Bashir's Michael Jackson circus......

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (212 of them)
Jody, love your thoughts, now reply (an order!) - but why the desire to make his appearance more Caucasoid? Where does that come from? More feelings of inferiority?

I also don't think he's capabale of enough calculation to actually change his appearance/body for the sake of keeping others at bay - I think he feels cut off from them, helplessly, due to identity he has to live with day fter day. Which is why the company of children, children he can trust, is what he seeks out...innocent fun ike climibing trees and starting food fights (careful, don't hit the shnozz! it'll fall in the mashed potatos!) is what fulfills him...and the sexual feelings he experiences towards the children, if he does at all, are unconscious.

You know, thats how many fetishes and hang-ups start: wanting something so bad. Wanting to BE it. Thinking you NEED t, then realizing even your BODY craves it. Being in love with an inanimate object, or concept, you have such a strongly emotional issue with (for him, it's childhood) --> in the psyche things can get twisted, and you start desiring the object/concept in a sexual manner, without even realizing it, since its attainment is supposed to emotionally satisfy you on such a deep level in the first place. Emotions/sexuality, you know the foggy connections. It's a wonder how the mind functions, or dysfunctions.

I could almost attest in terms of first-person experience on how some fetishes work this way, but since I'm one of the least-well-known regular posters on here, I'm not going to break the imagined spell just yet =)


Vic (Vic), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

mark: I agree, that's why I try not to pay attention to those words

Vic (Vic), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

He talked about the Culkins and a bunch of other kids having a big sleepover in his room, and the Culkins being on either side of him.

It seemed clear that the accusations of paedophilia really really bother him. He looked so angry and distraught when he was being asked about that. I would imagine he did the program to try and make people see him in a different light.

I just hated the way they moralized about him. Like everyone in America doesn't have a Peter Pan complex. Like every other celebrity hasn't had too much plastic surgery. Bashir was asking him about having surrogate children as if it was a bizarre crime. Kept going on about how he likes to sit in a tree and think as if this was outrageous.

Ben Williams, Friday, 7 February 2003 14:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

why the desire to make his appearance more Caucasoid? Where does that come from? More feelings of inferiority?

I don't know. I'm speaking as someone born in the mid '70s, and obviously I didn't witness Jackson 5-mania firsthand -- still, I don't get the impression that race was ever a huge stumbling block in MJ's career path. It could just be a personal hangup he has, not any specific career move.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

Isn't he like the greatest dancer of all time though? I was mesmerized just watching him improvise around the room in that early sequence in the documentary. And then catch some late '70s or early '80s footage of him performing -- amazing.

Mark (MarkR), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

".... i'm not sure that his activities these last few years have really been directed at "survival", at least at an unconscious level =. an awful lot of his work seems to me to be saying (more and more desperately) "look at me i playing on the motorway!!","

Again I agree to an extent Mark, although I'm not at all sure whether that's because he's testing the boundaries of his reality by getting gradually closer and closer to the traffic ; or because he's craving the oblivion of having one of those great big lorries finally splatter him all over the motorway; or because he's started believing that he controls the traffic and the lorries can't hurt him.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

jody beth: acc. "moonwalk" (i think, anyway some autobiog confession), his brothers constantly teased him as a tiny abt being ugly, called him liverlips etc etc

mark s (mark s), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

all three stewart, at dfft times of day

mark s (mark s), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

I also don't think he's capabale of enough calculation to actually change his appearance/body for the sake of keeping others at bay - I think he feels cut off from them, helplessly, due to identity he has to live with day fter day. Which is why the company of children, children he can trust, is what he seeks out...innocent fun ike climibing trees and starting food fights (careful, don't hit the shnozz! it'll fall in the mashed potatos!) is what fulfills him...and the sexual feelings he experiences towards the children, if he does at all, are unconscious.

Some more concrete explanations for his child-fetish:

*children aren't financially savvy (they won't swindle him out of his money)

*children don't know about sex (they won't be aggressive or predatory in a way that scares him)

*children are too young to be aware of who exactly Michael Jackson is (and they won't judge him, unlike the rest of the world)

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

Isn't he like the greatest dancer of all time though

No. I know the traditional response to something like this is supposed to be [something like!] "Martha Graham!?" but I wouldn't know who it is, i just don't think he's the greatest the world has ever seen, despite how good he is. Or was. Take away the moonwalk, and how unique are his moves?

