DEM not gonna CON dis NATION: Rolling UK politics in the short-lived post-Murdoch era

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6314 of them)

or let's say, in simplistic but broadly accurate terms, that the PLP runs the Party now and the aspirations and goals of the PLP are very different from those of the majority of its voter base. and let's ponder whether this is possible because most people don't vote as the result of a long logical enquiry into the policies that best represent their own best interests, and that possibly they are not really conscious of where their own best interests lie.

poking pocong (Noodle Vague), Monday, 18 March 2013 10:27 (eleven years ago) link

I dunno, that's all a bit high-concept for me.

the PLP represents a set of middle class technocratic interests that broadly support the economic beliefs of the other large parties, with some nods to "fairness" out of historical nostalgia. the Party isn't particularly democratic - policy doesn't derive from the wishes of all the members.

most people vote on 1 or 2 issues, on sentiment, or out of habit. parliamentary democracy as the best possible means for gauging the will and needs of the majority of the population is a massive lie/joke.

simpler?

poking pocong (Noodle Vague), Monday, 18 March 2013 10:39 (eleven years ago) link

hang on, i'm wandering a little.

so to tie it back to why "Labour" wd support or condemn a particular policy - it's based on a cold calculation of the appeal to a tiny sliver of the electorate - a few hundred thousand voters in swing constituencies - plus a reluctance to fully antagonise the broader Labour electorate, but tempered with the knowledge that most of them would elect a chimp if it was wearing a red rosette. and the MPs and their advisors and gurus who run the party are basically in agreement with the consensus across all parties about the economy and how it shd be run. they are all Thatcherites now.

poking pocong (Noodle Vague), Monday, 18 March 2013 10:44 (eleven years ago) link

sorry if this seems bleak. i guess on a positive note if people think this is wrong they shd join the party and try and influence it to change direction and let me know how that works out.

poking pocong (Noodle Vague), Monday, 18 March 2013 10:45 (eleven years ago) link

lol

mister borges (darraghmac), Monday, 18 March 2013 10:50 (eleven years ago) link

Of course I understand all that, you're absolutely right. I just don't quite understand how their cold calculations come up with this answer. But whatever.

most of them would elect a chimp if it was wearing a red rosette.

Hope this isn't a Eric Joyce joke, the guy has a problem.

i think it wd be interesting, if it was possible, to see how often concerns about spending taxpayers money were brought up in public discourse pre-1979. i have an unjustified feeling that people haven't always been encouraged and felt qualified to consider themselves experts on the micromanagement of public spending. nowadays everybody can tell you exactly what the exchequer shd be spent on - it's usually themselves and their families and nobody else.

poking pocong (Noodle Vague), Monday, 18 March 2013 11:12 (eleven years ago) link

lol and thinking about it focus groups and market research and radio phone-ins and the internet encourage this idea that opinions are increasingly important and democratically valid whereas the outcome is generally just a championing of ignorant opinion over expertise. which, y'know, fuck expertise in maintaining the machinery of control but good work on this whole new layer of mystification whereby the subjects are encouraged to mystify themselves.

poking pocong (Noodle Vague), Monday, 18 March 2013 11:18 (eleven years ago) link

"do you have an opinion on how the day to day management of a medium-sized NHS trust should be carried out? phone up and tell the nation now"

poking pocong (Noodle Vague), Monday, 18 March 2013 11:19 (eleven years ago) link

sorry i have to ramble, i'm pretty depressed

poking pocong (Noodle Vague), Monday, 18 March 2013 11:20 (eleven years ago) link

you think you're depressed? i'm at the end of the phone most days.

mister borges (darraghmac), Monday, 18 March 2013 11:22 (eleven years ago) link

yeah tbf at least i don't have to referee this shit

poking pocong (Noodle Vague), Monday, 18 March 2013 11:25 (eleven years ago) link

"Yeah, I'll set up an independant care trust, couldn't do much worse, could I, hurr hurrrup?"

Mark G, Monday, 18 March 2013 11:28 (eleven years ago) link

people haven't always been encouraged and felt qualified to consider themselves experts on the micromanagement of public spending. nowadays everybody can tell you exactly what the exchequer shd be spent on- it's usually themselves and their families and nobody else

Abso-bloomin-lutely. Also, everyone's a total fucking expert in the operation of the benefits system, and can tell you exactly how much the Lithuanian family who lives upstairs from their cousin's best friend gets in handouts, and the woman with learning difficulties who they occasionally see doing lottery scratchcards in Morrisons.

The Thatcher line was 'any housewife who can manage a family budget can manage a national economy' or a variation on that theme, iirc.

