PORTISHEAD: classic or dud?!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (109 of them)

I'm going to listen to it now!

admrl, Sunday, 4 November 2007 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

And the Black Crowes are good too! At least, the first two albums are!

admrl, Sunday, 4 November 2007 23:14 (sixteen years ago) link

"roads", yes.

jed_, Sunday, 4 November 2007 23:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Nobody's mentioned the Roseland Ballroom set (PNYC) which is one of my favorite live releases from the last ten years. Also, the one-off that Gibbons did with Rustin is pretty good. I'd say they're near-classic, which is a pretty significant coup considering they've only released two proper albums. Unless they find some way to expand their genre the new album may be little more than filthy lucre - but it'll probably sound great regardless.

christoff, Monday, 5 November 2007 14:39 (sixteen years ago) link

portishead>>>>>>>>>>dummy

LaMonte, Monday, 5 November 2007 14:41 (sixteen years ago) link

dud for jacking the smif-n-wessun loop on that one remix

and what, Monday, 5 November 2007 14:48 (sixteen years ago) link

i like the s/t one more than dummy too but I know people who just hated it, thought it was so over the top...insane people, admittedly, but people nonetheless.

the live record is great, and I'm really glad I got to see them live, even if I could barely see them because I was stuck behind tall assholes

akm, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:19 (sixteen years ago) link

the embarrassingly-accepted band from the whole idiotic blunted groovez lounge hipster movement, complete with annoying false emotional rants in gibbon's horrible screechy voice and sub limp bizkit-level dj scratching (to a fanbase that's never heard anything better)? red hot chili peppers for lilith fair girls? or, you know, not?

"Roads" A+++++

The above opening post ^^^ is so not OTM it's hilarious

stephen, Monday, 5 November 2007 15:47 (sixteen years ago) link

HALF DAY CLOSING, people!

"half day closing" was the point on portishead where i was like, "okay, yes, yes, more please." also helped that i had gotten really into the united states of america album between dummy and that one.

GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Monday, 5 November 2007 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Thing is, it's such an arch, such an obviously dramatic song, that I can imagine it turning a few people away. It employs a wonderfully-managed build-and-release (that scream), a wickedly atonal bassline/backing vocal effect, some fucking ominous guitar, and a horror movie keyboard several semitones too high; all of this amounts to a piece of visceral dread that although superficially unsubtle in its execution, utilises a LOT of sonic ingenuity in order to achieve its full effect. I think it's an extremely intelligent piece of music, albeit one whose full-on emotional splattering might be too much for some listeners.

Just got offed, Monday, 5 November 2007 23:43 (sixteen years ago) link

"Wandering Star" is beyond classic. It is the eppy tome of that which is and has even been classic to the classic power of classicity.

The Mad Puffin, Wednesday, 7 November 2007 02:11 (sixteen years ago) link

two months pass...

We're pleased to announce that we'll be releasing our album, titled THIRD. on April 14th 2008.

The album has 11 tracks and is 49 minutes 13 seconds long.


http://www.portishead.co.uk/news.php

Leee, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

!!!!

Simon H., Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Expected given the tour dates but at least we know when to expect it. (IE, a month earlier, when it leaks.)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Ten years, and Third is the album title they came up?

Leee, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

'Deep Down And Dirty' had already been taken

blueski, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I have no idea whether this will be good or not. I really hope so.

chap, Thursday, 24 January 2008 00:59 (sixteen years ago) link

fwiw I prefer the second album to the first - if they can equal it I'll be ecstatic.

Simon H., Thursday, 24 January 2008 01:02 (sixteen years ago) link

As a title, I liked "Title Unconfirmed" which is the one I saw in lists.

Mark G, Thursday, 24 January 2008 08:27 (sixteen years ago) link

(as it is, it's a Soft Machine reference)

Mark G, Thursday, 24 January 2008 08:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Attention radio people, please pronounce this very carefully when you announce the title on air. ("Turd")

StanM, Thursday, 24 January 2008 09:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Post of five minutes ago.

Mark G, Thursday, 24 January 2008 09:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Post of five minutes ago.

-- Mark G, Thursday, January 24, 2008 10:38 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

???

