The Wolf of Wall Street (new Scorsese)

xpost

ha

They're always action heroes slinging money instead of guns, even in the "critical" movies.

"Bloat on a Boat" wouldn't have been the worst title for this film

It actually took me two viewings to realize this was a period piece. Could just as easily have been set in 2013 - these greedhead scumbags are the same no matter the year.

some critic pointed out that as Gatsby he looks like Orson Welles

― ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Monday, June 17, 2013 3:37 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hah i can kinda see a connection w/ citizen kane

"Bloat on a Boat" would be apt:

Belfort was the final owner of luxury yacht the Nadine (renamed after his second wife, a British-born model) originally built for Coco Chanel. In June 1997, it sank off the east coast of Sardinia. The Italian Special Forces were called to rescue all aboard the vessel. Belfort has said he insisted on sailing out in high winds against the advice of his captain, resulting in the vessel's sinking when waves smashed the foredeck hatch.

wait this is a period piece? what period?

is last year a period?

90s

makes me think of wall street 2... mcconaughey even makes the same whistling noise as eli wallach

late '80s i think?

that eli wallach whistle was one of the strangest things i've seen in a movie

i was just thinking that it seemed weird to show wall street excess in a corporate office environment w/ particle board ceilings

particle board was all the rage, you're too young to remember

yeah this looks good. agree w/hurting that it'd be nice if they'd just replace all actors with new people I'm not sick of seeing but that's not really on the actors and I'll forget about it about ten minutes into the movie

ok '90s is right

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Belfort

they didn't bother with a period skyline I guess

or locations

that eli wallach whistle was one of the strangest things i've seen in a movie

― christmas candy bar (al leong), Monday, June 17, 2013 3:47 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

haha yeah. and then the little flying bird hand gesture!

yeah this looks good. agree w/hurting that it'd be nice if they'd just replace all actors with new people I'm not sick of seeing but that's not really on the actors and I'll forget about it about ten minutes into the movie

― Oral Sex in Sharp’s Ridge Park (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, June 17, 2013 3:48 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

oh actually I just meant I wish they'd replace dicaprio with someone else in every movie he's ever done. I never ever like him.

although I can't say I was psyched to see Jonah Hill in this either

that eli wallach whistle was one of the strangest things i've seen in a movie

― christmas candy bar (al leong), Monday, June 17, 2013 3:47 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

haha yeah. and then the little flying bird hand gesture!

― i wanna be a gabbneb baby (Hungry4Ass), Monday, June 17, 2013 12:52 PM (42 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

haha i still dgi, but i like that he still has enough clout to improv like that

i still think dicap looks pretty good in this one.

thing w/scorsese and leo is that i'm not sure scorsese wanted to find his new deniro as much as he wanted to find his new liotta.

yeah. and i love that he's still out there acting, just like... who's gonna tell eli wallach he cant make birds with his hands, hes freakin 97

"you know what Fugazi is?

yeah it's one of my favorite bands."

Feels out of date, now that quants with Aspergers put these swinging dicks out of business.

just watched trailer again and im more sold on it. leo's probably gonna be fine, it's in his wheelhouse

except he doesnt play 26 y/o as credibly as he used to

This will probably be bad, with the one caveat that lots of trailers make a movie look far worse than it actually is. (Going by the trailer posted on the Scorsese thread). So maybe that's the case here.

im down with leo

and when he was 26 he played it like he was 17.

i saw boiler room. man, this guy gets two party movies made about him.

http://www.grantland.com/blog/hollywood-prospectus/post/_/id/79764/things-thrown-by-leonardo-dicaprio-in-the-trailer-for-the-wolf-of-wall-street

he seems like a really fun guy to party with.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-ZpaOmOzew

The Gauntlet down for Anybody Other Than Matthew McConaughey Who Wanted to Win an Oscar in 2014

lol no you pathetic sycophant

http://www.vulture.com/2013/06/the-wolf-of-wall-street-trailer-gifs.html

mcconaughey looks like Rod Hull i swear.

yeah see that youtube video of him captures what dicaprio and all the other people to do these roles rarely get -- the kid from queens turned sales douchebag.

mcconaughey's gonna be a pretty great weird-looking old guy

he looks exactly how you'd picture him http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2009/09/04/1225769/656443-jordan-belfort.jpg

mcconaughey's gonna be a pretty great weird-looking old guy

lol I had this thought too

he's been really fun recently, post romcom wasteland

I think mcconaughey looks like he'll be good in this, maybe enough to save it

wild supporting cast

Jon Bernthal
Jon Favreau
Ethan Suplee
Spike Jonze
Rob Reiner
Shea Whigham
Jean Dujardin
Joanna Lumley
Christine Ebersole

i guess jon favreau too old to play the lead. he's jerky enough.

vin diesel was good as the guy in boiler room. i think he was the guy. its been awhile. scorsese should just work with vin.

or wait did ben affleck play the main guy? he's good at being a dick. he's from boston.

joanna lumley?? *mind blown*

I've watched the trailer three or four times, and yeah, some of it works. McConaughey thumping his chest is great--but it's great in the way it plays off the Kanye West song. How well it'll work in the film, especially after you've seen it already, who knows.

