that Mark Radcliffe-sounding platypus fucker must die
― the league against cool sports (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 20:50 (ten years ago) link
this type of marketing aims for public obliquity
'dont u hate {x}' is name recognition
― ghosts of erith spectral crackhouse slain rudeboy (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 20:54 (ten years ago) link
this is quite true, but i wd've thought the aim with a bank was to appeal to people to sign up
― the league against cool sports (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 20:57 (ten years ago) link
you're also suggesting that the kind of twats who come up with this kind of twat campaign are aware of the campaign's - and hence their own - twattery. which feels unlikely?
― the league against cool sports (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 20:58 (ten years ago) link
for a small retail bank (division of a major one) name recognition is fine
even the slowest person capable of opening a bank account doesnt believe one is substantially different to another
― ghosts of erith spectral crackhouse slain rudeboy (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:00 (ten years ago) link
Also I'd be more likely to say "don't you hate that twatty platypus campaign" over "don't you hate [whatever the bank is called]", so even then it doesn't really work. Plus I've seen several non-platypus TV ads for banks where the emphasis is on not being like a bank so it all kind of smushes together. I wonder what will happen when no banks are like banks?
― emil.y, Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:00 (ten years ago) link
banks like real ale and second-hand vinyl, they are Real England and they won't lend you a tenner while pay day.
― the league against cool sports (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:02 (ten years ago) link
yeah i do find a lot of annoyance campaigns don't do a good job of driving home the brand name, but i am probly easily annoyed/distractible
― the league against cool sports (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:03 (ten years ago) link
do u srsly think someone launches an obnoxious seven figure marketing campaign without noticing a lot of ppl find it obnoxious? 'creatives' neither commission it nor make the final decision
― ghosts of erith spectral crackhouse slain rudeboy (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:05 (ten years ago) link
theyre facing an uphill struggle with such a generic/forgettable name
if they launched today they would probably incorporate their quirky and distinctive brand into the name itself
― ghosts of erith spectral crackhouse slain rudeboy (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:09 (ten years ago) link
yeah, we really shd start to see some banks called "Snuggles" or something hitting the high street
― the league against cool sports (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:09 (ten years ago) link
"fuck filled platypus"5 results (0.21 seconds)
― ghosts of erith spectral crackhouse slain rudeboy (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:10 (ten years ago) link
Oh, you're probably right. I mean, just paying enough money to get the name on screen multiple times at primetime means that their custom will rise, regardless of whether or not the campaign chooses 'heartwarming' 'quirky', 'eco-conscious', 'elite' or whatever.
― emil.y, Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:11 (ten years ago) link
think i'm mostly just transferring disdain for stage northerners tbh
― the league against cool sports (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:13 (ten years ago) link
this magners advert with the grotty looking earthy irish 'poet' schmuck is really vile
realness marketing is more obnoxious than a lot of quirky marketing
― ghosts of erith spectral crackhouse slain rudeboy (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:15 (ten years ago) link
i think it's Film 4 that ruins a lot of their movies with Jameson's sponsorship every ad break, that one's pretty noxious too. tho clearly the brand name has stuck with me for some reason
― the league against cool sports (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 May 2013 21:17 (ten years ago) link
http://www.thedrum.com/stuff/2013/05/31/irn-bru-jumps-personalised-can-bandwagon-suitable-only-people-called-fanny
― sktsh, Friday, 31 May 2013 11:29 (ten years ago) link
That really is the anti-Innocent Smoothies in almost every way.
― Matt DC, Friday, 31 May 2013 11:33 (ten years ago) link
Dig that tbh
― OH NO, SECONDS LEFT, SECONDS LEFT, AND THERE IT IS. REGRET. (imago), Friday, 31 May 2013 12:39 (ten years ago) link
That is actually hilarious. Even if it is thought up by the same sort of cocks who equate a bank with a platypus.
― emil.y, Friday, 31 May 2013 13:15 (ten years ago) link
http://www.coca-cola.co.uk/share-a-coke/share-a-coke.html
^^^ Deeply wack though.
― Matt DC, Friday, 31 May 2013 13:17 (ten years ago) link
That makes the bottles look like overly elaborate urine sample containers.
― go cray cray on my lobster soufflé (snoball), Friday, 31 May 2013 13:21 (ten years ago) link
The thing that I don't get with the 'share a coke' thing is that it is SO OBVIOUSLY designed to get people taking photos to put up on social media, but I've known more than one person that's gone along with it anyway. It's like, how craven do they have to be to put you off?
(Also, I actually don't get the concept - it seems that they don't want you to buy coke with your own name on it, but then do they actually want you to 'share'? It looks like not. So what do you even do with it? Nothing, except take a fucking picture and put it up on facebook. I HATE YOU COCA-COLA.)
― emil.y, Friday, 31 May 2013 13:24 (ten years ago) link
Our special Share a Coke vending machines will be going on tour all over Great Britain, giving everyone that visits the location of the vending machine the chance to choose the name they would like printed on a free Coca-Cola or Coke Zero bottle.
they better have a version of
Words you can't have printed on the back of an NFL jersey
or that could be a ~social media disaster~
― ghosts of erith spectral crackhouse slain rudeboy (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Friday, 31 May 2013 13:32 (ten years ago) link
It seems like a very vague reference to the old 'I'd like to buy the world a coke' advert from the 70s. Like at some marketing meeting they realised that a lot of people wouldn't remember it or get the connection, but they decided to go along with the idea anyway.
