GIRLS talk (the Lena Dunham thread)

It's amazingly effective costuming, though. Funny how she looked a zillion times better in his sweater, huh?

yeah, that was really the highlight of the whole ep -- just the shot of her lounging with the newspaper and dressed in grown-up clothes.

found her freakout too excruciating to watch.

dude clearly was more interested in humoring her than engaging with her from the start though.

also a good reminder to never ever ever have sex with women under the age of thirty ever again.

that's a pretty gross take-away imo.

Anyway, this episode got to me. She blasts him for not revealing about himself, when, in the beginning of the episode, for a dude of his type, he actually gave her quite a lot of data, especially considering the way she showed up. I love how she didn't get the details quite right, and the way he quietly counters "san diego." Also, the Josh/Joshua thing. The way she flicks her tongue when he first says it, and she uses it against him later.

Her emotions in the episode and her batshit way of expressing them are so otm to me. She looks gorgeous, too. I have always liked her small-titted mermaid body, and here I think the nudity actually serves a purpose of showing the character in this kind of simply happy, unarmed state.

The way she comments on the "fixtures" and how everything is nice in the house, even the lemonade glass, seemed gross at first, but I realized I have had the same inner monologues...And yeah, the romper was wack, but I can see being a certain age and not really grasping how to dress for it--it suited the character. I don't know, I kind of love Hannah.

it def showed a lot more of inner hannah than I realized, in a really good way

the Josh/Joshua thing was straight out of Friends

every generation gets the Friends it deserves

was definitely feeling that monologue about happiness & loneliness p heavily

s/o to myself, btw

that's a pretty gross take-away imo.

I've read that Dunham tries on the show's outfits with shapewear but eschews it on set so that it won't fit quite right, which is a nice touch.

i know this is slightly off-topic but I can't get over how big that shower was

also hannah looked so lovely all tattooed and naked on the big white bed that next morning

http://jezebel.com/5983437/what-kind-of-guy-does-a-girl-who-looks-like-lena-dunham-deserve

but yeah i couldn't understand or relate to the 'i want to be happy' monologue at all, or even sort of process it as a thing someone would say. like even for someone without filters, you need to be without filters to just spill all that out.

I have a friend from college who is a writerly type and all the stuff lena/hannah says about wanting to experience it all just to be able to write about them ... is that some platitude they teach in creative writing classes

dedicate this to the ep

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nXoiG12-8g

it's funny i think there's a particularly ungenerous way to interpret this episode along the lines of sorta classic Romantic notion of the artist as having to leaving behind ordinary happiness and pursue the intensity of feeling for art's sake (that even this happiness literally suffocates her)....but then there's this other layer sorta making fun of Hannah for the banality of what she imagines happiness to be.

to be clear im not accusing LD of buying into that Romantic notion, but examining it.

oh no i think happiness is probably just about that banal. i thought i was more making fun of her for the banality of what she imagines art to be.

haha you're probably right (on both counts).

well she wants ALL the stuff

Okay an episode like that (and really the last one) is where my comparison of this show to Workaholics falls apart hah.

I have a friend from college who is a writerly type and all the stuff lena/hannah says about wanting to experience it all just to be able to write about them ... is that some platitude they teach in creative writing classes

it's not something that's taught in writing school, it's just that writing school attracts people who think like this, i.e., the majority of young writers.

The best and most candid conversations I've had about this show have been with my female writer/artist friends (I am a writer too) and we all can see bits of our younger selves in Hannah.

But xp to self: in my experience it was rare for anyone to express that sentiment out loud even tho everyone knew we played fast and loose with the consequences of reality while still remaining neurotic enough about it to not necessarily deeply damage ourselves.

(I recognize this privilege)

I have a friend from college who is a writerly type and all the stuff lena/hannah says about wanting to experience it all just to be able to write about them ... is that some platitude they teach in creative writing classes

it's not something that's taught in writing school, it's just that writing school attracts people who think like this, i.e., the majority of young writers.

― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, February 11, 2013 11:56 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

hah yeah that feels right.

as I was falling asleep though I had a thought, deeply platitudinous but I thought I'd share all the same, that if you want to become a good writer you don't need to write about something new, but rather write something that's true

*becomes high school english teacher*

As a former writing (or at least journalism) class person -that feeling definitely strikes a chord with me, shallow as it is. Although for me it was the opposite -- I wanted to write as an excuse to experience different things, not the other way 'round. Although maybe that's why I quit working as a writer!