Not that uniqueness is anything significant i pop-dancing, but even in regards to traditional forms of hoofing around, he couldn't win a dance-off with Astaire. And doesn't his nose have an increased chance of falling off these days, when he performs ?

Vic (Vic), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Some more concrete explanations for his child-fetish:

*children aren't financially savvy (they won't swindle him out of his money)

*children don't know about sex (they won't be aggressive or predatory in a way that scares him)

*children are too young to be aware of who exactly Michael Jackson is (and they won't judge him, unlike the rest of the world)"

Of course if he believes any of those things (bearing in mind that the "children" we saw on the programme / we're talking about appear to be aged between about 8 and 14) then he really *IS* naif!

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

I also loathed the way Bashir kept spluttering "but your a 44 year old man", as if there were a template of approved behaviour for 44 year old men and more than about 3% deviation was deeply sinister and morally suspect. Even though on just about measure you could devise Jacko's deviation from any concept of a "norm" was completely off the scale, mostly in ways that were completely harmless or at least no threat to anyone but himself.

ArfArf, Friday, 7 February 2003 14:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

Of course if he believes any of those things (bearing in mind that the "children" we saw on the programme / we're talking about appear to be aged between about 8 and 14) then he really *IS* naif!

How many financially savvy, sexually aggressive, Jacko-bashing eight-year-olds do you know?

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

"all three stewart, at dfft times of day"

That's what I figure Mark - which must means that at certain times of the day at least (or perhaps it would be more accurate to say *on some level*) he must be fully conscious that a great deal of his behaviour is at very least inappropriate.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

*children are too young to be aware of who exactly Michael Jackson is (and they won't judge him, unlike the rest of the world)"

I think this is true, and what I was trying to say anyway. Him believing this does not make him naive, on the contrary it's closer to pragmatism, really.

Vic (Vic), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

"How many financially savvy, sexually aggressive, Jacko-bashing eight-year-olds do you know?"

I don't know many who aren't capable of swindling someone out of money or being aggressive and predatory under the right circumstances - and I'd be prepared to bet that I don't know a single one who doesn't know who Michael Jackson is!

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

haha nice point stewart: the "stopped-clock" theory of mind!!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't know many who aren't capable of swindling someone out of money

Five bucks is not a million dollars.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think the problem for the filmmakers was that they actually didn't get anything (or at least not what they wanted, which is scandalous expose). There was nothing in there we haven't heard before, and given the cosmic levels of alien weirdness at which Jacko is commonly perceived, seeing him doing pretty much anything up close is only going to make him look a little more normal. So they had to amp up the framing a lot in order to get the outrageous tone they wanted. They overplayed it.

Ben Williams, Friday, 7 February 2003 14:48 (twenty-one years ago) link


It seemed clear that the accusations of paedophilia really really bother him. He looked so angry and distraught when he was being asked about that.

I caught the tail end of a documentary about a paedophile ring the other night. This could be a description of one of the men arrested - it was clear his view of what he had done was completely at odds with what the vast majority of people would think about it.


recognising that most people aren't going to be happy with the idea of a single adult male sharing his bed with a succession of young children probably ranks slightly above recognising that you shouldn't play on the motorway or stick your fingers in electrical sockets, as a basic survival skill if nothing else!

He's very very rich. He doesn't need to pay much attention to what anyone else thinks of his behaviour.

Andrew Norman, Friday, 7 February 2003 14:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Five bucks is not a million dollars"

It might be to an eight year old! ;~)

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

being angry when you get called a paedophile is not proof that you are one, andrew!!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

"haha nice point stewart: the "stopped-clock" theory of mind!!"

Well, it works better for me than the assumption that everyone else in the world is entirely one-dimensional.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

being angry when you get called a paedophile is not proof that you are one, andrew!!

It's not proof that you aren't one, either. In the case I mentioned, the man arrested had taken part with others in some pretty horrific sex crimes, but he didn't see them as crimes, or even as being wrong. The outrage was a result of his being (as he saw it) persecuted for his "innocent" love of pre-pubescent children.

I think it's a fairly common pattern for some people to do things the rest of us would find reprehensible, and for them not even to recognise that their behaviour is wrong (see Ernest Saunders and the Guinness case for a less emotive example).

Andrew Norman, Friday, 7 February 2003 14:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

I would not be all surprised if he was a pedophile. I also think it's possible he isn't.

Ben Williams, Friday, 7 February 2003 15:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

Howard Hughes to thread.

maria b (maria b), Friday, 7 February 2003 15:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

No, Elvis.

