Skyfall: Bond #23

Why wouldn't he be?

x-post

He has said so in interviews. He is a big star in Denmark, and has commented on it.

Aight. Too bad. I would think that would be a pretty good way to increase ones international profile, though that's not necessarily what he's after.

I apologize to the people of Denmark for my inadvertent belittling of their cultural icon

Oh man, you should all see Nanna, where he plays the father of a little pre-school girl. The scene where she comes into the parents bedroom and asks them 'What are you doing?' and he answers: 'We're having sex. What are you doing?' is a classic of Danish childrens television.

Sorry, I'm derailing this thread. Just wanted to tell you about that.

Haha, that sounds so Scandinavian.

tuomas.txt

every time i watch Casino Royale again i appreciate more and more how good a villain le chiffre is. hes not a big baller megalomaniac (dont get me wrong i like those guys too), just a mid-level euro weirdo who mads mikkelson gives lots of personality. tracer has a great post in the original CR thread thats appreciative of his performance

that parkour/crane chase in Casino still blows me away by how great it is

― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, November 12, 2013 1:52 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark

its amazing. craig busting through the drywall is one of the best bond moments ever. the way the sequence escalates is awesome and the editing is great, snappy but not rushed. campbell really knows what he's doing there, he's just "on" like mctiernan was in die hard. in the top 5 bond action scenes imo. also one of the best instances of expressing character thru an action scene, something the train opening in skyfall gets right as well tho its not as viscerally exciting

brosnan would make good bond villain now. like how michael caine played the bad guy in the remake of sleuth.

― Philip Nunez, Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:16 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark

always thought they missed an opportunity by not having connery play a villain during the brosnan era

the way craig's bond deliberately eschews the parkour flourishes for dumb brute strength ie the drywall reminded me of wile e coyote

So, apparantly they got the rights to SPECTRE and Blofeld back, and could work them in with Quantum, somehow: http://www.hitfix.com/motion-captured/mgm-and-danjaq-reported-close-deal-to-secure-all-spectre-and-blofeld-rights-for-james-bond

yippee

i don't feel like i want Blofeld reboot espesh if Sam Mendes is anywhere near it but let's see

who should play him? i say... brendan gleeson

okay that wd be fucking awesome

tbh Brendan Gleeson in anything wd be fucking awesome

brendan gleeson played international supercriminal in mission impossible II and it was not awesome

pretty sure i've never watched MI II but feel comfortable assuming any problems were not Gleeson's fault

he was only doing his job huh

he was good in it! he just couldnt will the whole movie into being good

James Bond is weird in that there is this idea of him having this arch-enemy and associated organization, but they're actually in, what, like...two of the films? Three? I've managed to never actually see any of those, too, so it just seems sort of silly to get the rights back or try to 'reboot' the concept, like the most likely reaction from audiences is going to be "Who?"

SPECTRE/blofeld appear in dr no, from russia w/ love, thunderball, you only live twice, on her majesty's secret service, diamond's are forever, and for your eyes only (just a blofeld cameo in the last one though). also never say never again if that counts.

also if you've never seen the connery ones you really really should cuz they still piss all over the others from a great height imo.

^^^

Huh, wow, I never realized it was that big of a thing! Maybe I was mixing it up with the novels. Still, in a post-Austin Powers world, can Bond really benefit from having a recurring arch-nemesis?

I've seen Goldfinger, it was great. Should definitely dig into the others, I agree. Last one I was trying out though was The Living Daylights and was totally getting into it before Netflix dropped it the same day.

They aren't really an arch nemesis as much as a crime illuminati. Imagine a second-world illuminati

Quantum is the alterna-Spectre of the Craig Bonds, fyi

lol apparently in bulgaria they just called quantum spectre and called quantum of solace spectre of solace which is the kind of thing you can do when yr titles are fucking nonsense anyway

loool

Doctor Casino, watch From Russia With Love stat.

^^^

^^^^^^^

if they're going to reboot the villains, what the next one needs is a really vicious train fight as per 'From Russia..' between Bond and a Shaw-esque psycho thug. i'm also totally down with a Rosa Klebb reboot.

tom cruise's last spy movie had a vicious thug train fight, was p good

Didn't they like trumpet a return to the set up with MI6 that they had in the very beginning of the Connery sequence? with Ralph Fiennes becoming Bernard Lee's M and the black girl who shot Bond at the beginning becoming Moneypenny.
So looked like they were trying to return to something approaching where things were then and this new Spectre/Blofeld development would just add to that. Not sure how things compare to the books since its been a while since I read those that I have, just wondering if it is trying to reboot something closer to them or something.

there's definitely a reboot of sorts going on. but the key question is how many more films will the producers let daniel craig make. skyfall was full of 'too old' themes, so my guess is one more for dc, the next story will include some transition to a younger replacement.

ffs he's not Doctor Who

they should ride craig as long as they can imo

aw yeah

for sure, the odds of a replacement being an improvement are pretty slim

he's signed for two more bonds iirc

the new one was original going to be a two-parter but they scrapped that idea once Mendes got back on board

I really hope they do give it to Idris Elba next. Seems very unlikely though.

They should reboot and shoot the next four or five as period pieces tbh

i wd really enjoy films of the original books - inasmuch as they're filmable - but it wd be "James Bond" not James Bond and kinda too big a budget for the arthouse and too out of time for the multiplex

Anyone read William Boyd's Bond novel? I'm quite keen to.

no way they can top Skyfall/ Royale with the next one. they should quit, take the rest of the decade off and come back with a new guy. the quote about how they were bringing back Bond's funny knockabout romp side (or something) doesn't fill me with much hope.

I'm not waiting 10 years for another bond movie just bcz you've had yr fill ffs

I could top skyfall with my phone camera, a bic lighter, a bmx and a jack jones shirt

+ komodo dragon

the quote about how they were bringing back Bond's funny knockabout romp side (or something) doesn't fill me with much hope.

I have the opposite view: IMO part of what makes Bond Bond is the humour/quipping/charming bastard side of the character. Bond shouldn't be just a thug, otherwise you could just be making generic action movies and not call the guy James Bond at all. I thought the thuggishness and overt seriousness was okay in Casino Royale, because it was established Bond was still a rookie and this was his origin story of a sort. But three movies of that is enough already, you don't need to imitate your imitator and makes James Bond into Jason Bourne. So yeah, bring back the one-liners!