The Power Of Nightmares/Adam Curtis

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (881 of them)
Yeah, but you could see the invasion of Afghanistan as the last, desperate agressive act of a moribund regime. There's no doubt the Soviet system was facing collapse - they would never stand a chance vs the US in full on warfare. That's not to say the nuclear threat wasn't real - my parents remember the Cuban missile crisis as a scary time.
Curtis didn't dismiss Madrid as inconsequential - but he dismissed the idea it was ordered and planned by Bin Laden. What you had was a terrorist group working independently inspired by the IDEA of Al Quaeda. And it's the idea that's dangerous and needs to be dealt with. Yes Bin Laden etc are dangerous, but they're not some deadly force in our midst as the neo-McCarthyist paranoia would have you believe.
Sure the UK needs to take precautions, but most of the arrests made under the terrorism act and the infringements on civil liberties are unjustified. The UK has been dealing with terrorist threats since the 60s - okay, the IRA et al usually called to say they'd planted a bomb, but not always.
The media have run with it cos it allows them to pursue existing agendas - the Sun/Daily Mail and their poisonous anti-immigration propaganda.
It wasn't perfect, but it made its point very well.

Stew S, Thursday, 4 November 2004 13:47 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah i only saw the last episode, but i thought it avoided answering some questions for example:

a) didnt really explore what Bin Laden's motivations were for trying a new policy of attacking america, going against what other islamic fundamentalist gorups were interested in (eg toppling central asian regimes*).

b) kept on repeating how the neo cons "grand mission" was some titanic battle of good vs evil, that seemed a bit suspect. are these people really solely driven by moral purpose, no matter how extreme or well, silly, that moral purpose is?

c) er i tcant think of another. but i sort of inherently dont believ things on tv when people make somewhat grandiose claims, whether they be blair, bush or some dude intoning opposing views over loads of tiny clips. it was kinda eisenstein-esque, and well, his aim was kinda totally "manipulate the viewer, worry bout factual issues later".

* interesting becasue in 2000 i was in debate with loads of russian politics students, and they savaged us about Chechnya, along the lines of "Russia is under the threat of Attack by a islamic super state, chehcnya will be the first to fall to them". We (ie a few brits) were all like, "WTF? Islamic fundamentalism? whats that? whats the issue here? quit being so paranoid!". a year later, it became a bit clearer what the idea of a threat from islamic fundamentalism might mean.

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 4 November 2004 14:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Of course, Chechnya is ALL about Islamic fundamentalism isn't it? Jesus H. Christ!

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:31 (nineteen years ago) link

could someone id the many music on the soundtrack. there was some Eno, there was some film score i had on the tip of my tongue all the time, and there was something that sounded like incidental music from Dr Who season 16

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:33 (nineteen years ago) link

Morricone was in there, several pieces

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:34 (nineteen years ago) link

On your b), ambrose, I thought the Straussian argument as Curtis presented it was that good/evil battles were a "necessary myth" - not true in themselves, but necessary to create a unified nation that valued something higher than individualism. Or less charitably, as a means to gain power.

I think the current election results put this theory pretty firmly to rest, at least w/r/t "unity."

You've Got to Pick Up Every Stitch (tracerhand), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:36 (nineteen years ago) link

While on the one hand I can see why these programs have value, on the other hand I really don't need to be made any more contemptuous and annoyed with things than I already am.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:39 (nineteen years ago) link

er yeah, so maybe should go to MGU politics department and tell some of the students that.
Not me though, cos er...that aint my view point. that was the russian kids saying that, or rather "islamskii fundamentalizm"

although if you ask me, chechnya is now about "you killed my brother/son, now i kill you" from both sides.

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:39 (nineteen years ago) link

i loved the James Bond villain "cave plan" thing! it was like something from an old Eagle comic.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:41 (nineteen years ago) link

OK so its established that Russian kids are as stupid as most of us are

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:41 (nineteen years ago) link

The Cave Plan was exactly like something Viz might have dreamed up

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:42 (nineteen years ago) link

OK so its established that Russian kids are as stupid as most of us are

ok but russian paranoia can be viewed in relation to the number of bombings, kidnappings*, and other related incidents that are loosely connected (or are supposed to be) with Chechens**, that have plagued russia especially the south and moscow (hint: dont go there on holiday right now!) for the last 5 years. I nearly got blown up a few years back*** (i was 30 mins too early) so its kinds weird for me.

