idk it often is too, or yknow at least that interface between them and you where the ~:*magec happenz:*~
― politically autocorrect (darraghmac), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 01:48 (ten years ago) link
has anyone ever tried OKC when you're visiting another city? I guess literally for activity partners.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 01:50 (ten years ago) link
I met a cute canadian guy who was doing that while he was going to be working here for 3 months - he was very interesting and arty and i thought we'd strike up a nice friendship but I never heard from him when he (presumably) got here, humf.
― the Bronski Review (Trayce), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 02:15 (ten years ago) link
I was going to make a joke but I don't think they have the "Canadian boyfriend" concept in Australia
― have a nice blood (mh), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 02:17 (ten years ago) link
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:50 AM (42 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
one of my housemates is doing this right now, changed her profile to new orleans a week in advance of her arrival. has two dates lined up!
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 02:33 (ten years ago) link
I think I just like the idea of a whole new pool of OKC matches.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 02:39 (ten years ago) link
― have a nice blood (mh)
Probably a "Perth boyfriend" thing there.
― nickn, Wednesday, 19 February 2014 08:31 (ten years ago) link
Queensland. As if you'd meet people from Perth.
― (D1CK$) (sic), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 12:07 (ten years ago) link
Hey now! U know full well I dated a perthian :P
― the Bronski Review (Trayce), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 12:10 (ten years ago) link
Not sure if you don't get it or if you had a long-distance bf
― have a nice blood (mh), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 14:40 (ten years ago) link
I do, I did, and that wasnt the point of my comment but nm
― the Bronski Review (Trayce), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 23:07 (ten years ago) link
pretty good/infuriating read:
http://nymag.com/thecut/2014/02/okcupid-most-desired-people-in-new-york.html
kind of lol mostly sad how both men game the system by 5-starring everyone, and both women are like "i look unconventionally hot"
― |$̲̅(̲̅ιοο̲̅)̲̅$̲̅| (gr8080), Monday, 24 February 2014 15:17 (ten years ago) link
that it starts off with a thing about how the straight girl is getting harassed with vulgar come-ons, followed by the reveal that she listed "OK for casual sex"... eh
all four pretty hot, but i imagine we could all look awesome in a New Yorker photoshoot
― Nhex, Monday, 24 February 2014 17:16 (ten years ago) link
I can't remember if we've talked about it on ilx or if I've just had the conversation with friends, but the "casual sex" question is such a trap. It's more about exclusion than inclusion, as far as dating goes. The only thing you'll gain is a ton of messages from people who troll the site looking for only that flag.
I was talking to a few friends who used okc and the general impression was that having checked "casual sex" was seedy and they'd avoid those people. But, if you go by their standard outside-okc definition of what that term means, they were definitely into it after a date or two.
― have a nice blood (mh), Monday, 24 February 2014 17:26 (ten years ago) link
It's almost as if people, mostly dudes, are unable to establish that there might be a difference between "sex without commitment but with mutual consent" and "totally indiscriminate sex with anyone". Who knew?
― Bipolar Sumner (Branwell Bell), Monday, 24 February 2014 19:03 (ten years ago) link
if a guy sends out 1000 messages like this and it works once, it was like totes worth it
― Nhex, Monday, 24 February 2014 19:18 (ten years ago) link
mostly dudes
right, but if I check it meaning the former, women are going to think I want the latter
― have a nice blood (mh), Monday, 24 February 2014 19:58 (ten years ago) link
i have been told by some that "for new friends" is used as code for "relationship-free fun (sex)" without stooping to actually declaring "casual sex"
― |$̲̅(̲̅ιοο̲̅)̲̅$̲̅| (gr8080), Monday, 24 February 2014 20:03 (ten years ago) link
now that one is a cryptic use I had not heard
― have a nice blood (mh), Monday, 24 February 2014 20:07 (ten years ago) link
yeah the 'friends' check is the weirdest one.
i've seen that on people who are new to town, additionally. i've also (via friends) seen it as the only thing checked on people with queer identification. so yeah idk people must be using it for a variation of meanings.
