http://i.imgur.com/skmOriL.png
at this point I'm just like
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/9627011/photos/seinfeld.gif
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 12 March 2013 01:29 (eleven years ago) link
You left a dating website cos ppl are ppl?
― gubba hoy hoy (darraghmac), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 01:31 (eleven years ago) link
hah well also everybody's profile was starting to look really same-y
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 12 March 2013 01:35 (eleven years ago) link
Homo II your response to that loser was AMAZING. Kudos to you, girl.
Haha someone just starred/"chose" me and I got an email about it and I wrote him back half trying to talk him out of it (he is a vegetarian non-smoker, are you sure you want to go down this road, etc). I mean, nicely. And I called him cute. But I am not taking shit about Budweiser later on if I was up front about it now.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 03:12 (eleven years ago) link
otm, start as you mean to go on.
― estela, Tuesday, 12 March 2013 03:43 (eleven years ago) link
My last OKC date tried to dissuade me from drinking Bud because of the company's business practices. Look, I didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday, brah.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 03:50 (eleven years ago) link
As a vegetarian non-smoker, I attract carnivorous smokers like damn. And that guy harassing HomoII is why I basically never message anyone ever. About to meet a lady from OKC who it turns out works about 500 feet from my apartment. Plus: lunchtime trysts Minus: awkward looks on the way home from work every day for the next five years. PLUS WINS
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 04:14 (eleven years ago) link
Let me rephrase that, I am drunk. Most of the women I end up meeting for dates and such are carnivorous smokers.
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 04:16 (eleven years ago) link
just disabled my account
― homosexual II, Tuesday, 12 March 2013 04:24 (eleven years ago) link
homo II, don't leave, you have allot to offer
― ☠ ☃ ☠ (mh), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 13:56 (eleven years ago) link
homo ii: avenging angel
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 12 March 2013 15:20 (eleven years ago) link
dayo, that table made me a sad, sad man
― Nhex, Tuesday, 12 March 2013 15:25 (eleven years ago) link
lol yeah - i mean its not that big a drop but on a site where people reject other people for the most arbitrary reasons it just makes everything seem that much more of an uphill climb than it already is
like im sure there are plenty of nonwhite dudes who do find ~love~ on that site, its just more bullshit than im willing to put up with rite now
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 12 March 2013 15:27 (eleven years ago) link
the most important advice I could possibly give, based on my fairly extensive experiences, is that meeting quickly is the best thing you can do, and getting stuck into lengthy email exchanges the worst, even though it will not seem so at the time
this is such excellent advice it should be repeated
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 15:35 (eleven years ago) link
Guy I gave friendly warning to has not replied. Okay!
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 15:59 (eleven years ago) link
or he's still working on a giant diatribe
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 16:29 (eleven years ago) link
Vegetarians. What can you do.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 16:31 (eleven years ago) link
I disabled because I seriously hardly ever encountered a single person on that site who caught my interest, and when I did and messaged said person never received a response... and plus I am already dating a few people and up to my eyeballs in boy problems, so why create more right now.
― homosexual II, Tuesday, 12 March 2013 20:04 (eleven years ago) link
he has to pause between paragraphs to let the iron build back up in his blood
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 20:07 (eleven years ago) link
would use dating site called "boy problems"
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 23:03 (eleven years ago) link
I may look classy, and act classy, but I am actually a queer kinky freak, so put that in your pipe and smoke it.
<333333333333333333333333333333333333333 *dead*
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 15 March 2013 14:21 (eleven years ago) link
always mildly confused when a person i know irl visits my profile--"did she look cause she's curious or interested? did she intend for me to know she saw?"--and doubly so when okc sends me an email that says "[YOUR IRL FRIEND] is checkin you out RIGHT NOW! you're compatible, go look at her"
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 15 March 2013 14:23 (eleven years ago) link
lol this is the best, especially when you awkwardly break the silence
― scream blahula scream (govern yourself accordingly), Friday, 15 March 2013 15:37 (eleven years ago) link
a girl i dated in 2002 gets recommended to me on there all the time as a high match
Is there a general guideline for first messages? I know I can be doing very well once the barrier is broken but I can't, for the life of me, send a confident first message.
― Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 23:20 (eleven years ago) link
All I can say for what gets me to reply is, address the persons profile! If youre messaging someone because of things in their profile you like or have in common, say so! I sometimes get messages even from reasonably cute guys that dont have any indication they care less who I am. "you're a spunk!" was one recent one. Um. thanks!? But do you actually have any interest in who I am as a person that aside or did you txt "youre a spunk!" to 87675 Melbourne OKCer girls?
― a kissed out red popemobile (Trayce), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 23:27 (eleven years ago) link
But that said, even then sometimes I wont reply if:- theyre spectacularly unattractive (and believe me, I am NOT fussy, but oh lord ugh)- the match is below about 75%. - they have any massive dealbreakers in their profile (want kids, is the main one, tho Ive not let that stop me once or twice)
― a kissed out red popemobile (Trayce), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 23:28 (eleven years ago) link
Well I'm glad because that's what I've been doing! I guess since girls get so many messages, most of the time, I am just getting lost in a pile.
― Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 23:50 (eleven years ago) link
lol i have definitely attracted more interest since switching from 'a little extra' to 'average'
― mookieproof, Thursday, 21 March 2013 00:28 (eleven years ago) link
Maybe some girls get many messages... I sure dont :(
― a kissed out red popemobile (Trayce), Thursday, 21 March 2013 00:40 (eleven years ago) link
oh hush
there seems to be no shortage of t demand iirc
― mookieproof, Thursday, 21 March 2013 00:42 (eleven years ago) link
so if a lady visits your profile two or three times, but doesn't message you, is that a sign you should message her? or is this 21st century lovelorn apophenia.
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Thursday, 21 March 2013 02:35 (eleven years ago) link
if the visits are close together, i would say yes
― mookieproof, Thursday, 21 March 2013 02:44 (eleven years ago) link
http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/online-dating-advice-exactly-what-to-say-in-a-first-message/
― goole, Thursday, 21 March 2013 14:25 (eleven years ago) link
how is 'zombie' at all specific to anyone under 45 these days
― j., Thursday, 21 March 2013 15:26 (eleven years ago) link
i'm guessing "zombie" is used the way "Star Wars" is in 30 Rock
― Nhex, Thursday, 21 March 2013 16:05 (eleven years ago) link
This can only lead to min-maxing of OKC profiles.
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Thursday, 21 March 2013 16:11 (eleven years ago) link
that would be pretty hilarious if it did! but i'm guessing a low % of OKC users read the metric blogs
― Nhex, Thursday, 21 March 2013 16:18 (eleven years ago) link
I read the blog but don't use OKC so maybe it balances out.
― aztec table rapper (seandalai), Thursday, 21 March 2013 16:19 (eleven years ago) link
no metrics on 'juggalo', no cred.
― s.clover, Thursday, 21 March 2013 20:48 (eleven years ago) link
I'm pleased to see "ur" "u" "wat" etc resulting in very low/bad reply rates. No one deserves a date typing like a 12 year old. And it is astonishing how often I'll get a message like "ur hot" or "hay u pretty wanna chat?" I mean ffs guys, just type "A/S/L?" and be done with it, eh?
(actually that'd possbily merit a response because it'd be obvious it was a joke)
― a kissed out red popemobile (Trayce), Thursday, 21 March 2013 21:06 (eleven years ago) link
yeah, A/S/L is too longform these days
― Nhex, Thursday, 21 March 2013 21:10 (eleven years ago) link
http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/how_to_get_replies_2/efface-chart.png
haha
― polyphonic, Thursday, 21 March 2013 21:18 (eleven years ago) link
Gonna craft a message using all of these terms, guaranteed success.
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Thursday, 21 March 2013 21:27 (eleven years ago) link
They should run the stats on that, I bet actually your results go down the more you combine those and come off as a tracks-covering wishy-washer.
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 21 March 2013 21:42 (eleven years ago) link
SEO Cupid
― aztec table rapper (seandalai), Thursday, 21 March 2013 22:01 (eleven years ago) link
was kinda horrified at that section actually. must be more non-threatening...
― Nhex, Thursday, 21 March 2013 22:15 (eleven years ago) link
All the messages I've replied to make reference to & usually expand on something in my profile. Paying a compliment can be nice, too, but don't overdo it. xpost
― emilys., Friday, 22 March 2013 21:42 (eleven years ago) link
is "you should message me if: you're a feminist" too much of a double-edged sword?
― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:58 (eleven years ago) link
good q
― Nhex, Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:03 (eleven years ago) link