To "rock fans", what is meant to be the canonical, everyone can agree on, album of the decade?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (582 of them)

every rock fan i've ever met loves radiohead!

I know plenty - PLEEENNTYY - of "rock fans" who would regard radiohead as "that weird faggot arty music", so, no. Sorry.

FooFighters, yeah. QOTSA maybe in the early 2k's but not now.

one art, please (Trayce), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 01:06 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm thinking of generic "I listen to Clear Channel radio stations and buy chart music" rock fans here, mind you, which is as broad a church as can be assumed, surely.

one art, please (Trayce), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 01:06 (fifteen years ago) link

people will be wedding dancing to songs off is this it for similar decades as those mentioned above.

^^^ this is actually true. i think that the strokes' albums, for better or for worse, will have some nostalgic staying power.

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 01:07 (fifteen years ago) link

i think it's actually very similar to both of those, though more in terms of they way they're all now viewed than the way they occurred in their respective moments. throw dark side of the moon in there, too. all rock canon klassiks - not just popular and influential, but sanctified by some invisible (critical) hand.

franz f = even narrower in their rock appeal than the strokes. indie + pop + dance is their circle. no real appeal to throwback/dadrocker types, metalheads.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 01:07 (fifteen years ago) link

that was in response to whiney's mention of nevermind & london calling

contenderizer, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 01:08 (fifteen years ago) link

I think that is probably a very accurate reduction of Franz Ferdinand's fans (at least US-wide) but you could do that to most of the other albums and artists being discussed.

what you know about hat? I know all about hat. (edwardo), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 01:10 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't think you trust in my
Self-righteous suicide
I cry
When angels deserve to DIE!!!!

I'm not sure there have ever been better lyrics...

that song is comedy gold at rock clubs. the bouncy start gets everyone all fired up, so much so that they forget that 60% of the tune consists of slow, maudlin wailing. cue a dancefloor full of frustrated metalheads standing around looking utterly unsure what to do with themselves. some may emote-mime if you're lucky.

sorry.

as you were.

m the g, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 01:30 (fifteen years ago) link

NEVER FORGET

what you know about hat? I know all about hat. (edwardo), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 01:42 (fifteen years ago) link

Uh, won't it likely be My Chemical Romance or something? I mean, isn't that our generation's Nirvana?

THESE ARE MY FEELINGS! FEEL MY FEELINGS! (I eat cannibals), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 01:47 (fifteen years ago) link

no

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 01:51 (fifteen years ago) link

to the ongoing and extremely important question of foo fighters, the reason gaydiohead win out over FF (and strokes and other FF bands named after things related to wars and maybe even white strhipes) = rockism. it's not about having fans or radioplay or chart hits, though those matter - it's about artistic artistry, breaking new ground, the cutting age, and being seriously important for reasons to be enumerated, etc. that's what makes bands not just present or remembered, but symbolic, iconic.

the reason that led zep IV and london calling seem to bookend the 70s (not that they're alone in that) isn't just sales or hooks or fans, it's that there's a narrative of significance attached to each. they're not just collections of songs, they're expressions tapping into something "valuable". this narrative is super dominant and self-supporting at this point. like the foo fighters, bachman turner overdrive, BOC and grand funk sold records, rocked stadiums, authored extremely classic tunes that will live in history for all the days of mankind. but they never managed to create an aura of almost holy "artistic importance" around themselves. so they're not enshrined in the decade-defining cubbyholes of history. they're just these bands, see.

radiohead have done this, as did nirvana in the 90s, and maybe kinda NIN? sonic youth? kyuss? suspect that the slowly increasing importance of the latter will sneak rated R & songs for the deaf into the decade-definement biz (as also-rans) long before foo fighterses. who will be remembered as record your dad had, plus maybe it was that guy from nirvana.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 02:24 (fifteen years ago) link

As the thread title calls upon "rock fans" rather than rock fans, I have nothing to add except to agree that "rock fans" would certainly favour Radiohead, while rock fans would probably prefer something more like one of Motorhead's or Killing Joke's last two albums.

moley, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 02:29 (fifteen years ago) link

. . . Or maybe it's because Foo Fighters suck.

