I HATE APPLE

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (10189 of them)
This thread stinks like a jock's locker room thanks to TOMBOT and Allyzay's balls-out cussing. I haven't heard so many testicular metaphors since the bigshot lawyer played squash with the rightwing radio host and they "told it like it was" in the changing room instead of taking a shower.

Momus (Momus), Friday, 13 January 2006 06:02 (eighteen years ago) link

Now Apple are switching over to to Intel processors isn't it about time Microsoft rewrite their operating system with *nix and put these fucking bullshitters out of business?

I've never felt such a mug in all my life. God just imagining the prospect of using Finder (or whatever bullshit "search" function, gadget or app they try & present to make it appear like the file browser is a trifling nonsense to be ignored) and iTunes again, with no good alternatives make me want to stick redhot needles in my scrotum (sorry Momus).

My feelings when I sit back in front of a Windows PC "Ah, good. Now I can stop pissing about pretending to be streamlined and efficient and actually f*cking get something done, as the operating system isn't permanently working against me so hard"

I can't even face unpacking my boxed up iBook to watch a DVD :( My sister apparently wants to buy it, but even that seems like keeping it in my life too much now (god no, not 'family' tech support for the evil f*cking thing).

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 05:43 (eighteen years ago) link

hahaha you said scrotum!

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 19:00 (eighteen years ago) link

incidentally, why do the volume buttons on every powerbook i've owned since 1997 take anywhere from 1-10 seconds to have any effect at all, replete with hard-disk churning, etc? fuck's sake. and oh, balls.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 19:11 (eighteen years ago) link

Momus, did Shoyu Weenie steal your song?

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 18 January 2006 19:12 (eighteen years ago) link

Tracer, that's a feature. Not a bug.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 19:14 (eighteen years ago) link

fandango: for someone who made so much noise upthread about how happy he was switching back to windows, you still seem awfully crabby about apple. did you trap your knob in the iBook lid or something? i just don't get the level of hate if you're not actually using the thing any more.

grimly fiendish's scrotal sac (grimlord), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 19:17 (eighteen years ago) link

People don't buy enough RAM for how they use their systems.

A BOLD QUAHOG (ex machina), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 19:18 (eighteen years ago) link

i just want to make it louder, or softer.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 19:26 (eighteen years ago) link

That would be everyone since macs never come with enough to begin with.

xpost

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 19:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Wow Jon, that DOES explain everything.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 18 January 2006 19:27 (eighteen years ago) link

#1 apple annoyance -- inability to turn off "relative date" in open dialog boxes of individual applications -- also the absolute idiocy of the relative date sorting mechanism.

the fix the finder stuff rilly can get irritating.

on the other hand, with the side-shelf & the right cmd & option combos, etc., navigating the finder is still waay faster than windows -- just took a little getting used to.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 19:52 (eighteen years ago) link

the cross application cmd-backtick window switch thing is magic too.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 19:53 (eighteen years ago) link

and you can't sort by date in column view!!!! USELESS!@

fail to see how volume madness is a "feature."

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 20:05 (eighteen years ago) link

My iPod's disk is very dead.

A BOLD QUAHOG (ex machina), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 20:08 (eighteen years ago) link

STICKIES WAS BETTER BEFORE OS X

A BOLD QUAHOG (ex machina), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 20:31 (eighteen years ago) link

Tracer, if you can't see how a screaming hard drive is a feature, then you're obviously a complete fucking retard and probably never even used Netscape 4.x before, because you'd understand if you were me. Testicles!

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 21:30 (eighteen years ago) link

While we've got the hedz here, anybody have a good solution for fucking FONTS? I use Suitcase, but all my fonts are on an external drive. Suitcase forgets what it's activated, for some reason, so I have to go turn on the sets I want every time I restart. That doesn't happen for fonts on the local drive.

First off, throw out Suitcase completely. Extensis' developers have been completely out to lunch when it comes to proper OS X development and are currently racing with Quark as to how fast they can alienate their user base.

Second, download a copy of Font Explorer. It's free and it works fantastically.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 21:38 (eighteen years ago) link

and you can't sort by date in column view!!!! USELESS!@

I haven't been really happy with any of the Finder augmentation apps, but Path Finder seems to be pretty good - and it will sort by date in column view.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 21:42 (eighteen years ago) link

can someone explain how these purported OSX problems might be relevant to a lifetime Mac user, nonprogrammer, new iPod owner, totally novice downloader, and non-illegal file-sharer considering supplementing an old OS9-G3book with an OSX/unix-desktop?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 21:43 (eighteen years ago) link

er, i meant OSX/intel - one of the new machines

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 21:45 (eighteen years ago) link

People don't buy enough RAM for how they use their systems.

