"My Chemical Romance is this generation's Nirvana"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (735 of them)
I read the linked article, I didn't like it much b/c I don't like the "voice" she writes in, but as far as it went, I didn't think she was totally wrong.

What did occur to me was that, uh, there is this assumption that MCR "mean" s.th. to "this" generation, but when Nirvana were active & Cobain alive, I don't recall them "meaning" anything like that to the equivalent generation back then, though obviously layers of "meaning" have been applied to Nirvana & Cobain in the intervening years. Perhaps.

I've heard MCR on the radio a bit, but I didn't think they were particularly, well, particularly anything, really. Then again, I'm 40 and I like Hawkwind.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:32 (eighteen years ago) link

nirvana meant a lot to the sensitive people with curtains in the years above me.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:33 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm all for their dress sense (well, the lead dude's dress sense, and make-up for that matter) and implied ruined romanticism. Their music, not so much.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:34 (eighteen years ago) link

I would argue that those "hacks" who think youth phenomena are important and to be written about, write about youth music and therefore MCR in proportion to their popularity. Those who are still writing about Neil Young and Springstreen or whoever are writing about the music they like and feel has "artistic" merit, or they cover the Red Hot Chili Peppers or Madonna or whoever, following those commercial urges you spoke about.

As always, it would be interesting to see some numbers comparing column inches, record sales, and airplay for MCR, Kanye, etc.

mitya is really tired of making up names, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:36 (eighteen years ago) link

oh MCR are totally this generation's Nirvana: they're both a) angsty, b) have terrible noisy guitars, c) crap singers and d) are complete crap.


The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:39 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost

Bon Jovi were the Nirvana of hair metal.

Exactly my point, except that the rockists among us won't take umbrage at comparing Bon Jovi and MCR the way they do Nirvana.

mitya is really tired of making up names, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:39 (eighteen years ago) link

Some of the comments to the original post were quite interesting as well. It wasn't so long ago that someone would ahve been substituting Korn or Limp Bizkit for MCR in that post. And now look...

mitya is really tired of making up names, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:40 (eighteen years ago) link

"Bands in becoming less popular over period of time" shock!

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:41 (eighteen years ago) link

Various things...

Another question is what does "this generation's Nirvana" mean?

I have no idea what this means either! Does she mean they're a band that are changing the greater musical landscape or does she simply mean that they're important to angsty kids? Or both? I don't geddit.

i suppose the more subjective answer is that many music hacks still see pop and rock music as essentially 'youth' forms, not without reason, really, and that youth phenomena are important, a sign of the times. probably this is because more music obsessives are teenagers than 35-year-olds.

One thing about Nirvana I suppose is that yer old buggers were into them way before yer 16-year olds knew who they were. Is this her point? I don't know!

Also, at the time Tad were the media tip for the big act to come out of Sub Pop.

I don't really recall this, but I wasn't really paying that much attention. Was this on the evidence of God's Balls vs. Bleach? 'Behemoth' was good, but not that good, IIRC. Anyhow Mudhoney would've been the obvious choice to me, but it's nice thinking about a planet where Tad released Nevermind. If only Dave Geffen had listened to that demo of 'Smells Like Beef Dripping'...

NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:44 (eighteen years ago) link

I kind of assume that she means "important to angsty kids". I don't recall nirvana's usp being "important to angsty kids" while they were active, though obviously they became so later. Actually, I don't know if it is "obviously" - I'm just assuming so b/c I remember seeing a lot of teenagers w/nirvana tees, satchel patches etc over the years. I saw Nirvana twice - once with Tad as a double headliner, where the audience could perhaps be characterised as early-mid twenties people, the kind of folks who had been into eg swans, pixies, snc youth, big black. When I saw Killdozer playing the tour for "uncompromising war on art..." it was a slightly smaller audience, but nearly all the same people. Mudhoney headlining w/Telescopes support drew a much bigger crowd. The second time it was w/eugenius & shonen knife at a bigger venue, and it was a more metalised audience. It reminded me strongly of when Hanoi Rocks crossed over from a small proto-goth audience to a much larger kerrang readers audience.

If u/grl'z "it's yoof, you oldies don't understand" blather is true w/r/2 MCR's audience, then I don't see the comparison, & I bet she's just tossing it out b/c she knows it'll annoy some Cobain=godhead type ppl.

(blethering about the innate musical & rocking superiority of Mudhoney to any of this shit ruthlessly excised)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:54 (eighteen years ago) link

I saw Nirvana twice - once with Tad as a double headliner, where the audience could perhaps be characterised as early-mid twenties people, the kind of folks who had been into eg swans, pixies, snc youth, big black.

I saw them on the same tour, and yeah, that was what the crowd were like. Later on, it was more of your grebo-lite Neds types. But certainly not kids.

NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Later on, it was more of your grebo-lite Neds types

Yay! Oh wait...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:08 (eighteen years ago) link

Actually *High School Musical* is this generation's Bon Jovi. (My Chemical Romance is for OLD people. Ultragrrrl is clearly not in touch with the kids.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:09 (eighteen years ago) link

Ned, are you grebo-lite?

NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:11 (eighteen years ago) link

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00004VVNB.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:31 (eighteen years ago) link

She's what, 26 now? Most of my friends fall in the mid 20s and I can see where she's coming from. If you were just beginning your teens when Nirvana started getting huge then their canonization seems a little odd. Most of the bands that are popular at any one time with kids of that age are forgotten a decade later. The narrative that the music press puts together in retrospect is great, but I think at that age you're likely to feel fairly passionately about whatever bands you like.

MCR might not fare as well in the retrospective critical opinion, but does that matter to their core fanbase? I mean, look at the NME readers in the UK -- they think that there's some canon with Arctic Monkeys and this Pete Doherty stuff near the top! That sounds like kids thinking they're living in some crucial moment to me.

mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:37 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't recall nirvana's usp being "important to angsty kids" while they were active, though obviously they became so later.

Pash, OTM It wasn't until the deification of Cobains death in the late 90's that the angsty kid's became their core audience.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:50 (eighteen years ago) link

My Chemical Romance is fucking terrible.

Dan (Blech) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:59 (eighteen years ago) link

being a kid in the mythical time of nirvana, i can unequivocally state that they were huge with the kids, angsty or not (at least in the us). they were also popular with adults. the critics liked them too. then the guy killed himself.

these seem to be the four things that made nirvana the nirvana of their generation: loved by the kids, loved by the non-kids, enjoyed by the critics, suicide.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:05 (eighteen years ago) link

I was 12-15 during the Nirvana time and peers of that time definitely had a huge awareness of the band, even if not everybody liked them. But the I think its a bad analogy because MCR isn't nearly as accepted by the rockcrit world as Nirvana was.

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:12 (eighteen years ago) link

Also Nevermind didn't gradually hit 2 million over a year and a half.

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:13 (eighteen years ago) link

It's not about whether MCR is good or bad. It's about accepting them or risking irrelevance to anyone that matters.

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:13 (eighteen years ago) link

sorry for all the typos, just got up.

x-post the children of rich white people?

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Dakota Fanning matters?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Eminem is this generation's Nirvana, duh.

I accept My Chemical Romance. I think they are totally relevant for 2006, but certainly won't be remembered that way in, say, 2010. They write OK rock songs that are pretty fun now, but won't be much more than nostalgia in the longrun. MCR is this generation's Bush.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:15 (eighteen years ago) link

To paraphrase Clooney at the Oscars the other night: in that case I'm proud to be "irrelevant."

(xpost x 3)

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:16 (eighteen years ago) link

Jane's Addiction might be a better analogy. Nasal vocals, represents subculture on the cusp of cultural saturation. Fun videos. Singer who likes to paint and says hippie-ish stuff on stage. Derivative fashion sense that's considered vaguely refreshing in cultural context. Somewhat more tolerable than their peers (emo being funk-metal).

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:20 (eighteen years ago) link

"Helena" = "Jane Says"

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:22 (eighteen years ago) link

This is what I don't get--back when Nirvana "broke," it's not like the journalists were that much younger. I mean, by the time you "make" it in the paper rags, aren't you already a bit older? So wouldn't the ppl writing about Nirvana have been the same distance from Nirvana as journalists are today with MCR?

Or maybe not.

Jubalique (Jubalique), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:24 (eighteen years ago) link

If only Perry had thought to film a video at a funeral.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Eminem is this generation's Nirvana, duh.

ok grandad.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:27 (eighteen years ago) link

I like that one, Miccio, esp. because Jane's Addiction is still a pretty fun listen today. Not sure what some would say about the "chops" of JA as compared to MCR, though. Actually, I am pretty sure and I think it would end up unfavorably for MCR, not that I'm too bogged down with such concerns.

xpost

regular roundups (Dave M), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:28 (eighteen years ago) link

the children of rich white people?

the children of white people?

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:29 (eighteen years ago) link

See, I spent a long portion of last year actually digging into this kind of stuff. Because I think she's right -- people who write about music certainly need to grapple with it. And it's not just an issue of whether MCR themselves are good or important -- the bigger issue is that there will soon enough be a whole lot of music listeners (and criticism readers), of whatever taste, whose formative records came from this area. Who knows where they'll wind up? And of course when it happens it'll be better to know where they're coming from, no matter what you actually thought of it.

My whole investigation was largely based on working with a 19-year-old metalhead whose description of the rock world was largely foreign to me, even when he talked about "indie" and pop-rock kids; he knew a lot about music, but the set of things that mattered to him and the lineages he saw in them were completely non-canonical. Unfortunately after a few months of listening the main thing I would up listening to a lot was Nightmare of You, who just sound like Morrissey.

nabiscothingy, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:36 (eighteen years ago) link

Not necessarily a problem, that.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:37 (eighteen years ago) link

people who write about music certainly need to grapple with it

In the UK, MCR have thus far had four Top 40 singles, none of which has climbed higher than #19, and one Top 40 album which spent one week at #34. So in British terms, "we" need to grapple with them about as much as we need to grapple with Dave Matthews or Phish or Hamilton, Joe Frank and Reynolds.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:41 (eighteen years ago) link

BWAHAAHAHA
mark OTM w/ Logan's Run!!!!!

too funny...

eedd, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:42 (eighteen years ago) link

There were adults who grew up on Poison/Ratt too. And all that meant was 4 years of Nickelback.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:44 (eighteen years ago) link

Marcello it may come as a terrific shock to you to learn that (a) I'm not British, and (b) you surely have your own teen favorites to deal with.

