bill simmons IS bill simmons IN the book of BASKETBALL

oh n/m i didn't realize it was on the feature page, not the homepage

are you looking at the article page or the home page ha xp tech support is reading yr mind

hahaha yeah the article page redesign is horrific

its like the opposite of what the times did w their redesign, like its fine i guess to try and just cram everything into the home page but the article pages shd be designed to maximize readability otherwise people arent going to like reading yr articles and they wont even know why theyll just not like you

oh also you know those side notes that are kind our thing lets just cram em in there lol

― lag∞n, Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:29 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

They used to turn into footnotes on tablets and they still do only now no "jump" link to return to the article sure ill scroll up 10k words after I read this one line DJ mbenga joke actually nope

the whole thing is just so dumb, do not have notes of any kind unless you have a ton of sources to site its v annoying and pointless

obvs its not hard to imagine simmons brainstorming ways to fit more inane asides into his writing

i don't read much grantland other than simmons or lowe but lowe could really do without the footnotes anyway, actually he should basically stick to x's and o's i basically hate every opinion he has

that basically how i break it down to an extent

hate the footnotes because they don't work in my offline reading app where i pretend i am going to read things later

'it hurts so much that we failed [our asshole writer]'

people said mean things to him on the tweets

Grantland looks like a 1999 website now

yeah major step back

its bad

yeah the entire aesthetic of this is terrible, and not in a "way different but you'll get used to it" kind of way

its designed to cram as much stuff as possible in there w any concern for the reading experience or visual hierarchy or anything, and it does look very specifically dated for sure

"content everywhere" is such a bad design but I guess the intent is to get the most clicks-on-page so whatever works I guess

clicks on clicks on clicks

wonder if grantland wasnt doing as well as espn wouldve liked and they forced this design on them cause iirc simmons explained a lil bit of the original design and he seemed to understand re user experience and readability, which i think most writers do

but even if youre determined to cram all the clicks in there this is just really poor execution, like look at buzzfeed they have tons of shit everywhere but its way more user friendly than this

i will not look at buzzfeed

you know youre a 90s kid when you wont look at buzzfeed

I really liked the old site, one of my favorites on the whole internetz

the old site was good from a readability pov but imo but kinda lacked attention to detail otherwise, obvs the whole olde timey aesthetic is total garbage too but w/e

yeah v readable

oh wow theyre showing preload ads now too

the hipster design aesthetic was trendy yeah but the articles just read so nicely

ya thats by far the most important thing

that and ease of navigation

and fast loading

I hate sidebar footnotes but yeah I liked the old design a lot

i thought the old design was awesome, very readable who cares about the rest

it couldve been even more cooler and you wouldve liked it

why does anybody redesign anything

speaking of, the new espn app is a disaster. more for usability reasons tho

Speaking of Perkins, I enjoyed this e-mail from Kyle Leonard in OKC: “Every day when I get home from work and look at my DVR, there it still sits — four hours straight of ‘Grammys Live from the Red Carpet’ that my girlfriend is not ready to delete in case she needs to ‘go back and look at someone’s outfit’ (unreal). It drives me crazy every time I look at it. But then I realized something. Having that recording on my DVR is actually a possible asset. Just think of all the space I will have once I amnesty it off my DVR queue. So I just renamed it ‘Kendrick Perkins’ and now it’s not quite as bad when I look at it.”

total package

In fact, it was Simmons' father who nudged Silver into locking in the deal with ESPN over the other media entities he was considering. "Right when Nate was deciding what to do, he happened to be in San Antonio, and he was going to the [NBA Finals] game, and my dad got two tickets from the NBA, so we hooked him up with the passes and things like that, it's when he kind of realized that it would be really cool to work for ESPN," he says. A courtside seat and a pep talk from a proud Boston parent later, and Silver was won over.

ha no

http://sports.politicususa.com/2013/07/27/bill-simmons-evolution-the-sports-guy-insufferable-sports-pundit.html

old article, but holy crap did this really happen?

Also, something else about Simmons that has become overly annoying is that he is always looking for a unified theory of WHY THINGS HAPPEN. A perfect example of this was after Game 3 of the San Antonio/Memphis series in the NBA Playoffs this year. On the postgame show, when discussing the crowd’s reaction when Memphis got behind in the game, Simmons tied in the 1968 assassination of MLK in the city. Basically, he said that because of the tragic events 45 years ago in their city, the crowd just knew something bad was happening, and it caused them to go quiet. If you read his writing, you’ll notice dozens of these theories that he throws out there, trying to position himself as some next-level thinker.

Bill Simmons is the Alex Jones of sports writing

I think he got that move from klosterman.

Is Michael Wilbon really considered as bad as Skip Bayless or Bill Simmons? I guess you can lump them all in as "sports pundits", but...

MLK assassination thing astounding though

I have really disliked him on TV in the playoffs so far. He says stupid obvious shit and repeats it over and over again, interrupting people who have more substantive things to say.

NBA draft article was really the only thing worth reading.

Also, something else about Simmons that has become overly annoying is that he is always looking for a unified theory of WHY THINGS HAPPEN. A perfect example of this was after Game 3 of the San Antonio/Memphis series in the NBA Playoffs this year. On the postgame show, when discussing the crowd’s reaction when Memphis got behind in the game, Simmons tied in the 1968 assassination of MLK in the city. Basically, he said that because of the tragic events 45 years ago in their city, the crowd just knew something bad was happening, and it caused them to go quiet. If you read his writing, you’ll notice dozens of these theories that he throws out there, trying to position himself as some next-level thinker.

― Doritos Loco Parentis (Hurting 2), Sunday, May 11, 2014 11:59 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

http://deadspin.com/oh-tim-youre-so-naive-the-cavs-lebrons-former-team-1579579873

lol

sry that comment is lol but meant to link to the main video http://deadspin.com/bill-simmons-lays-out-nonsensical-theory-about-lebron-j-1579566715

Listening to Bill Simmons shouting nonsense while Sage Steele is trying to make a point is really unfun.

He needs to not be... there.