We got Ant-Man movie

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (411 of them)

They could play on Lang being a reformed criminal and have a double redemption for hero and mentor.

EZ Snappin, Monday, 13 January 2014 22:38 (ten years ago) link

xp oh god noooooo

Nhex, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 07:28 (ten years ago) link

four months pass...

Whoa, that's kinda big. Hasn't he been talking about doing this forever?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 23 May 2014 21:26 (nine years ago) link

Yeah, damn.

Nhex, Friday, 23 May 2014 21:29 (nine years ago) link

Yo wtf

Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Friday, 23 May 2014 21:29 (nine years ago) link

And it's kinda weird to see too since this'll be the next film after Age of Ultron by about two and a half months and presumably important in setting things going for the next phase as such...then again maybe they're hoping that even if this screws up a bit then they can coast on the presumed Ultron afterburners.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 23 May 2014 21:30 (nine years ago) link

conspiracy theory - maybe guardians of the galaxy is getting torn up by focus groups and studio is panicking and getting their damn dirty ape hands all over ant man

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 23 May 2014 21:36 (nine years ago) link

That...makes no sense?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 23 May 2014 21:36 (nine years ago) link

Oh no they've gotten to Ned too

Disagree. And im not into firey solos chief. (Phil D.), Friday, 23 May 2014 21:46 (nine years ago) link

*is possessed*

Ned Raggett, Friday, 23 May 2014 22:02 (nine years ago) link

nah i can see mj's point. this seemed to possibly be in line w/ guardians, a 'different' kind of comic book movie, and maybe early rxn to guardians is scaring marvel. maybe there's only so much deviation from house style marvel can stomach and wright couldn't rein it in that much. either way whatever interest i had in this was just drastically reduced.

balls, Friday, 23 May 2014 22:12 (nine years ago) link

yeah what balls said.

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 23 May 2014 22:13 (nine years ago) link

yep, balls otm, esp that last sentence.

djenter the dragon? (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 23 May 2014 22:18 (nine years ago) link

The word from people on the crew is Wright got booted for being REALLY behind schedule and being ineffective at righting the ship and getting it back on track. Production has been bleeding money for a month and Marvel got fed up with him and they lost their confidence in his ability to manage a production of this size.

if you can't trust anonymous reddit commenters who can you trust

anonanon, Friday, 23 May 2014 22:50 (nine years ago) link

Ugh this is a bummer

da croupier, Saturday, 24 May 2014 00:46 (nine years ago) link

feel like if two writers of community can handle a cap movie wright'd probably be fine at antman

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Saturday, 24 May 2014 01:50 (nine years ago) link

ohhhh that's where they were from!!! man they did a great job

Nhex, Saturday, 24 May 2014 02:09 (nine years ago) link

Directors, not writers

Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Saturday, 24 May 2014 04:10 (nine years ago) link

still, I wouldn't have expected two guys from Happy Endings to put out a top-tier superhero movie

Nhex, Saturday, 24 May 2014 04:18 (nine years ago) link

Paul Rudd looked a bit rundown on SNL. Perhaps this is partly why.

the glimmer man (Sufjan Grafton), Saturday, 24 May 2014 04:38 (nine years ago) link

Russos were directors on Arrested Development, directors and exec producers on Community, and had made at least two feature films before

rage against martin sheen (sic), Saturday, 24 May 2014 12:49 (nine years ago) link

I mean yeah if they have the wright approved script and all the visual aesthetic established this could still be good, but I'm kinda dubious some hires hand thrown in at the last second will show the same confidence and wit when it comes to a footage of character shrinking and growing in the blink of an eye.

da croupier, Saturday, 24 May 2014 16:01 (nine years ago) link

hired hand, rather.

da croupier, Saturday, 24 May 2014 16:02 (nine years ago) link

The most exciting thing about this movie was that it involved a power we've never seen, and a director whose previous work suggested he could display it in an inspired way

da croupier, Saturday, 24 May 2014 16:04 (nine years ago) link

I admit, nice touch from Whedon

https://twitter.com/josswhedon/statuses/470141319831363584

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 24 May 2014 18:47 (nine years ago) link

<3

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 24 May 2014 18:52 (nine years ago) link

didn't know what that was so i searched and found the lol worst article of all time jfc cinemablend

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Saturday, 24 May 2014 20:45 (nine years ago) link

if you can't trust anonymous reddit commenters who can you trust

if you can't trust anonymous rebutters on latino-review who can you

Not true. AT ALL.

The prep on this film has been forever and it was impossible to be behind schedule because the entire production was out on hiatus by Marvel for duration of the script's rewrite. Families left homes to work on the movie in Atlanta and were now suddenly in limbo.

So about the rewrite...

About 3 months ago, Marvel had notes. The meat of the notes were about the core morality of the piece, must include franchise characters. etc., These notes came from the big four at Marvel. Joe Cornish and Edgar Wright did two drafts to try and answer the notes without compromising their vision.

6 weeks ago Marvel took the script off them and gave the writing assignment to two very low credit writers. One of the writers were from Marvel's in house writing team. Edgar stayed cool, agreed to stay on the project, and read the draft.

The script came in this week and was completely undone. Poorer, homogenized, and not Edgar's vision. Edgar met with Marvel on Friday to formally exit and the announcement went out directly after.

