who was the last pope to get assassinated by malcontents from within
― j., Tuesday, October 1, 2013 11:06 PM (1 minute ago)
that guy in the godfather 3
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 October 2013 03:07 (ten years ago) link
^that was JP I, yeah
didn't see this til today.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 October 2013 23:13 (ten years ago) link
Check this out: http://www.repubblica.it/cultura/2013/10/01/news/pope_s_conversation_with_scalfari_english-67643118/
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 October 2013 23:17 (ten years ago) link
Proselytism is solemn nonsense, it makes no sense
<3
― Fizzles, Thursday, 3 October 2013 01:51 (ten years ago) link
seriously, if this guy survives the year, then I will be really ~amazed~
also I'm all about the Vatican putting together an XI for a cricket match against the Anglicans
― The Miracle of the Jimmy Smits (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 24 October 2013 08:27 (ten years ago) link
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/10/us/conservative-us-catholics-feel-left-out-of-the-popes-embrace.html?hp&_r=0
lotta chumps sure seem to know better than their spirit-prince how to be catholic
― j., Sunday, 10 November 2013 15:55 (ten years ago) link
omg
“There have been bad popes in the history of the church,” Mr. Skojec said. “Popes that murdered, popes that had mistresses. I’m not saying Pope Francis is terrible, but there’s no divine protection that keeps him from being the type of guy who with subtlety undermines the teachings of the church to bring about a different vision.”
― j., Sunday, 10 November 2013 15:56 (ten years ago) link
yes!! prophecies!!!
Some conservative Catholics are sharing prophecies online that foretell of tribulations for the church. In one, an Irish woman predicted that Benedict would be held hostage. Others cite the German mystic Anne Catherine Emmerich, who wrote of a “relationship between two popes,” one who “lives in a palace other than before,” which some now see as a reference to Benedict, who resigned as pope early this year but still lives in Vatican City. During this time there arises a “false church of darkness.”
― j., Sunday, 10 November 2013 15:58 (ten years ago) link
A pity Nino, Alito, Roberts, and Slobbo weren't quoted.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 10 November 2013 16:12 (ten years ago) link
What kind of a Christian tells an atheist he has no intention to convert him?
The best kind!
― tokyo rosemary, Sunday, 10 November 2013 22:39 (ten years ago) link
i got good LOLs from this article
― the late great, Sunday, 10 November 2013 22:55 (ten years ago) link
The sly kind
― golfdinger (darraghmac), Sunday, 10 November 2013 22:57 (ten years ago) link
http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/world-news/detail/articolo/francesco-francis-francisco-ebrei-jews-judios-29683/
Lol.
― Matt DC, Friday, 15 November 2013 10:54 (ten years ago) link
The article does not really deliver on the promise of the headline alas.
― Matt DC, Friday, 15 November 2013 10:56 (ten years ago) link
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2013/11/how-strong-is-pope-francis.html
― lag∞n, Monday, 18 November 2013 05:13 (ten years ago) link
strong like bull
― j., Monday, 18 November 2013 05:15 (ten years ago) link
strong enough to create a rock that he cant lift
― lag∞n, Monday, 18 November 2013 05:16 (ten years ago) link
good piece
― twist boat veterans for stability (k3vin k.), Monday, 18 November 2013 05:31 (ten years ago) link
Obv not a medici pope.
― Aimless, Monday, 18 November 2013 05:36 (ten years ago) link
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/22/opinion/conservative-view-of-pope.html?_r=0
I am not anti-pope. Popes are infallible only when speaking ex cathedra on matters of faith and morals. Pope Francis’s off-the-cuff remarks during an interview do not have to be supported to remain a Catholic in good standing.BRIDGET KURTSmyrna, Ga., Nov. 18, 2013
BRIDGET KURTSmyrna, Ga., Nov. 18, 2013
BRING ON THE ANTIPOPES
― j., Sunday, 24 November 2013 15:32 (ten years ago) link
An apostolic exhortation!