Ben Williams, Friday, 7 February 2003 15:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

"I think it's a fairly common pattern for some people to do things the rest of us would find reprehensible, and for them not even to recognise that their behaviour is wrong"

A great many 8 years olds, when caught with their hands in the cookie jar, will give you a look of wide-eyed innocence and say something along the lines of "what?".

Most of them do, however, do know that they shouldn't be pinching cookies.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 15:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

He's very very rich. He doesn't need to pay much attention to what anyone else thinks of his behaviour.

Yes he does, since other people liking him is what made him rich.
At first, I withheld judgement of his sleep-overs, but I think he does have a problem and most likely is molesting people.
I tried to put myself in his position and give him the benefit of the doubt. So, I love children. I think sharing my bed is wholesome and forms a deep bond with a child (stay with me here).
But, after I got any grief for having children in my bed, after it caused my career to disintegrate, after I was investigated for my activities, I would come to the conclusion that it wasn't worth it. Sure, I don't think I'm doing anything wrong, but it's just too much of a hassle. After all, it's not like I need to sleep with them.
By MJ continuing to sleep w/kids after all the trouble its caused him, it shows he can't stop and leads me to believe it's not innocent.

Oops (Oops), Friday, 7 February 2003 15:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Once again, he didn't actually say he slept in the same bed with the kids.)

Ben Williams, Friday, 7 February 2003 15:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

also it didn't cause his career to distintegrate, really

mark s (mark s), Friday, 7 February 2003 15:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

"By MJ continuing to sleep w/kids after all the trouble its caused him, it shows he can't stop and leads me to believe it's not innocent."

I'm not sure I share this belief, however I really can't believe that MJ could have been in any doubt that a great many people would reach this conclusion

"(Once again, he didn't actually say he slept in the same bed with the kids.)"

Actually, as Jody Beth rightly pointed out earlier, he did specifically say that Macaulay and Kieran Culkin used to sleep one on either side of him. I'm not sure he actually stipulated whether they did so in a bed, on the floor or halfway up a tree but then, I don't think *where* they did so is really the issue.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

"He's very very rich. He doesn't need to pay much attention to what anyone else thinks of his behaviour."

"Yes he does, since other people liking him is what made him rich."

In fact he is rich - and in trouble - as a result of very, very desperately wanting people to like him.

ArfArf, Friday, 7 February 2003 16:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Bashir was asking him about having surrogate children as if it was a bizarre crime."

Having surrogate children in itself is not a crime. Maintaining that the mothers of these children "gave" those children "as a gift" to him, and that he "snatched" the second one "still covered in the placenta" and ran because he "didn't want to hear anything bad" is pretty much bizarre to the fuckin' letter. Did you watch the footage when he was trying to feed the baby? Did you watch him during the footage at the zoo? I think one would be very hard-pressed to call him model parent.

"Kept going on about how he likes to sit in a tree and think as if this was outrageous."

Ya gotta admit......it's pretty fuckin' weird though, eh? When was the last time *YOU* climbed a tree?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

I climbed a mountain recently (the base of it, anyway). Why is one acceptable and the other not?

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Once again, he didn't actually say he slept in the same bed with the kids.)

Yes he did. I have the tape. Shall we go over it together?

Oops (Oops), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

How about you just transcribe it for me? Thanks.

Ben Williams, Friday, 7 February 2003 16:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

(As far as the Culkin thing goes, as I said earlier, he said they were over one time with a bunch of other kids and they slept on either side of him. Leastways, that's how I remember it. I was admittedly burning vinyl onto my computer during the documentary.)

Ben Williams, Friday, 7 February 2003 16:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't think he's a model parent--not sure what a model parent is, mind you--and of course I think he's very odd. It's just that the relentlessly interrogatory, shocked tone that Bashir took was obnoxious. It would have been far more effective to show, not tell.

Ben Williams, Friday, 7 February 2003 16:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Ya gotta admit......it's pretty fuckin' weird though, eh? When was the last time *YOU* climbed a tree?"

"I climbed a mountain recently (the base of it, anyway). Why is one acceptable and the other not?"

Lots of adults regularly climb mountains therefore it's seen as acceptable behaviour for an adult. Relatively few adults regularly climb trees therefore (unless they happen to be tree surgeons) it tends to be seen as a bit weird.