Edgar & Joe were upset by the sudden, out of nowhere lack of faith in them as filmmakers. Fiege had always batted for them but this felt like it came from the higher ups.

Where does this leave the cast? Well, it is believed they don't have the option to walk like Edgar did.

rage against martin sheen (sic), Monday, 26 May 2014 02:20 (nine years ago) link

sic where is that from?

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 26 May 2014 03:15 (nine years ago) link

latino-review.com

rage against martin sheen (sic), Monday, 26 May 2014 03:42 (nine years ago) link

Scratch Adam McKay off the list of replacements for Ant-Man helmer Edgar Wright.

Negotiations began with McKay in earnest on Friday but the Anchorman director abruptly decided against taking the job on the film, The Hollywood Reporter has learned. The decision is said to be his alone.

A director search had been underway to helm the Marvel superhero tentpole since Wright officially exited the project on May 23. The film is set to star Paul Rudd as the title hero.

We're the Millers director Rawson Marshall Thurber and Zombieland's Ruben Fleischer were also in contention along with McKay to get the directing job, THR had earlier reported.

Number None, Saturday, 31 May 2014 19:46 (nine years ago) link

probably a good thing, McKay hasn't really done anything effects-oriented ever and has only done as much action as is in The Other Guys. the Zombieland guy seems like a good fit, that movie had a nice visual flair to it.

ςὖτ ιτ Οὖτ (some dude), Saturday, 31 May 2014 21:05 (nine years ago) link

otoh it sucked

resulting post (rogermexico.), Saturday, 31 May 2014 21:37 (nine years ago) link

How hard can this be? The dudes who did Captain America 2 were best known for "Community." Thor 2 guy was also TV anono. Just hire some chump and save the budget for the FX team.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 June 2014 00:09 (nine years ago) link

Kinda depressingly otm. The Feige/Quesada/Bendis et al brain trust exert more influence on these films than their individual directors. It would be interesting to see what an auteur with a particular visual style would bring to any of these films, but I'm not holding my breath waiting for that to happen. Maybe a Dr. Strange movie would be more stylized, more Craig Russellesque as it were...

WilliamC, Sunday, 1 June 2014 00:24 (nine years ago) link

Jim Rash & Nat Faxon should do it

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 1 June 2014 00:42 (nine years ago) link

i think we know who the men for the job are

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/514sGy2oc3L._SL290_.jpg

Disagree. And im not into firey solos chief. (Phil D.), Sunday, 1 June 2014 01:06 (nine years ago) link

Why not?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 June 2014 01:24 (nine years ago) link

How hard can this be? The dudes who did Captain America 2 were best known for "Community." Thor 2 guy was also TV anono. Just hire some chump and save the budget for the FX team.

Have you ever seen anything directed by Wright?

rage against martin sheen (sic), Sunday, 1 June 2014 01:37 (nine years ago) link

also alan taylor is kind of the opposite of a TV anono

r. bean (soda), Sunday, 1 June 2014 01:44 (nine years ago) link

Anono in the sense that he is not known as a film director, nor as a selling-point name a la Wright. He's a guy who gets it done, and there are lots of people like him, especially in TV. Hell, anyone who handled an episode of Game of Thrones could likely handle Ant-man. And the unlikely hodgepodge of people behind several of these superhero movies already ranges from genre auteurs like Raimi to competent technicians like Joe Johnston to Kenneth Branagh to fucking Jon Favreau. I mean, jeez, Shane Black directed Iron Man 3. Shane Black! Seriously, if this motley crue could all pull it off, plus the aforementioned, then anyone can.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 June 2014 02:12 (nine years ago) link

BTW, Iron Man 3 had 1,834 credited visual effects crewmembers, something like 10 fewer than Avatar. When I saw that movie, it scrambled my brain wondering just what a director actually does when so much of his film is a massively complicated effects sequence. The irony being, I guess, that many of the most notable sequences of Iron Man 3 were those with RDJ just doofing around, sans suit.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 June 2014 02:25 (nine years ago) link

and trevor slattery bumbling about

lauded at conferences of deluded psychopaths (Sparkle Motion), Sunday, 1 June 2014 05:09 (nine years ago) link

and gwenyth Paltrow consciously unpeppering

the glimmer man (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 1 June 2014 05:41 (nine years ago) link

does seem that marvel's nu spooreero line is best thought of as the creation of its producers, with the director as a higher-up among an army of hired-hand technicians

riot grillz (contenderizer), Sunday, 1 June 2014 14:31 (nine years ago) link

he tells the fx ppl what to create. ideally.

socki (s1ocki), Sunday, 1 June 2014 14:36 (nine years ago) link

there's storyboards, animatics, etc etc

socki (s1ocki), Sunday, 1 June 2014 14:36 (nine years ago) link

its not like they all just go off by themselves, all 1,834, and vote on what to do.

socki (s1ocki), Sunday, 1 June 2014 14:36 (nine years ago) link

When I saw that movie, it scrambled my brain wondering just what a director actually does when so much of his film is a massively complicated effects sequence.

It's worth looking at the extras on the Pacific Rim DVD for some insight into this - Guillermo del Toro is super-hands-on with the effects team and it's easy to get a sense of how vital his input is into making the CGI and effects sequences what they are.

bizarro gazzara, Sunday, 1 June 2014 15:09 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.