2001: A Space Odyssey

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (924 of them)
Part of my ex-roomie's email is "ae35" (falsely malfunctioning unit on Discovery).

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 21:05 (eighteen years ago) link

I just think 2001 is boring. The only Kubrick I can get into is War Kubrick. The rest (that I've seen) comes across as masturbatory rubbish. I AM STANLEY KUBRICK I AM SO FREAKING YOU OUT RIGHT NOW LOL. That's what I hear, in my head, during that stupid slow-motion blood spilling out of the walls shot in Shining. Or the space baby thing with the fanfare. Give it a rest, beardo.

Full Metal Jacket
Dr. Strangelove
Spartacus
Paths of Glory

I like all of these! I really do! And except for FMJ I liked all of them BEFORE I ever had any intention of joining the cast of MASH so there!

BTW Joshua could whup HAL's ass.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 30 November 2005 21:16 (eighteen years ago) link

hands up whoever has used hal-9000 audio themes on their PCs. *raises hand*
hearing "just a moment..." is so much better than the stupid default windows exclamation. or the critical stop sound of "i'm sorry dave, i'm afraid i can't do that" (extra good if your name happens to be dave)

did you like Barry Lyndon, TOMBOT? it's got war in it.

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 21:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Tombot (pls don't crack my ribs), did you see 2001 in a theater ever? Cuz it really is different, and not just in a widesceen outer-space way.

Man, Spartacus is fine as Decadent Hollywood Rome spectacles go, but i can't take that slaves-frolic-with-the-lambs shit.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 21:26 (eighteen years ago) link

Judging from the film ballots, you've all seen it on small black-and-white TVs.

And haven't seen La Jetée at all. But que sera, et al.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 21:33 (eighteen years ago) link

I saw 2001 on a re-release on the old big screen at Unit Four in Wallasey (before they split it into two, maybe three screens) when I was 11 in the summer of 1979. Magical.

Isn't it the case that Sarah Cracknell was screentested for the Starchild? (Her dad was 1st AD.) Stanley decided to go with a fake.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 22:02 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, God knows what lengths Stan woulda gone to make infant Sarah Cracknell suggest Keir Dullea...

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 22:06 (eighteen years ago) link

I have not seen Barry Lyndon.
I have not seen 2001 in the theater.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 30 November 2005 22:51 (eighteen years ago) link

john landis really ran with that...

Not the only thing that he ran into the ground...

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 22:57 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm not THAT into Kubrick.

General Doinel (Charles McCain), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 23:06 (eighteen years ago) link

wildcat vs apes
apes vs apes
men vs supercomputer

hence
2001 = WAR KUBRICK


Joshua??? Haha, is that the WarGames computer? You'd put a killer of astronauts up against something programmed by Matthew Broderick?!?

(Reagan-era kiddie nuke adventures: The Manhattan Project > WarGames)

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2005 14:28 (eighteen years ago) link

i have never seen this on a big screen. i liked it in college. these days i have gone back to preferring 'full metal jacket', and i think i'm right.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 1 December 2005 14:33 (eighteen years ago) link

Dr Morbius why are you always wrong about everything?

The WOPR had the entire nuclear arsenal of the world at its disposal. It almost wiped out the human race. They couldn't shut it down, they had to teach it futility. That's a much, much more interesting character arc than HAL, and better armament to boot.

When I get my own digital projector and an apartment to fit it in, I'll be sure and netflix 2001 again and let you know how I feel afterwards. I am not optimistic.

(I also think Henry is right, AGAIN. Enrique didn't we used to get in fites on film threads? what went wrong?)