Apple don't include enough RAM for how their OS runs. this thing cost me 2 grand ffs!

jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 21:52 (eighteen years ago) link

gabbneb it depends on what exactly you're using your computer for.

tears before 7pm EST.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:01 (eighteen years ago) link

gabby, just buy shitloads of RAM from a third party and never use the volume keys.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:02 (eighteen years ago) link

can someone explain how these purported OSX problems might be relevant to a lifetime Mac user, nonprogrammer, new iPod owner, totally novice downloader, and non-illegal file-sharer considering supplementing an old OS9-G3book with an OSX/unix-desktop?

They're all non-issues unless you like to painfully nit-pick over things or are affronted that Steve Jobs didn't personally call you for your input in development. I'm a programmer, database developer, network cop, iPod owner, p2p user, etc. and I'm 85% satisfied with my set-up. If I sat down and thought about it some more I could probably work up a good series of complaints about that remaining 15% but since that 85% satisfaction is responsible for 100% of my income I don't really have the time.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:03 (eighteen years ago) link

is Font Explorer really robust? I was bummed when OSX came about because Apples said Font Book solved all the problems, but realized right away that it was a toy and a mess. I've used Suitcase, ATM, Masterjuggler and Font Reserve and I hate them all. But can Font Explorer handle thousands of fonts well? Auto-activate w/ no problem? I can only assume it's the real deal coming from Linotype. I guess I'll find out tonight...

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:05 (eighteen years ago) link

"painfully nit-pick" = have a computer that crashes on you consistently. Except for when I compiled some shit. Worked like a total dream then, finished in like record time. That was pretty cool. Please don't pull a Jon, Chris, you're normally like the sanest, least judgemental person on these threads. If I could afford something else, I'd buy it.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Agggh! Font Book!

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:08 (eighteen years ago) link

since that 85% satisfaction is responsible for 100% of my income I don't really have the time

hence, my latter-day lack of reasons to hate Microsoft anymore, and instead be perturbed at Apple because just-as-reliable ugly Dell gear comes with 1.5x better price/performance/compatibility ratio.

I think it's the coming-home-to-relax factor as opposed to working-with-it factor that's responsible for a lot of my OS X Finder et al. animosity. It's just not as easygoing or fun(ctional) as I remember it being.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:10 (eighteen years ago) link

OSXIntel won't much matter to you, Gabbneb. Right now the big hurdle is for pro/power-users, who need to run Final Cut and Photoshop at reasonable speeds. For you, all the provided Apple apps are either native or will be soon and you'll eventually be able to run Windows programs (either in a dual-boot setup, or in VirtualPC, which will run at full speed rather than like a 386/12).

xpost
I'm not sure about that 1.5x price-to-performance ratio. When I was buying my G5, I looked pretty close at Windows machines and saved very little money for the same quality.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:13 (eighteen years ago) link

gabbneb it depends on what exactly you're using your computer for.

this is one of those philosophical questions, isn't it? besides l'interweb-retina fusion, yer basic Word-based notepad-type stuff, plus I guess lots of music (and photo? dvd?)-downloading/storage type stuff, which i'll be totally new to.

gabby, just buy shitloads of RAM from a third party and never use the volume keys.

WHAT?! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!

They're all non-issues unless you like to painfully nit-pick over things

ok, that's what i was looking for

one thing i've noticed on my parents' OSX - these sidebar application icons that JUMP. OUT. AT. YOU. when you get within half a mile of them. is this what i have to look forward to?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:15 (eighteen years ago) link

if I did somehow figure my way into this strange world of putting photos you take? on computers? on the internet?! i could see myself going crazy on that end

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:17 (eighteen years ago) link

You can change the dock settings to your preferences. I made mine small and turned off all the useless crap they have it set up to do (magnifying icons, disappearing, etc.)

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:18 (eighteen years ago) link

But can Font Explorer handle thousands of fonts well?