Human beings are themselves considered consumer goods to be used and then discarded. We have created a “disposable” culture which is now spreading. It is no longer simply about exploitation and oppression, but something new. Exclusion ultimately has to do with what it means to be a part of the society in which we live; those excluded are no longer society’s underside or its fringes or its disenfranchised – they are no longer even a part of it. The excluded are not the “exploited” but the outcast, the “leftovers”.
In this context, some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and naïve trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the sacralized workings of the prevailing economic system. Meanwhile, the excluded are still waiting. To sustain a lifestyle which excludes others, or to sustain enthusiasm for that selfish ideal, a globalization of indifference has developed. Almost without being aware of it, we end up being incapable of feeling compassion at the outcry of the poor, weeping for other people’s pain, and feeling a need to help them, as though all this were someone else’s responsibility and not our own. The culture of prosperity deadens us; we are thrilled if the market offers us something new to purchase; and in the meantime all those lives stunted for lack of opportunity seem a mere spectacle; they fail to move us.
http://www.salon.com/2013/11/26/pope_francis_capitalism_is_a_new_tyranny/
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 27 November 2013 15:28 (ten years ago) link
really interesting. key gesture that separates what he's saying from marxist leftism is that distinction between "exploited" and "excluded"--a question of mercy rather than justice. both have their place, i suppose, and im glad he's willing to speak up for the former.
― ryan, Wednesday, 27 November 2013 15:32 (ten years ago) link
49. Let us go forth, then, let us go forth to offer everyone the life of Jesus Christ. Here I repeat for the entire Church what I have often said to the priests and laity of Buenos Aires: I prefer a Church which is bruised, hurting and dirty because it has been out on the streets, rather than a Church which is unhealthy from being confined and from clinging to its own security. I do not want a Church concerned with being at the centre and then ends by being caught up in a web of obsessions and procedures. If something should rightly disturb us and trouble our consciences, it is the fact that so many of our brothers and sisters are living without the strength, light and consolation born of friendship with Jesus Christ, without a community of faith to support them, without meaning and a goal in life. More than by fear of going astray, my hope is that we will be moved by the fear of remaining shut up within structures which give us a false sense of security, within rules which make us harsh judges, within habits which make us feel safe, while at our door peole are starving and Jesus does not tire of saying to us: “Give them something to eat” (Mk 6:37).
goin so hard, what a boss
― j., Thursday, 28 November 2013 19:07 (ten years ago) link
Wow this Pope rules.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 29 November 2013 01:49 (ten years ago) link
I keep thinking there's gotta be a catch.
― a fifth of misty beethoven (cryptosicko), Friday, 29 November 2013 01:55 (ten years ago) link
there usually is when they give you something to eat
― j., Friday, 29 November 2013 01:56 (ten years ago) link
can he save K Lo's soul
― Matt Armstrong, Friday, 29 November 2013 01:57 (ten years ago) link
The less-than-awesome stuff this Pope has already been involved in has been cataloged already, and shouldn't be dismissed, but I admit, I'm impressed with the economic-morality stance. Not to mention making those positions the first points of the document.
― Simon H., Friday, 29 November 2013 02:00 (ten years ago) link
Its sweet he wants to wade in on this kinda thing, but who exactly do ye imagine is about to take budgeting advice from il papa?
― 30 ch'lopping days left to umas (darraghmac), Friday, 29 November 2013 02:03 (ten years ago) link
Not many... because John Paul II, for example, said some similar things, just not as forcefully.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 November 2013 02:06 (ten years ago) link
FWIW, I had to scroll waaaay down on US HuffPo to see this reported at all, and in a way that didn't communicate the strength of the language.
― Simon H., Friday, 29 November 2013 02:09 (ten years ago) link
Anecdotally, my French-Canadian grandma has pictures of JPII everywhere, and I don't imagine Francis dislodging any of those in her lifetime.
