― Ryan WS (fffv), Saturday, 15 May 2004 13:26 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ryan WS (fffv), Saturday, 15 May 2004 13:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Saturday, 15 May 2004 13:34 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ryan WS (fffv), Saturday, 15 May 2004 13:37 (nineteen years ago) link
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Saturday, 15 May 2004 14:01 (nineteen years ago) link
Forget I said that last part.
How long does the Soulseek server usually stay down anyway?
― kjoerup, Saturday, 15 May 2004 14:12 (nineteen years ago) link
― Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 15 May 2004 14:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 15 May 2004 14:41 (nineteen years ago) link
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Saturday, 15 May 2004 14:48 (nineteen years ago) link
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Saturday, 15 May 2004 14:49 (nineteen years ago) link
― .adam (nordicskilla), Saturday, 8 January 2005 04:22 (nineteen years ago) link
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Saturday, 8 January 2005 05:16 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 8 January 2005 05:22 (nineteen years ago) link
Michael that's not the point!
― .adam (nordicskilla), Saturday, 8 January 2005 05:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Sunday, 27 February 2005 09:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Mr Deeds (Mr Deeds), Sunday, 27 February 2005 20:54 (nineteen years ago) link
― jergins (jergins), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― zappi (joni), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― djdee (djdee2005), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:03 (nineteen years ago) link
― No, Not Marcel, Saturday, 5 March 2005 22:49 (nineteen years ago) link
― cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 5 March 2005 22:57 (nineteen years ago) link
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 5 March 2005 23:03 (nineteen years ago) link
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 5 March 2005 23:09 (nineteen years ago) link
I got the impression the original arrangement wasn't scaling up so well for an increased number of users. Hence the tinkering?
― Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Sunday, 6 March 2005 00:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― piscesboy, Saturday, 23 April 2005 20:37 (eighteen years ago) link
― kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 23 April 2005 21:26 (eighteen years ago) link
― Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Saturday, 23 April 2005 21:28 (eighteen years ago) link
― piscesboy, Saturday, 23 April 2005 22:01 (eighteen years ago) link
― jergins (jergins), Saturday, 14 May 2005 22:31 (eighteen years ago) link
― Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Saturday, 14 May 2005 22:37 (eighteen years ago) link
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Saturday, 14 May 2005 22:56 (eighteen years ago) link
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 23 May 2005 23:14 (eighteen years ago) link
Anyone getting things they wanted to download showing up again in their folder long after they're removed? I delete something and it comes back an hour later as if it's been redownloaded. I heard someone else say they're getting this but I don't know if it's widespread.
― Cunga (Cunga), Monday, 23 May 2005 23:55 (eighteen years ago) link
Go to 'Options' than 'File Sharing...' to 'Accept Downloads From:' and change it from "Everyone" to "No One" or another choice. It has fixed that problem for me.
― BeeOK (boo radley), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 06:58 (eighteen years ago) link
― BeeOK (boo radley), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 07:01 (eighteen years ago) link
type in a search query and get results for a previous query, occasionally mixed in with new results (like i typed in geiger and the ada remixes i was trying to get yesterday came up). anyone else?
― jergins (jergins), Sunday, 26 June 2005 17:19 (eighteen years ago) link
― dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 21:07 (eighteen years ago) link
― ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 21:39 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 21:49 (eighteen years ago) link
― fe zaffe (fezaffe), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 22:19 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 22:29 (eighteen years ago) link
I believe so.
― Cunga (Cunga), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 23:18 (eighteen years ago) link
― Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 00:06 (eighteen years ago) link
yes. since 157 is a test version, you only see users also running 157.
― teh Nü and Impröved john n chicago (frankE), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 01:40 (eighteen years ago) link
http://www.slsknet.org/157.html
― toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 06:38 (eighteen years ago) link
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 10:57 (eighteen years ago) link
― Christopher Costello (CGC), Sunday, 23 October 2005 23:46 (eighteen years ago) link
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Monday, 24 October 2005 00:37 (eighteen years ago) link
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Monday, 24 October 2005 11:30 (eighteen years ago) link
soulseek has been so completely flaky over the last week or so, whenever downloading one file will go and then the rest will just sit there and never start. i know enough that i'm not the only one having this problem but there's no acknowledgement of the problem or any eta on fixing it. i know soulseek is literally old enough to vote at this point and at some point i guess i should just let it go...
― Kate (rushomancy), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 23:05 (three years ago) link
try the slsk thrd
― j., Wednesday, 20 May 2020 23:41 (three years ago) link
i know i'm lame but idk how to search ilxor.com and i wind up just necrobumping a thread at random, have a link?
― Kate (rushomancy), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 23:52 (three years ago) link
oh wow i didn't realize there were so many threads
anyway this one is the most up to date
soulseek
― j., Wednesday, 20 May 2020 23:55 (three years ago) link