*yes i know these are not often actually really anything to do with the war, just get rich qucik schemes, but it is an easy thing to associate with other worse crimes if you want to hate on the chechens!

** I think "Chechmes" means "anyone south and east of Kislovodsk" nowadays in russia

*** Okhotny Ryad 1999. Gas explosion or bomb? apartment bombings: FSB or chechens ?!?! ooh the mystery!!!

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:48 (nineteen years ago) link

The soundtrack was fantastic. If there was any justice the BBC would put up a tracklisting on the website.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Saturday, 6 November 2004 17:43 (nineteen years ago) link

The recurring theme was John Barry's theme from The Ipcress File.

Alba (Alba), Saturday, 6 November 2004 17:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I noticed that. I also noticed 'Colours' by Donovan in either part one or part two.

Also inspired was using the audio from what seemed to be one of the phone calls from one of the planes used on 9/11 over the top of footage of Bush, Blair and Bin Laden in the intros to the programmes. It sounded completely unreal. If, indeed, that is what it was. In fact, that shot of Bin Laden at the start of the three programmes was possibly the best thing about all of it.

http://img114.exs.cx/img114/638/power-of-nightmares.jpg

And that not only did the programme show the amateur footage of the plane crashing into the World Trade Center, but that the 'FUCK! SHIT! WHAT THE FUCK?' exclaimations weren't cut out.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Saturday, 6 November 2004 18:01 (nineteen years ago) link

stll dwnldng

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 6 November 2004 19:14 (nineteen years ago) link

vry gd

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 7 November 2004 19:06 (nineteen years ago) link

spent most of today downloading this, and i'm astounded (not least on an aesthetic level). i'll try and get hold of episode 2 tomorrow.

m. (mitchlnw), Monday, 8 November 2004 23:18 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm joining tracer in his chorus of "everyone see this, please".

m. (mitchlnw), Monday, 8 November 2004 23:27 (nineteen years ago) link

As others have said, be prepared for diminishing returns, mitch. I think the final part is a bit better than part 2, though.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 8 November 2004 23:28 (nineteen years ago) link

an excellent piece of TV.

cºzen (Cozen), Monday, 8 November 2004 23:29 (nineteen years ago) link

i'll try and prep myself for disappointment, alba.

(and i'm sure alan knows this by know, but the recurring eno piece was "in dark trees")

m. (mitchlnw), Tuesday, 9 November 2004 08:34 (nineteen years ago) link

the national review case against the documentary:

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/davis200410211043.asp

michael ledeen is quoted:
"The situation at the CIA in the '70s was very similar to what's happened over Iraq. The CIA was busy saying that the Soviets weren't involved in international terrorism. This at a time when the PLO actually had training camps in the Soviet Union."

m. (mitchlnw), Tuesday, 9 November 2004 19:11 (nineteen years ago) link

I love the crack Ledeen smokes. I figure he'll be choking on it over the next year.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 November 2004 19:13 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm trying to do some amateur google research on the actual relationship between the soviet union and terrorism. can anyone tell me how reliable "www.meta-religion.com" is? they say this:

The Soviet Union also provided training for certain terrorist
groups on its homeland, as well as spearheaded training in the territory of its Warsaw Pact allies. The Soviets sponsored terrorism
as part of an overall strategy designed to destabilize Western
Europe/NATO by supporting international and Western revolutionary
movements whose insurrectional activities would have helped
expand the communist block and further Soviet aims. In fact, a
former senior officer of Soviet Military Intelligence stated that
"ideological sympathy with the Soviet Union is unnecessary: anyone
who helps destabilize the west is our friend."