― Simon H., Friday, 29 November 2013 02:11 (ten years ago) link
Francis pissed off that circus clown Rash Limbaugh, apparently, but I sure as hell wasn't gonna listen to the clip or link it.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 November 2013 02:20 (ten years ago) link
― Simon H., Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:09 PM (49 minutes ago)
it's been covered pretty widely
― k3vin k., Friday, 29 November 2013 03:01 (ten years ago) link
yeah it got alot of press, almost certainly due to francis' previous statements. jpII spent the post-cold war part of his papacy making similar (if more muted) statements but w/ him there were so many other things in his agenda that were more of a focus and that coaligned more w/ conservative evangelical interests it never got much play. plus arguably the atmosphere is different, more ready to hear that message now than during jpII's day. it's interesting cuz catholicism's become this weird marker of intellectualism w/ the right, nro clowns, the conservative scotus justices, and obv newt gingrich.
― balls, Friday, 29 November 2013 03:12 (ten years ago) link
My right wing cousin and host praised Francis' messages and scorned Obama's "closing of the Vatican embassy just when it has the potential of being influential again".
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 29 November 2013 03:16 (ten years ago) link
The less-than-awesome stuff this Pope has already been involved in has been cataloged already, and shouldn't be dismissed,
what is this stuff?
― i lost my shoes on acid (jed_), Friday, 29 November 2013 15:47 (ten years ago) link
The church
― 30 ch'lopping days left to umas (darraghmac), Friday, 29 November 2013 16:18 (ten years ago) link
Let's agree that the church has backward agendas on sexuality and equality for women. They do some other stuff that's good -- feeding the hungry, running hospitals, etc.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 November 2013 16:51 (ten years ago) link
this guy is the pope of good PR
― sleepingbag, Friday, 29 November 2013 16:53 (ten years ago) link
― a fifth of misty beethoven (cryptosicko), Thursday, November 28, 2013 8:55 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I know, right? I keep reminding myself to temper my enthusiasm for this guy.
― rip van wanko, Friday, 29 November 2013 17:39 (ten years ago) link
by all accounts he's just a fantastic guy. he's a product of his upbringing and of his background -- all popes are going to be -- but laying out his priorities like this, taking a moral stance against markets, etc, these things matter
― k3vin k., Friday, 29 November 2013 19:02 (ten years ago) link
i mean i'd love it if he called for the ordination of women or supported civil unions, but that's just not going to happen. the fact that he's called for these issues to be deemphasized is a pretty big step. and you know, imo, economic issues are more important anyway, so i'm glad he's being as forceful as he is.
― k3vin k., Friday, 29 November 2013 19:05 (ten years ago) link
isn't there some reasonably critical summit or juncture sometime soon at which like at least attitudes toward gay marriage are addressed? feel like amy davidson was suggesting it was a kinda litmus test for him in swashbuckling rhetoric vs effect
― love mike love (ko komo) (schlump), Friday, 29 November 2013 19:10 (ten years ago) link
wkiw this dude:
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2013/12/03/pope-i-was-once-a-bar-bouncer/?hpt=hp_c2
― sleeve, Tuesday, 3 December 2013 22:46 (ten years ago) link
priests' laundry, so you know he has seen some dark shit
― j., Tuesday, 3 December 2013 22:57 (ten years ago) link
Would kill to read an interview with Benedict about Pope Frankie.
― polyphonic, Tuesday, 3 December 2013 23:10 (ten years ago) link
<3http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/vatican-refuses-to-share-sex-abuse-investigations-with-un-1.1616591<3
Church so cool now that pope frank is dropping commie tracts <3
― mind totally brown (darraghmac), Wednesday, 4 December 2013 08:28 (ten years ago) link
you are absolutely correct and I regret my flippant post from yesterday, if I had a beer with the dude his goons would probably throw me out of a helicopter afterwards
― sleeve, Wednesday, 4 December 2013 21:25 (ten years ago) link
TIME Person of the Year
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 December 2013 17:03 (ten years ago) link
Oops.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/29/europe/pope-francis-russia-ukraine-intl-hnk/index.html
― Monthly Python (Tom D.), Wednesday, 30 August 2023 12:35 (eight months ago) link
sorry ukraine but how is he going to heal the great schism if he can't win over the third rome?
― your original display name is still visible (Left), Wednesday, 30 August 2023 14:39 (eight months ago) link