago) link

A few years ago, when I was in college and there were tons of "mod" punk kids, early Who stuff definitely had status near or next to The Stones. I don't know if that's changed now.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 15:04 (eighteen years ago) link

On a side note is Mark, Ryan?

-- BeeOK

Not sure if this was addressed to me, but if so, Mark is Mark, not Ryan.

Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:12 (eighteen years ago) link

I agree with a lot of what's been said here. I don't think that The Who's back catalogue has been treated with respect in the way The Beatles or The Stones has. Despite the parallel in events with LZ at the end of the 70's/early 80's. LZ split and that was that The Who have soldiered on for the best part of 25 years in one shape or form. Dylan and Bowie have managed to put out some material of note post '79 and I'd probably say that the recent attention around Pink Floyd probably puts The Who behind all of them.

Back to Who's Next, It's patchy and I think it's status as the first classic rock album puts it in a bad light but a lot of it isn't worth recommending. I'd say the essential Who is Live At Leeds, The Who Sell Out and that compliation from 2002. After that the orginal My Generation. I think you had to be there for Tommy and Quadrophenia, they are even more patchy than Who's Next

MitchellStirling (MitchellStirling), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:02 (eighteen years ago) link

One of Townshend's demo/archive/Scoop albums has the extended-synth, bandless version of "Baba O'Reilly" on it and it's pretty outstanding. Like Pink Floyd, Townshend approaches the Moog and VCS3 as pure sound-generators without any "proper keyboard training" getting in the way.

As for Who's Next it's both classic and dud. Past 1967, Townshend's failures are generally pretty interesting and the sinking of Lifehouse results in a pretty outstanding rock album without all the conceptual blubber of hippie mysticism weighing it down. I'd dump some of the tracks with a couple of the Odds And Sods leftovers (really just "Pure And Easy" and "Naked Eye") though.

Who's Next also marks the point where the studio version of The Who completely separates from the live version of The Who. It's not surprising, Townshend has everything he needs to feed his maniac pursuit to whatever/wherever, but the one thing he can't do is get the live sound down of the 70s-era Who. Too bad, the live versions of "Won't Get...," "Baba...," and "My Wife" on The Kids Are Alright are still U & K and there's a live take of "Bargain" out there that's just amazing.

The Equator Lounge (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:32 (eighteen years ago) link

six years pass...

I think the biggest reason the Who haven't aged well is because of all the falsetto. It's terrible, and sucks all the masculine power out of every song. A shame, because they're pretty good otherwise.

Poliopolice, Thursday, 6 September 2012 05:23 (eleven years ago) link

Where does he sing in falsetto?

timellison, Thursday, 6 September 2012 05:36 (eleven years ago) link

i've always called this album a shit sandwich on golden bread.
"baba o'rielly" and "won't get fooled" again are amazing. the rest... shit.

BringTheAuBonPain, Thursday, 6 September 2012 05:49 (eleven years ago) link

six years pass...

This album really isn't very good, is it? Case in point: The Song Is Over is like Yes if Yes were shit

imago, Friday, 9 August 2019 15:40 (four years ago) link

the song is over is nothing like yes

jakey mo collier (voodoo chili), Friday, 9 August 2019 15:42 (four years ago) link

Even Baba O'Reilly commits the sin of ending just as it's getting interesting again

imago, Friday, 9 August 2019 15:43 (four years ago) link

ok if you think the intro and the outro are the best parts of baba o'riley then this album is just not for you

jakey mo collier (voodoo chili), Friday, 9 August 2019 15:43 (four years ago) link

The last minute of BOR heads in a cool new direction and you're like woo prog o'clock and then it just ENDS

imago, Friday, 9 August 2019 15:44 (four years ago) link

'Won't Get Fooled Again' conveniently describes my feelings every time I deign give this album another chance.

pomenitul, Friday, 9 August 2019 15:44 (four years ago) link

"it's like they realized they wrote a perfect song, panicked, then added a violin solo."