the distinction between short- and long-term dating is another oddity when you think abt it
― goole, Monday, 24 February 2014 20:08 (ten years ago) link
Ive used it at bingo but its not working like id hoped
― politically autocorrect (darraghmac), Monday, 24 February 2014 20:09 (ten years ago) link
it was a dark day when "look at my etchings" expired
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 24 February 2014 20:10 (ten years ago) link
short-term dating, meaning "I'm leaving town," "I'm not looking to get serious in any short order," or the classic "I get bored really easily"
― have a nice blood (mh), Monday, 24 February 2014 21:22 (ten years ago) link
long term dating "you must agree to a minimum 6mo relationship if we meet for coffee this week"
― |$̲̅(̲̅ιοο̲̅)̲̅$̲̅| (gr8080), Monday, 24 February 2014 21:28 (ten years ago) link
why should we even eat a whole meal unless you're serious
― j., Monday, 24 February 2014 21:30 (ten years ago) link
i'm looking to settle down, if that's not what you're interested in i'll just have the cheese sticks
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 24 February 2014 21:42 (ten years ago) link
you will take my seed with this anchor steam or you will have neither
― goole, Monday, 24 February 2014 21:44 (ten years ago) link
think I'm going to dive back in in March
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Monday, 24 February 2014 21:54 (ten years ago) link
None of the people in that article are attractive, what the hell humanity.
― the Bronski Review (Trayce), Monday, 24 February 2014 22:28 (ten years ago) link
short term dating only, "you can hang with me and my friends but I'll never call you my girlfriend and I'm going to stop calling in a month"
― have a nice blood (mh), Monday, 24 February 2014 22:30 (ten years ago) link
I always liked the futuristic perfect society sound of "activity partners"
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Monday, 24 February 2014 22:38 (ten years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Isrd7E5nzIQ
― j., Monday, 24 February 2014 22:39 (ten years ago) link
lol "activity partners" is either the most innocuous or most suspicious one
― have a nice blood (mh), Monday, 24 February 2014 22:44 (ten years ago) link
trayce u crazy!
― goole, Monday, 24 February 2014 22:48 (ten years ago) link
Well ok, tatts chick isnt bad, tho she has a slight air of drag about her face to me.
See nothing appealing in either of the guys pictured, I'd pass em by without a second thought.
― the Bronski Review (Trayce), Monday, 24 February 2014 22:51 (ten years ago) link
http://0-media-cdn.foolz.us/ffuuka/board/vg/image/1378/14/1378144654283.jpg
― have a nice blood (mh), Monday, 24 February 2014 22:53 (ten years ago) link
I've been noticing a lot of my matches turning up in comments on my friends' Facebook statuses... might be time for a PSA about the privacy risk of using the same photo across web sites.
xpost hehehe
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Monday, 24 February 2014 22:54 (ten years ago) link
tatts chick is the least imo. the gay girl is way cute. dudes look ok to me, but i'm less expert there.
i forget you're upside down tho
― goole, Monday, 24 February 2014 23:03 (ten years ago) link
to really know they would have needed to be a row of icons across the bottom of the photos saying if they like cats or dogs, cigarettes, or moulin rouge/ultimate fighting/etc.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Monday, 24 February 2014 23:10 (ten years ago) link
needed to *have*
Hey there Mister Goole. What sort of trouble are you getting into this week? :)
― |$̲̅(̲̅ιοο̲̅)̲̅$̲̅| (gr8080), Monday, 24 February 2014 23:12 (ten years ago) link
http://www.okcupid.com/profile/loandthecosmos
http://www.okcupid.com/profile/MyTiesAreSkinny
http://www.okcupid.com/profile/riot_rhythms
http://www.okcupid.com/profile/vibes4dayz
― |$̲̅(̲̅ιοο̲̅)̲̅$̲̅| (gr8080), Monday, 24 February 2014 23:16 (ten years ago) link
goole otm mostly
― have a nice blood (mh), Monday, 24 February 2014 23:47 (ten years ago) link
all four of those probably would have looked hotter in a New Yorker photoshoot
― I got the Poison, I got the Rammellzee (sic), Tuesday, 25 February 2014 00:24 (ten years ago) link
does the new yorker do photoshoots? I thought they did long-form articles and dumb single-line comics
― have a nice blood (mh), Tuesday, 25 February 2014 00:27 (ten years ago) link
Richard Avedon yo
― I got the Poison, I got the Rammellzee (sic), Tuesday, 25 February 2014 00:49 (ten years ago) link
oh sure
― have a nice blood (mh), Tuesday, 25 February 2014 01:05 (ten years ago) link
From a local person's profile:
I am Welcoming a man who has or is willing to step forward into his greatness and to share , grow and evolve at this current rapid speed of love, light , bliss, and to show up and be present holding that space and being that safe container when your mate needs that.
No pressure!
― Bell, ball, bone, boot. No surprises. (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 25 February 2014 02:54 (ten years ago) link
what about healing powers, should he have any healing powers
― j., Tuesday, 25 February 2014 03:01 (ten years ago) link
Does he cast magic missile.
― the Bronski Review (Trayce), Tuesday, 25 February 2014 03:07 (ten years ago) link