TOMBOT, Thursday, 1 December 2005 14:39 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah we did: long story.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 1 December 2005 14:40 (eighteen years ago) link

Whatever bub, I ain't seen WG since 1983. (and when did you last see On Her Majesty's Secret Service? great D. Rigg and stuntwork, the rest godawful boring)

So is the ending of 2001 Kubrick's most optimistic? Is it, as John Simon dissed, "a shaggy God story"? Or is tracking human evolution as a series of steps engineered from Beyond the Infinite depressingly deterministic? And why do aliens like 18th-century French decor?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2005 14:53 (eighteen years ago) link

hum. i think it is his most optimistic.

but i'm unsure abt evolution as a theory.

ok lol

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 1 December 2005 14:54 (eighteen years ago) link

the 18c decor is meant to represent 'rationalism'. and he spills the glass ----> rationalism = impossible ideal?

i was a riot at college

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 1 December 2005 14:55 (eighteen years ago) link

I read something linking the broken glass to Jewish weddings.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2005 14:58 (eighteen years ago) link

it works on so many levels, man.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 1 December 2005 14:58 (eighteen years ago) link

The rest (that I've seen) comes across as masturbatory rubbish. I AM STANLEY KUBRICK I AM SO FREAKING YOU OUT RIGHT NOW LOL. That's what I hear, in my head, during that stupid slow-motion blood spilling out of the walls shot in Shining.

That's a shame! I always find it interesting to see where different people draw the line beyond which everything becomes "pretentious" or "masturbatory".

sleep (sleep), Thursday, 1 December 2005 15:26 (eighteen years ago) link

Esp from fans of Kill Bill. (The Shining is pompous tho -- but less so than Stephen King would've liked.)

Apparently the 2001 makeup people weren't considered for an Oscar because the pajama-clad Academy types didn't realize the apes were actors.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2005 15:31 (eighteen years ago) link

Haha. I guess it's pompous, but I think I have a high tolerance for that stuff, relatively speaking. But it's not like it's so busy going up its own ass that it's inaccessible, right?

sleep (sleep), Thursday, 1 December 2005 15:41 (eighteen years ago) link

didn't planet of the apes win an oscar for makeup that same year?

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 1 December 2005 15:49 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah, i always wondered about the ape-makeup thing, and why it was so understated in film circles. i mean, make-up skills/latex compounds (not to mention CGI/post effects) have come a long way since then, but i still think the 2001 apes are the perfect man/ape hybrid. waaaay better than planet of the apes sytle.

although he did use a real chimp baby...

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Thursday, 1 December 2005 15:53 (eighteen years ago) link

Tried to read the book in the 5th grade and couldn't. But the Jack Kirby comic book was classic.

http://blogs.citypages.com/pscholtes/images/11111111%20Jack%20Kirby.jpg

I loved the movie so early and unconditionally that reading Pauline Kael's pan as an adolescent was an event. But she was so wrong...

Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 1 December 2005 16:12 (eighteen years ago) link

Yes on Apes (it was a special award as there was as yet no makeup category). Of course the POTA actors had to talk so it was adifferent challenge, but still...

The 2001 apes were in Shepperton Studios -- the landscapes were rear projections.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2005 16:19 (eighteen years ago) link

did you see 2001 in a theater ever?

I have. It looks great, but it doesn't change everything else I find wrong with it. This is my issue with Kubrick almost en totale. Everything looks great (except most of the Shining but I'm not sure who to blame really for why the Shining is so awful, mainly I blame Nicholson), but that's...it...which there is something to be said for that but there is also something to be said for not making films like Eyes Wide Shut.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 1 December 2005 16:39 (eighteen years ago) link

I watched it in Cinerama too, at the Bradford Film and tv museum. It was amazing to look at, but that doesn't change the flaws in the film itself.

Vicky (Vicky), Thursday, 1 December 2005 16:45 (eighteen years ago) link

I think my best comparison/contrast for this movie would probably be with something like L'Avventura or Red Desert, which are extraordinarily visually focused and very carefully composed, but I just feel have "more" to them than 2001 does.

And yeah the space baby thing was crap, I gotta be honest, that is totally awkward cinema IMO.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 1 December 2005 16:50 (eighteen years ago) link

this is my favorite movie ever, pretty much.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 1 December 2005 16:54 (eighteen years ago) link

The shot where you're looking through astronaut Dave's eyes to old Dave, and Dave walks towards you and suddenly you realise young Dave is gone and OMG perspective shift from first-person-young-Dave to third-person-old-Dave! Literally the most breathtaking movie moment ever. For me.

ledge (ledge), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:02 (eighteen years ago) link

A friend hates Kubrick, except for this one.