(xp)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 18 February 2009 02:30 (fifteen years ago) link

contenderizer otm until he started talking about kyuss

Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 02:32 (fifteen years ago) link

while rock fans would probably prefer something more like one of Motorhead's or Killing Joke's last two albums.

― moley

no, you're thinking of "real rock" fans, which as far as i can tell is some kind of drug cult, but i understand the confusion

contenderizer, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 02:32 (fifteen years ago) link

i <3 kyuss, it makes me think wrong

contenderizer, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 02:33 (fifteen years ago) link

whiney consistenly otm. i dont get this thread really, as we're all being a bit retarded if we (1) honestly think there's a record or band that can actually claim to unite any substantial majority of rock fans and (2) are really giving dom's trolly thread 100+ posts

Jewish Lager (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 03:03 (fifteen years ago) link

consistently*

Jewish Lager (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 03:03 (fifteen years ago) link

NEVER FORGET PART 2

ilxor, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 03:56 (fifteen years ago) link

When the best-of-the-decade lists start popping up in 10 months or so, these are the 8 albums that will be mentioned the most frequently in publications read by "rock fans":

The Strokes: Is This It
Bob Dylan: Love and Theft
Radiohead: Kid A
Emimen: Marshall Mathers LP
Green Day: American Idiot
Outkast: Either Stankonia or Speakerboxxx
White Stripes: Elephant (should be White Blood Cells)
MIA: Kala

kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 04:09 (fifteen years ago) link

Blue collar local guys will vouch for Green Day, Eminem, and Foos but not White Stripes and Strokes

i'm pretty sure that's not what he meant by twinky train (los blue jeans), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 05:06 (fifteen years ago) link

I hope it's Arular

dan138zig (Durrr Durrr Durrrrrr), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 06:24 (fifteen years ago) link

korn's list seems reasonable, and when it gets all esspanded out like that, it seems reasonable to rope in more not-so-entirely-crit-friendly stuff, like MCR's the black parade, SoaD's toxicity, tool's lateralus, fall out boy's infinity on high and i dunno, whatever the fuck U2 and REM did this decade. that one with beautiful day.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 06:51 (fifteen years ago) link

plus some coldplay record or other

contenderizer, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 06:52 (fifteen years ago) link

plus what else? deftones' white pony might once have been a runner-up, but they never followed it up properly, interest died. QotSA: songs for the deaf, shoo in, duh. that 1st franz ferd lp, yah. HOF's blessed black wings? liars' they were wrong, so we drownded? maybe that next liars has more fans tho. i dunno, do people still rate mogwai records? mclusky do dallas? isis' oceanic?

contenderizer, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 07:08 (fifteen years ago) link

I care way too much about questions like these and even I think this one's a lost cause.

Matos W.K., Wednesday, 18 February 2009 07:39 (fifteen years ago) link

there must be other rock musics that people will feel inclined to list (other than guaranteed winners test icicles, babyshambles and creed, of course). hold steady's first couple, gossip's standing in the way of control, maybe all hands on the bad one (or is that too late 90s?), maybe boris' pink. hives veni, vidi, vicious. noisy skeng from blood brothers, battles, lightning bolts, etc. black dice beaches & canyons. are animal collective a "rock band"? were they ever? what about hot chip? is is ridiculous to think that the exploding hearts will get a few sympathy points here and there? does anybody else like that "little razorblade song"? god, there have to be about a hundred more...

matos: well, yeah

contenderizer, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 07:40 (fifteen years ago) link

spoon, shins (and post-shins/death cab development of fleet foxes type bearded west coast amerindie), eome of yr more time-honored wilco and ted leo records, arcade fire (really?), but i dunno if gorillas were ever a proper band, and didn't they used to have a arctic monkeys over there that they were quite excited about, or was that related the whole test icicles fiasco? BLACK ONE.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 07:59 (fifteen years ago) link

O_o

Choose Leif, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 08:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Considering by this point in the 90s there were at least 10-15 nailed on straight into the canon big rock albums, this decade really doesn't seem to have produced many. I think this *might* have something to do with the decline of the album as a physical format.