StanM, Thursday, 24 January 2008 09:44 (sixteen years ago) link

there was a fake title of 'Alien' floating around years ago - liked that.

blueski, Thursday, 24 January 2008 12:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Really looking fwd to this. Loved the couple of tunes they premiered.

baaderonixx, Thursday, 24 January 2008 14:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Where did you hear these? There's only a couple of experimental vocaless tracks on their myspace.

chap, Thursday, 24 January 2008 14:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Live clips on PFork a few weeks ago

baaderonixx, Thursday, 24 January 2008 15:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Found some clips on YouTube, but the sound quality's a bit too shitty to judge the tunes. One definately has a theremin in though, so business as usual.

chap, Thursday, 24 January 2008 15:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyone try and get tickets this morning? Just had a frustrating experience with seetickets, in which I was taken as far as bank details, delivery address etc, only to be told they'd sold out. Gah.

Interstingly, seatwave were already selling tickets at 9.05 for twice the face value.

Not that I'm surprised at how crap the system is, but it is most annoying.

Daniel Giraffe, Friday, 25 January 2008 09:46 (sixteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

he sampled "moon in june" and "out-bloody-rageous" from third for the portishead remix of junkwaffel's "mud skipper"

any other soft machine sampling in the portishead catalog?

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 11 February 2008 03:11 (sixteen years ago) link

front cover apparently goes like this:

http://angryape.com/images/news/portishead-15-02-08.jpg

Portishead Third Track Listing Unveiled — News — AngryApe

djmartian, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:25 (sixteen years ago) link

omg want

HI DERE, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Third Track Listing:

01. Silence
02. Hunter
03. Nylon Smile
04. The Rip
05. Plastic
06. We Carry On
07. Deep Water
08. Machine Gun
09. Small
10. Magic Doors
11. Threads

djmartian, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

typically classy cover!

Simon H., Friday, 15 February 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Quite like the cover.

xpost

chap, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

:-)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

John Mulvey @ Uncut reviews the new Portishead album: Uncut.co.uk | Wild Mercury Sound - Post details: Portishead - Third

djmartian, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

omg want

HI DERE, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:24 (sixteen years ago) link

From Mulvey's Uncut review:

"It’s funny, listening to Gibbons, to remember how Portishead were rapidly stereotyped as some kind of coffee table cliché, the dinner party CD of choice and so on. Again, I can’t remember exactly how discomforting those old albums were – I always suspect that the band were cursed by those who followed after them, so that when we try and recall how Portishead sounded, we sometimes summon up, I don’t know, Morcheeba by accident." (Cf. ethan's remarks opening this thread)

And yes: WANT.

dblcheeksneek, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

beth gibbon singing over "lovefingers" = want

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:49 (sixteen years ago) link

good guardian interview: http://music.guardian.co.uk/rock/story/0,,2256187,00.html

blueski, Sunday, 17 February 2008 20:51 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

th new one is really great..in ways i never would have thought anyone would bother trying out in th studio anymore...i can send it as a zp or sum such if u need one

danbunny, Monday, 24 March 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

The thread for Portishead's Third

Z S, Monday, 24 March 2008 21:39 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

Dud; and one of the most overrated duds ever. I worked hard at that first LP, before realizing that its grimy reaches weren't for me. Then, years later, I worked hard at that second LP, before realizing that its grimy reaches weren't for me.
-- the pinefox, Friday, July 6, 2001 7:00 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark Link

Did you ever get the live album, Pinefox? If not, don't bother - its grimy reaches aren't for you.
-- Dr. C, Saturday, July 7, 2001 7:00 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark Link

classic dr. c response ^

stephen, Sunday, 27 April 2008 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link

I think the basic concept behind Portishead was a good one. Slow dreamy, almost ambient take on hip hop. The main problem I think is the way the records were produced. Every element of the mix is too clean and upfront, designed that way I imagine to give a sort of intimacy to the experience. But from an emotional standpoint, the vocalist is a bit detatched from her own feelings, almost drugged out, and the mix of the music should have reflected that. More reverb on her vocals (a la All Mine) dirtier beats, the scratching should have sounded thinner and farther back in the mix.