*opens up Font Explorer and counts fonts*

I've got 2672 fonts loaded of which 314 are active right now. FWIW, a designer at one of the places I consult at has 5500 or so fonts loaded in Font Explorer and hasn't reported any issues with it (they were running Suitcase which caused problems daily)

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:38 (eighteen years ago) link

Nice. I figured it'd be proper. I actually used to use Linotype-Hell's Linocolor software for my home scanner because where I worked used the pro version of Linocolor for their drum scanners. It was a big "german" in it's design, but very powerful. I don't think it exists anymore but all of it's super cool features were later adopted by Photoshop anyway.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:40 (eighteen years ago) link

xposts: fandango: for someone who made so much noise upthread about how happy he was switching back to windows, you still seem awfully crabby about apple. did you trap your knob in the iBook lid or something? i just don't get the level of hate if you're not actually using the thing any more.

-- grimly fiendish's scrotal sac

I didn't get much (any) sleep last night, was posting ... with nothing much to add.

The level of hate though is generated by the fact I would LOVE to use the thing. There are plenty reasons why Windows sucks too you know! And I'm sick of fixing desktop PC's, and Windows laptops are often fugly and poorly thought/laid out in comparison. I would love to use it but... it makes me tear my hair out in frustration. So I don't. Yes I'm crabby! I fell for the hype and I feel like a fool.

The piss-poor state of the finder though is something that I just can't ignore (and believe me I've tried!!) in regular use, it just gets in my way and confounds me at every turn. It really is the elephant in the room. It took me what... five minutes? to get my head around Windows Explorer's folder tree. SIX MONTHS struggling with the finder and I still wasn't really sure if I was using it right, and was mostly just AWARE of it being there.

This isn't a "geek" rant. Or an anti-Apple screed (mostly). I couldn't give a shit about brushed metal, I don't even mind the dock... I really like my iPod (but they NEED to fix the LAME VBR bug asap!)

I'm just a fairly competent PC user who is plain amazed that everyone else can get along with something so wrong and broken on a basic usability level. It isn't even the slowness of the thing that grates. And frustrated that it'll basically NEVER be fixed because Apple seems to think bells, whistles & PR will somehow bridge the gap. All I see in the future if I was to hang onto this thing is lies, self-denial, and excessive further costs to come. I dunno about "long term" but I still feel I'm doing the right thing by jumping off now before it gets worse. I hate them for putting me in this position.

"I can find my files okay" is SUCH a 'mac' response too. As if that's ALL a file browser does. ffs.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:58 (eighteen years ago) link

"painfully nit-pick" = have a computer that crashes on you consistently. Except for when I compiled some shit. Worked like a total dream then, finished in like record time. That was pretty cool. Please don't pull a Jon, Chris, you're normally like the sanest, least judgemental person on these threads. If I could afford something else, I'd buy it.

I'm not trying to be knee jerk here, nor am I invalidating your crappy iBook/iPod but there's a lot of "Macs don't do this one thing EXACTLY so it SUCKS!" talk in this thread that bothers me. Most likely, that iBook G3 you had was just crap and from looking at the results of this iBook and PowerBook survey quite a few people had problems with it...

"The iBook G3, which sold quite well, had the most failures of any Apple laptop we surveyed and the failures were critical (the motherboard). Some other Mac models have had quite a few failures as well, but they generally were due to specific component problems. The iBook G3 simply appears to have been a flawed design, but it took a long time for Apple engineers to get a handle on the problem and fix it."

Every manufacturer has a flawed design sooner or later (don't get me started on Dell laptops), but it doesn't necessarily extend to the entire product line. Gabbneb just wanted to know if he would be making a mistake if he bought a new laptop (I don't believe he would, but I think he should get AppleCare with it)

Of course I'm biased to some degree because much of my livelihood depends on having more Macs out there.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 23:20 (eighteen years ago) link

Not wishing to stir the pot at all, but what exactly is wrong with Finder? Is it because it's inferior to the OS9 version? It does crash sometimes, sure, but then I've also seen "EXPLORER.EXE has generated errors and will be closed by Windows" far too many times to count (I would talk about Nautilus, but I'm a terminal man in Linux).


(I jumped to Mac in 2002, so I've never actually used the old Finder, but so far, the only thing that really bothers me sometimes is that it can sometimes be difficult to create a new directory when it's in list mode. I also seem to remember fuss about it being Carbon-based rather than written in Cocoa)

carson dial (carson dial), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 23:23 (eighteen years ago) link

It took me what... five minutes? to get my head around Windows Explorer's folder tree. SIX MONTHS struggling with the finder and I still wasn't really sure if I was using it right, and was mostly just AWARE of it being there.