I can understand the Starbaby not working for you, but "awkward"? If the finale shows the post-human evolutionary leap, how else would you show it? All the other options seem too mundane.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:04 (eighteen years ago) link

I agree that it's a difficult thing to show, how else would you do it, what is mundane versus what is exciting ("exciting" etc), BUT mainly it just makes me giggle and then makes me not want to watch it at all because I feel I should be taking it more seriously than I am, but I am NOT. I think it's the music, more so than the actual image, that does it in for me.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:08 (eighteen years ago) link

I much prefer TOTO's guitars as Muad'Dib rides the worm into the fortress walls. Atomics, as they say. I want to see THAT in the theater. Hell with this Kubrick nonsense.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:18 (eighteen years ago) link

Earth Astronauts got nothin on the Fremen of Arrakis y'all

TOMBOT, Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:19 (eighteen years ago) link

maybe cuz the image and that minute of Thus Spake Zarathustra have been parodied endlessly?

(friend claims this is why I hate Brando in The Godfather, but I maintain it's because he's bad)

Dune, aghhh. Medieval-style sci-fi... me so sleeeepppyyy...

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:20 (eighteen years ago) link

I've seen that in a theatre too. Trust me, you don't want to see it in a theatre. Unless you're seriously drunk.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:21 (eighteen years ago) link

mang i like dune and 2001. i hate movies-as-competition shit.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:24 (eighteen years ago) link

They're finally going to release the 3-hour version Jan 31st. Hopefully with the sequence where they drown the baby sandworms to get 'em to cough up the water of life. That's pretty crucial.

How the hell did you get to see Dune in the theater? Man.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Brando is kind of bad in the Godfather, that's the exact moment in time where he becomes BRANDO teh JOKE in my mind. But OTOH I'm on record on this board as kind of disliking everything about the Godfather besides Al Pacino's performance and maybe Diane Keaton's.

I bought tickets to see Dune in a theatre. WTF?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:26 (eighteen years ago) link

Parody factor is a good point though, though in Brando's case he kind of parodies himself see also DeNiro and, uh, Pacino actually.

i hate movies-as-competition shit.

what do you mean?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:27 (eighteen years ago) link

He probably means that, like me, he likes most of the films that have been bashed by various people on this thread in order to praise other films.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:29 (eighteen years ago) link

i mean the whole comparison. "dune" and "2001" are totally different movies, and comparing them is pointless - not to mention the idea that one's better than the other when it's like apples and oranges! it's like ILM and the total "taking sides" bullshit. both of those movies stand fine on their own merits.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:30 (eighteen years ago) link

both of those movies stand fine on their own merits.

But as films go, Stence, you must admit that 2001 has the edge, no?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:32 (eighteen years ago) link

I wasn't trying to bring up competition. I was kind of thinking about silly music moments in sci-fi and movies I would put up on a big screen first, if I had a big screen in my house, ergo, DUNE.

I meant where the hell do they still show Dune in the theater! I guess not in Alabama or Tennessee or the Washington DC metro area.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:34 (eighteen years ago) link

there was a jack kirby 2001 comic?!?!

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:36 (eighteen years ago) link

I've been mostly joking on this thread, but when has Kubrick come up with a joke as good as the WOPR (ohno popcult ref ohno!). And can someone explain why 2001 is better than his last two?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:37 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh yes.

Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:37 (eighteen years ago) link

I mean yes to the Kirby comic.

Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:38 (eighteen years ago) link

(I would also highlight this piece called The Problems with Discussing Stanley Kubrick's Lolita... it's somewhat of a departure from her usual format, in that it's a lengthy, somewhat personal rumination/essay on "problematic" art & artists – obv. a very familiar subject these days, but she goes places that were new to me, and I thought it was really good and thoughtful.)

"Mick Wall at Kerrang!" (morrisp), Friday, 25 November 2022 22:37 (one year ago) link

Another good "Supplemental" piece (sorry, my last post) is The Real Horror of The Shining: The Misogyny of the Audience for Wendy Torrance.

"Mick Wall at Kerrang!" (morrisp), Friday, 25 November 2022 22:42 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.