Soundgarden, Primus, Alice in Chains -- these are 90s rock acts that "everyone" listened to, but none of them hold much critical sway anymore. Even assuming that MCR wind up in that category, don't critics benefit from knowing what Soundgarden, Primus, and Alice in Chains were about?

Further complication: part of why bands like that don't "hold critical sway" is that we ignore the people for whom they were formative -- people, so far as I can tell, in nu-metal acts. Same probably goes for the Get Up Kids.

nabiscothingy, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:45 (eighteen years ago) link

>There were adults who grew up on Poison/Ratt too. And all that meant was 4 years of Nickelback. <

????
Nickelback (sadly) sound more like Nirvana than Poison or Ratt!

xhuxk, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:48 (eighteen years ago) link

don't critics benefit from knowing what Soundgarden, Primus, and Alice in Chains were about?

Yes, if only to avoid having to "grapple" with them. We were too busy here drooling over transient novelty American acts like Jeff Buckley, Wu-Tang Clan, Will Oldham, DJ Shadow, etc.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:48 (eighteen years ago) link

And Whiney your argument's totally backwards! Poison and Ratt -- don't you think it's worthwhile for a critic (or at least some critics) to know something about hair metal, especially if it could explain something about current acts? Not that I think people should investigate new music with a sense of duty and disdain, rather than discovery, but the point here (mine, if not Ultra-face's) is that critics would benefit from knowing a little about this category, rather than putting it down to "MySpace rock" and then going home.

nabiscothingy, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:49 (eighteen years ago) link

Said critics are probably already sick of all the invites from MySpace rock type bands, thus the disdain.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:50 (eighteen years ago) link

don't critics benefit from knowing what Soundgarden, Primus, and Alice in Chains were about?

Yeah, you find out that Godsmack isn't as original as you thought.

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:55 (eighteen years ago) link

Y'all have a lot of jokes but I don't see how it doesn't benefit a critic to know about stuff people like! I guess this is just a question of whether critics should pay attention to pop/rock in general, which I suppose they historically haven't.

nabiscothingy, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:02 (eighteen years ago) link

the singer for this band looks like a garbage pail kid

latebloomer: keeping his reputation for an intense on-set presence (latebloomer), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:03 (eighteen years ago) link

I suppose it depends on perceived audience, though, Nabisco.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:04 (eighteen years ago) link

For whatever it's worth, I cared more about Poison and Ratt a couple decades ago or Candlebox and Collective Soul a decade ago than I care about My Chemical Romance now. But to me that seems neither here nor there, and I have no idea what it has to do with age. I care about *other* stuff now, including plenty of stuff listened to by people whose fans are *younger* than My Chemical Romance's fans. And come to think of it, I probably could have said the same thing about Nirvana or Jane's Addiction in 1991. I *respect* critics who care about My Chemical Romance now, especically people who can say interesting things about that kind of music in general. (Mikael Wood is great at it, though I'm not sure he's ever written about MCR specifically.) But not every critic has to be interested in all music. And, not that anybody has suggested this, but MCR not doing as well as Nirvana in critics' polls doesn't necessarily mean critics aren't paying attention to MCR; it might just mean critics don't like them. Me, I just wish MCR were have as fun or catchy as Poison or Ratt used to be (then again, maybe if I spent more time with MCR, I'd think they are.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Y'all have a lot of jokes but I don't see how it doesn't benefit a critic to know about stuff people like! I guess this is just a question of whether critics should pay attention to pop/rock in general

I would agree that if you have pretensions toward "big picture" criticism, then you should at least be familiar with someone like MCR. But that doesn't mean you have to buy into Ultragrrrl's premise that you have to believe they are central to music.

which I suppose they historically haven't.

?!?

mitya is really tired of making up names, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:06 (eighteen years ago) link

"Eminem is this generation's Nirvana, duh."

Chris OTM.

Without Nirvana, there'd be no MCR. Without MCR there'll be no...?

And isn't Pfork the "young critical establishment"? They seem to care about MCR in roughly the same measure that they care about CCR.

js (honestengine), Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:08 (eighteen years ago) link

My daughter was at the show last night in Nashville. She's never been much of a concertgoer but would have run through a brick wall to get to this one, and I gather it totally delivered.

WmC, Wednesday, 24 August 2022 16:42 (one year ago) link

Lucky her! Definitely looked like it was a total blast

Roz, Wednesday, 24 August 2022 16:49 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.