The obvious problem, which I'm sure someone's mentioned already, is that every square inch of the immorality/excess/fantasyland of this world has been covered already, starting with Wall Street and especially the past few years in a bunch of documentaries. Scorsese's so late on this. I guess no one's done it as broad comedy yet, but not sure if he's the guy to pull that off.

you guys do know you just watched a 2-minute trailer, and not the actual film, right?

no

I still think the quaalude fight is perfect physical comedy.

Many ppl who have never seen a Jerry Lewis film say this of this Lewis hommage

Was Jerry Lewis into crip jokes too?

Many ppl who have never seen a Jerry Lewis film say this of this Lewis hommage

There is plenty of room for both, Morbs. Jackie Chan does not negate Buster Keaton or Harold Lloyd, thank goodness.

this really is way too long and all the Goodfellas parallels are v obvious (luude freakout leading up to bust = coke + helicopter freakout). Goodfellas is taut and *short* though, makes me wonder if all the bloat in this was not in some ways v intentional, since the whole thing is about bloated excess.

That's sort of how I watch it. I mean, Wolf is 30 minutes longer than Fellas, which isn't radical. Tastes vary, obviously, but I can't think of 30 minutes I'd necessarily want cut from this, any more than I can think of 30 minutes Fellas should be longer. Different stories. Fellas is clearly superior, but I'm not sure I can understand why someone would like that one and outright hate this one, even if it is just more of the same but less.

started re-watching this last night

otm tbh

"the sides cured cancer, that's why they were so expensive"

WoWS and Silence back-to-back is a pretty impressive directorial achievement, not sure of another director who would be capable of making two films of imo near-equal quality (i lean more towards Silence, maybe) that completely different in almost every respect.

A pretty clean guilt-transcendence pivot.

Silence is def the better film

but yeah it is a p interesting 1-2 punch

havent seen silence just want to say this movie rules

wouldn't cut a second of it

Its ~drunk on power, full bore live for today~ nihilism is genuinely electric and frightening. Walked out of it in a daze. I think it's a great film and a fitting end to the Goodfellas, Casino unintentional trilogy.

I think when Leo casually watched the plane crash and thought about what it meant to him personally was when I knew it was special.

haha that plane crash was like the Departed's "the rat symbolizes obviousness" redux

https://media.giphy.com/media/5VIjIJ9YO5lyU/giphy.gif

The Wolf of Wall Street (1929) started out as a silent movie, but was reworked to include sound. It was released in February, eight months before the Wall Street Crash of 1929. The plot involves a trader who corners the market in copper pic.twitter.com/43nmY0oa5E

— Silent Movie GIFs (@silentmoviegifs) April 5, 2019

The Wolf of Wall Street (1929) is today believed to be a lost film. The only part of the movie known to still exist is this brief montage sequence created by Slavko Vorkapić pic.twitter.com/W5pzqDvDWX

— Silent Movie GIFs (@silentmoviegifs) April 5, 2019

I like the zeppelin.

Very Terry Gilliam.

The fact that WOLF OF WALL STREET’s financing continues to lead to active prosecution is pretty perfect pic.twitter.com/zUMzN4lmfM

— Vadim Rizov (@vrizov) July 7, 2019

Goodfellas is taut and *short* though, makes me wonder if all the bloat in this was not in some ways v intentional, since the whole thing is about bloated excess.

there were some fairly comical things in the second half but tonally they didn't make me laugh much, which i think was an intentional function of the length and bloat - like they had to be made pathetic/ridiculous enough that you could see them as comical without finding them funny, because the funniness of the first half was part of the enticement of the audience but it needs a moral corrective that follows the plot.

surprising amount of slow motion in this - it's been a while since i've seen his older movies so i forget but he is fond of it, right? which seems caught up with the tone. all the scenes of office debauchery sliding into slow-mo or seeming sped-up like hints of benny hill, seemed like it voided all those scenes of their potential titillation.

I probably said this up thread but I think Scorsese’s moral seriousness is the reason he doesn’t shortchange the allure of “bad” behavior. Like they say about war movies, you kinda can’t help but make this stuff look fun/exciting...but he sees that the only way out is through, which is why on rewatching a 2nd or 3rd time the desperation and sadness that seems to drive everything/everyone seems downright obvious. I’d be willing to bet that on some level Scorsese sees making films itself as morally dubious...at least movies like this (though Silence has similar overtones)...and so they operate as confessions, and they keep that charge of titillation that all good confession surely has.

lord make me chaste, but not yet

this is a great thread, one day i will maybe watch this movie and discover who is right and who is wrong

it really says something about the audience that wants characters wrapped in immoral excess

every broke american is a temporarily disenfranchised millionaire, who would totally be the good millionaire if they actually made it. and if they weren't, then we should grant them some leeway, because they meant to be the good millionaire.

the audience is embodied in the movie by the two security guards who watch margot robbie's character taunt her husband sexually through the nanny cam

incredible movie

otm

Brad otm nelson