I did like this episode, but I'm not sure it told us anything about Hannah we didn't already know.

I wanted to write as an excuse to experience different things, not the other way 'round.
yeah, i think a lot of young writing-class/writers feel this way too, like it's not one way 'round or the other but a murky mix of the two... i don't even think it's ultimately all that shallow because, funnily enough, what it seems to really be about is consciously "acquiring" depth as a person, like ways of getting to a place where one "really gets it, really nails it" with storytelling/artistic panache, wise words, "the truth," etc., as in, the road to being a successful writer/artist is to experience life at all costs. I'm certainly not saying this is the case with all writers/artists nor that writing/art school creates this, only that it can reinforce something that is already there in some creative people. It's kind of fucked up, but combined with youthful naivete and seemingly nebulous consequences/sense of immortality, it's understandable. Somewhere along the line, life (usually in the form of recognizing that other people are people, with feelings and experiences too) steps in and says "hey, quit it." Or it doesn't.

this also i think touches on how even though there's always hype around amazing young writers and artists, most of the really great writers/artists do if not their "best" (subjective, culturally contextual term), their most deep/investigative work after age 40.

or 35, obv depending on what's been done before, obv generalizing

it's funny that the drive to fill yr early life with experiences is ultimately what causes the later realization that oh wait this stuff comes from inside me anyway, and somehow the schism between the two becomes that creative force

hooboy I may need more coffee for that to make sense

I guess I just enjoyed writing (as a reporter, not an personal essayist) because the variety of stories I got to cover were so interesting, and got to meet lots of interesting folks. It was less about filling an internal void that filling a giant external void with more interesting stuff.

I eventually quit because it became exhausting, and because I realised I was more interested in the experiences than going home to write about them ("or really nailing it"). I guess this is a long way of saying that I was too lazy to be a journalist.

Anyway, great show this week. Surprised some people didn't buy the Wilson/Dunham pairing. The only red flag with me was Ray's obnoxiousness in the first scene, which I didn't buy at all, except for the fact that it was funny, which I suppose is good enough.

I was secretly hoping it would be a Watchmen crossover episode

:D

I didn't see the ep, but there's /*\ INTERNET CONTROVERSY /*\ brewing around the Wilson/Dunham thing, which, afaikt boils down to "that's not realistic" vs. "are you saying she doesn't deserve a guy like that just because she doesn't look like a model"?

i dont think it *quite* boils down to that

The only red flag with me was Ray's obnoxiousness in the first scene, which I didn't buy at all, except for the fact that it was funny, which I suppose is good enough.

― Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:34 AM (30 minutes ago) Bookmark

yeah this felt really forced

personally thought wilson looked like a serial killer when he was first introduced

I kinda knew what the Jezebel link was about before I clicked but didn't expect to find mainstream critics suggesting the hook-up was so unrealistic that the whole episode must have been a dream sequence. I mean Jesus.

the last three episodes have all been really good imo

i feel like their horribleness really shouldn't color my response to this show. like i don't want to embrace it as particularly good in certain "empowering" ways, just because some critics are characters in mad men or the like.

Oh man, I thought Ray was totally realistic! I've had customer service like that.

i.e. "is this empowering" is i think a very boring and not useful conversation about this show. but "was it a dream" is an insane conversation. i'd rather not have either.

Ray was out-of-control, though tbf the coffee shop *is* called "Grumpy's."

it's a real coffee shop in greenpoint, and it's "Grumpy" *scoff*

To be fair, I am totally out of Mrs Chuck's league, so I did sympathise with Wilson on that point.

Oh man, I thought Ray was totally realistic!

yeah. and the character's m.o. has pretty much been that he's a dick to most people, not sure what's not to get about that scene

The way I interpreted it at first when I watched was that Ray was being overly defensive b/c he was the one dumping the trash (related to his homelessness/not wanting anyone at work to catch on) and then Hannah, knowing his secret & seeing how much this threatened him, went to apologize and cover for him as a solid. But I didn't see anyone else interpreting it that way anywhere so maybe not. Can't recall if it was established that it was actually Hannah.

^ I had that thought too

I thought Ray's m.o. is that he's a dick, but mostly only to people who are also dicks, and Wilson didn't seem like he deserved that response.

But I don't think it's really that big a deal if a sitcom character acts out-of-character for five minutes in a joke scene.

yeah felt like they probably just needed a 3 minute sequence to explain how hannah ends up in this dude's brownstone