pitchfork is dumb (#34985859340293849494 in a series.)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (22860 of them)

i like nice, printed magazines like the new arthur and yeti and the los angeles review of books ... i'm sure this will have some cool things in it. still, $20 is pretty pricey.

tylerw, Thursday, 21 November 2013 17:52 (ten years ago) link

too pricey to take on the subway that's for sure

Papa Roachford (NickB), Thursday, 21 November 2013 17:53 (ten years ago) link

20$/y or 20$ per ish?

flopson, Thursday, 21 November 2013 17:58 (ten years ago) link

Single copies will be available for $19.96, in a nod to Pitchfork’s founding year

Papa Roachford (NickB), Thursday, 21 November 2013 17:59 (ten years ago) link

yea that's steep

flopson, Thursday, 21 November 2013 17:59 (ten years ago) link

but it's special paper!

Papa Roachford (NickB), Thursday, 21 November 2013 18:00 (ten years ago) link

You'll have to store it like you would a porn mag, essentially.

Position Position, Thursday, 21 November 2013 18:00 (ten years ago) link

This seems more about "brand management" than about making money. Plus $1.996 would be too cheap.

Immediate Follower (NA), Thursday, 21 November 2013 18:02 (ten years ago) link

Solidifying Pitchfork as "serious music journalism" basically.

Immediate Follower (NA), Thursday, 21 November 2013 18:03 (ten years ago) link

so let's cut to the chase here, is it cool to pay 45/yr for a subscription to pfmag, like does it make you cool to do that.

sleepingbag, Thursday, 21 November 2013 18:10 (ten years ago) link

If you want to be cool, I recommend constantly referring to "brand management" in scare quotes.

Immediate Follower (NA), Thursday, 21 November 2013 18:11 (ten years ago) link

i do want to be cool particularly because it's important to my personal brand, which is why i have to carefully negotiate the value of brands before deciding to affix my brand to their brand

sleepingbag, Thursday, 21 November 2013 18:14 (ten years ago) link

Can't wait to masturbate using this

you are kind, I am (waterface), Thursday, 21 November 2013 18:14 (ten years ago) link

would totally read this tbh

rap steve gadd (D-40), Thursday, 21 November 2013 18:23 (ten years ago) link

went to the pitchfork review site and also saw they have an except from a new book about the birth of delicious vinyl and LA hip hop! i'm kinda excited about this actually

lorde willin' (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 21 November 2013 19:50 (ten years ago) link

never forget
http://www.abebooks.com/Thesaurus-Musicarum-Pitchfork-Year-Music-2003/4054820856/bd

tylerw, Thursday, 21 November 2013 19:56 (ten years ago) link

i did, in fact, forget about that, but someone just reminded me of it

tylerw, Thursday, 21 November 2013 19:57 (ten years ago) link

I've got one on my shelf... is it collectible yet???

sctttnnnt (pgwp), Thursday, 21 November 2013 19:57 (ten years ago) link

"5 Used from US $ 9.00"
sooooo.... yes it is collectible

tylerw, Thursday, 21 November 2013 19:59 (ten years ago) link

I tried to find my copy but gave up after 30 seconds. It's around somewhere, evidence of my lost innocence.

Murgatroid, Thursday, 21 November 2013 19:59 (ten years ago) link

I read they are asking everyone who buys it to wear costumes or formal dress.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 November 2013 20:21 (ten years ago) link

Wax your handlebar mustaches boys! We're gonna buy a pitchfork magazine.

Statham. Versus. Franco. (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:27 (ten years ago) link

Please wear your best old western saloon keeper's outfit to checkout

Statham. Versus. Franco. (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:29 (ten years ago) link

"the pitchfork review" sounds like what it would be called in a new yorker cartoon or something

socki (s1ocki), Thursday, 21 November 2013 22:46 (ten years ago) link

They should publish a print version of Pitchfork Reviews Reviews called the Pitchfork Reviews Reviews Review.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 November 2013 22:49 (ten years ago) link

hey dawg we heard you liked

some dude, Thursday, 21 November 2013 22:52 (ten years ago) link

pretty sure that was the zine

katherine, Friday, 22 November 2013 01:56 (ten years ago) link

otm

intheblanks, Friday, 22 November 2013 02:07 (ten years ago) link

Maybe 3 years ago I looked at ILM every day when I woke up and I used to say to myself that any day when this thread was not bumped + I did not have blood in my urine was a good day.