Kid A feels like an end-of-the-90s album more than a beginning-of-the-00s one - pretty much the last time anyone dropped Warp as a hip influence. Elephant seems like as good a call as any, in that crucial 'recognisable from the very first note' way.

Maximo Park Ji-Sung (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 08:35 (fifteen years ago) link

In twenty years, when people are asked to name the biggest rock band of the 00's, they're going to say Coldplay and you all know it. If you're looking for a rock band that "united the masses" this decade (kids and grandmas know their songs, they're the rock band it's OK for R&B fans to like), then look no further.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 09:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Wow Contenderizer. Just...wow

DJ Mr. Face Stabba, M.D. (Whitey on the Moon), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 09:56 (fifteen years ago) link

Merriweather Post Pavilion

AleXTC, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 10:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Foo Fighters seem like a pretty good call: omnipresent, neither really objectionable not terribly memorable, kind of rock ambience of the period. The sort of thing that only becomes obvious with the distance of a decade or so.

Soukesian, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 11:40 (fifteen years ago) link

"Neither really objectionable not terribly memorable" does not equal canonical, not by a long shot.

Maximo Park Ji-Sung (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 11:45 (fifteen years ago) link

err, isn't this thread about the album, not the band of the decade ?

AleXTC, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 11:46 (fifteen years ago) link

You're right. But "Neither really objectionable not terribly memorable" is what you end up with when you talk about "everyone can agree on". Canonical can be something else again.

Soukesian, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 11:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Dunno, if "Nevermind" was the one for a previous decade, it's neither of those things...

Mark G, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 12:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Dudes, when people say things like "everyone can agree", they do not actually mean everyone.

Maximo Park Ji-Sung (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 12:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Well, even "Happy Birthday to you" can be counted as canonical, and yet people get depressed by it. It's memorable, though...

Mark G, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 12:13 (fifteen years ago) link

ok, definitely the 2000s failed to have an 'album of the decade'. it's official. it's 2009.

people badmouth the 90s, but Nevermind and OK Computer were there. and you didn't have to like these albuns to accept the fact either one was THE album of the 90s. I'm not talking about personal opinion here.

but 'Is this it'? 'Elephant'? Even Kid A it's hard to defend without using some brainy argument.

Shin Oliva Suzuki, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 12:45 (fifteen years ago) link

brainy argument for Kid A:

the anti-tunes are as good as the tunes, man.

37 x 18 = (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 13:33 (fifteen years ago) link

Argh argh argh we're taking Dom's lolthread seriously

Mequophidiophobia: fear of the beer snake (country matters), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 13:35 (fifteen years ago) link

brainy argument for Kid A:

the anti-tunes are as good as the tunes, man.

ok then. Kid A, the album of 2000s

Shin Oliva Suzuki, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 13:52 (fifteen years ago) link

Too much Kid A in this thread, not enough Kid Rock.

I'd say OK ComputerDevil Without a Cause.

Who said the album of the 00s actually had to be from the 00s?

kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 13:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Actually, I'd probably say "Hybrid Theory" by Linkin Park.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 14:09 (fifteen years ago) link

another music forum came up with this list:

The Ondarock Forum Best Albums of the 00s
http://rateyourmusic.com/list/ondarockforum/the_ondarock_forum_best_albums_of_the_00s

153 album listed

note: number 1:
Kid A
Radiohead
Kid A (2000)

djmartian, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 14:13 (fifteen years ago) link

Blue collar local guys will vouch for Green Day, Eminem, and Foos but not White Stripes and Strokes

― i'm pretty sure that's not what he meant by twinky train (los blue jeans), Wednesday, February 18, 2009 12:06 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

rong

brainless popcorn (some dude), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 14:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Return to Sucky Mountain?

Yankee Hotel Sucktrot?

Fuck all of you.

billstevejim, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 14:15 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.