I'm not saying it's right; I'm certainly not saying it's logical; I'm not even saying that the world mightn't be a better place (hey, isn't there a song in there somewhere?) if a few more adults learned to lighten up a bit and climb the ocasional tree; but nevertheless I do think you'll find it's the current "norm." in our society.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

If MJ was a child molester, how come Jordy Chandler was the only kid (and wasn't it really his father rather than the boy itself) ever to press charges against such a high profile, rich man?

JoB (JoB), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

Lest we forget: http://www.mlp.cz/space/opatrilp/Pulp/the_Brits_96.html

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

"If MJ was a child molester, how come Jordy Chandler was the only kid (and wasn't it really his father rather than the boy itself) ever to press charges against such a high profile, rich man?"

How generous can Mr Jackson be to his little friends and their parents, I wonder?

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

hang on, is child molesting legally only a crime if the abused and their parents choose to press charges? but like fine if the parents say, fine i'll take the money, help yrself?

mark s (mark s), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

>Ya gotta admit......it's pretty fuckin' weird though, eh? When was the last time *YOU* climbed a tree?

Maybe 4 months ago. Its kinda fun, mainly just to see if you are limber enough to still do it.

What is weird about MJ is that he actually makes a point of regularly climbing trees, which few adults do. And he clearly does't do it for the physical challenge like mountain climbers.

fletrejet, Friday, 7 February 2003 16:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

Look, clearly the man is very severely in need of help (the type of psychiatric help which he'll invariably never own up to needing, much less get). I'm not saying he should be taken out back and shot (although...), but how people can continually fawn over him and turn a blind eye to his ever increasing burden of rather chilling eccentricities truly mystifies me. I mean, he is deteriorating before our eyes!!!! HE IS DR.PHIBES!!! Yes, it's tragic, and yes he needs help, but he's taking innocents with him in his descent (how his poor children will ever adjust to any semblance of a normal life is virtually inconceivable).

Also, how about comin' up with some new dance moves, eh?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

"hang on, is child molesting legally only a crime if the abused and their parents choose to press charges? but like fine if the parents say, fine i'll take the money, help yrself?"

Absolutely not - it's merely infinitely less likely to reach a prosecution

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

this is from the article i linked to above:
"And what became of the massive investigation of Jackson? After millions of dollars were spent by prosecutors and police departments in two jurisdictions, and after two grand juries questioned close to 200 witnesses, including 30 children who knew Jackson, not a single corroborating witness could be found. (In June 1994, still determined to find even one corroborating witness, three prosecutors and two police detectives flew to Australia to again question Wade Robson, the boy who had acknowledged that he'd slept in the same bed with Jackson. Once again, the boy said that nothing bad had happened.)"

"Deteriorating before our eyes" I buy completely: the child molesting stuff I just don't. It basically boils down to "He climbs trees: burn the witch!"

mark s (mark s), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

He climbs trees......and sleeps with children....and consorts with mannequins.....and has daily plastic surgery....and dangles babies out of windows.....and accuses record executives of racism when his albums don't sell....

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 7 February 2003 16:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

This thing about his children not having a--shock, horror--"normal" life: whatever he does, there is absolutely no way they are going to have a "normal" life. Given the generally held opinion of MJ as a circus freakshow, I think protecting the identity of his kids is pretty understandable. They would go through hell in a regular school.

Ben Williams, Friday, 7 February 2003 16:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

Under what circumstances would you let your son sleep with Janet Jackson?

Mark (MarkR), Friday, 7 February 2003 23:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

If your son is Justin Timerlake, I guess.

maria b (maria b), Friday, 7 February 2003 23:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Under what circumstances would you let your son sleep with Janet Jackson? "

My children are not allowed out of the Skinner box.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 7 February 2003 23:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

Under which circumcisers would you let your son sleep with Janet Jackson?

Oops (Oops), Saturday, 8 February 2003 00:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

LOL!

maria b (maria b), Saturday, 8 February 2003 00:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

Things could always be worse.....

http://sfgate.com/gallery/pod/

maria b (maria b), Saturday, 8 February 2003 00:24 (twenty-one years ago) link

"When did you stop beating your wife?"

J (Jay), Saturday, 8 February 2003 01:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

don't hav da energy 2 read thru dis thread but did he say he slept in bed wit da kids, or was he adamant dat he always slept on da ground cos dats wot i remember from da doc + its only in da intervening yrs dat da sleep wit kids angle has cum 2 lite.

naked as sin (naked as sin), Saturday, 8 February 2003 02:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

nine months pass...
Google News:

"Warrant Issued for Jackson's Arrest" - 751 related stories

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 15:15 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.