jakey mo collier (voodoo chili), Friday, 9 August 2019 15:45 (four years ago) link

Won't Get Fooled Again still has 3 minutes left, but I can't imagine what it has left to give

imago, Friday, 9 August 2019 15:58 (four years ago) link

Turned out to be 'aimless noodling', as expected. Oh wait what's this? Do I smell false ending? No, I smell 'we've heard of Terry Riley* and all our best stuff is basically him'

*John Cage? Whatever

Oh hey, it was a false ending! Way to goooo

imago, Friday, 9 August 2019 16:01 (four years ago) link

all our best stuff

it's ok to admit that a band is just not for you, then move on. like idk what you're going for here, but the best thing about a band that has Keith Moon in it isn't their brief detours into minimalism.

jakey mo collier (voodoo chili), Friday, 9 August 2019 16:16 (four years ago) link

Rong.

pomenitul, Friday, 9 August 2019 16:17 (four years ago) link

Yeah the other great thing is the playing I guess, but the songwriting is just not for me, sure. I'm sure they ripped it up live

imago, Friday, 9 August 2019 16:19 (four years ago) link

"it's like they realized they wrote a perfect song, panicked, then added a violin solo."

― jakey mo collier (voodoo chili), Friday, August 9, 2019 10:45 AM (thirty-two minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

joe otm

budo jeru, Friday, 9 August 2019 16:20 (four years ago) link

townshend needed the courage of his convictions: sack daltrey and replace all his singing with violin solos and minimalist sequencer patterns

mark s, Friday, 9 August 2019 16:24 (four years ago) link

imago has successfully identified the fact that The Who, the band that would routinely blow up their enormous amps with bombs and fireworks, were not as committed to minimalism as Terry Riley and John Cage

“Hakuna Matata,” a nihilist philosophy (One Eye Open), Friday, 9 August 2019 16:33 (four years ago) link

nor as committed to prog as Yes

imago, Friday, 9 August 2019 16:35 (four years ago) link

in other news, despite using electronic amplification to reproduce & distort sound and creating pieces founded on mantra-like repetition, when all is said and done The Ramones simply do a sorry job of engaging with the works of Alvin Lucier.

“Hakuna Matata,” a nihilist philosophy (One Eye Open), Friday, 9 August 2019 16:39 (four years ago) link

well, no the who weren't a prog rock band.

xp

jakey mo collier (voodoo chili), Friday, 9 August 2019 16:41 (four years ago) link

It's remarkable how thoroughly the Who's arena rock era, like the Stones own early '70s', completely steamrolled the band's iconic '60s era.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 9 August 2019 17:02 (four years ago) link

the song is over is nothing like yes

... and Yes are shit.

Euripedes' Trousers (Tom D.), Friday, 9 August 2019 17:14 (four years ago) link

completely steamrolled the band's iconic '60s era.

Steamrolled it by amplification but not by energy. Keith Moon was actually reined in on Who's Next and asserts himself as a nut again on Quad.

timellison, Friday, 9 August 2019 17:31 (four years ago) link

I meant that when the band finally dies I suspect it will be something like "Won't Get Fooled Again" or "Baba" that serve as their lasting epitaph, rather than "My Generation" or "I Can See For Miles."

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 9 August 2019 17:41 (four years ago) link

In the USA maybe, not in the UK.

Euripedes' Trousers (Tom D.), Friday, 9 August 2019 17:42 (four years ago) link

I mean you lot didn't even start buying Kinks records till about 1973.

Euripedes' Trousers (Tom D.), Friday, 9 August 2019 17:43 (four years ago) link

gives a new meaning to the album title tbh

kissinger on my list (voodoo chili), Friday, 12 January 2024 00:57 (three months ago) link

or it's almost like the name of the album is asking "who (of the members of the band that recorded me)'s next (to die? after all, two of the original four have already passed away)" - and then roger daltrey (the singer) says "it's probably me, I'm probably next." ba dum tish!

conrad, Friday, 12 January 2024 05:34 (three months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.