That way, I think the basic concept of Portishead could have survived another album or two until the band developed some new ideas, and hence a new production style.

Always remember, it may not be the band you don't like, the way a record is produced has a massive effect on the way you percieve the music, and I think Portishead was harmed by a production style that didn't complement their ideas.

Love, Jeff

-- Jeff Guidry, Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:00 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark Link

Looks like Portishead took Jeff's advice to heart for the new record :)

stephen, Sunday, 27 April 2008 17:27 (fifteen years ago) link

one year passes...

8 years of posts on this thread and no mention of the Airbus Reconstruction. I wasn't even sure it was the same band when I heard it, but it grew on me and I played it more than any other Sour Times version for a while.

How do you feel about Portishhead's venture into grungy indie?

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 19 October 2009 17:22 (fourteen years ago) link

c'mon haters, glory box has to be one of the great torch songs

Dr X O'Skeleton, Monday, 19 October 2009 17:45 (fourteen years ago) link

"airbus reconstruction" is done by an old grungy indie band from bristol called airbus, so not the same band, no.

matt h, Monday, 19 October 2009 19:18 (fourteen years ago) link

No shit?

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 19 October 2009 19:19 (fourteen years ago) link

one year passes...

New Portishead album! Quote below is Geoff Barrow on Twitter...

http://thequietus.com/articles/05507-portishead-new-album-brace-yourselves

"There will be NO free downloads There will be NO bonus tracks There will be NO remixes There will be NO hidden footage" he commenced earlier this evening. And then: "There will be NO additional content There will be NO corporate partners There will be NO fashion lines There will be NO tabloid pictures" before continuing "There will be NO £25 unit cost There will be NO streetteam There will be NO myspace There will be NO celeb producer There will be NO twitter". We're so enthused by this approach that we don't mind one jot that "There will be NO press/blogger gig There will be NO acoustic session There will be NO meet and greet There will be NO edited version" and FINALLY (the last bit we especially like) "There will be NO iTunes only There will be NO press launch There will be NO asian version There will be NO radio friendly". ALL HAIL MR BARROW.

Neil S, Thursday, 6 January 2011 09:50 (thirteen years ago) link

There will be NO asian version

racist

― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, January 6, 2011 5:03 AM (25 minutes ago) Bookmark

asians are entitled to the same slab of wax that everybody else gets.

won't be on this church plan ting (kkvgz), Thursday, 6 January 2011 10:31 (thirteen years ago) link

geoff is funny. when we announced the portishead/atp event in london he replied to the facebook post about it saying "CAN MY BAND PLAY PLEASE"

reallysmoothmusic (Jamie_ATP), Thursday, 6 January 2011 11:30 (thirteen years ago) link

Lex that Geoff Barrow quote is pretty obviously a joke - he's only one step away from going "There will be NO Simon Cowell".

Matt DC, Thursday, 6 January 2011 12:03 (thirteen years ago) link

He did a good zing on FAT M the other week

idgi fridays (blueski), Thursday, 6 January 2011 14:32 (thirteen years ago) link

looking fwd to this!

also, this quietus commenter is otm:

octophone
JAN 6, 2011 3:03PM
You do realise that somewhere, in a London office that's slightly smaller than it was 5 years ago, a man in braces is sitting saying "ah, genius - anti-marketing, great move".

ilxor this could be a standout thread for you imo (ilxor), Saturday, 8 January 2011 20:45 (thirteen years ago) link

really makes u think

just sayin, Saturday, 8 January 2011 20:46 (thirteen years ago) link

Never would've guessed at a successful revival, in particular one based on channeling top-shelf Krautrock, but glad it happened. Anyone heard anything about the actual sounds for this new LP?

Soundslike, Saturday, 8 January 2011 20:48 (thirteen years ago) link

nine years pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7R4bu6mExI

Podcast with a modular synth nerd

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Tuesday, 21 January 2020 06:02 (four years ago) link

one year passes...

man, those b-sides from the first two albums are totally classic. "numbed in moscow" is like a mobb deep beat!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcwPXUXw330

the beginning of the end of discourse. (Austin), Thursday, 18 November 2021 22:24 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.