― go cray cray on my lobster soufflé (snoball), Friday, 31 May 2013 13:33 (ten years ago) link
Oh man, if I could get a bottle of Coke with 'PISS' printed on the side...
― go cray cray on my lobster soufflé (snoball), Friday, 31 May 2013 13:34 (ten years ago) link
I actually really like Coke, too, but I'm tempted to boycott it during this phase because it genuinely riles me. Not to 'send a message' to the corporation or anything, just to try to reduce my IA levels.
― emil.y, Friday, 31 May 2013 13:40 (ten years ago) link
aren't they pretty much the same thing? essentially saying that the brand and you the customer are above the usual marketing tricks, either because you're too nice (innocent) or because you're too nasty (brewdog).
this is about as far as most people's critical faculties about anything whatsoever go, anyway. i mean it's the core of a good chunk of cultural criticism for starters.
― ... (LocalGarda), Friday, 31 May 2013 13:57 (ten years ago) link
I think he meant 'authenticity' type realness there? So like rustic barns and happy peasants and shit?
― emil.y, Friday, 31 May 2013 14:02 (ten years ago) link
either because you're too nice (innocent) or because you're too nasty (brewdog).
or too WKD
― no man is an islam (onimo), Friday, 31 May 2013 14:40 (ten years ago) link
https://twitter.com/first_direct/status/342284099093925891
this just appeared at the top of my twitter feed. don't think i can bring myself to watch the video, don't know why i'd want to.
― Fanois och Alexander (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:45 (ten years ago) link
http://www.advertisingarchives.co.uk/assets/thumbnails/34/3/22bcf4d84cf1ad09e707dec23126dabc.jpg
^ they sure have changed since this earlier campaign
― dschinghis kraan (NickB), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:56 (ten years ago) link
golly
― ghosts of lower belvedere high technology sludge incinerator (imago), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:56 (ten years ago) link
think of these new adverts as post-wank babytalk to themselves
― dschinghis kraan (NickB), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:58 (ten years ago) link
I unsubscribed WEEKS ago to a mailing list (which I only subscribed to by failing to untick a box) and have gotten three emails from them since unsubscribing, including this one:
Ok little squirrels, we hear you, we're going to take you off our list but before we do, we're just making sure that you're sure that we're sure that you're sure.
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK YOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
― Walter Galt, Tuesday, 18 June 2013 14:33 (ten years ago) link
Talisker 35 Bottling NoteFamously described as being "totes amaze", this is a fabulous 35 year old Talisker from Diageo's 2012 Special Releases.
― ghosts of erith spectral crackhouse slain rudeboy (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Thursday, 20 June 2013 13:33 (ten years ago) link
dear innocent,
udon is not ramen.
yrs,c sharp
http://www.innocentdrinks.co.uk/things-we-make/noodle-pots/japanese-ramen
― ✌_✌ (c sharp major), Thursday, 20 June 2013 21:50 (ten years ago) link
I tried that one, it was as disappointing as their other veg pots. Bland.
― kinder, Thursday, 20 June 2013 22:47 (ten years ago) link
got a vice piece hopefully up today that's very much inspired by this thread, so cheers guys.
― the Shearer of simulated snowsex etc. (Dwight Yorke), Friday, 21 June 2013 09:03 (ten years ago) link
link plse
― Neil S, Friday, 21 June 2013 09:04 (ten years ago) link
That Talisker one is really pissing me off. Putting "totes amaze" next to a 35-year-old £500-a-bottle single malt is just urgh.
― no man is an islam (onimo), Friday, 21 June 2013 09:41 (ten years ago) link
Soon come, Neil, hopefully by 1pmish
― the Shearer of simulated snowsex etc. (Dwight Yorke), Friday, 21 June 2013 11:04 (ten years ago) link
Your giffgaff SIM will be with you quick smart.If you can't see this email in all its glory click here Hi,
So you've ordered a giffgaff SIM. Nice work. Your order number is xxxxxxxx. Your shiny new giffgaff SIM will be with you in three to four days depending on how far the postie has to go.
― r|t|c, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:58 (ten years ago) link
it arrives in an ingenious folded envelope of recycled matter as well
― reet pish (imago), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:59 (ten years ago) link
i'm just going to put it in the bin, on second thoughts i don't need to talk to anyone ever
― r|t|c, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 19:02 (ten years ago) link
(is their reception as shit as some say it is btw?)
― r|t|c, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 19:03 (ten years ago) link
ummm it's not amazing iirc but it's not noticeably worse than vodafone's.
― reet pish (imago), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 19:07 (ten years ago) link
with us you sometimes won't be able to hear your friends, but that way you can pretend you're wearing a set of big fluffy electronic earmuffs!
― Fanois och Alexander (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 19:16 (ten years ago) link
it's just whatever o2 reception is
― caek, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 19:26 (ten years ago) link
"hiya, welcome to giff gaff voicemail. yer've no new messages."
eff you.