You Want Superman Revamp? [Also the Man of Steel (2013) thread]

I take offense at the "the nerds won" thing, becuase the nerds would most definitely concoct some sort of continuity-weighted logistical pretzel (cf. Clone Saga) than some warmed-over soap-opera potboiler. Of course, maybe Austen is just a horny nerd - his storylines in various Marvel books involve contrived lovelines & triangles & other types of polygons w/ dialogue that would melt Joe Eszterhas at 50 feet (cf. the example I posted earlier in this thread). Also, he's been lambasted by various "internet trolls" for his questionable characterization of various female characters. It's also worth reading that CBR interview to read the paragraph where he refers to old-school Lois Lane as a "gold-digging bitch" (paraphrased, of course).

I'd like to think there's a happy DMZ between continuity acknowledgement and devil-may-care hooptie where good stories involving established comic characters can be created and enjoyed. For the love of monkeyfuck, there's no need to play "the other woman" card AGAIN!

He's not an alien, he's Jewish!

(Captain Atom's own series was quite good in places, IIRC, or maybe I'm thinking of someone else.)

BTW, Horace, if you liked _Quiver_ (the Kevin Smith Green Arrow story, right?), you might like the 6-issue Brad Melzter Green Arrow run that followed it (_The Archer's Quest_). I liked it MUCH better than Smith's GA work, actually (or the bits of _Quiver_ I read) - Mr. Smith's knack w/ dialogue (which might be overstated) doesn't translate too well onto the printed page.

Its been so successful they have signed on for another mini called "I Can't Believe Its Not The Justice League".

And on the movie front:

Warner Bros is trying to ready its DC Comics stalwart Superman to soar again on the Big Screen, and the studio has turned to Chris Nolan to mentor development of the movie. Our insiders say that the brains behind rebooted Batman has been asked to play a "godfather" role and ensure The Man Of Steel gets off the ground after a 3 1/2-year hiatus. Nolan's leadership of the project can set it in the right direction with the critics and the fans, not to mention at the box office. Besides, Nolan is considered something of a god at Warner Bros and has a strong relationship with the studio after the success of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight. Though he wasn’t obligated to do so, he gave the studio first crack at his spec script Inception, and Warner Bros was able to buy it before other studios even got a sniff. While Nolan completes that Leonardo DiCaprio-starrer for a July 16th release, he's also hatched an idea for Warner Bros' third Batman installment. Now his brother and frequent collaborator Jonah Nolan, and David Goyer who co-wrote Batman Begins and penned the story for The Dark Knight, are off scripting it.

Let us emphasize that Superman 3.0 is in the early stages of development. And we doubt Nolan would direct. This wouldn't be a sequel to Superman Returns but a completely fresh franchise. As one of our insiders reassures: “It would definitely not be a followup to Superman Returns." Nolan coming on board follows a hiatus period for Superman after that 2006 reboot as the studio tried to figure out whether or not to make a sequel to that version starring Brandon Routh directed by Bryan Singer. As recently as this summer, Warner Bros was still contemplating how to proceed. We were told that "Bryan or Brandon are not completely out of it yet. But Warner Bros doesn't have a handle yet on it, either. (Producer) Jon Peters is trying to make something happen since he stands to benefit financially. But they (the studio) need to hear a great story that makes sense." Another insider explained to us, "We know what we don't want to do. But we don't know what we want to do. We learned a lot from the last movie, and we want to get it right this time."

Etc. etc.

It's a little weird that they're rebooting all of these commics franchises so soon (Hulk, Spider-Man...and Fantastic Four, from what I understand), but I think I might be okay with it from the standpoint of shit just not working the first time.

bankruptcy of ideas, plus cynical appeal to the familiar.

Isn't it still Superman 2.0 at this point? Singer/Routh still held all the trappings if the Donner/Lester/Reeve films.

Hey you're the one with the doctorate, how can you not know!

(mail order)

Permanment Origins Issue

Kinda with they'd reboot with Bizarro instead of Superman.

considering that the guy who made x-men turned out a superfilm that was too murky and overwrought, it seems ironic they'd go to the guy who made Dark Knight to rectify the situation. admittedly they're probably not thinking much beyond "the money comes out of THAT GUY" but all the same...

if they're looking for alighter tone then you'd have though favreau would have been the superheromoviemaker to go to?

if they're looking for a lighter tone, i can't imagine they'd go with nolan.

Favreau not already at the WB table.

superbad team should have a shot at the title.

or alternatively, vince vaughan playing the bad/drunk superman for an entire movie.

Jason Reitman, since Up in the Air is the movie I think Superman Returns was trying to be.

psyched for new superman voice

lars von trier

Zack Snyder is the director for this job.

barf

guess I'll be skipping this one

barf x 2

SUPEROWL

"Faster than a speeding bullet!"

*extended slow motion sequence*

hunky tudor Henry Cavill to play supes

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/celebritynews/8291749/Another-British-superhero-Henry-Cavill-to-play-Superman.html

hes a horrible actor from what i can tell

Ta-da?

http://www.comingsoon.net/nextraimages/manofsteelsupermansmall.jpg

A clickthrough on the bigger version confirms the suit is, well, scalloped.

looks shite

I find it hard to believe this is the first Superman to radiate amber alert. But it's true.

I hope we find out how Superman became Superman.

He looks like Bizarro, so now I want to see the Bizarro movie instead.

There's still a little too much blue in the suit, it's not DARK and GRITTY enough. They really should have just set saturation at 0% rather than 25%.

why do they keep trying to make superman movies? nobody gives a shit about superman.

I am still at a loss as to why the suit would be scaly. Did Ma and Pa Kent kill and skin a pack of ornery lizards and make it for him?

they should have made it silky and shiny

like this!

http://www.milanoo.com/upen/v/200808/Shiny-Metallic-Blue-Superman-Costume-with-Red-Pants-and-Cape-3147-1.jpg

(If only they would occasionally have a '*See Arrow Season 4, Episode 15' text box pop up, the experience would be complete.)

https://news.avclub.com/ray-cyborg-fisher-now-refusing-to-be-in-any-movies-ma-1845970504?

This was not a good movie. But Superman learning to fly was fun, and I appreciated not being asked to laugh every thirty seconds.

It's possible that my low expectations helped out. I didn't even mind Superman shouting "noooo" while disappearing into skull-quicksand.

still nothing that tops Superman destroying dick bar patron's semi-truck off-screen and then chucking it on top of a telephone pole and nobody questioning it, like sometimes you find shoes on top of telephone poles, sometimes you find wrecked semi-trucks, nothing to see here folks

i was genuinely surprised by how great this movie was and will be arguing about it forever i guess

I'm on Brad's side, I find a lot of the criticism of this movie weird, as if Superman specifically is a sacrosanct character that can only be portrayed one way.

i just had a problem with Snyder's directorial style and storytelling.

Superman "killing" someone didn't really bother me so much. he should kill more people IMO

This is really good on that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38Cy_Qlh7VM

i did appreciate that the action sequences that looked like handheld footage from a natural disaster. And Superman and Zod punching each other at Mach 3. And Jor-El was great. There was a lot to like, I just didn't think the end worked at all.