"A typical member of the Palestine Liberation Army (PLO) selected
for training behind the Iron Curtain received an orientation brief on
expected conduct while undergoing instruction, as well as ideological
orientation prior to departing for Moscow. Upon arrival he was
greeted by the PLO representative there and arrangements were
made for further travel to the individual's ultimate training
destination."

m. (mitchlnw), Tuesday, 9 November 2004 19:17 (nineteen years ago) link

I think the site's name would immediately put me off trusting it - but I don't know anything about it other than that. It's true the USSR had clode ties with middle eastern and north african nations, including supplying technology, information etc. However to interpret this as an attempt at de-stabilising the West, as opposed to persuing limited local aims with ideological friendly nations (remember that a lot of Islamic liberation ideology is shot through with marxism, as were the Irish nationalist militants at certain points) is not, I think, supportable by the evidence. To claim that the USSR was behind all international terrorism, and that these terrorists groups were not primarily striving for the local aims they claimed to be is nonsense.

"Pipes, perhaps the world's leading expert on Kremlin ideology, is left looking an amiable dunce. British viewers, unaware of his distinguished career, will be none the wiser". Oh, please, what misleading and condescending rubbish. I like that the article paints Britain as a nation of uninformed roobs, being propagandized by Moore and Chomsky.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Tuesday, 9 November 2004 19:29 (nineteen years ago) link

thanks for the input kevin. anybody got any trusted sources on this stuff? i'm the the above meta-religion text that i quoted appearing repeatedly on the web, verbatim, unsourced, which is another strike against its validity.

m. (mitchlnw), Tuesday, 9 November 2004 19:36 (nineteen years ago) link

interview with wolfowitz from phronesis.org, http://phronesis.org/article.php3?id_article=14 :

First of all, the question of ideas. That is, is there anything at all, we talked about this a little off the record, is there anything at all to the Straussian Connection ?

Wolfowitz : It's a product of fevered minds who seem incapable of understanding that September 11th changed a lot of things and changed the way we need to approach the world. Since they refused to confront that, they looked for some kind of conspiracy theory to explain it. I mean I took two terrific courses from Leo Strauss as a graduate student. One was on Montesquieu's spirit of the laws, which did help me understand our Constitution better. And one was on Plato's laws. The idea that this has anything to do with U.S. foreign policy is just laughable.

m. (mitchlnw), Tuesday, 9 November 2004 19:59 (nineteen years ago) link

agree with alba way upthread about portrayal of strauss's influence on neocon foreign policy (in some ways its hard to believe that these people are anyone's unwavering disciples, in the sense that this might require subjugation of self-interest)

m. (mitchlnw), Tuesday, 9 November 2004 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link

(and i'm sure alan knows this by know, but the recurring eno piece was "in dark trees")

Listening to the snippets on the Amazon page for 'Another Green World', it sounds more like 'Big Ship' to me.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 03:58 (nineteen years ago) link

big ship's used in the opening sequence yeah, but "dark trees" recurs throughout

m. (mitchlnw), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 09:41 (nineteen years ago) link

i didn't know that James - i know little Eno by name, just recognise the style. also thanks Alba, re The Ipcress File.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 09:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Anyone interested in the neocons should read this - it's clearly the major source on them for Curtis. Very interesting.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 19 November 2004 00:30 (nineteen years ago) link

one month passes...
This programme is being re-screened:

Tuesday 23.20 BBC2

Wednesday 23.20 BBC2

Thursday 23.20 BBC2

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 17 January 2005 11:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Was there not a thread on this before? I thought so but found nothing.
Missed it first time round but finally managed to catch a repeat of the second episode last night and was gripped. The choice of narrator helps a lot, Geoffrey Palmer's (I presume) authoriative but human tone explaining the motives and reasoning of governments, neocons and Islamists alike.

Q&A from the series producer Adam Curtis here - note: Will the programme be shown internationally, in America or online?

We are very keen that the programmes are made widely available including in America and although the main networks have shown little interest


-- Stevem On X (stevem7...), January 20th, 2005.

Answers
no DVD release planned because of the range of footage required to clear. a great shame as it seems that this is something everyone should see.
-- Stevem On X (stevem7...), January 20th, 2005.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the musical choices are really good, he (and his team) just knows his shit. i have no idea how they pull that kind of thing together -- how much footage has to be gone through to find the 'right' bit -- if you think about how many diift news orgs cover the same stuff. it's the avalanches of facumentary!
-- Miles Finch (poptha...), January 20th, 2005.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i need the torrents, and bad
-- Stevem On X (stevem7...), January 20th, 2005.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here y'go:
The Power Of Nightmares/Adam Curtis

-- Richard C (avoid8...), January 20th, 2005. (tracklink)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I've been taping it.
playing brian eno throughout - classik!