Des Fusils Pour Banter (ShariVari), Monday, 18 March 2013 12:08 (eleven years ago) link

Give that genius of a woman a state funeral

Step not on a loose unforgiving stone on a pyramid to paradise (Tom D.), Tuesday, 19 March 2013 10:45 (eleven years ago) link

Tomorrow seems to amount to "We need state spending to restart the economy, so we are going to cut state spending and use the money to increase state spending". Huh.

stet, Tuesday, 19 March 2013 17:09 (eleven years ago) link

are we going to see George Osborne eating his own tail or what

Gukbe, Tuesday, 19 March 2013 17:09 (eleven years ago) link

"if you run a business we will throw bags of money at you"

poking pocong (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 19 March 2013 17:11 (eleven years ago) link

"if you could use some of it to create minimum wage jobs for recently unemployed local government staff that'd be great ta"

poking pocong (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 19 March 2013 17:11 (eleven years ago) link

"We need state spending to restart the economy, so we are going to cut state spending and use the money to increase state spending"

theoretically it does help more to spend it in some areas/ways rather than others, so this isn't in itself impossible. devil in the details obv.

mister borges (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 01:17 (eleven years ago) link

Xzibit meme to follow, yo dawg I heard you like to cut state spending so we put spending in your state so you can cut state spending while you spend

I turned away to leave these few in thought and contemplation (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:22 (eleven years ago) link

Oh hai @george_osborne

Matt DC, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:29 (eleven years ago) link

I pity the hapless Treasury intern who has to trawl through that over the coming hours.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:30 (eleven years ago) link

Best Osborne zing is still Denis Healey's from a couple of years back: "I feel sorry for George Osborne, despite his politics [pregnant pause] – and his personality."

I turned away to leave these few in thought and contemplation (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:39 (eleven years ago) link

"Aspiration Nation"

Gukbe, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 12:41 (eleven years ago) link

#downgradedchancellor is trending on Osborne's first day on Twitter

Habemus opiniones pro vobis (onimo), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:13 (eleven years ago) link

Thought that was an awful line but i guess it worked.

Gukbe, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:23 (eleven years ago) link

govt offering 20% loans to help buy £600k houses, good to know that bedroom tax is going somewhere useful

Habemus opiniones pro vobis (onimo), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:33 (eleven years ago) link

Yay, more taxpayer money to prop up the housing market and lumber young people with shitloads of debt.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:34 (eleven years ago) link

It's all new houses too, so the money goes straight into the pockets of large house-building companies/Tory donors. Whee!

karl lagerlout (suzy), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:35 (eleven years ago) link

cut the price of beer by 1p a pint

Uh so how's that going to work? Does that mean pubs are going to have to order in a shitload of pennies to give out as change when the price drops from £3.50 to £3.49 (or whatever, LOL London eh?)

Step not on a loose unforgiving stone on a pyramid to paradise (Tom D.), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 15:11 (eleven years ago) link

No, as far as pubs are concerned it's a little boost to the businesses rather than consumers. You likely won't see prices drop, just as you likely won't have seen the prices go up a penny or two last year. Most pubs seem to swallow duty increases until their gross profits get bad enough to stick the prices up by 5p or whatever.

The duty is not calculated on pints of beer sold to customers, fwiw, it's levied at the point the barrel is sold to the pub.

Tim, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 15:25 (eleven years ago) link

Well whoop-de-do, George, thanks a bunch

Step not on a loose unforgiving stone on a pyramid to paradise (Tom D.), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 15:28 (eleven years ago) link

Yeah it's a headline grabber more than anything else. Although whether the press will care or not depends on how much they decide to punish the government for press regulation (my guess = a lot).

Matt DC, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 15:46 (eleven years ago) link

You mean the optional regulation they don't have to sign up for?

I'm just relieved that we finally have the crippling corporation tax down to historic lows. Poor corporations.

stet, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 15:52 (eleven years ago) link

Not sure the small businesses that the government constantly bangs on about will be too happy to hear they're paying the same tax rate as massive corporations.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:48 (eleven years ago) link

http://labourlist.org/2013/03/the-welfare-sanctions-vote-was-labours-own-omnishambles/

TWO-THIRDS of Labour MPs opposed the workfare abstention they ended up going along with anyway. Spineless idiots.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 March 2013 11:22 (eleven years ago) link

democracy is about doing what your party leader tells you

Easter Humphreys (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 21 March 2013 11:28 (eleven years ago) link

That is piss weak stuff really.

Matt DC, Thursday, 21 March 2013 15:58 (eleven years ago) link

to offer some relief from the usual grim horror of this thread and give us instead um another kind of grim horror, luke bozier now writes erotic fiction: http://lukebozier.co.uk/introducing-damian-gold-erotic-fiction-with-a-leading-man/#.UVDx_hyeOSo

a similar stunt failed to work with a cow (Merdeyeux), Tuesday, 26 March 2013 00:56 (eleven years ago) link

Well, I am not a toy. It doesn’t say ‘pull here
for ego boost’ anywhere near my manhood. I was a
booty-call for enough women in my twenties to have
thoroughly gotten over that most potent drug: being
desired. I’ve seen the ‘god I’m so horny’, semidesperate,
hidden-by-the-female-ego, ‘please,
Damian take me home and make me come’ look as
many times as any man could wish for. Been there,
done that, bought the souvenir stick of rock.

No worse than fifty shades tbf

the faintest whiff of praise

Habemus opiniones pro vobis (onimo), Tuesday, 26 March 2013 13:09 (eleven years ago) link

Who is Luke Bozier?

Step not on a loose unforgiving stone on a pyramid to paradise (Tom D.), Tuesday, 26 March 2013 13:12 (eleven years ago) link

just read the "About" bit on his blog. it's not pretty.

Kontuszówka reverie (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 26 March 2013 13:13 (eleven years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.