Going the Mac->Windows direction isn't much better either. I dread the Windows folder tree and still hate how it slows me down.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 23:27 (eighteen years ago) link

I was wondering the same. The only two things that bother me about it are previews of .avi files taking ages to appear, and only 'copy' file being available from the menu, not 'cut'. The latter isn't a big deal cause I usually drag and drop (with Alt if necessary) when I'm moving files anyway.

I used to find it a bit fiddly to get to non-dock applications, but then I realised I could put an alias to the Application folder in my dock.

Other than that I have no problems. Oh, integrated FTP and CD copying support would be nice.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 23:31 (eighteen years ago) link

The only two things that bother me about it are previews of .avi files taking ages to appear,

This bothered me for a long time also, but upgrading to the latest DivX 6 driver seemed to have sped things up a lot (using OS X 10.4.4 with QuickTime 7.0.4 if it matters)

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 23:35 (eighteen years ago) link

If you don't find 'Finder' problematic then I'm just happy for you. I wish I could have got to that zen-state.

The windows folder tree is hardly perfect I'll admit! But it slow me down less because it behaves consistently, you can rely on it (except when it crashes obv.). That's the key.

OS X behaves in ways that are unexpected, unusual, random, illogical and stop you "just getting on with it". It's like a slippery electric eel, when it should be your pet dog & friend.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 23:38 (eighteen years ago) link

I should make clear that I'd get a desktop if I got a new machine. And that I really should convert to OSX, given that I'm stuck with an ancient Internet Explorer version and can't run a lot of really basic flash-type stuff. But is it worth getting a new machine to get OSX or should I just convert my Powerbook G3 (bronze keyboard)?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 18 January 2006 23:50 (eighteen years ago) link

No cut & paste, Window locations jumping all over your screen, icons dissapearing off the window edge, moving up a directory being different dependent on where you started, folder views enforced PER FOLDER instead of globally (that one is a real bitch), difficulty picking up files in some views, slow previews, not being able to hide the sidebar all the time, no visible file-path in the address bar = total confusion, inconsistent behaivour dragging the folder icon from the top of the finder windows (sometimes creates an alias, sometimes moves the directory! - yet another thing "best left avoided").

There's so much wrong with the fucking thing.

fandango (fandango), Thursday, 19 January 2006 00:01 (eighteen years ago) link

What was that "quick open folders" thing called? I remember when for no reason I could think of it suddenly changed actions & started opening every folder I passed in a new window instance. That's the kind of thing that I just don't have to give a second's thought to in crappy, but reliably unglamourous bumble-your-way through Windows Explorer.

fandango (fandango), Thursday, 19 January 2006 00:05 (eighteen years ago) link

If anyone understands what I'm getting at with those points there (communication isn't easy when filled with pure rage) I am curious to know if improvements/changes have been made in Tiger. At least one beef there is unmentioned (items copied to desktop not updating, or being visible for minutes) because it's been fixed now.

fandango (fandango), Thursday, 19 January 2006 00:09 (eighteen years ago) link

fandango...I understand the points fully, but don't find it that big a deal (after getting used to it) and while some of those aspects still annoy me, I still find the entire thing easier then the alternative.

The first thing to understand is they're not windows anymore like they used to be...when you double click a folder you're not opening the folder, you're opening a little browser window that shows you what's in the folder. If you don't think to hard about it it may seem like I'm splitting hairs, but remembering that difference is one major way I'm able to understand how finder works now differently then before.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 19 January 2006 00:18 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm on 10.3, but folder views enforced PER FOLDER instead of globally (that one is a real bitch I can see would be a bitch if you didn't prefer column view, as I do. In Finder preferences, I checked the 'Open New Windows in column view' and that works fine.

I honestly haven't experienced most of the things you mention! I do find Desktop icons are sometimes invisible in XP though... And XP's 'map network drive' view is appalling, where if the directory path is longer than about 12 characters it just truncates it and there's no way of scrolling or even copy-pasting it to see the full thing.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 19 January 2006 00:25 (eighteen years ago) link

that's spot on!! thank you for figuring that out, i just wish somebody had told me earlier :( they need to stop with the pics of folders now already, though, and go with something that fits their abstract browser view metaphor better. maybe each directory could be represented with a, wait i've got it, a sherlock holmes hat and magnifying glass!

xpost: yeah, dan's precise summary of the New Way explains why column view is k-1,000,000 times better than the alternatives (although you STILL have to use list view to get date sorting, and you still have to use icon view if you want thumbnails without the irritating potential of accidentally firing up a QT preview)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 19 January 2006 00:28 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.