truth bombs

the '78 ta was junk. piece of crap 403 engine. 76 was the last good year.

this is probably not the place to get on this particular soapbox but the whole "WHOA WHAT WOULD IT BE LIKE TO WATCH THIS STONED!!!!!" meme is idiotic.

if you watched this stoned, you might do one or several of the following
- laugh more and longer than you would not stoned
- talk more in the movie theater, annoying other patrons
- lose your train of thought frequently, with a line or scene perhaps suggesting a long series of fantasies or random associations; consequently you might find it a bit more difficult to follow the narrative

This is more or less true for every movie. if you're the sort who can get paranoid smoking weed, and you're watching a scary movie, it might bug you out to an unpleasant degree.

i mean, what do you think will happen? you think the film has some secret code buried the mise-en-scene that will only appear to those who are high?

-- amateurist, Thursday, 7 August 2008 01:24 (3 days ago)

that trans am is just :0~~

http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k6/eldodave/y84124.jpg

that amateurist t-bomb is clinical

Top Grossing Films of 1978:

1. Grease
2. Superman
3. Animal House
4. Every Which Way But Loose
5. Jaws II

i saw all these movies stoned but then I was high all of 1978 :D

IIRC lol

The only one that didn't have a sequel was Animal House.

hoos: issac hayes rip :(((
gf: :(
gf: you're gonna listen to shaft all night aren't you

ultimate truthbomb:

http://media.abum.com/image/66451.jpg

uncle floyd and aunt beth must've had a pretty wild 50th

but "cute college girl" is right there out in the open

what a tease

Aunt Floyd

http://www.franklinmaine.net/Gossip%20and%20News/Gossip%20Images/CountFloyd.jpg

My first car was a 78 chevy nova. It cost a thousand dollars and I named it Sonja and it lasted about six years. Four days after I bought it, a driving instructor totaled a Mercedes on me and left me with a broken headlight. God I loved that car.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/chevrolet-nova17.htm

awman i love 60s/70s chevy novas & plymouth valiants

I have no love for the 1973 (or thereabouts) nova, as that was the one my mom had that would stall out constantly on the way to school and generally sucked

hahaha "/New Folder/New Folder/Error 1325531-G/"

my cousin lovingly restored a 70s nova in high school and then literally wrapped it around a telephone pole while we were in it. it's a miracle we weren't killed/maimed. the car hit the pole on the passenger side backseat in a sideways skid, nearly tearing the car in half. the car then spun back onto the road and came to a rest facing 180 degrees in the other direction. to get out we had to crawl through a hole ripped in the backseat opposite of the impact point. no seatbelts! if we had hit the pole a foot or two closer to the front passenger side I woulda been a grease spot, and if you saw a picture of the car afterwards you wouldn't believe anyone walked away from it.

car before:

 __

|  | 

|__|

 __

/ /

\_\

senseless teenage me was delighted, of course.

awman i love 60s/70s chevy novas & plymouth valiants

early/mid 60s novas and the 65-67 valiant are fucking great. but you really can't beat the '68 volvo p1800.

http://z.about.com/d/cars/1/7/E/l/volvo_P1800coupe.jpg

so pretty
but i still feel more affinity with cars that look like this
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6c/PlymouthValient100BlackFront.jpg
fuel efficiency aside obv, but why does fuel efficient have to mean dumb looking?
god new cars are so ugly

truth/car/image bombs

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/63Dart170_4D.jpg/800px-63Dart170_4D.jpg

^almost bought one once for $800. owner was having money trouble, unfortunately so was I.

my mom said her first car was an early 60s valiant. she didn't realize you had to change the oil from time to time and wound up seizing the engine.

my mom's first car was a 60s valiant too! she sold it some time around my 2nd brother being born and got a 70s vw van. which we had for like ever.

that dart is soo beautiful <3

god new cars are so ugly

i very seriously want one of these (in white)

http://www.blackbookmag.com/ee/images/uploads2/smart-car-fortwo-on-two-coa.jpg

http://www.autospectator.com/cars/files/images/554701_979741_4668_3080_07C2015_037.JPG

Few things in this world more repulsive than British people talking about sex.

-- caek, Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:09 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

im too tall for those. though parallel parking must be a breeze.

British people are the most disgusting savages

http://i38.tinypic.com/iz6wsw.jpg

JBR youll be killed in that thing!

it's a worthy sacrifice.

btw is it that new $2500 nano car (or did i dream that car?)

Are these cars just new in the US? They were to be seen frequently in London at least five years ago, maybe even more.

they're new in the u.s., but only the fortwo line is being sold here at the moment. they're selling really well, apparently!

sunny: it's the smartcar. they start at around $11000.

i want a car that's also a phone

my mum has a smart car

lol slocki

jbr i love you but i totally totally can't get behind the look of hybrid cars gaah

Smart cars are everywhere in Oxford/London. I think you get one when you qualify as an estate agent.

lol "qualify"

more like dumbcars

amirite

xp to rrrobyn:
http://i33.tinypic.com/2znzlae.jpg

smart cars are not hybrids
they are also ridiculously safe

crumple zones

I guess I'm wrong as usual.

-- Just got offed, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 13:38 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

whatever smart cars are they do not look cool and also that hybrid suv is ugly and also i mean i don't even drive so let me have my car fantasy world