It overlaps a bit with his other series on freud. that theme of society and its control reappears.

x-post

the bit I couldn't figue out was in the first part where that neocon wz trying to distort the threat of the soviets: "if there is no evidence for weapons doesn't mean it isn't there" like it was really logical, sensible thing to say. The conviction he had in that. It wasn't like he wz trying to concoiusly create a myth to fool the people so much just that he wz really paranoid but i need to watch it again.


-- Julio Desouza (juli...), January 20th, 2005.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

why that didn't show up in searching i don't know
-- Stevem On X (stevem7...), January 20th, 2005.

Miles Finch, Thursday, 20 January 2005 11:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Does Geoffry Palmer narrate this? I thought it was the maker Adam Curtis.

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 20 January 2005 12:20 (nineteen years ago) link

you are probably right - the voice just really sounded like Palmer to me!

Stevem On X (blueski), Thursday, 20 January 2005 12:23 (nineteen years ago) link

i don't think it was palmer, no.

Miles Finch, Thursday, 20 January 2005 12:23 (nineteen years ago) link

haha

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 20 January 2005 12:44 (nineteen years ago) link

don't laugh at me

Stevem On X (blueski), Thursday, 20 January 2005 12:45 (nineteen years ago) link

I was laughing at geoffrey palmer and you, I suppose, yeah.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 20 January 2005 12:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes, he narrated it sitting up in bed, occasionally looking over the top of his glasses.

Peter Stringbender (PJ Miller), Thursday, 20 January 2005 12:51 (nineteen years ago) link

and then Judi Dench passed him another scone and that was that.

Stevem On X (blueski), Thursday, 20 January 2005 12:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Then they fucked liked rabid monkeys.

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 20 January 2005 12:56 (nineteen years ago) link

torrent at bi-torrent dot com under the documentaries section.

Bernard the Butler (Lynskey), Thursday, 20 January 2005 17:34 (nineteen years ago) link

i don't want to download THAT

Stevem On X (blueski), Thursday, 20 January 2005 17:35 (nineteen years ago) link

The programme was good.

the bluefox, Thursday, 20 January 2005 17:36 (nineteen years ago) link

torrents

John Cocktolstoy, Thursday, 20 January 2005 19:36 (nineteen years ago) link

I thought the neocons might have had a good point about the nonacoustic sonar or whatever. If a basic component of equipment simply isn't there, there must be something else they're using that you can't detect, right? It's not as weird a conclusion to draw as the doc makes you think it is. But it ties in very nicely with the WMD stuff in Iraq. Maybe the parallel was just too hard to pass up.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 20 January 2005 20:03 (nineteen years ago) link

I only just saw ep 1, had seen 2 & 3 previously. There are obvious gaps as people mentioned, it can't be a 'total' history of the past four decades. This is excusable but perhaps there is a weakness in that it sees the neocons as in control of events, which means downplaying 'objective' factors. In terms of US involvement in the mid-East, you cannot overlook the oil crisis on the early '70s, which acts on all sorts of things -- the sluggish economy of Ford and Carter which Reagan could use against them, as well, obviously, as the turmoil in the mid-East itself. Also isn't there a contradiction? If the Straussians hated the materialist liberal 50s America, why are they so keen on spreading its values across the globe?

Miles Finch, Friday, 21 January 2005 09:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Anyone seen this?

today is 9/11. but in a way, every day since 9/11 has also been 9/11......

i interviewed Christopher Jason Bell (@UpdateTheGrids) about his sprawling found-footage chronicle of the B*sh years MISS ME YET, free to stream on @means_tv, for @thebafflermag ~https://t.co/EJmB1AnIIs

— $teve Macfarlane (℠) (@dimension_tide) September 11, 2023

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 28 September 2023 17:11 (six months ago) link

I’m intrigued by this but, having been in high school during this era, I don’t know how long I could watch it without ruining my day with anger. Had the same reaction last year when I read Reign of Terror: How the 9/11 Era Destabilized America and Produced Trump.

blatherskite, Friday, 29 September 2023 14:22 (six months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.