Mark, Friday, 22 November 2013 05:54 (ten years ago) link

the entire thread would read differently if the subject line was just changed to "pitchfork wisdom (#34985859340293849494 in a series.)"

some dude, Friday, 22 November 2013 06:01 (ten years ago) link

yes, and I would probably live about four months longer

Mark, Friday, 22 November 2013 06:05 (ten years ago) link

It begins with Push the Sky Away’s hazy-headed pocket history of modern civilization, “Higgs Boson Blues”, whose Miley Cyrus name-drops elicit audible giggles from the studio attendees. Its appearance here underscores just how perfectly Cave predicted her year, with the line “Hannah Montana/ Does the African Savannah” standing as an almost biblical prophecy of twerk-gate.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm nah

Immediate Follower (NA), Tuesday, 3 December 2013 22:27 (ten years ago) link

almost biblical, you say

frogbs, Tuesday, 3 December 2013 22:35 (ten years ago) link

the twerking is like the twerking of Miley the daughter of Billy; for she twerketh furiously

i have sounded the very dub step of humility (anonanon), Tuesday, 3 December 2013 22:40 (ten years ago) link

People who miss the point on this cover by designer Jonathan Barnbrook are likely reading into it too much. If slapping a boring square on the iconic Heroes cover seems lazy, think about our age of appropriation on Tumblr as well as where every image came from first. Then think about how many cultural icons are left that have been able to make meaningful art in both of those eras.

flopson, Friday, 6 December 2013 01:38 (ten years ago) link

our age of appropriation : where every image came from = 2013 : the 70s

CANONICAL artists, etc., etc. (contenderizer), Friday, 6 December 2013 02:46 (ten years ago) link

So Pitchfork is having their Reader's Choice Poll, and once again they have it that when you start typing in letters it'll give you suggestions for albums/tracks that were covered by Pitchfork within the past year.

Except for the "Best New Artist" category which seems to list every single band reviewed by the site in its history, regardless of the artist being new to 2013.

So of course I voted for Paul McCartney on that one.

MarkoP, Friday, 6 December 2013 03:36 (ten years ago) link

i mean...it's just an autocomplete suggestion thing, it's not like they actually put Paul McCartney in the "best new artist" category. but hey, WHAT A GAFFE!

deez the season (some dude), Friday, 6 December 2013 03:38 (ten years ago) link

That should show them for not optimizing your experience when voting in the PITCHFORK READERS POLL

tuostprophets (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 6 December 2013 03:51 (ten years ago) link

I just found the auto complete for that section amusing. Plus I was actually hoping that it would only have 2013 artists, then it would make choosing less difficult. And it also annoyed me a bit that there was no auto complete for best music video cause my mind was drawing blanks for that.

MarkoP, Friday, 6 December 2013 03:52 (ten years ago) link

Also I like terrible puns.

MarkoP, Friday, 6 December 2013 03:52 (ten years ago) link

I hate filling out the second part with all the personal info. I just realized I'm an alcoholic who never leaves the house.

a fifth of misty beethoven (cryptosicko), Friday, 6 December 2013 03:57 (ten years ago) link

auto-complete for Best New Artist should draw from artists created in our database since Nov. 2012 (which won't be perfect since some older artists were created since then).

Mark, Friday, 6 December 2013 04:35 (ten years ago) link

not just spit, but "hooker spit," which should give you a window into the tension, claustrophobia, and foulness that infect Morelli's music.

franklin, Wednesday, 11 December 2013 06:21 (ten years ago) link

Jamie Stewart is angry https://twitter.com/XiuXiuforLife/status/410659620605001728

Murgatroid, Wednesday, 11 December 2013 06:41 (ten years ago) link

daffy cunt prob my favorite disney character, but there really are so many

le goon (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 11 December 2013 06:50 (ten years ago) link

jfc daffy duck is not even disney, i should go to sleep

le goon (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 11 December 2013 06:52 (ten years ago) link

I like the idea of a pissed-off tweet by Jamie Stewart about a review leading you down a Daffy Duck Wikipedia hole.

Murgatroid, Wednesday, 11 December 2013 06:54 (ten years ago) link

he would find ways to circumvent twitter's limitations and find modes of expression to suit his tweet, no doubt

Santana featuring (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 11 December 2013 07:08 (ten years ago) link

one month passes...

The Lucksmiths -- Cartography for Beginners: A Best of the Lucksmiths

...wry lyrics about various shades of emotional ache, featuring the kind of wordplay that tends to come from people who can both define "zeugma" and provide an example

Yes! Spot on. I love it.

("I can't see the florist for the flowers/ And I can't see the point in hanging 'round.")

What? No, terrible example. You've ruined it. Totally ruined. Now this is some motherfucking zeugma:

Though you kept me guessing and your distance
Were it not for my persistence
We would never have been lovers
You kept your distance and me guessing
Finally acquiescing only after I’d discovered
You kept the things I sent you
The lengths I went to

L'Haim, to life (St3ve Go1db3rg), Wednesday, 15 January 2014 14:51 (ten years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.